Critical Phyisical Conditions for Accumulation of Yinan 2 "Continuous" Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoir, Kuqa Depression
-
摘要: “连续型”致密砂岩气藏是一种重要的非常规油气资源.恢复储层临界物性条件的演化对于揭示致密砂岩气成藏机理及成藏过程具有重要的理论意义.以库车坳陷依南2“连续型”致密砂岩气藏为例，利用数值模拟方法结合盆地模拟技术，恢复了储层临界物性的演化过程，并根据临界物性条件和储层演化的耦合关系，确定了该地区“连续型”致密砂岩气藏可以成藏的最早时间.研究表明，“连续型”致密砂岩气成藏临界物性并不是固定不变的，它随着地质条件的变化而不断发生改变.依南2“连续型”致密砂岩气藏最早的形成时间为距今9 Ma，对应的临界孔隙度为6.95%；现今储层临界孔隙度为7.26%.结合实际地质情况进一步证实了依南2气藏为“连续型”致密砂岩气藏.Abstract: It is necessary to reconstruct its evolution of critical physical conditions while researching the formation mechanism and accumulation process of "Continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir since it is one of significant unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Taking Yinan 2 "continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir as the study area, the evolution of critical physical conditions is reconstructed with numerical modeling as well as basin model technology. The earliest formation time of "Continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir is determined based on the temporal coupling between critical physical conditions and reservoir evolution. The results show that critical physical conditions of "Continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir are dynamic, changing with the geological settings. As for Yinan 2 "continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir, the earliest formation time is about 9 Ma, and the corresponding porosity is about 6.95%. The present critical porosity is about 7.26%.Combined with the geological conditions, it is further confirmed that Yinan 2 gas reservoir is a "Continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir.
-
图 1 库车凹陷构造单元分区及依南地区阿合组顶面构造
Fig. 1. Distribution of structural units within the Kuqa with the top structural characters of Ahe Formation in Yinan area
图 3 “连续型”致密砂岩气藏力平衡模式(据庞雄奇等，2006)
Fig. 3. The model of force balance in the "continuous" tight-sand gas reservoir
图 5 依南2井镜质体反射率随深度的变化
Fig. 5. The change of vitrinite reflectance with depth in the Yinan 2 well
图 6 库车坳陷侏罗系阿合组天然气运聚动力的演化
Fig. 6. The evolution of gas dynamic in the Ahe Formation, Jurassic in Kuqa Depression
图 7 依南地区侏罗系阿合组孔隙度与孔喉半径关系
Fig. 7. The relationship between porosity and pore throat radius in Ahe Formation, Jurassic in Yinan area
图 8 依南地区砂岩储层孔隙度与储层埋藏深度关系
Fig. 8. The relationship between porosity and burial depth in Yinan area
图 10 依南2气藏含气饱和度随孔隙度变化关系
Fig. 10. The change of gas saturation with the porosity in the Yinan 2 gas reservoirs
图 11 依南2“连续型”致密砂岩气藏成藏临界物性与实际物性演化
Fig. 11. The evolution of critical porosity and actual critical porosity in Yinan 2 "continuous" tight-sand gas reservoir
表 1 依南2井三叠系和侏罗系烃源岩参数
Table 1. Parameter of source rocks in the Triassic and Jurassic from Yinan 2 well
层位 厚度(m) 岩性 干酪根类型 有机碳(%) 氢指数(mg/g) J2kz 451.5 煤 Ⅲ 53.42 152.03 J1y 205.5 煤 Ⅲ 55.24 96.99 T3t 52.0 煤 Ⅲ 54.37 94.51 T2h 184.0 泥岩 Ⅲ 2.52 66.29 T2k 45.0 泥岩 Ⅲ 1.48 43.26 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 库车坳陷地史时期地表温度
Table 2. The surface temperature in geological time in the Kuqa depression
地史时期 Q N2k N1-2k N1j E K J T 古地表温度(℃) 14 14 14 14 15 16 15 15 注：据高瑞祺和赵政璋，2001.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 库车坳陷地温梯度
Table 3. Geothermal gradient in Ku depression
时间(Ma) 0 2 5 23.5 65 145 208 245 地温梯度(℃) 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 注：据梁狄刚等, 2004.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 依南2气藏阿合组在主要历史时期各项参数统计结果
Table 4. Parameters from Ahe Formaiton in Yinan 2 gas reservoir in different periods
地史时(Ma) 埋深(m) 气体压力(105 Pa) 温度(℃) 气－水界面张力(N/m) 水密度(kg/m3) 23 2 400 16.29 81.2 0.041 969.89 12 4 300 21.92 126.8 0.027 950.59 5 4 800 40.09 144.6 0.023 950.38 0 4 995 26.25 135.0 0.025 948.66
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 依南2“连续型”致密砂岩气藏成藏临界孔隙度模拟结果
Table 5. The modeling result of critical porosity in Yinan 2 "continuous" tight-sand gas reservoir
时间(Ma) 23 12 5 0 孔隙度(%) 9.89 8.22 5.05 7.26
下载: 导出CSV
-
Bao, C., 1988. Natural Gas Geology. Science Press, Beijing, 216-217 (in Chinese). Berkenpas, P.G., 1991. The Milk River Shallow Gas Pool: Role of the Undip Water Trap and Connate Water in Gas Production from the Pool. SPE, 22922. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/314779858_The_Milk_River_Shallow_Gas_Pool_Role_of_the_Updip_Water_Trap_and_Connate_Water_in_Gas_Production_From_the_Pool Cant, D.J., 1983. Spirit River Formation—A Stratigraphic-Diagenetic Gas Trap in the Deep Basin of Alberta. AAPG Bulletin, 67(4): 577-587. http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/67/4/577 Cant, D.J., 1986. Diagenetic Traps in Sandstones. AAPG Bulletin, 70(2): 155-166. http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/70/2/155 Dai, J.X., Ni, Y.Y., Wu, X.Q., 2012. Tight Gas in China and Its Significance in Exploration and Exploitation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 39(3): 257-264(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380412600433 Deng, L., Wang, Y.M., 1998. Dynamic Simulation Approach to the Evolution History of the Palaeogeotemperature Field of a Basin. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 25(Suppl. ): 38-47 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG8S1.007.htm Feng, Z.Q., Zhang, S., Feng, Z.H., 2011. Discovery of "Enveloping Surface of Oil and Gas Overpressure Migration" in the Songliao Basin and Its Bearings on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation Mechanisms. Science in China (Series D), 41(12): 1872-1883 (in Chinese). Gao, R.Q., Zhao, Z.Z., 2001. The Frontier Petroleum Exploration in China. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 64 (in Chinese). Gies, R.M., 1984. Case History for a Major Alberta Deep Basin Gas Trap: The Cadomin Formation. In: Masters, J.A., ed., Case Study of a Deep Basin Gas Field. AAPG Memoir, 38: 115-140. Guo, Q.L., Li, J.Z., Chen, N.S., et al., 2011. Modeling of the Tight Sandstone Gas Accumulation for the Xujiahe Formation, Hechuan-Tongnan Area, Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 38(4): 409-417 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60044-X Guo, X.W., 2010. Overpressure Evolution Caused by Hydrocarbon Generation in Petroliferous Basins—Two Cases Studies from Dongying and Baiyun Depressions (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 15-16 (in Chinese with English abstract). Hou, Q.J., Zhao, Z.Y., Huang, Z.L., 2011. Accumulation Threshold and Exploration Potential of Deep Basin Oil in the Songliao Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 38(5): 523-529 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60052-9 Jia, C.Z., Zheng, M., Zhang, Y.F., 2012. Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources in China and the Prospect of Exploration and Development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 39(2): 129-136(in Chinese with English abstract). Jiang, Z.X., Lin, S.G., Pang, X.Q., et al., 2006. The Comparison of Two Types of Tight Sand Gas Reservoir. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 28(3): 210-214, 219(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/284662473_The_comparison_of_two_types_of_tight_sand_gas_reservoir Law, B.E., 2002. Basin-Centered Gas Systems. AAPG Bulletin, 86(11): 1891-1919. Law, B.E., Dickinson, W.W., 1985. Conceptual Model for Origin of Abnormally Pressured Gas Accumulation in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 69(8): 1295-1304. http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/69/8/1295 Law, B.E., Spencer, C.W., 1993. Gas in Tight Reservoirs—An Emerging Major Source of Energy. USGS Professional Paper, 12(1): 233-252. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236523233_Gas_in_tight_reservoirs_-_an_emerging_major_source_of_energy Liang, D.G., Chen, J.P., Zhang, B.M., et al., 2004. Petroleum Geology and Exploration of Tarim Basin. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 119(in Chinese). Ma, Z.Z., Dai, G.W., Sheng, X.F., et al., 2013. Tight Sand Oil Reservoir of Continuous Type in Northern Songliao Basin and Its Geological Significance. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 42(2): 221-229 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201302010.htm Masters, J.A., 1979. Deep Basin Gas Trap, Western Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 63(2): 152-181. http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/63/2/152 Mi, J.K., Xiao, X.M., Liu, D.H., et al., 2003. Study on Upper-Paleozoic Deep Basin Gas Migration in Ordos Using Inclusion Information. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 24(5): 46-51 (in Chinese with English abstract). Pang, X.Q., Jin, Z.J., Jiang, Z.X., et al., 2003. Critical Condition for Gas Accumulation in the Deep Basin Trap and Physical Modeling. Natural Gas Geoscience, 14(3): 207-214 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1417630 Rose, P.R., Everett, J.R., Merin, I.S., 1984. Possible Basin Centered Gas Accumulation, Raton Basin, Southern Colorado. Oil & Gas Journal, 82(40): 190-197. Schmoker, J.W., 1999. Geological Survey Assessment Model for Continuous (Unconventional) Oil and Gas Accumulations—The "FORSPAN" Model. US Survey Bulletin, 2168: 2-9. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/242132072_US_Geological_Survey_Assessment_Model_for_Continuous_Unconventional_Oil_and_Gas_Accumulations-The_FORSPAN_Model Wang, T., 2002. Deep Basin Gas Field in China. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 44-45 (in Chinese). Wu, H.Y., Liang, X.D., Xiang, C.F., et al., 2007. The Synclinal Reservoir Characteristics and Accumulation Mechanism in Songliao Basin. Science in China (Series D), 37(2): 185-191 (in Chinese). Xie, G.J., Jin, Z.J., Yang, L.N., 2004. Numerical Simulation on Accumulation Mechanism of Deep Basin Gas. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science), 28(5): 13-17 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200405003.htm Xing, E.Y., Pang, X.Q., Xiao, Z.Y., et al., 2011. Type Discrimination of Yinan 2 Gas Reservoir in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Natural Science Edition), 35(6): 21-27, 35 (in Chinese with English abstract). Yang, S.L., Wei, J.Z., 2004. Reservoir Physics. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 185 (in Chinese). Yang, T., Zhang, G.S., Liang, K., et al., 2012. The Exploration of Global Tight Sandstone Gas and Forecast of the Development Tendency in China. Chinese Engineering Science, 14(6): 64-68, 76(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/289676373_The_exploration_of_global_tight_sandstone_gas_and_forecast_of_the_development_tendency_in_China Zhang, J.C., 2006. Source-Contacting Gas: Derived from Deep Basin Gas or Basin-Centered Gas. Natural Gas Industry, 26(2): 46-48 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200602013.htm Zhang, J.C., Jin, Z.J., Pang, X.Q., 2000. Formation Conditions and Internal Features of Deep Basin Gas Accumulations. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 22(3): 210-214 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200003003.htm Zhang, J.C., Tang, X., Bian, R.K., et al., 2008. Dynamic Equations for Nonassociated Gas Accumulation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 35(1): 73-79 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(08)60011-7 Zhang, J.C., Zhang, J., 2003. Equilibrium Principle and Mathematic Description for Source-Contacting Gas Accumulation. Geological Journal of China Universities, 9(3): 458-466 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GXDX200303016.htm Zou, C.N., Jia, J.H., Tao, S.Z., et al., 2011. Analysis of Reservoir Forming Conditions and Prediction of Continuous Tight Gas Reservoirs for the Deep Jurassic in the Eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 85(5): 1173-1186. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2011.00549.x 包茨, 1988. 天然气地质学. 北京: 科学出版社, 216-217. 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇, 2012. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义. 石油勘探与开发, 39(3): 257-264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203002.htm 邓林, 王英民, 1998. 盆地古地温场演化动态数值模拟方法及其应用. 成都理工学院学报, 25(增刊): 38-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG8S1.007.htm 冯志强, 张顺, 冯子辉, 2011. 在松辽盆地发现"油气超压运移包络面"的意义及油气运移和成藏机理探讨. 中国科学(D辑), 41(12): 1872-1883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201112016.htm 高瑞祺, 赵政璋, 2001. 中国油气新区勘探. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 64. 郭秋麟, 李建忠, 陈宁生, 等, 2011. 四川合川－潼南地区须家河组致密砂岩气成藏模拟. 石油勘探与开发, 38(4): 409-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201104005.htm 郭小文, 2010. 含油气盆地生烃增压演化研究——以东营凹陷和白云凹陷为例(博士学位论文). 武汉: 中国地质大学, 15-16. 侯启军, 赵占银, 黄志龙, 2011. 松辽盆地深盆油成藏门限及勘探潜力. 石油勘探与开发, 38(5): 523-529. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201105004.htm 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰, 2012. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景. 石油勘探与开发, 39(2): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm 姜振学, 林世国, 庞雄奇, 等, 2006. 两种类型致密砂岩气藏对比. 石油实验地质, 28(3), 210-214, 219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2006.03.003 梁狄刚, 陈建平, 张宝民, 等, 2004. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷陆相油气的生成. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 119. 马中振, 戴国威, 盛晓峰, 等, 2013. 松辽盆地北部连续型致密砂岩油藏的认识及其地质意义. 中国矿业大学学报, 42(2): 221-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201302010.htm 米敬奎, 肖贤明, 刘德汉, 等, 2003. 利用包裹体信息研究鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界深盆气的运移规律. 石油学报, 24(5): 46-51. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2003.05.010 庞雄奇, 金之钧, 姜振学, 等, 2003. 深盆气成藏门限及其物理模拟实验. 天然气地球科学, 14(3): 207-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200303012.htm 王涛, 2002. 中国深盆气田. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 44-45. 吴河勇, 梁晓东, 向才富, 等, 2007. 松辽盆地向斜油藏特征及成藏机理探讨. 中国科学(D辑), 37(2): 185-191. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2007.02.006 解国军, 金之钧, 杨丽娜, 2004. 深盆气成藏数值模拟. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 28(5): 13-17. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2004.05.003 邢恩袁, 庞雄奇, 肖中尧, 等, 2011. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷依南2气藏类型的判别. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 35(6): 21-27, 35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2011.06.004 杨胜来, 魏军之, 2004. 油层物理学. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 185. 杨涛, 张国生, 梁坤, 等, 2012. 全球致密气勘探开发进展及中国发展趋势预测. 中国工程科学, 14(6): 64-68, 76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2012.06.009 张金川, 2006. 从"深盆气"到"根缘气". 天然气工业, 26(2): 46-48. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.02.013 张金川, 金之钧, 庞雄奇, 2000. 深盆气成藏条件及其内部特征. 石油实验地质, 22(3): 210-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2000.03.004 张金川, 唐玄, 边瑞康, 等, 2008. 游离相天然气成藏动力连续方程. 石油勘探与开发, 35(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2008.01.013 张金川, 张杰, 2003. 深盆气成藏平衡原理及数学描述. 高校地质学报, 9(3): 458-466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.03.016 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 4228
- HTML全文浏览量: 917
- PDF下载量: 651
- 被引次数: 0
