Deformation Characteristics and Geochronological Constraints of Late Mesozoic Extensional Structures in Quanzhou, Fujian Province
-
摘要: 晚中生代福建沿海地区发育多期与古太平洋板块俯冲有关的岩浆活动和构造变形.福建泉州地区伸展构造变形主要表现为高角度正断层和低角度正断层或拆离断层, 古构造应力场反演指示其形成于NW-SE向伸展环境.锆石U-Pb年代学指示泉州地区发育4期岩浆活动, 分别为晚侏罗世(~155 Ma)、早白垩世中期(130~125 Ma)、早白垩世末期(~109 Ma)以及晚白垩世早期(~100 Ma之后).结合构造变形的切割关系和岩浆岩年代学, 长乐-南澳剪切带左旋韧性走滑形成于130~120 Ma, 而右旋脆性剪切形成于120~100 Ma之间.古太平洋板块向华南大陆之下的俯冲角度变化导致福建沿海地区发育晚中生代造山带.造山作用开始于早白垩世之初, 结束于早白垩世末期, 以大规模NW-SE向伸展构造发育为标志, 其从同造山挤压到后造山伸展的转换发生于~120 Ma.Abstract: Multi-stage Late Mesozoic magmatism and structural deformation related to the subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate occurred in the coast of Fujian Province, southeastern China. Extensional deformation in Quanzhou area presents high-angular normal faults and low-angular normal faults or detachment faults. The extensional deformation developed in NW-striking extensional setting. Zircon U-Pb geochronological data in this study suggest that Late Jurassic (~155 Ma), middle Early Cretaceous (130-125 Ma), late Early Cretaceous (~109 Ma) and early Late Cretaceous magmatic rocks outcrop in Quanzhou area. The comprehensive analyses of cutting relations and geochronological data of magmatic rocks show that the sinistral ductile strike-slip of the Changle-Nan'ao shear zone occurred in 130-120 Ma, whereas the dextral brittle shear developed between 120 Ma and 100 Ma. The angular variations of subduction for the Paleo-Pacific plate underneath the South China led to the development of the Late Mesozoic orogenic belt in the coast of Fujian Province. This orogen commenced at the beginning of Early Cretaceous and terminated in the latest Early Cretaceous, which is marked by the extensive NW-striking extensional structures. The transform from syn-orogen compression to post-orogen extension occurred at ~120 Ma.
-
Key words:
- Late Mesozoic /
- orogeny /
- tectonics /
- extensional deformation /
- zircon U-Pb /
- geochronology
-
图 2 福建泉州地区低角度和高角度正断层构造古应力场反演
Fig. 2. Paleo-stress field inversion of low and high-angular normal faults in Quanzhou area, Fujian Province
图 3 福建泉州地区野外采样照片和室内显微照片
a.石狮市黄金海岸北东向基性岩墙；b.石狮市黄金海岸低角度拆离断层中发育的片麻状花岗岩；c.石狮市灵秀山北东向左旋韧性剪切带中发育的花岗质糜棱岩；d.晋江市灵源山北东向左旋韧性剪切带中发育的眼球状花岗岩；e.晋江市灵源寺北东向基性岩墙侵入北东向左旋韧性剪切带；f.南安市芹山英安质凝灰岩；g.石狮市灵秀山花岗质糜棱岩的显微照片；h.晋江市灵源寺花岗质糜棱岩的显微照片；i.南安市官桥镇英安质晶屑凝灰岩的显微照片
Fig. 3. Photos of field sampling and micro-images of slices
图 4 福建泉州地区岩浆岩样品锆石CL图像、测试位置以及年龄
Fig. 4. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images, analysis location and ages of magmatic rocks in Quanzhou area, Fujian Province
图 5 福建泉州地区岩浆岩样品锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb和谐年龄图谱
Fig. 5. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb concordia diagrams for magmatic rocks in Quanzhou area, Fujian Province
图 6 福建沿海地区构造变形的交切关系
a.北北东向脆性右旋剪切带切割北东向左旋韧性剪切带, 福建晋江灵秀山；b.低角度正断层切割了长北东向左旋韧性走滑剪切带, 福建晋江灵秀山；c.高角度正断层切割右旋脆性走滑剪切带, 福建石狮祥芝镇
Fig. 6. Cutting relation of structural deformations in the coast of Fujian Province
表 1 福建泉州地区伸展断层实测滑移矢量数据
Table 1. Strike-slip vector data of extensional faults in Quanzhou area, Fujian Province
断层面产状 擦痕/线理产状 断层面产状 擦痕/线理产状 倾向 倾角 倾伏向 倾伏角 倾向 倾角 倾伏向 倾伏角 FES-02, GPS: E118°41′48″, N24°40′05″, 石狮市永宁镇黄金海岸, 低角度拆离断层 130 18 135 18 173 16 125 11 130 28 141 28 185 19 131 11 141 22 145 22 215 10 140 3 161 22 142 21 209 10 147 5 148 21 136 21 165 21 132 18 102 33 144 26 171 18 143 16 122 17 135 17 145 19 138 19 132 18 143 18 258 18 315 10 155 19 140 18 275 5 331 3 154 12 141 12 135 12 133 12 135 10 140 10 137 15 143 15 130 27 135 27 115 15 127 15 146 15 145 15 158 5 133 4 145 17 147 17 170 25 135 21 136 18 136 18 135 9 148 9 142 18 143 18 155 17 136 16 140 22 140 22 148 28 139 28 125 16 135 16 131 12 148 11 130 16 142 16 130 4 135 4 136 28 153 27 60 8 138 2 145 20 142 20 50 16 132 2 150 20 140 19 110 11 139 10 145 22 138 22 128 31 152 29 162 12 135 11 150 28 144 28 153 16 140 15 149 20 135 19 FES-07, GPS: E118°40′42″, N24°37′24″, 石狮市深沪镇码头, 低角度正断层 105 24 145 18 140 49 151 49 85 26 135 18 83 28 133 19 79 31 140 16 97 39 148 27 100 26 141 20 119 33 139 31 101 15 140 12 95 38 121 35 102 28 131 25 96 20 133 16 40 35 128 1 92 37 129 31 130 41 149 39 95 27 145 18 140 48 140 48 76 29 144 12 25 36 296 1 98 26 129 23 94 20 137 15 75 22 142 9 FES-08, GPS: E118°40′47″, N24°37′02″, 石狮市深沪镇金海村, 低角度正断层 95 29 139 22 126 47 154 43 86 35 142 21 132 31 145 30 90 30 132 23 88 38 149 20 100 25 130 21 134 35 153 33 90 36 129 29 134 42 148 42 86 43 145 25 92 28 132 22 101 34 120 33 136 27 150 26 121 38 149 34 90 31 136 23 FES-10, GPS: E118°39′52″, N24°35′07″, 晋江市金井镇, 低角度正断层 125 46 146 45 114 17 154 13 134 24 140 24 86 20 139 12 86 24 150 11 84 28 144 15 110 12 130 11 110 16 146 13 FES-16, GPS: E118°31′33″, N24°44′00″, 晋江市安海镇采石场, 高角度正断层 138 78 - - 130 74 - - 140 72 142 72 135 75 - - 124 75 122 71 - - 128 78 115 78 131 72 135 72 120 84 122 70 131 69 135 85 142 85 115 60 113 59 FES-18, GPS: E118°20′34″, N24°49′05″, 晋江市安海镇采石场, 高角度正断层 115 59 113 59 118 52 140 50 120 66 122 66 120 65 122 65 121 61 140 60 119 51 125 51 125 60 134 60 121 62 118 61 120 53 127 53 - - - - 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 福建泉州地区岩浆岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测试分析数据
Table 2. Detailed analysis data of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb for magmatic rocks in Quanzhou area, Fujian Province
分析数据 Th(10-6) U(10-6) Th/U 207Pb/206Pb 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/206Pb 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 比值 1σ 比值 1σ 比值 1σ 年龄 1σ 年龄 1σ 年龄 1σ FES-01, 石狮市黄金海岸(E118.826°, N24.769°), 辉绿岩墙, Mean=102.4±1.5 Ma, MSWD=0.37 FES-01-01 303 3 513 0.09 0.047 020 0.000 480 0.103 850 0.001 100 0.016 020 0.000 220 50 15 100 1 102 1 FES-01-02 19 489 0.04 0.051 710 0.000 720 0.290 640 0.004 080 0.040 780 0.000 570 273 15 259 3 258 4 FES-01-03 173 100 1.73 0.064 100 0.004 520 0.170 510 0.011 530 0.019 300 0.000 470 745 102 160 10 123 3 FES-01-04 134 193 0.69 0.072 730 0.003 790 0.181 370 0.009 000 0.018 090 0.000 390 1 006 66 169 8 116 2 FES-01-05 1 178 758 1.55 0.073 030 0.001 270 0.188 890 0.003 210 0.018 760 0.000 280 1 015 15 176 3 120 2 FES-01-07 73 96 0.76 0.052 350 0.003 500 0.116 900 0.007 630 0.016 200 0.000 320 301 113 112 7 104 2 FES-01-06 67 88 0.76 0.051 680 0.003 170 0.115 190 0.006 910 0.016 170 0.000 310 271 102 111 6 103 2 FES-01-08 79 108 0.73 0.051 910 0.002 090 0.192 100 0.007 540 0.026 850 0.000 460 281 58 178 6 171 3 FES-01-09 388 720 0.54 0.050 130 0.000 750 0.139 350 0.002 060 0.020 160 0.000 300 201 16 132 2 129 2 FES-01-10 354 472 0.75 0.050 370 0.000 960 0.169 060 0.003 160 0.024 350 0.000 370 212 20 159 3 155 2 FES-01-11 86 128 0.67 0.058 740 0.006 680 0.174 220 0.019 270 0.021 550 0.000 650 557 191 163 17 137 4 FES-01-12 241 478 0.50 0.051 930 0.001 890 0.156 510 0.005 530 0.021 860 0.000 370 282 50 148 5 139 2 FES-01-13 191 661 0.29 0.057 170 0.001 620 0.571 010 0.015 660 0.072 430 0.001 180 498 33 459 10 451 7 FES-01-14 1 017 1 923 0.53 0.051 600 0.001 070 0.183 140 0.003 560 0.025 710 0.000 440 268 20 171 3 164 3 FES-01-15 240 563 0.43 0.052 000 0.001 450 0.168 880 0.004 620 0.023 560 0.000 370 285 35 158 4 150 2 FES-01-16 57 64 0.89 0.050 750 0.008 690 0.132 530 0.022 420 0.018 940 0.000 580 229 298 126 20 121 4 FES-01-17 356 328 1.09 0.052 680 0.004 230 0.145 590 0.011 290 0.020 070 0.000 510 315 130 138 10 128 3 FES-01-18 998 3 717 0.27 0.062 040 0.001 060 0.195 350 0.003 220 0.022 840 0.000 370 675 16 181 3 146 2 FES-01-19 364 603 0.60 0.052 610 0.001 480 0.153 010 0.004 220 0.021 100 0.000 330 312 35 145 4 135 2 FES-01-20 218 276 0.79 0.054 900 0.004 900 0.119 700 0.010 370 0.015 840 0.000 420 408 147 115 9 101 3 FES-02, 石狮市黄金海岸(E118.803°, N24.756°), 片麻状花岗岩, Mean=109.4±3.6 Ma, MSWD=10.3 FES-02-01 98 128 0.77 0.049 130 0.005 820 0.113 290 0.013 260 0.016 710 0.000 400 154 218 109 12 107 3 FES-02-02 134 193 0.69 0.052 710 0.018 710 0.111 360 0.039 260 0.015 310 0.000 670 316 562 107 36 98 4 FES-02-03 86 128 0.67 0.054 350 0.003 080 0.139 950 0.007 770 0.018 670 0.000 340 386 92 133 7 119 2 FES-02-04 99 37 2.68 0.048 920 0.018 800 0.109 940 0.041 980 0.016 290 0.000 740 144 579 106 38 104 5 FES-02-05 280 239 1.17 0.059 100 0.003 820 0.126 220 0.007 980 0.015 480 0.000 310 571 103 121 7 99 2 FES-02-06 897 2 696 0.33 0.051 130 0.000 960 0.125 920 0.002 360 0.017 850 0.000 280 247 19 120 2 114 2 FES-02-07 582 575 1.01 0.050 200 0.001 850 0.112 790 0.004 090 0.016 290 0.000 280 204 52 109 4 104 2 FES-02-08 161 250 0.64 0.048 450 0.003 460 0.116 430 0.008 160 0.017 420 0.000 370 121 117 112 7 111 2 FES-02-09 106 557 0.19 0.050 570 0.002 250 0.132 210 0.005 750 0.018 960 0.000 350 221 66 126 5 121 2 FES-02-10 140 103 1.36 0.052 740 0.006 980 0.111 720 0.014 600 0.015 360 0.000 400 318 247 108 13 98 3 FES-02-11 996 550 1.81 0.049 010 0.001 700 0.114 680 0.003 890 0.016 970 0.000 280 148 49 110 4 108 2 FES-02-12 98 79 1.24 0.049 300 0.007 790 0.127 590 0.019 930 0.018 770 0.000 530 162 273 122 18 120 3 FES-02-13 326 606 0.54 0.051 210 0.001 270 0.200 290 0.004 880 0.028 360 0.000 450 250 29 185 4 180 3 FES-02-14 217 186 1.17 0.049 180 0.003 600 0.124 830 0.008 990 0.018 410 0.000 370 156 125 119 8 118 2 FES-02-15 176 494 0.36 0.050 450 0.001 870 0.114 350 0.004 150 0.016 440 0.000 280 216 53 110 4 105 2 FES-02-16 73 35 2.09 0.053 050 0.018 010 0.127 800 0.043 040 0.017 470 0.000 780 331 541 122 39 112 5 FES-02-17 139 1 495 0.09 0.052 020 0.001 100 0.125 870 0.002 620 0.017 550 0.000 270 286 23 120 2 112 2 FES-02-18 83 41 2.02 0.050 470 0.017 420 0.106 720 0.036 600 0.015 340 0.000 650 217 530 103 34 98 4 FES-02-19 33 868 0.04 0.050 110 0.001 280 0.116 600 0.002 920 0.016 880 0.000 270 200 30 112 3 108 2 FES-02-20 257 631 0.41 0.050 540 0.001 800 0.110 330 0.003 820 0.015 830 0.000 270 220 49 106 3 101 2 FES-06, 石狮市灵秀山(E118.657°, N24.638°), 花岗质糜棱岩, Mean=124.5±2.2 Ma, MSWD=3.4 FES-06-01 262 805 0.33 0.057 729 781 0.004 549 781 0.169 526 349 0.013 047 934 0.022 087 969 0.000 499 027 520 169 159 11 141 3 FES-06-02 1 190 5 375 0.22 0.050 379 685 0.001 941 348 0.134 259 857 0.005 003 717 0.019 286 607 0.000 228 182 213 89 128 4 123 1 FES-06-03 1 419 4 378 0.32 0.052 338 093 0.002 513 126 0.141 711 381 0.006 253 552 0.019 864 981 0.000 289 353 302 109 135 6 127 2 FES-06-04 524 1122 0.47 0.053 565 784 0.003 625 327 0.148 605 959 0.010 381 830 0.019 962 248 0.000 390 074 354 154 141 9 127 2 FES-06-05 1 994 6 830 0.29 0.054 619 539 0.002 422 315 0.143 318 834 0.006 092 447 0.018 947 426 0.000 238 624 398 100 136 5 121 2 FES-06-06 441 1 847 0.24 0.071 838 239 0.005 552 842 0.198 864 260 0.014 917 447 0.020 105 663 0.000 371 507 981 157 184 13 128 2 FES-06-07 1 759 5 443 0.32 0.051 728 964 0.002 253 673 0.133 837 927 0.005 567 529 0.018 795 753 0.000 249 476 272 100 128 5 120 2 FES-06-08 612 1 837 0.33 0.044 661 614 0.002 735 982 0.123 955 099 0.007 570 648 0.020 175 005 0.000 303 054 121 17 119 7 129 2 FES-06-09 628 1 109 0.57 0.058 977 003 0.006 487 958 0.176 699 921 0.017 959 639 0.022 262 222 0.000 545 981 565 243 165 15 142 3 FES-06-10 442 1 626 0.27 0.048 215 755 0.003 296 643 0.135 347 208 0.009 321 748 0.020 142 880 0.000 312 355 109 156 129 8 129 2 FES-06-11 763 1 502 0.51 0.050 688 242 0.003 530 509 0.142 087 129 0.010 394 683 0.020 307 892 0.000 426 365 233 166 135 9 130 3 FES-06-12 2 414 2 725 0.89 0.083 243 213 0.004 465 378 0.250 178 802 0.015 026 318 0.021 241 542 0.000 380 517 1276 105 227 12 135 2 FES-06-13 734 2 087 0.35 0.051 232 399 0.003 232 263 0.136 049 918 0.008 060 771 0.019 591 639 0.000 316 452 250 146 130 7 125 2 FES-06-14 1 727 3 015 0.57 0.067 223 795 0.003 466 668 0.175 095 168 0.008 270 752 0.019 150 973 0.000 269 644 856 103 164 7 122 2 FES-06-15 465 1 349 0.34 0.052 630 112 0.003 368 713 0.136 004 999 0.008 623 690 0.018 901 651 0.000 337 506 322 144 129 8 121 2 FES-06-16 317 1 577 0.20 0.054 307 072 0.003 624 856 0.141 454 277 0.009 147 660 0.019 229 505 0.000 371 473 383 147 134 8 123 2 FES-06-17 295 1 156 0.26 0.062 527 079 0.003 677 729 0.187 038 239 0.010 377 940 0.022 102 019 0.000 493 333 700 126 174 9 141 3 FES-06-18 347 1 226 0.28 0.049 947 535 0.006 747 085 0.138 668 29 0.016 671 165 0.021 358 611 0.000 598 616 191 289 132 15 136 4 FES-06-19 531 1 838 0.29 0.048 328 923 0.003 321 221 0.134 945 362 0.009 516 329 0.020 088 408 0.000 320 318 122 211 129 9 128 2 FES-06-20 241 857 0.28 0.060 516 890 0.005 034 161 0.164 959 357 0.013 510 860 0.020 479 487 0.000 457 655 620 180 155 12 131 3 FES-13, 晋江市电视塔(E118.553°, N24.527°), 眼球状花岗岩, Mean=158.6±2.1 Ma, MSWD=2.3 FES-13-01 4 846 7 555 0.64 0.048 000 0.000 630 0.169 370 0.002 300 0.025 590 0.000 370 99 15 159 2 163 2 FES-13-02 7 449 7 604 0.98 0.058 080 0.001 010 0.171 080 0.002 940 0.021 370 0.000 310 533 17 160 3 136 2 FES-13-03 1 553 1 457 1.07 0.090 940 0.002 880 0.218 300 0.006 600 0.017 410 0.000 300 1 445 32 200 6 111 2 FES-13-04 4 981 3 408 1.46 0.059 010 0.001 630 0.218 220 0.005 840 0.026 830 0.000 430 567 32 200 5 171 3 FES-13-05 2 357 3 195 0.74 0.060 940 0.001 360 0.169 020 0.003 690 0.020 120 0.000 300 637 23 159 3 128 2 FES-13-06 8 664 10 186 0.85 0.051 090 0.000 780 0.171 500 0.002 650 0.024 350 0.000 350 245 16 161 2 155 2 FES-13-07 17 636 12 531 1.41 0.055 780 0.001 070 0.165 320 0.003 150 0.021 490 0.000 330 444 19 155 3 137 2 FES-13-09 4 761 5 571 0.85 0.057 670 0.001 390 0.207 020 0.004 870 0.026 040 0.000 400 517 26 191 4 166 3 FES-13-08 9 066 10 757 0.84 0.052 520 0.000 810 0.179 640 0.002 770 0.024 800 0.000 370 308 16 168 2 158 2 FES-13-10 6 084 7 635 0.80 0.052 430 0.001 320 0.180 960 0.004 450 0.025 040 0.000 390 304 29 169 4 159 2 FES-13-11 7 385 1 1433 0.65 0.050 400 0.000 620 0.171 600 0.002 180 0.024 700 0.000 360 213 15 161 2 157 2 FES-13-12 10 012 10 243 0.98 0.050 840 0.000 730 0.173 000 0.002 520 0.024 690 0.000 370 234 16 162 2 157 2 FES-13-13 8 503 13 854 0.61 0.051 450 0.000 760 0.171 690 0.002 570 0.024 210 0.000 360 261 16 161 2 154 2 FES-13-14 58 690 24 728 2.37 0.054 290 0.000 860 0.128 960 0.002 010 0.017 230 0.000 280 383 16 123 2 110 2 FES-13-15 6 282 9 754 0.64 0.051 750 0.000 710 0.178 280 0.002 500 0.025 000 0.000 370 274 15 167 2 159 2 FES-13-16 4 780 7 574 0.63 0.046 210 0.000 650 0.164 170 0.002 340 0.025 790 0.000 380 9 16 154 2 164 2 FES-13-17 4 636 9 529 0.49 0.049 180 0.000 800 0.169 830 0.002 750 0.025 060 0.000 370 156 17 159 2 160 2 FES-13-18 5 146 6 012 0.86 0.054 150 0.000 800 0.199 360 0.002 960 0.026 730 0.000 400 377 15 185 3 170 3 FES-13-19 12 488 15 506 0.81 0.053 030 0.001 070 0.182 400 0.003 610 0.024 980 0.000 410 330 20 170 3 159 3 FES-13-20 1 343 2 754 0.49 0.075 720 0.001 820 0.256 770 0.006 000 0.024 600 0.000 390 1 088 23 232 5 157 2 FES-14, 晋江市灵源寺(E118.550°, N24.524°), 辉绿岩墙, Mean=123.0±2.3 Ma, MSWD=0.033 FES-14-01 559 481 1.16 0.071 061 353 0.005 066 019 0.182 237 128 0.011 861 307 0.019 360 786 0.000 482 886 959 146 170 10 124 3 FES-14-02 596 1 224 0.49 0.065 060 522 0.003 297 048 0.190 883 017 0.008 885 992 0.021 371 451 0.000 375 364 776 107 177 8 136 2 FES-14-03 3 488 3 351 1.04 0.047 299 751 0.002 157 930 0.143 691 208 0.006 231 426 0.021 987 689 0.000 316 475 65 104 136 6 140 2 FES-14-04 1 923 3 198 0.60 0.083 957 524 0.005 872 217 0.269 320 789 0.018 844 917 0.022 831 815 0.000 342 638 1 292 136 242 15 146 2 FES-14-05 1 299 1 264 1.03 0.076 252 713 0.007 953 349 0.255 971 951 0.034 511 993 0.021 838 931 0.000 519 600 1 102 210 231 28 139 3 FES-14-06 1 325 1 558 0.85 0.047 122 546 0.002 686 916 0.167 925 127 0.009 517 909 0.025 698 482 0.000 469 431 54 133 158 8 164 3 FES-14-07 825 1 674 0.49 0.048 542 566 0.002 649 895 0.146 540 107 0.008 261 224 0.021 591 587 0.000 311 093 124 126 139 7 138 2 FES-14-08 1 648 1 876 0.88 0.055 016 807 0.003 131 894 0.146 651 300 0.007 941 697 0.019 268 723 0.000 245 299 413 160 139 7 123 2 FES-14-09 1 480 1 541 0.96 0.051 699 537 0.002 711 461 0.150 864 648 0.007 378 730 0.021 288 293 0.000 341 517 272 120 143 7 136 2 FES-14-10 507 813 0.62 0.054 099 720 0.003 753 625 0.165 631 759 0.011 785 316 0.022 186 538 0.000 442 453 376 157 156 10 141 3 FES-14-11 290 376 0.77 0.075 928 764 0.006 809 954 0.217 848 850 0.018 039 207 0.022 315 347 0.000 619 137 1 094 181 200 15 142 4 FES-14-12 915 944 0.97 0.048 647 929 0.003 306 912 0.128 411 068 0.008 437 498 0.019 202 893 0.000 375 159 132 152 123 8 123 2 FES-14-13 136 174 0.78 0.135 016 007 0.013 202 667 0.317 917 516 0.035 434 472 0.017 209 773 0.000 603 586 2 165 171 280 27 110 4 FES-14-14 1 723 3 351 0.51 0.061 957 210 0.002 965 100 0.186 899 492 0.008 345 480 0.022 222 182 0.000 515 460 672 102 174 7 142 3 FES-14-15 188 642 0.29 0.224 897 380 0.026 061 213 2.268 484 755 0.570 341 317 0.038 049 824 0.004 569 160 3 016 187 1 203 179 241 28 FES-14-16 1 359 3 104 0.44 0.046 602 263 0.002 038 669 0.139 016 979 0.005 780 536 0.021 666 391 0.000 346 292 28 104 132 5 138 2 FES-14-17 1 113 1 248 0.89 0.051 001 172 0.003 325 543 0.150 437 305 0.008 949 926 0.021 772 724 0.000 349 935 243 150 142 8 139 2 FES-14-18 568 815 0.70 0.052 312 526 0.003 804 228 0.165 583 759 0.012 270 051 0.022 827 700 0.000 490 305 298 167 156 11 146 3 FES-14-19 700 745 0.94 0.069 374 340 0.005 179 363 0.217 610 051 0.016 115 273 0.022 694 606 0.000 435 867 909 155 200 13 145 3 FES-14-20 365 512 0.71 0.059 010 826 0.004 349 879 0.165 170 418 0.010 295 896 0.021 257 731 0.000 452 655 569 161 155 9 136 3 FES-16, 晋江市安海镇(E118.434° N24.754°), 辉绿岩墙, Mean=99.8±1.7 Ma, MSWD=0.81 FES-16-01 310 892 0.35 0.150 088 719 0.013 422 698 0.273 334 829 0.019 846 846 0.014 255 256 0.000 460 369 2 347 153 245 16 91 3 FES-16-02 373 1 463 0.25 0.155 354 507 0.017 386 674 0.717 608 218 0.175 366 748 0.020 531 880 0.001 539 763 2 406 191 549 104 131 10 FES-16-03 223 725 0.31 0.217 010 628 0.019 937 913 0.495 718 577 0.035 338 607 0.018 434 540 0.000 690 959 2 959 149 409 24 118 4 FES-16-04 239 733 0.33 0.175 062 206 0.019 182 206 0.371 542 534 0.036 501 982 0.016 525 314 0.000 462 761 2 606 188 321 27 106 3 FES-16-05 266 778 0.34 0.139 233 807 0.012 215 213 0.242 577 755 0.016 853 346 0.015 001 292 0.000 546 333 2 218 153 221 14 96 3 FES-16-06 2 328 8 341 0.28 0.052 641 456 0.002 596 445 0.113 477 809 0.005 742 018 0.015 479 843 0.000 266 901 322 111 109 5 99 2 FES-16-07 858 1 564 0.55 0.076 385 979 0.007 150 268 0.181 409 739 0.016 701 118 0.018 002 859 0.000 535 828 1 106 189 169 14 115 3 FES-16-08 288 882 0.33 0.081 267 088 0.005 998 572 0.171 147 513 0.012 877 558 0.015 677 729 0.000 501 683 1 228 145 160 11 100 3 FES-16-09 281 816 0.34 0.107 237 581 0.011 572 257 0.212 042 217 0.020 487 312 0.015 206 774 0.000 547 791 1 754 198 195 17 97 3 FES-16-10 481 1 028 0.47 0.080 976 609 0.009 333 835 0.179 728 217 0.018 555 763 0.016 874 427 0.000 559 382 1 220 228 168 16 108 4 FES-16-11 194 659 0.29 0.132 044 246 0.012 107 431 0.251 189 861 0.022 937 213 0.014 956 506 0.000 566 82 2 126 161 228 19 96 4 FES-16-12 146 507 0.29 0.154 488 697 0.019 604 855 0.333 688 804 0.035 550 512 0.016 165 283 0.000 666 313 2 396 217 292 27 103 4 FES-16-13 479 2 115 0.23 0.121 439 272 0.007 289 439 0.275 134 493 0.017 144 165 0.016 309 101 0.000 432 124 1 977 107 247 14 104 3 FES-16-14 271 884 0.31 0.147 179 910 0.013 102 342 0.313 279 226 0.026 641 472 0.016 331 409 0.000 510 164 2 313 153 277 21 104 3 FES-16-15 944 2 283 0.41 0.161 896 050 0.019 861036 1.250 612 935 0.393 421 672 0.028 023 497 0.003 650 531 2 476 208 824 179 178 23 FES-16-16 339 925 0.37 0.103 179 170 0.009 798 839 0.211 463 625 0.016 323 378 0.015 579 915 0.000 487 140 1 683 176 195 14 100 3 FES-16-17 178 517 0.34 0.136 711 102 0.016 145 115 0.281 656 371 0.035 054 904 0.015 507 282 0.000 650 482 2 187 212 252 28 99 4 FES-16-18 556 1 634 0.34 0.061 726 438 0.005 399 171 0.127 019 665 0.010 579 656 0.015 405 533 0.000 417 721 665 189 121 10 99 3 FES-16-19 205 620 0.33 0.134 045 441 0.017 994 945 0.258 635 007 0.028 618 635 0.015 568 905 0.000 596 227 2 152 236 234 23 100 4 FES-16-20 238 741 0.32 0.138 348 254 0.016 392 591 0.303 458 936 0.030 222 154 0.018 012 704 0.000 683 578 2 206 207 269 24 115 4 FES-17, 南安市官桥镇(E118.354°, N24.835°), 英安岩, Mean=131.5±1.4 Ma, MSWD=2.6 FES-17-01 400 1 319 0.30 0.064 3 0.004 1 0.185 4 0.011 4 0.021 1 0.000 4 754 137 173 10 135 2 FES-17-02 1 966 2 301 0.85 0.054 9 0.003 4 0.152 5 0.008 9 0.020 4 0.000 3 409 141 144 8 130 2 FES-17-03 238 642 0.37 0.091 0 0.006 5 0.253 8 0.016 6 0.020 8 0.000 5 1 447 136 230 13 133 3 FES-17-04 324 1 139 0.28 0.053 4 0.004 2 0.157 5 0.012 7 0.021 7 0.000 5 346 175 148 11 138 3 FES-17-05 576 1 915 0.30 0.049 1 0.002 9 0.143 7 0.008 7 0.021 0 0.000 3 154 137 136 8 134 2 FES-17-06 253 643 0.39 0.058 7 0.004 8 0.158 1 0.011 7 0.020 7 0.000 6 567 178 149 10 132 4 FES-17-07 402 1 637 0.25 0.078 7 0.003 7 0.223 3 0.011 0 0.020 3 0.000 3 1 165 62 205 9 129 2 FES-17-08 951 3 354 0.28 0.049 7 0.002 2 0.138 5 0.006 3 0.020 0 0.000 2 189 106 132 6 128 2 FES-17-09 552 2 794 0.20 0.051 6 0.002 6 0.146 7 0.007 5 0.020 6 0.000 3 265 121 139 7 131 2 FES-17-10 958 2 681 0.36 0.059 4 0.003 1 0.173 1 0.009 0 0.021 1 0.000 3 589 118 162 8 135 2 FES-17-11 622 2 645 0.24 0.053 0 0.002 8 0.143 0 0.007 5 0.019 6 0.000 3 328 122 136 7 125 2 FES-17-12 549 1 300 0.42 0.055 4 0.004 0 0.150 3 0.010 2 0.020 1 0.000 4 428 163 142 9 129 2 FES-17-13 928 2 175 0.43 0.054 1 0.003 0 0.159 3 0.009 0 0.021 3 0.000 4 376 121 150 8 136 2 FES-17-14 275 669 0.41 0.069 4 0.006 1 0.185 2 0.014 7 0.020 0 0.000 5 911 180 173 13 128 3 FES-17-15 662 976 0.68 0.063 7 0.005 4 0.169 9 0.013 6 0.019 9 0.000 4 731 180 159 12 127 2 FES-17-16 325 1 006 0.32 0.049 5 0.004 5 0.137 2 0.011 5 0.020 2 0.000 4 172 196 131 10 129 3 FES-17-17 342 860 0.40 0.062 1 0.005 8 0.171 8 0.014 1 0.021 2 0.000 5 680 194 161 12 135 3 FES-17-18 296 936 0.32 0.063 2 0.004 8 0.179 4 0.013 7 0.020 8 0.000 4 722 168 168 12 133 3 FES-17-19 592 1 216 0.49 0.051 2 0.004 6 0.138 0 0.011 2 0.020 1 0.000 4 250 214 131 10 128 2 FES-17-20 295 755 0.39 0.126 2 0.021 7 1.142 2 0.363 3 0.029 1 0.002 9 2 046 308 774 174 185 18 FES-17-21 428 1 553 0.28 0.053 6 0.003 2 0.156 1 0.009 4 0.021 3 0.000 4 367 137 147 8 136 2 FES-17-22 323 1 158 0.28 0.061 5 0.005 5 0.166 6 0.012 8 0.020 3 0.000 4 654 193 156 11 130 2 FES-17-23 543 1 723 0.32 0.049 6 0.003 1 0.136 4 0.008 8 0.020 0 0.000 3 176 142 130 8 128 2 FES-17-24 780 2 444 0.32 0.051 4 0.003 0 0.146 6 0.008 4 0.020 7 0.000 3 257 135 139 7 132 2 FES-17-25 424 929 0.46 0.057 7 0.005 4 0.164 0 0.013 3 0.021 3 0.000 5 517 206 154 12 136 3 FES-17-26 186 538 0.35 0.069 0 0.006 2 0.206 2 0.018 9 0.021 7 0.000 6 902 187 190 16 138 4 FES-17-27 326 766 0.43 0.058 1 0.006 3 0.167 2 0.016 3 0.021 5 0.000 5 600 239 157 14 137 3 FES-17-28 600 1 305 0.46 0.050 0 0.003 7 0.144 9 0.010 6 0.021 4 0.000 4 195 177 137 9 136 3 FES-17-29 225 795 0.28 0.061 4 0.004 5 0.178 6 0.012 7 0.021 6 0.000 6 654 158 167 11 137 3 FES-17-30 473 1 548 0.31 0.045 2 0.003 3 0.132 3 0.009 4 0.021 4 0.000 4 126 8 136 2 FES-22, 南安市芹山山顶(E118.176°, N25.147°), 英安岩, Mean=155.0±2.3 Ma, MSWD=3.4 FES-22-01 954 2 064 0.46 0.045 847 773 0.002 374 022 0.153 462 826 0.007 695 537 0.024 141 889 0.000 331 626 130 112 145 7 154 2 FES-22-02 588 1 408 0.42 0.048 403 544 0.002 151 705 0.166 657 807 0.007 191 584 0.024 991 063 0.000 398 171 120 106 157 6 159 3 FES-22-03 704 943 0.75 0.048 860 575 0.003 395 401 0.164 718 983 0.011 293 934 0.024 512 014 0.000 464 923 143 156 155 10 156 3 FES-22-04 206 517 0.40 0.052 574 796 0.004 003 102 0.205 000 291 0.016 144 511 0.028 428 483 0.000 678 028 309 174 189 14 181 4 FES-22-05 457 1 036 0.44 0.079 006 423 0.004 844 053 0.281 923 000 0.014 889 606 0.026 671 078 0.000 467 090 1 172 122 252 12 170 3 FES-22-06 742 1 611 0.46 0.048 076 342 0.002 578 629 0.166 268 948 0.008 709 287 0.025 163 633 0.000 431 215 102 131 156 8 160 3 FES-22-07 398 853 0.47 0.066 219 620 0.004 207 347 0.232 628 609 0.014 141 935 0.025 686 343 0.000 405 418 813 133 212 12 163 3 FES-22-08 1 109 1 415 0.78 0.049 314 334 0.002 762 998 0.158 133 991 0.008 526 973 0.023 437 467 0.000 348 016 161 127 149 7 149 2 FES-22-09 1 333 1 877 0.71 0.050 760 163 0.001 969 545 0.270 887 678 0.010 575 118 0.038 792 261 0.000 546 318 232 58 243 8 245 3 FES-22-10 720 1 125 0.64 0.056 683 133 0.003 708 784 0.190 922 792 0.011 702 672 0.025 193 943 0.000 491 862 480 144 177 10 160 3 FES-22-11 1 237 2 267 0.55 0.065 470 891 0.003 014 117 0.208 747 019 0.009 362 200 0.023 236 122 0.000 307 849 791 92 193 8 148 2 FES-22-12 540 1 035 0.52 0.050 601 994 0.003 040 854 0.172 600 006 0.010 291 005 0.024 951 964 0.000 448 392 233 145 162 9 159 3 FES-22-13 630 1 330 0.47 0.047 006 973 0.002 706 261 0.164 847 222 0.008 901 727 0.026 045 252 0.000 706 121 56 133 155 8 166 4 FES-22-14 772 881 0.88 0.076 013 139 0.005 019 662 0.260 811 944 0.015 409 992 0.025 699 024 0.000 542 829 1 095 133 235 12 164 3 FES-22-15 359 918 0.39 0.102 696 201 0.003 557 877 1.405 801 121 0.046 233 922 0.098 459 397 0.001 207 577 1 673 63 891 20 605 7 FES-22-16 300 694 0.43 0.090 168 584 0.008 689 233 0.349 227 263 0.035 996 279 0.027 195 315 0.000 623 106 1 429 185 304 27 173 4 FES-22-17 506 987 0.51 0.061 604 143 0.003 792 254 0.212 187 218 0.012 909 695 0.025 129 880 0.000 433 381 661 131 195 11 160 3 FES-22-18 2 194 5 438 0.40 0.050 210 848 0.001 651 560 0.162 013 916 0.005 536 736 0.023 207 702 0.000 307 572 206 76 152 5 148 2 FES-22-19 465 732 0.64 0.054 429 741 0.003 716 554 0.168 504 681 0.011 328 366 0.022 747 228 0.000 483 872 387 186 158 10 145 3 FES-22-20 1 338 2 158 0.62 0.049 829 872 0.002 529 932 0.170 483 008 0.008 857 300 0.024 667 355 0.000 339 284 187 119 160 8 157 2 FES-22-21 1 063 1 526 0.70 0.049 793 815 0.002 776 686 0.166 046 324 0.009 445 142 0.024 078 794 0.000 350 287 187 130 156 8 153 2 FES-22-22 583 1 026 0.57 0.049 872 829 0.002 848 690 0.166 708 877 0.009 517 988 0.024 503 137 0.000 399 462 191 133 157 8 156 3 FES-22-23 529 973 0.54 0.048 998 300 0.003 208 040 0.163 310 590 0.010 510 421 0.024 679 434 0.000 488 672 146 148 154 9 157 3 FES-22-24 4 077 2 509 1.63 0.051 364 844 0.002 160 390 0.176 990 525 0.007 840 108 0.024 766 932 0.000 320 074 257 92 165 7 158 2 FES-22-25 643 1 214 0.53 0.052 755 783 0.003 209 295 0.172 860 649 0.010 168 214 0.024 076 225 0.000 429 042 317 139 162 9 153 3 FES-22-26 608 1123 0.54 0.080 244 277 0.004 137 342 0.272 331 303 0.013 399 959 0.024 865 999 0.000 400 909 1 203 102 245 11 158 3 FES-22-27 286 624 0.46 0.098 814 606 0.006 338 439 0.356 369 737 0.024 068 150 0.026 193 032 0.000 518 183 2 000 120 310 18 167 3 FES-22-28 802 1 612 0.50 0.049 301 106 0.002 265 179 0.162 661 159 0.007 390 412 0.023 919 033 0.000 373 969 161 107 153 6 152 2 FES-22-29 1 048 1 648 0.64 0.047 856 612 0.002 818 720 0.165 638 746 0.009 428 474 0.025 087 765 0.000 410 338 100 133 156 8 160 3 FES-22-30 519 1 175 0.44 0.068 647 284 0.004 253 122 0.243 146 563 0.013 234 626 0.026 440 711 0.000 460 417 887 130 221 11 168 3
下载: 导出CSV
-
Andersen, T., 2002. Correction of Common Lead in U-Pb Analyses That do not Report 204Pb. Chemical Geology, 192(1-2): 59-79. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X Angelier, J., 1989. From Orientation to Magnitudes in Paleostress Determinations Using Fault Slip Data. Journal of Structural Geology, 11(1-2): 37-50. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(89)90034-5 Angelier, J., 1994. Fault Slip Analysis and Paleostress Reconstruction. In: Hancock, P.L., ed., Continental Deformation. Pergamon, Oxford, 53-100. Charvet, J., Faure, M., Xu, J.W., et al., 1990. La Zone Tectonique de Changle-Nanao, Chine du sud-est. Comptes Rendues de I'Académie des Sciences, 310(9): 1271-1278. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=4623573 Chen, B., 1997. Petrographic Evidences and Tectonic Significance for Two Phases of Metamorphism in Sillimanite-and Garnet-Bearing Mica Schists of Pintan-Dongshan Metamorphic Zone of Eastern Fujian, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 13(3): 380-394 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB703.008.htm Chen, C.H., Lin, W., Lan, C.Y., et al., 2004. Geochemical, Sr and Nd Isotopic Characteristics and Tectonic Implications for Three Stages of Igneous Rock in the Late Yanshanian (Cretaceous) Orogeny, SE China. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 95: 237-248. doi: 10.1017/S0263593300001048 Chen, J.Y., Yang, J.H., Zhang, J.H., et al., 2013. Petrogenesis of the Cretaceous Zhangzhou Batholith in Southeastern China: Zircon U-Pb Age and Sr-Nd-Hf-O Isotopic Evidence. Lithos, 162: 140-156. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.01.003 Chen, W.S., Yang, H.C., Wang, X., et al., 2002. Tectonic Setting and Exhumation History of the Pingtan-Dongshan Metamorphic Belt along the Coastal Area, Fujian Province, Southeast China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 20: 829-840. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(01)00066-9 Cui, J.J., Zhang, Y.Q., Dong, S.W., et al., 2013. Zircon U-Pb Geochronology of the Mesozoic Metamorphic Rocks and Granitoids in the Coastal Tectonic Zone of SE China: Constraints on the Timing of Late Mesozoic Orogeny. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 62: 237-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.09.014 Delvaux, D., Sperner, B., 2003. Stress Tensor Inversion from Fault Kinematic Indicators and Focal Mechanism Data: The TENSOR Program. In: Nieuwland, D., ed., New Insights into Structural Interpretation and Modelling. Geological Society, Special Publications, London. Dong, C.W., Zhang, D.R., Xu, X.S., et al., 2006. SHRIMP U-Pb Dating and Lithogeochemistry of Basic-Intermediate-Dike Swarms from Jinjiang, Fujian Province. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(6): 1696-1702 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279605200_SHRIMP_U-Pb_Dating_and_lithogeochemistry_of_basic-intermediate_dike_swarms_from_Jinjiang_Fujian_Province Dong, C.W., Zhou, C., Gu, H.Y., et al., 2011. The Age Difference, Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Mafic Dikes and Host Granites from Meizhou Island in Fujian Province. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 41(3): 735-744 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283879360_The_age_difference_geochemistry_and_petrogenesis_of_mafic_dikes_and_host_granites_from_Meizhou_Island_in_Fujian_Province Engebretson, D., Cox, A., Gordon, R.G., 1985. Relative Motions between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin. Geological Society of America (Special Paper), 206: 1-60. doi: 10.1130/SPE206-p1. Fu, Y.L., Ren, J.S., Chen, T.Y., et al., 1989. 40Ar/39Ar Isotopic Dating of Magmatic Granite and Granulitite from the Jinjiang Area, Fujian. Geological Review, 35(6): 552-557 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/291772256_40Ar39Ar_isotopic_dating_of_migmatic_granite_and_granulitite_from_the_Jingjiang_area Gao, J., Zhang, J.X., Wang, Q., 1993. Dynamics and Deformation Features of the Changle-Dongshan Structural Zone in Fujian Province. Geological Review, 39(1): 57-63 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/291772171_Dynamics_and_deformation_features_of_the_Changle-Dongshan_structural_zone_in_Fujian_Province Griffin, W.L., Belousova, E.A., Shee, S.R., et al., 2004. Archean Crustal Evolution in the Northern Yilgarn Craton: U-Pb and Hf-Isotope Evidence from Detrital Zircons. Precambrian Research, 131(3-4): 231-282. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.011 He, Z.Y., Xu, X.S., 2011. Petrogenesis of the Late Yanshanian Mantle-Derived Intrusions in Southeastern China: Response to the Geodynamics of Paleo-Pacific Plate Subduction. Chemical Geology, 328: 208-221. Hu, R.Z., Bi, X.W., Peng, J.T., et al., 2007. Some Problem Concerning Relationship between Mesozoic-Cenozic Lithospheric Extension and Uranium Metallogenesis in South China. Mineral Deposits, 26(2): 139-152 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200702000.htm Hu, Z.C., Gao, S., Liu, Y.S., et al., 2008. Signal Enhancement in Laser Ablation ICP-MS by Addition of Nitrogen in the Central Channel Gas. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 23(8): 1093-1101. doi: 10.1039/B804760J Jackson, S.E., Pearson, N.J., Griffin, W.L., et al., 2004. The Application of Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry to in Situ U-Pb Zircon Geochronology. Chemical Geology, 211(1-2): 47-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.017 Li, L.M., Sun, M., Xing, G.F., et al., 2009. Two Late Mesozoic Volcanic Events in Fujian Province: Constraints on the Tectonic Evolution of Southeastern China. International Geology Review, 51(3): 216-251. doi: 10.1080/00206810802619092 Li, W.X., Zhou, X.M., Li, X.H., 2003. U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar Datings of Deformed Igneous Rocks from the Changle-Nan'ao Fault. Chinese Journal of Geology, 38(1): 22-30 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_chinese-journal-geology-scientia-geologica-sinica_thesis/0201253268484.html Li, X.H., 2000. Cretaceous Magmatism and Lithospheric Extension in Southeast China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 18(3): 293-305. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00060-7 Li, Z., Qiu, J.S., Xu, X.S., 2012. Geochronological, Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Constraints on Petrogenesis of Late Mesozoic Gabbro-Granite Complexes on the Southeast Coast of Fujian, South China: Insights into a Depleted Mantle Source Region and Crust-Mantle Interactions. Geological Magazine, 149(3): 459-482. doi: 10.1017/S0016756811000793 Li, Z.X., Li, X.H., 2007. Formation of the 1 300-km-Wide Intracontinental Orogen and Postorogenic Magmatic Province in Mesozoic South China: A Flat-Slab Subduction Model. Geology, 35(2): 179-182. doi: 10.1130/G23193A.1 Liu, Q., Yu, J.H., Wang, Q., et al., 2012. Ages and Geochemistry of Granites in the Pingtan-Dongshan Metamorphic Belt, Coastal South China: New Constraints on Late Mesozoic Magmatic Evolution. Lithos, 150: 268-286. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.031 Liu, Y.S., Hu, Z.C., Gao, S., et al., 2008. In Situ Analysis of Major and Trace Elements of Anhydrous Minerals by LA-ICP-MS without Applying an Internal Standard. Chemical Geology, 257(1): 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004 Liu, Y.S., Gao, S., Hu, Z.C., et al., 2010a. Continental and Oceanic Crust Recycling-Induced Melt-Peridotite Interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb Dating, Hf Isotopes and Trace Elements in Zircons of Mantle Xenoliths. Journal of Petrology, 51(1-2): 537-571. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egp082 Liu, Y.S., Hu, Z.C., Zong, K.Q., et al., 2010b. Reappraisement and Refinement of Zircon U-Pb Isotope and Trace Element Analyses by LA-ICP-MS. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(15): 1535-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4 Ludwig, K.R., 2001. Isoplot/Ex (rev. 2.49): A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronological Center, Special Publications, 1a: 1-55. Martin, H., Bonin, B., Capdevila, R., et al., 1994. The Kuiqi Peralkaline Granitic Complex (SE China): Petrology and Geochemistry. Journal of Petrology, 35(4): 983-1015. doi: 10.1093/petrology/35.4.983 Maruyama, S., Isozaki, Y., Kimura, G., et al., 1997. Paleogeographic Maps of the Japanese Islands: Plate Tectonic Synthesis from 750 Ma to the Present. The Island Arc, 6(1): 121-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1738.1997.tb00043.x Petit, J.P., 1987. Criteria for the Sense of Movement on Fault Surfaces in Brittle Rocks. Journal of Structural Geology, 9(5-6): 597-608. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(87)90145-3 Qiu, J.S., Xiao, E., Hu, J., et al., 2008. Petrogenesis of Highly Fractioned I-Type Granites in the Coastal Area of Northeastern Fujian Province: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Geochronology, Geochemistry and Nd-Hf Isotopes. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(11): 2468-2484 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1473393 Qiu, J.S., Li, Z., Liu, L., et al., 2012. Petrogenesis of the Zhangpu Composite Granite Pluton in Fujian Province: Constrains from Zircon U-Pb Ages, Elemental Geochemistry and Nd-Hf Isotopes. Acta Geologica Sinica, 86(4): 561-576 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201204003.htm Shu, L.S., Yu, J.H., Wang, D.Z., 2000. Late Mesozoic Granitic Magmatism and Its Relation to Metamorphism-Ductile Deformation in the Changle-Nan'ao Fault Zone, Fujian Province. Geological Journal of China Universities, 6(3): 368-378 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200003000.htm Shu, L.S., Zhou, X.M., Deng, P., et al., 2009. Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Southeast China Block: New Insights from Basin Analysis. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 34(3): 376-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.06.004 Sun, T., Zhou, X.M., 2002. Late Mesozoic Extension in Southeast China: Petrologic Symbols. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Sciences, 38(6): 737-746 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NJDZ200206001.htm Tong, W.X., Tobisch, O.T., 1996. Deformation of Granitoid Plutons in the Dongshan Area, Southeast China: Constraints on the Physical Conditions and Timing of Movement along the Changle-Nanao Shear Zone. Tectonophysics, 267(1-4): 303-316. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00107-2 Wang, D.Z., Zhou, J.C., Qiu, J.S., et al., 2000. Characteristics and Petrogenesis of Late Mesozoic Granitic Volcanic-Intrusive Complexes in Southeastern China. Geological Journal of China Universities, 6(4): 487-498 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200004000.htm Wang, Z.H., Lu, H.F., 1997. Evidence and Dynamics for the Change of Strike-Slip Direction of the Changle-Nanao Ductile Shear Zone, Southeastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 15(6): 507-515. doi: 10.1016/S0743-9547(97)00035-4 Wang, Z.H., Lu, H.F., 2000. Ductile Deformation and 40Ar-39Ar Dating of the Changle-Nanao Ductile Shear Zone, Southeastern China. Journal of Structural Geology, 22(5): 561-570. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(99)00179-0 Wu, G.G., Zhang, D., Chen, B.L., et al., 2000. Transformation of Mesozoic Tectonic Domain and Its Relation to Mineralization in Southeastern China: An Evidence of Southwestern Fujian Province. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 25(4): 390-396(in Chinese with English abstract). http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=4527471 Xing, G.F., Yang, Z.L., Chen, R., et al., 2004. Three Stages of Mesozoic Bimodal Igneous Rocks and Their Tectonic Implications on the Continental Margin of Southeastern China. Acta Geologica Sinica: English Edition, 78(1): 27-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2004.tb00672.x Xing, G.F., Lu, Q.D., Chen, R., et al., 2008. Study on the Ending Time of Late Mesozoic Tectonic Regime Transition in South China: Comparing to the Yanshan Area in North China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 82(4): 451-463 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200804003.htm Xing, G.F., Chen, R., Yang, Z.L., et al., 2009. Characteristics and Tectonic Setting of Late Cretaceous Volcanic Magmatism in the Coastal Southeastern China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 25(1): 77-91 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_acta-petrologica-sinica_thesis/0201252025515.html Xu, X.B., Zhang, Y.Q., Jia, D., et al., 2011. U-Pb Dating of Volcanic Rocks and Granites along the Wuyishan Belt: Constraints on Timing of Late Mesozoic Tectonic Events in Southeast China. Acta Geologica Sinica: English Edition, 85(1): 130-144. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2011.00385.x Xu, X.S., Dong, C.W., Li, W.X. et al., 1999. Late Mesozoic Intrusive Complexes in the Coastal Area of Fujian, SE China: The Significance of the Gabbro-Diorite-Granite Association. Lithos, 46(2): 299-315. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00087-5 Xu, Z.J., Cheng, R.H., Zhang, L., et al., 2012. The Geochemistry Records of Sea-Level Relative Movement and Paleoclimatic Evolution of the South China Continental Margin in Late Triassic-Early-Middle Jurassic. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 37(1): 113-124 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx201201011 Yang, Y.F., Yang, J.J., Li, N.M., et al., 2010. SHRIMP U-Pb Zircon Dating of the Basic-Intermediate Dikes from the Coastland of Fujian Province. Geological Science and Technology Information, 29(5): 23-29(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201005007.htm Zhao, J.H., Hu, R.Z., Liu, S., 2004. Geochemistry, Petrogenesis, and Tectonic Significance of Mesozoic Mafic Dikes, Fujian Province, Southeastern China. International Geology Review, 46(6): 542-557. doi: 10.2747/0020-6814.46.6.542 Zhou, X.M., Li, W.X., 2000. Origin of Late Mesozoic Igneous Rocks in Southeastern China: Implications for Lithosphere Subduction and Underplating of Mafic Magmas. Tectonophysics, 326(3-4): 269-287. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00120-7 Zhou, X.M., Sun, T., Shen, W.Z., et al., 2006. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic Granitoids and Volcanic Rocks in South China: A Response to Tectonic Evolution. Episodes, 29(1): 26-33. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2006/v29i1/004 Zou, H.B., 1995. A Mafic-Ultramafic Rock Belt in the Fujian Coastal Area, Southeastern China: A Geochemical Study. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, 12(1-2): 121-127. doi: 10.1016/0743-9547(95)00014-3 陈斌, 1997. 福建平潭-东山变质带夕线石榴云母片岩中两期变质作用的岩相学证据及其构造意义. 岩石学报, 13(3): 380-394. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0569.1997.03.010 董传万, 张登荣, 徐夕生, 等, 2006. 福建晋江中-基性岩墙群的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年和岩石地球化学. 岩石学报, 22(6): 1696-1702. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200606026.htm 董传万, 周超, 顾虹艳, 等, 2011. 福建湄州岛镁铁质岩墙群与寄主花岗岩的形成时差、地球化学及成因. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 41(3): 735-744. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201103015.htm 富云莲, 任纪舜, 陈廷愚, 等, 1989. 福建晋江地区混合花岗岩及浅粒岩的40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄测定. 地质论评, 35(6): 552-557. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1989.06.008 高俊, 张建新, 王荃, 1993. 福建长乐-东山构造带的变形特征及动力学研究. 地质论评, 39 (1): 57-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1993.01.009 胡瑞忠, 毕献武, 彭建堂, 等, 2007. 华南地区中生代以来岩石圈伸展及其与铀成矿关系研究的若干问题. 矿床地质, 26 (2): 139-152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2007.02.001 李武显, 周新民, 李献华, 2003. 长乐-南澳断裂带变形火成岩的U-Pb和40Ar/39Ar年龄. 地质科学, 38(1): 22-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200301003.htm 邱检生, 肖娥, 胡建, 等, 2008. 福建北东沿海高分异I型花岗岩的成因: 锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Nd-Hf同位素制约. 岩石学报, 24(11): 2468-2484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200811003.htm 邱检生, 李真, 刘亮, 等, 2012. 福建漳浦复式花岗岩体的成因: 锆石U-Pb年代学、元素地球化学及Nd-Hf同位素制约. 地质学报, 86(4): 561-576. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2012.04.003 舒良树, 于津海, 王德滋, 2000. 长乐-南澳断裂带晚中生代岩浆活动与变质-变形关系. 高校地质学报, 6(3): 368-378. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2000.03.001 孙涛, 周新民, 2002. 中国东南部晚中生代伸展应力体制的岩石学标志. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 38(6): 737-746. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0469-5097.2002.06.002 王德滋, 周金城, 邱检生, 等, 2000. 中国东南部晚中生代花岗质火山-侵入杂岩特征与成因. 高校地质学报, 6(4): 487-498. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2000.04.001 吴淦国, 张达, 陈柏林, 等, 2000. 中国东南大陆中生代构造域的转换及其与成矿的关系—以闽西南地区为例. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 25(4): 390-396. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200004011.htm 邢光福, 卢清地, 陈荣, 等, 2008. 华南晚中生代构造体制转折结束时限研究—兼与华北燕山地区对比. 地质学报, 82(4): 451-463. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2008.04.003 邢光福, 陈荣, 杨祝良, 等, 2009. 东南沿海晚白垩世火山岩浆活动特征及其构造背景. 岩石学报, 25(1): 77-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200901008.htm 许中杰, 程日辉, 张莉, 等, 2012. 华南陆缘晚三叠-早、中侏罗世海平面相对升降与古气候演化的地球化学记录. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 37(1): 113-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201201015.htm 杨永峰, 杨俊杰, 李南美, 等, 2010. 福建沿海中-基性岩墙群锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年. 地质科技情报, 29(5): 23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2010.05.004 -
点击查看大图
图(6) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3486
- HTML全文浏览量: 395
- PDF下载量: 283
- 被引次数: 0
