青海卡尔却卡铜多金属矿床地球化学特征与成矿物质来源

赖健清; 黄敏; 宋文彬; 苏生顺; 王守良

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2015.001

青海卡尔却卡铜多金属矿床地球化学特征与成矿物质来源

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2015.001

赖健清^{1, 2,},
黄敏^{1, 2},
宋文彬^{1, 2, 3},
苏生顺⁴,
王守良⁴

1.
中南大学有色金属成矿预测教育部重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410083
2.
中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院, 湖南长沙 410083
3.
湖南省地质科学研究院, 湖南长沙 410083
4.
青海省第三地质矿产勘查院, 青海西宁 810029

基金项目:

中国地质调查局"祁漫塔格地区成矿条件研究与找矿靶区优选"项目资[2008]青藏21-03

中国地质调查局"祁漫塔格成矿带铁铜多金属成矿作用与勘查方法技术试验研究"项目资[2011]03-01-64

详细信息

作者简介:
赖健清(1964-), 男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事矿产地质、岩石学、流体包裹体研究.E-mail: ljq@csu.edu.cn

中图分类号: P595
计量
- 文章访问数: 3353
- HTML全文浏览量: 589
- PDF下载量: 398
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-04-03
- 刊出日期: 2015-01-15

Geochemical Characteristics and Source of Ore-Forming Materials of Kaerqueka Copper Polymetallic Deposit in Qinghai Province, China

Lai Jianqing^{1, 2
,},
Huang Min^{1, 2},
Song Wenbin^{1, 2, 3},
Su Shengshun⁴,
Wang Shouliang⁴

1.
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2.
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
3.
Hunan Research Academy of Geological Sciences, Changsha 410083, China
4.
Third Institute of Qinghai Geological Mineral Prospecting, Xining 810029, China

摘要

摘要: 为了解卡尔却卡铜多金属矿床的物质来源, 探讨其成岩、成矿机制, 通过现场调查, 结合矿床地质成矿条件, 对矿区典型的岩浆岩、围岩及矿石进行了主量元素、微量元素分析及S、Pb同位素分析.结果表明: 矿区岩体属中酸性岩, 为高钾钙碱性系列岩石, 源于深部, 上侵时受地壳混染, 具同源特征.不同地质体稀土配分曲线均为右倾轻稀土富集型, 岩浆岩、矽卡岩和矿石为同一成矿系统.微量元素地球化学显示矿区花岗岩产于火山弧环境.矿石硫同位素δ³⁴S_CDT值为4.4×10^-3~11.0×10^-3, 处于岩浆硫跟围岩混合硫范围内, 成矿物质具多源性.矿石铅同位素Th/U值范围为3.46~3.69, μ值为9.46~9.52, 均低于9.58, 介于地壳与原始地幔值之间, 反应矿石铅具深源铅和壳源铅特征.铅同位素特征参数示踪、构造模式示踪和Δβ-Δγ图解示踪的结果表明: 铅来源与岩浆作用有关, 以壳源铅为主并混合少量深源地幔铅.总结矿床地球化学特征表明成矿物质主要来源于岩浆, 少量来源于周围地层.矿区岩体成矿演化过程复杂, 在岩体中形成斑岩型铜、钼矿化, 在与碳酸盐岩接触带形成矽卡岩型铅、锌矿化, 及至后期热液作用形成中低温热液脉型金矿化, 是一个多因复成矿床.
- 地球化学 /
- 同位素 /
- 成矿物质来源 /
- 卡尔却卡 /
- 青海省
Abstract: Combined with field investigation and ore-forming geological conditions of the Kaerqueka copper polymetallic deposit, the geochemical characteristics of the deposit are summarized, the origin of the ore-forming materials is ascertained, and the rock-forming and ore-forming mechanisms are discussed according to the S, Pb isotopes as well as chemical analysis, including major element analysis, trace element analysis. Results of typical magmatic rocks, wall rocks and ores show that the magmatic rocks which were derived from deep and affected by crustal contamination during intrusion are intermediate acidity comagmatic rocks and belong to the high-K calc-alkaline series. All REE distribution patterns of different geologic bodies incline to the right and LREE-rich, indicating that the magmatic rock, skarn and ore belong to the same metallogenic system. The geochemistry of trace elements shows that the granites of the deposit occurred in volcanic arc environment. The δ³⁴S_CDT values of ore minerals lie between those of magmatic rock and country rock sulfur, with a range of 4.4‰ to 11.0‰, which indicates various metallogenic material sources. The Th/U values of lead isotope in ore minerals range from 3.46 to 3.69 and the μ values range from 9.46 to 9.52 (< 9.58), which fall between the values of crust and primitive mantle and indicate that the ore lead is characterized by both deep-sourced and crust-sourced origins. The tracer analysis regarding the characteristic parameters, lead composition model and Δβ-Δγ diagram show that the ore lead is mainly crust-derived and mixed with minor mantle-derived lead and affected by magmatism. The geochemical characteristics of Kaerqueka deposit suggest that the ore-forming materials mainly originated from magma with minor strata substance. The complicated evolution of magmatic rock is revealed by the porphyry-type copper-molybdenum mineralization in magmatic rock, the skarn-type lead-zinc mineralization following the contact of carbonate rock and the late low-medium hydrothermal vein-type gold mineralization, which indicates the Kaerqueka deposit is a polygenetic compound deposit.
- geochemistry /
- isotope /
- ore-forming material source /
- Kaerqueka /
- Qinghai Province

HTML全文

图 1 卡尔却卡多金属矿床地质简图

1.第四系；2.滩间山群；3.矽卡岩；4.黑云母二长花岗岩；5.花岗闪长岩；6.石英闪长岩；7.闪长岩；8.闪长玢岩；9.花岗岩；10.破碎蚀变带；11.断层；12.矿体；A区.斑岩型矿化区；B区.矽卡岩型矿化区；C区.热液脉型矿化区；D区.未探明区; 据李东生等，2010

Fig. 1. Geologic sketch map of Kaerqueka copper polymetallic deposit

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 卡尔却卡矿区矽卡岩矿物镜下特征

a.黑云母二长花岗岩(+)；b.花岗闪长岩(+)；c.石榴子石被透闪石交代(+)；d.绿帘石被石榴子石包围(+)；e.绿泥石充填在石榴子石颗粒间(-)；f.矿化岩体中的阳起石(-)；Qz.石英；Pl.斜长石；Kp.钾长石；HB.角闪石；Grt.石榴子石；Ep.绿帘石；Chl.绿泥石；Tr.透闪石；Act.阳起石；据宋文彬，2012修改

Fig. 2. Photos of skarn in Kaerqueka deposit under microscope

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 TAS图解

Ir.Irvine分界线，上方为碱性，下方为亚碱性；1.橄榄辉长岩；2a.碱性辉长岩；2b.亚碱性辉长岩；3.辉长闪长岩；4.闪长岩；5.花岗闪长岩；6.花岗岩；7.硅英岩；8.二长辉长岩；9.二长闪长岩；10.二长岩；11.石英二长岩；12.正长岩；13.副长石辉长岩；14.副长石二长闪长岩；15.副长石二长正长岩；16.副长正长岩；17.副长深成岩；18.霓方钠岩/磷霞岩/粗白榴岩；据Middlemost, 1994

Fig. 3. TAS diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 K₂O-SiO₂图解

据Peccerillo and Taylor, 1976

Fig. 4. K₂O vs. SiO₂ relation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同地质体稀土元素球粒陨石标准化模式

Fig. 5. Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns of different geologic bodies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 卡尔却卡各地质体稀土元素参数

1.岩浆岩；2.地层(围岩)；3.矽卡岩；4.矿石

Fig. 6. Relations of REE parameters of different geologic bodies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 岩浆岩(a)及矽卡岩(b)微量元素蛛网图

Fig. 7. Trace elements spider diagrams of magmatic rock (a) and skarn (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 花岗岩的构造环境判别

WPG.板内花岗岩；syn-COLG.同碰撞花岗岩；VAG.火山弧花岗岩；ORG.洋中脊花岗岩；据Pearce et al., 1984

Fig. 8. Tectonic discrimination of granite

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 铅同位素组成

A.地幔；B.造山带；C.上地壳；D.下地壳；据Zartman and Doe, 1981

Fig. 9. Lead isotope compositions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 铅同位素Δβ-Δγ分类

1.地幔铅；2.上地壳铅；3.上地壳与地幔混合的俯冲带铅(3a.岩浆作用，3b沉积作用)；4.化学沉积型铅；5.海底热水作用铅；6.中深变质作用铅；7.深变质下地壳铅；8.造山带铅；9.古老页岩上地壳铅；10.退变质铅；据朱炳泉等，1998

Fig. 10. Δβ-Δγ diagram of genetic classification by lead isotopes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 铅同位素构造环境判别

LC.下地壳；UC.上地壳；OIV.洋岛火山岩；OR.造山带；图中A、B、C、D代表各区域中样品相对集中区；据朱炳泉等，1998

Fig. 11. Discrimination of tectonic setting by lead isotopes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 卡尔却卡多金属矿床成矿模式示意

1.矽卡岩；2.滩涧山群；3.黑云母二长花岗岩；4.花岗闪长岩；5.蚀变破碎带；6.矿体；7.岩浆流体；8.外来流体; 据宋文彬，2012

Fig. 12. Schematic diagram of metallogenic model of Kaerqueka polymetallic deposit

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 岩浆岩主量元素化学组成及参数(%)

Table 1. Chemical composition and geochemical parameters of major elements of magmatic rock

岩性样品	闪长岩	花岗闪长岩				黑云母二长花岗岩
岩性样品	IIIB-29	KE-3-18	IA-1	KD17-3	IIA-55	KTA-1	ZKB28-1	IA-3	ZKB28-6	AD-2
SiO₂	58.20	65.24	65.66	65.28	63.12	69.80	71.60	71.49	68.39	71.03
TiO₂	0.84	0.56	0.60	0.61	0.56	0.34	0.23	0.19	0.33	0.22
Al₂O₃	16.96	14.56	15.14	15.68	17.61	14.85	14.35	13.82	14.62	13.92
TFe₂O₃	7.08	5.10	4.69	3.57	4.61	3.64	2.82	3.15	3.43	2.60
MnO	0.11	0.06	0.07	0.09	0.05	0.05	0.02	0.04	0.02	0.01
MgO	2.97	1.75	1.92	1.82	1.19	0.90	0.61	0.59	0.83	0.69
CaO	6.47	4.88	3.87	4.52	4.54	2.76	2.21	1.93	2.00	1.49
Na₂O	3.17	2.78	3.27	3.57	4.43	3.85	3.86	3.58	3.55	2.18
K₂O	1.99	3.10	3.23	3.69	2.22	3.03	3.51	3.89	4.03	5.90
P₂O₅	0.16	0.11	0.13	0.12	0.13	0.10	0.06	0.06	0.09	0.06
LOI	0.71	0.67	0.80	0.62	0.97	0.81	0.72	0.84	2.29	1.82
Total	98.71	98.88	99.44	99.63	99.54	100.00	100.00	99.61	99.67	100.00
σ	1.68	1.52	1.84	2.34	2.15	1.76	1.89	1.94	2.22	2.31
AKL	5.16	5.88	6.50	7.26	6.65	6.88	7.37	7.47	7.58	8.08
A/CNK	0.89	0.87	0.95	0.87	0.98	1.02	1.01	1.02	1.06	1.10
AR	1.56	1.87	2.04	2.12	1.86	2.28	2.60	2.80	2.68	3.20
注：测试单位为广州澳实矿物研究室；AKL=K₂O+Na₂O；A/CKN=Al₂O₃/(CaO+K₂O+Na₂O)，用摩尔百分比计算.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同地质体稀土元素含量及特征值

Table 2. REE contents of different geological bodies in Kaerqueka deposit

样品	岩性	La	Ce	Pr	Nd	Sm	Eu	Gd	Tb	Dy	Ho	Er	Tm	Yb	Lu	Y	∑REE	LREE/HREE	δEu	δCe	La_N/Yb_N	La_N/Sm_N	Gd_N/Yb_N
样品	岩性	10^-6																LREE/HREE	δEu	δCe	La_N/Yb_N	La_N/Sm_N	Gd_N/Yb_N
ZKB28-16	花岗闪长岩	45.0	77.4	8.22	25.7	4.35	0.93	3.99	0.58	3.07	0.64	1.80	0.28	1.82	0.29	18.6	174	12.96	0.74	0.79	14.68	6.47	1.34
KTA-1	黑云母二长花岗岩	37.0	64.5	6.86	21.5	3.81	0.88	3.53	0.54	2.84	0.58	1.68	0.25	1.70	0.27	17.0	146	11.81	0.79	0.79	12.92	6.07	1.27
ZKB28-1	黑云母二长花岗岩	32.7	56.8	6.01	18.6	3.18	0.77	2.85	0.43	2.21	0.46	1.35	0.22	1.47	0.23	13.7	127	12.80	0.84	0.79	13.21	6.43	1.19
IA-1	花岗闪长岩	32.4	57.7	6.16	19.7	3.54	0.96	3.44	0.48	2.53	0.53	1.50	0.22	1.49	0.24	14.7	131	11.55	0.91	0.80	12.91	5.72	1.42
IA-3	黑云母二长花岗岩	30.7	55.2	6.01	18.9	3.81	0.59	3.61	0.58	3.17	0.69	2.12	0.33	2.31	0.35	20.7	128	8.75	0.53	0.80	7.89	5.04	0.96
ZKB28-6	黑云母二长花岗岩	35.1	61.7	6.56	20.3	3.55	0.75	3.30	0.49	2.54	0.53	1.54	0.22	1.54	0.23	15.0	138	12.32	0.72	0.80	13.53	6.18	1.31
IIIB-29	闪长岩	30.8	60.6	7.01	24.5	4.99	1.24	4.58	0.69	4.07	0.80	2.31	0.36	2.28	0.35	23.2	145	8.36	0.86	0.83	8.02	3.86	1.23
KD17-3	花岗闪长岩	33.0	66.7	7.54	25.2	4.82	1.00	4.04	0.61	3.72	0.77	2.20	0.35	2.24	0.35	21.9	153	9.68	0.74	0.86	8.75	4.28	1.11
IIA-55	花岗闪长岩	50.4	88.1	8.79	27.2	4.05	1.54	2.94	0.42	2.39	0.47	1.44	0.22	1.49	0.24	13.7	190	18.74	1.42	0.81	20.08	7.78	1.21
AD-2	黑云母二长花岗岩	28.5	53.8	5.73	18.4	3.33	0.61	2.75	0.44	2.67	0.55	1.70	0.29	1.95	0.30	16.0	121	10.36	0.65	0.84	8.68	5.35	0.86
KE-3-18	花岗闪长岩	34.5	63.2	6.57	22.4	3.86	0.85	3.14	0.50	2.98	0.62	1.76	0.26	1.74	0.27	18.7	143	11.66	0.79	0.83	11.77	5.59	1.11
KTB12-1	斜长角闪岩	7.10	17.0	2.59	11.9	3.64	1.40	4.86	0.77	4.21	0.87	2.30	0.32	1.99	0.28	22.8	59.2	2.80	1.13	0.83	2.12	1.22	1.50
KTA3-2	斜长角闪岩	55.2	99.8	11.7	40.2	8.20	1.71	7.90	1.18	6.31	1.32	3.77	0.55	3.50	0.51	34.9	242	8.66	0.70	0.79	9.36	4.21	1.38
ZK13-1	斜长角闪岩	24.4	50.3	6.46	24.6	5.64	2.06	6.36	0.97	5.02	0.98	2.69	0.38	2.21	0.31	25.0	132	6.00	1.16	0.82	6.56	2.70	1.76
ZK13-2	斜长角闪岩	24.4	42.8	5.82	21.2	4.47	0.58	4.69	0.79	4.65	1.05	3.12	0.49	3.41	0.54	30.0	118	5.30	0.42	0.73	4.25	3.41	0.84
ZK13-3	斜长角闪岩	9.31	24.4	3.57	15.0	4.22	1.17	5.71	0.97	5.40	1.15	3.24	0.47	2.97	0.43	28.8	78.0	2.83	0.81	0.88	1.86	1.38	1.18
KTB2-2	板岩	8.22	19.5	3.02	14.0	4.21	1.57	5.75	0.92	4.91	1.00	2.77	0.37	2.31	0.34	26.4	68.9	2.75	1.09	0.82	2.11	1.22	1.53
KTB6	板岩	8.01	19.2	2.94	13.4	4.11	1.67	5.51	0.89	4.79	0.99	2.62	0.36	2.21	0.31	25.4	67.0	2.79	1.19	0.83	2.15	1.22	1.53
IB6	板岩	92.6	97.5	17.6	60.1	12.5	3.40	12.6	1.88	9.23	1.76	4.75	0.65	4.07	0.57	46.7	319	7.99	0.90	0.48	13.51	4.63	1.90
KE-01-2	石榴子石矽卡岩	134	134	25.3	94.4	16.5	2.38	15.8	2.21	13.1	3.00	8.47	1.14	7.11	1.08	127	458	7.84	0.49	0.45	11.19	5.08	1.36
KCD1-8	石榴子石矽卡岩	7.81	18.4	2.44	9.11	2.26	0.52	2.46	0.40	2.16	0.45	1.32	0.20	1.25	0.18	13.1	49.0	4.81	0.74	0.88	3.71	2.16	1.21
KCD1-13	石榴子石矽卡岩	3.42	10.1	1.51	6.62	1.91	0.43	2.15	0.34	1.86	0.41	1.24	0.19	1.34	0.20	11.7	31.7	3.10	0.71	0.93	1.51	1.11	0.98
KE-2-2	阳起石矽卡岩	181	218	18.2	45.3	5.85	0.97	4.50	0.71	4.05	0.87	2.42	0.33	2.04	0.30	34.4	485	30.84	0.61	0.65	52.68	19.34	1.35
KE-2-4	绿帘石矽卡岩	47.4	58.4	5.24	15.2	2.14	0.41	1.65	0.27	1.58	0.34	1.01	0.15	1.03	0.17	11.1	135	20.77	0.70	0.65	27.32	13.84	0.98
KE-2-3	黄铜矿矿石	0.81	1.42	0.16	0.62	0.11	0.03	0.16	0.02	0.15	0.04	0.11	0.01	0.09	0.02	2.6	3.70	5.17	0.77	0.78	5.28	4.55	1.09
KE-3-14	黄铜矿矿石	4.11	8.62	1.32	5.91	1.41	0.35	1.17	0.22	1.43	0.33	1.02	0.15	1.10	0.16	9.5	27.3	3.89	0.89	0.77	2.21	1.82	0.65
KE-3-10	辉钼矿矿石	2.81	11.9	2.32	10.8	2.41	0.50	2.18	0.38	2.35	0.50	1.35	0.20	1.26	0.18	15.5	39.1	3.66	0.72	0.90	1.32	0.73	1.06
注：测试单位为广州澳实矿物研究室.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 岩浆岩与矽卡岩微量元素含量及特征值

Table 3. Trace elements contents and eigenvalues of magmatic rock and skarn in Kaerqueka deposit

样品	岩性	Ba	Rb	Th	Nb	Ta	Sr	Nd	Zr	Hf	P₂O₅	K₂O	TiO₂	K/Rb	Nd/Th	Nb/Ta	Ti/Zr	Rb/Sr	Zr/Hf	Nb^*
样品	岩性	10^-6									%			K/Rb	Nd/Th	Nb/Ta	Ti/Zr	Rb/Sr	Zr/Hf	Nb^*
ZKB28-16	花岗闪长岩	521	120	15.3	10.7	0.81	155	25.7	245	6.45	0.11	2.73	0.39	188.9	1.7	13.4	9.5	0.8	38.3	0.19
KTA-1	黑云母二长花岗岩	620	132	14.4	8.81	0.82	256	21.5	175	5.01	0.10	3.03	0.34	189.8	1.5	11.0	11.6	0.5	35.0	0.16
ZKB28-1	黑云母二长花岗岩	490	152	14.8	7.22	0.61	219	18.6	164	4.72	0.06	3.51	0.23	191.1	1.3	12.0	8.4	0.7	34.9	0.12
IA-1	花岗闪长岩	491	136	16.2	8.71	1.03	353	19.7	178	5.14	0.13	3.23	0.60	197.2	1.2	8.7	20.2	0.4	34.9	0.15
IA-3	黑云母二长花岗岩	492	174	21.1	9.03	1.11	163	18.9	143	4.62	0.06	3.89	0.19	185.6	0.9	8.2	8.0	1.1	31.1	0.14
ZKB28-6	黑云母二长花岗岩	828	167	12.9	7.91	0.63	221	20.3	147	4.11	0.09	4.03	0.33	200.3	1.6	13.2	13.5	0.8	35.9	0.12
IIIB-29	闪长岩	438	86.8	12.6	8.62	0.74	340	24.5	166	4.42	0.16	1.99	0.84	190.3	1.9	12.3	30.3	0.3	37.7	0.21
KD17-3	花岗闪长岩	650	174	20.2	9.91	1.21	328	25.2	170	5.14	0.12	3.69	0.61	176.0	1.2	8.3	21.5	0.5	33.3	0.16
IIA-55	花岗闪长岩	1 005	99.3	16.6	9.43	0.62	443	27.2	319	7.80	0.13	2.22	0.56	185.6	1.6	15.7	10.5	0.2	40.9	0.18
AD-2	黑云母二长花岗岩	999	183	15.2	7.61	0.81	158	18.4	131	4.12	0.06	5.90	0.22	266.9	1.2	9.5	10.1	1.2	32.0	0.09
KE-3-18	花岗闪长岩	383	151	17.4	9.22	0.92	241	22.4	168	5.20	0.11	3.10	0.56	170.4	1.3	10.2	20.0	0.6	32.3	0.16
KE-01-2	石榴子石矽卡岩	14.7	3.91	30.2	36.5	2.64	77.1	94.4	340	11.9	0.01	0.06	0.91	127.7	3.1	14.0	16.0	0.1	28.6
KCD1-8	石榴子石矽卡岩	1.91	1.92	6.02	4.71	0.52	15.2	9.10	47.1	1.50	0.03	0.01	0.20	43.7	1.5	9.4	25.5	0.1	31.3
KCD1-13	石榴子石矽卡岩	2.21	3.61	8.31	8.31	0.73	21.1	6.62	95.2	2.74	0.07	0.06	0.40	138.4	0.8	11.9	25.2	0.2	35.2
KE-2-2	阳起石矽卡岩	44.1	1.82	66.1	3.02	0.91	20.4	45.3	66.3	2.83	0.05	0.01	0.17	46.1	0.7	3.3	15.4	0.1	23.6
KE-2-4	绿帘石矽卡岩	8.81	0.23	34.5	3.71	0.72	71.2	15.2	44.1	2.01	0.01	0.01	0.06	415.1	0.4	5.3	8.2	0.0	22.0
注：测试单位为广州澳实矿物研究室；Nb^*=2Nb_N/(K_N+La_N).

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 卡尔却卡矿石S、Pb同位素组成及参数

Table 4. S and Pb isotope parameters of ores in Kaerqueka deposit

样号	样品名称	δ³⁴S_CDT(10^-3)	²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	μ	Th/U	△α	△β	△γ
ZKB28-13	黄铜矿	11.0	18.555	15.628	38.501	9.50	3.69	86.89	20.15	37.48
KCD1-10	辉钼矿	4.9	19.285	15.637	38.795	9.46	3.46	129.65	20.74	45.40
KCD1-7	黄铜矿	7.8	19.059	15.639	39.005	9.48	3.65	116.41	20.87	51.06
KCD1-6	黄铜矿	8.3	19.045	15.656	38.967	9.52	3.64	115.59	21.98	50.04
KCD1-5	黄铜矿	7.7	18.950	15.641	38.669	9.50	3.57	110.02	21.00	42.01
KCD1-2	黄铜矿	7.2	18.712	15.638	38.561	9.51	3.64	96.08	20.80	39.10
RM-1^*	磁铁矿	-	18.595	15.623	38.242	9.49	3.57	89.23	19.82	30.50
RM-10^*	黄铜矿	4.4	18.580	15.609	38.463	9.46	3.66	88.35	18.91	36.46
RM-14^*	辉钼矿	-	18.473	15.605	38.232	9.47	3.62	82.08	18.65	30.23
注：* 标记数据来源于徐国端(2010)，其余数据来源于本文; 测试单位：北京核工业测试中心.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(66)

Ding, Q.F., 2004. Metallogenesis and Mineral Resources Assessment in Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt(Dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun, 25-28(in Chinese with English abstract).
Ding, Q.F., Sun, F.Y., Li, Z.S., 2007. Composite Ore Prospect Areas in the East Kunlun Metallogenic Belt, Qinghai. Geology in China, 34(6): 1101-1108(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DIZI200706015.htm
Feng, C.Y., Li, D.S., Qu, W.J., et al., 2009. Re-Os Isotopic Dating of Molybdenite from the Suolajier Skarn-Type Copper-Molybdenum Deposit of Qimantage Mountain in Qinghai Province and Its Geological Significance. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 28(3): 223-227(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YKCS200903012.htm
He, S.Y., Qi, L.Y., Shu, S.L., et al., 2008. Metallogenic Environment and Potential in the Qimantage Porphyry Copper Deposit, Qinghai. Geology and Prospecting, 44(2): 14-22(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-dzkt200802004.htm
Herrmann, A.G., 1971. Yttrium and Lantbanides. In: Wedepohl, K.H., Correns, C.W., Shaw, D.M., eds., Handbook of Geochemistry. Springer-Verlag, 1(II/2), Berlin-Heidelberg, 39, 57-71.
Jake, R.C., Andrew, C.K., Iain, M., et al., 2013. The Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of the Blue Draw Metagabbro. Lithos, 174: 271-290. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.035
Jiang, C.F., Wang, Z.Q., Li, J.Y., 2000. Opening-Closing Tectonics of Central Orogenic Belt. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 150-154(in Chinese).
Lang, X.H., Tang, J.X., Chen, Y.C., et al., 2012. Neo-Tethys Mineralization on the Southern Margin of the Gangdise Metallogenic Belt, Tibet, China: Evidence from Re-Os Ages of Xiongcun Ore-Body No. I. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 37(3): 515-525(in Chinese with English abstract).
Li, B.L., Sun, F.Y., Yu, X.F., et al., 2010. Genetic Type and Mineralizing Mechanism of the Yelasai Copper Deposit in Kaerqueka Area, Eastern Kunlun, Qinghai Province. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 26(12): 3796-3708(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279619365_Genetic_type_and_mineralizing_mechanism_of_the_Yelasai_copper_deposit_in_Kaerqoeka_area_eastern_Kunlun_Qinghai_Province
Li, D.S., Zhang, Z.Y., Su, S.S., 2010. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Kaerqueka Copper Molybdenum Deposit, Qinghai Province. Northwestern Geology, 43(4): 239-244(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_northwestern-geology_thesis/0201254328168.html
Li, H., Xi, X.S., Wu, C.M., et al., 2013. Genesis of the Zhaokalong Fe-Cu Polymetallic Deposit at Yushu, China: Evidence from Ore Geochemistry and Fluid Inclusions. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 87(2): 486-500. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12063
Li, L., Zheng, Y.F., Zhou, J.B., 2001. Dynamic Model for Pb Isotope Evolution in the Continental Crust of China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 17(1): 61-68(in Chinese with English abstract).
Li, S.J., Sun, F.Y., Wang, L., et al., 2008. Fluid Inclusion Studies of Porphyry Copper Mineralization in Kaerqueka Polymetallic Ore District, East Kunlun Mountains, Qinghai Province. Mineral Deposits, 27(3): 399-407(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200803011.htm
Li, Y.H., Yan, Y.F., Tan, J., 2007. The Application of Rare Earth Elements in Research of Ore Deposits. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 22(4): 294-298(in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu, B., Ma, C.Q., Guo, P., et al., 2013. Discovery of the Middle Devonian A-Type Granite from the Eastern Kunlun Orogen and Its Tectonic Implications. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 38(5): 947-962(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.093
Lu, Y.F., 2004. Geo-Kit—A Geochemical Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Geochimica, 33(5): 459-464(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_geochimica_thesis/0201252981865.html
Middlemost, E.A.K., 1994. Naming Materials in the Magma/Igneous Rock System. Earth-Science Reviews, 37(3-4): 215-224. doi:101.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9
Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B.W., Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4): 956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
Peccerillo, A., Taylor, S.R., 1976. Geochemistry of Eocene Calc-Alkaline Volcanic Rocks from the Kastamonu Area, Northern Turkey. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 58(1): 63-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745
Qi, C.M., Zou, Z.R., Li, H.N., 1994. General Geochemistry. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 167-180(in Chinese).
Shen, N.P., Peng, J.T., Yuan, S.D., et al., 2008. Lead Isotope Composition and Its Significance for Ore-Forming Material of the Xujiashan Antimony Deposit, Hubei Province. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 28(2): 169-176(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB200802009.htm
Song, W.B., 2012. The Characteristics and Genesis of Kaerqueka Copper Polymetallic Deposit, Qinghai Province(Dissertation). Central South University, Changsha, 23-26(in Chinese with English abstract).
Song, W.B., Lai, J.Q., Huang, M., et al., 2012. Characteristics of Fluid Inclusions and Origin of Kaerqueka Copper Polymetallic Deposit, Qinghai Province. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 22(3): 733-742(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/286700352_Characteristics_of_fluid_inclusions_and_origin_of_Kaerqueka_copper_polymetallic_deposit_Qinghai_Province
Tang, G.J., Wang Q., Zhao Z.H., et al., 2009. Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Ore-Bearing Porphyries in the Baogutu Area(Western Junggar): Petrogenesis and Their Implications for Tectonics and Cu-Au Mineralization. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 34(1): 56-74(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2009.007
Thompson, R.N., 1982. Magmatism of the British Tertiary Volcanic Province. Scottish Journal of Geology, 18(1): 59-107. doi:10.1144/sjg180 10049
Wang, S., Feng, C.Y., Bai, H.X., et al., 2009a. Mineral Assemblage Characteristics and Genesis of Kaerqueka Skarn Copper Deposit, Qimantage Mountain, Qinghai Province. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, (Suppl. ): 483-484(in Chinese). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281258576_Mineral_Assemblage_Characteristics_and_Genesis_of_Kaerqueka_Skarn_Copper_Deposit_Qimantage_Mountain_Qinghai_Province
Wang, S., Feng, C.Y., Li, S.J., et al., 2009b. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb Dating of Granodiorite in the Kaerqueka Polymetallic Ore Deposit, Qimantage Mountain, Qinghai Province, and Its Geological Implications. Geology in China, 36(1): 74-84(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287462569_Zircon_SHRIMP_U-Pb_dating_of_granodiorite_in_the_kaerqueka_polymetallic_ore_deposit_qimantage_mountain_qinghai_province_and_its_geological_implications
Wang, X.H., Hou, Z.Q., Song, Y.C., et al., 2012. Baiyangping Pb-Zn-Cu-Ag Polymetallic Deposit in Lanping Basin: A Discussion on Characteristics and Source of Ore-Forming Fluids and Source of Metallogenic Materials. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 37(5): 1015-1028(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201205016.htm
Wu, K.X., Hu, R.Z., Bi, X.W., et al., 2002. Ore Lead Isotopes as a Tracer for Ore-Forming Material Sources: A Review. Geology-Geochemistry, 30(3): 73-81(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ200203012.htm
Xu, G.D., 2010. Geological and Geochemical Studies on Typical Deposits of Qimantage Metallogenic Belt in Qinghai Province(Dissertation). Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 126-128 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Xu, W.X., 1995. Isotope Geochemistry Researches of Tin Deposit of China. Mineral Resources and Geology, 45(1): 1-11(in Chinese).
Yan, Y.T., Zhang, N., Li, S.R., et al., 2014. Mineral Chemistry and Isotope Geochemistry of Pyrite from the Heilangou Gold Deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, Eastern China. Geoscience Frontiers, 5(2): 205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2013.05.003
Yang, Y., Luo, T.Y., Huang, Z.L., et al., 2010. Sulfur and Lead Compositions of the Narusongdou Silver Zinc-Lead Deposit in Tibet: Implications for the Sources of Plutons and Metals in the Deposit. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 30(3): 311-318(in Chinese with English abstract).
Zartman, R.E., Doe, B.R., 1981. Plumbotectonics—The Model. Tectonophysics, 75(1-2): 135-162. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(81)90213-4
Zhang, J.Y., Ma, C.Q., Wang, R.J., et al., 2013. Mineralogical, Geochronological and Geochemical Characteristics of Zhoukoudian Intrusion and Their Magmatic Source and Evolution. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 38(1): 68-86(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.007
Zhao, Z.H., 1997. Principles of Trace Element Geochemistry. Science Press, Beijing, 183-204 (in Chinese).
Zhou, Z.J., Chen, Y.J., Jiang, S.Y., et al., 2014. Geology, Geochemistry and Ore Genesis of the Wenyu Gold Deposit, Xiaoqinling Gold Field, Qinling Orogen, Southern Margin of North China Craton. Ore Geology Reviews, 59: 1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.12.001
Zhu, B.Q., Li, X.H., Dai, T.M., 1998. Isotope System Theory and Application to the Earth Sciences—On Crust-Mantle Evolution of Continent of China. Science Press, Beijing, 216-230(in Chinese).
丁清峰, 2004. 东昆仑造山带区域成矿作用与矿产资源评价(博士学位论文). 长春: 吉林大学, 25-28.
丁清峰, 孙丰月, 李钟山, 2007. 青海东昆仑成矿带综合选区研究. 中国地质, 34(6): 1101-1108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2007.06.016
丰成友, 李东生, 屈文俊, 等, 2009. 青海祁漫塔格索拉吉尔矽卡岩型铜钼矿床辉钼矿铼-锇同位素定年及其地质意义. 岩矿测试, 28(3): 223-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2009.03.006
何书跃, 祁兰英, 舒树兰, 等, 2008. 青海祁漫塔格地区斑岩铜矿的成矿条件和远景. 地质与勘探, 44(2): 14-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT200802004.htm
姜春发, 王宗起, 李锦轶, 2000. 中央造山带开合构造. 北京: 地质出版社, 150-154.
郎兴海, 唐菊兴, 陈毓川, 等, 2012. 西藏冈底斯成矿带南缘新特提斯洋俯冲期成矿作用: 来自雄村矿集区Ⅰ号矿体的Re-Os同位素年龄证据. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 37(3): 515-525. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201203015.htm
李碧乐, 孙丰月, 于晓飞, 等, 2010. 青海东昆仑卡尔却卡地区野拉塞铜矿床成因类型及成矿机制. 岩石学报, 26(12): 3796-3708. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201012022.htm
李东生, 张占玉, 苏生顺, 等, 2010. 青海卡尔却卡铜钼矿床地质特征及成因探讨. 西北地质, 43(4): 239-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2010.04.028
李龙, 郑永飞, 周建波, 2001. 中国大陆地壳铅同位素演化的动力学模型. 岩石学报, 17(1): 61-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200101007.htm
李世金, 孙丰月, 王力, 等, 2008. 青海东昆仑卡尔却卡多金属矿区斑岩型铜矿的流体包裹体研究. 矿床地质, 27(3): 399-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2008.03.010
李闫华, 鄢云飞, 谭俊, 等, 2007. 稀土元素在矿床学研究中的应用. 地质找矿论丛, 22(4): 294-298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1412.2007.04.010
刘彬, 马昌前, 郭盼, 等, 2013. 东昆仑中泥盆世A型花岗岩的确定及其构造意义. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 38(5): 947-962. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201305005.htm
路远发, 2004. GeoKit: 一个用VBA构建的地球化学工具软件包. 地球化学, 33(5): 459-464. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2004.05.004
戚长谋, 邹祖荣, 李鹤年, 1994. 地球化学通论. 北京: 地质出版社, 167-180.
沈能平, 彭建堂, 袁顺达, 2008. 湖北徐家山锑矿床铅同位素组成与成矿物质来源探讨. 矿物学报, 28(2): 169-176. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.2008.02.009
宋文彬, 2012. 青海省卡尔却卡铜多金属矿床特征及成因分析(硕士学位论文). 长沙: 中南大学, 23-26.
宋文彬, 赖健清, 黄敏, 等, 2012. 青海省卡尔却卡铜多金属矿床流体包裹体特征及成矿流体. 中国有色金属学报, 22(3): 733-742. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXZ201203015.htm
唐功建, 王强, 赵振华, 等, 2009. 西准噶尔包古图成矿斑岩年代学与地球化学: 岩石成因与构造、铜金成矿意义. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 34(1): 56-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200901008.htm
王松, 丰成友, 柏红喜, 等, 2009a. 青海祁漫塔格地区卡尔却卡矽卡岩型铜多金属矿床矿物组合特征及成因. 矿物学报, (增刊1): 483-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB2009S1252.htm
王松, 丰成友, 李世金, 等, 2009b. 青海祁漫塔格卡尔却卡铜多金属矿区花岗闪长岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb测年及其地质意义. 中国地质, 36(1): 74-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200901008.htm
王晓虎, 侯增谦, 宋玉财, 等, 2012. 兰坪盆地白秧坪铅锌铜银多金属矿床成矿流体及成矿物质来源. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 37(5): 1015-1028. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201205016.htm
吴开兴, 胡瑞忠, 毕献武, 等, 2002. 矿石铅同位素示踪成矿物质来源综述. 地质地球化学, 30(3): 73-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2002.03.013
徐国端, 2010. 青海祁漫塔格多金属成矿带典型矿床地质地球化学研究(博士学位论文). 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 126-128.
徐文忻, 1995. 我国锡矿床的同位素地球化学研究. 矿产与地质, 45(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCYD501.000.htm
杨勇, 罗泰义, 黄智龙, 等, 2010. 西藏纳如松多银铅矿S、Pb同位素组成: 对成矿物质来源的指示. 矿物学报, 30(3): 311-318. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB201003007.htm
张金阳, 马昌前, 王人镜, 等, 2013. 周口店岩体矿物学、年代学、地球化学特征及其岩浆起源与演化. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 38(1): 68-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201301011.htm
赵振华, 1997. 微量元素地球化学原理. 北京: 地质出版社, 183-204.
朱炳泉, 李献华, 戴橦谟, 1998. 地球科学中同位素体系理论与应用——兼论中国大陆地壳演化. 北京: 科学出版社, 216-230.