• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    桐柏造山带中龟山杂岩的白云母40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义

    曲玮 刘晓春 崔建军 胡娟 李淼

    曲玮, 刘晓春, 崔建军, 胡娟, 李淼, 2018. 桐柏造山带中龟山杂岩的白云母40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义. 地球科学, 43(1): 247-258. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.015
    引用本文: 曲玮, 刘晓春, 崔建军, 胡娟, 李淼, 2018. 桐柏造山带中龟山杂岩的白云母40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义. 地球科学, 43(1): 247-258. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.015
    Qu Wei, Liu Xiaochun, Cui Jianjun, Hu Juan, Li Miao, 2018. 40Ar/39Ar Dating of Muscovite from the Guishan Complex in the Tongbai Orogen, Central China, and Its Geological Implications. Earth Science, 43(1): 247-258. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.015
    Citation: Qu Wei, Liu Xiaochun, Cui Jianjun, Hu Juan, Li Miao, 2018. 40Ar/39Ar Dating of Muscovite from the Guishan Complex in the Tongbai Orogen, Central China, and Its Geological Implications. Earth Science, 43(1): 247-258. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.015

    桐柏造山带中龟山杂岩的白云母40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.015
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金项目 41472064

    国家重大基础研究发展规划项目 2015CB856104

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      曲玮(1962-), 女, 高级工程师, 主要从事岩石组构和岩石地球化学研究

    • 中图分类号: P597

    40Ar/39Ar Dating of Muscovite from the Guishan Complex in the Tongbai Orogen, Central China, and Its Geological Implications

    • 摘要: 出露于桐柏造山带松扒-龟梅断裂带南侧的龟山杂岩经历了两阶段变质及多期变形作用,但其变质变形时代及其与秦岭造山带中产于相同构造部位的武关杂岩的构造关系尚缺乏深入研究.为此,对取自于龟山杂岩中的4件变质沉积岩和2件变质火山岩样品中的白云母进行了40Ar/39Ar同位素定年.结果表明,白云母的40Ar/39Ar坪年龄从306.7±1.7 Ma(保存最好的白云母斑晶)延续到279.2±2.6 Ma(经历后期变形改造的白云母).结合前期锆石U-Pb定年结果推测龟山杂岩的两阶段变质及主期逆冲推覆变形均发生在石炭纪,并在二叠纪遭受到左行走滑剪切作用的改造.龟山杂岩与武关杂岩具有类似的岩石组成和变质变形演化历史,二者共同构成一条>500 km的晚古生代中级变质带,是华北-华南陆块最终碰撞之前大洋俯冲-增生的产物.

       

    • 图  1  桐柏造山带地质简图及研究样品的位置

      Fig.  1.  Geological sketch of the Tongbai orogen with the locations of the studied samples

      图  2  龟山杂岩中定年样品的野外和显微照片

      Bt.黑云母;Cal.方解石;Grt.石榴石;Kfs.钾长石;Ms.白云母;Oq.不透明矿物;Pl.斜长石;Qtz.石英;Ser.绢云母;St.十字石;Tur.电气石

      Fig.  2.  Photographs and photomicrographs of the dated samples from the Guishan complex

      图  3  龟山杂岩中白云母的40Ar/39Ar坪年龄

      Fig.  3.  40Ar/39Ar plateau ages of muscovites from the Guishan complex

      表  1  龟山杂岩中定年样品的位置、岩性、矿物组合和定年结果

      Table  1.   Sampling locations, lithologies, mineral assemblages and age results of the dated samples from the Guishan complex

      样品 位置 经纬度 岩性 矿物组合 年龄(Ma)
      变质沉积岩
      YJZ06-8 老河堰 32°28′29″N
      113°16′52″E
      含石榴白云石英片岩 Grt+Ms+Pl+Qtz+Tur +Oq 306.7±1.7
      LW01-6 老湾 32°27′50″N
      113°19′30″E
      白云石英片岩 Ms+Pl+Qtz+Cal+Tur+Oq 279.2±2.6
      XY30-10 震雷山 32°04′51″N
      114°07′17″E
      含石榴十字白云石英片岩 Grt+St+Ms+Bt+Qtz+Tur+Oq 286.5±1.7
      XY32-1 双桥 32°03′30″N
      114°08′17″E
      含石榴绢云片岩 Grt+Ms+Ser+Qtz+Tur+Oq 297.7±1.6
      变质火山岩
      XY13-6 十三里桥 32°04′32″N
      114°02′54″E
      白云钾长浅粒岩 Ms+Kfs+Qtz+Oq 292.9±1.7
      XY22-6 大石门 32°04′04″N
      114°04′46″E
      白云钾长浅粒岩 Ms+Kfs+Qtz+Oq 280.6±1.6
      注:Bt.黑云母;Cal.方解石;Grt.石榴石;Kfs.钾长石;Ms.白云母;Oq.不透明矿物;Pl.斜长石;Qtz.石英;Ser.绢云母;St.十字石;Tur.电气石.
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  龟山杂岩中白云母的40Ar/39Ar同位素分析及年

      Table  2.   40Ar/39Ar isotopic analyses of muscovites from the Guishan complex

      加热阶段 T
      (℃)
      40Ar/39Ar
      m
      36Ar/39Ar
      m
      37Ar/39Ar
      m
      38Ar/39Ar
      m
      40Ar
      (%)
      F 39Ar
      (10-14 mol)
      39Ar (cum.)
      (%)
      年龄
      (Ma)
      ±2σ
      YJZ06-8(样品重量W=28.88 mg,照射参数J=0.007 789)
      1 700 44.0566 0.080 2 0.000 0 0.027 6 46.21 20.358 4 0.17 0.35 265.5 7.3
      2 800 34.0635 0.036 0 0.016 4 0.019 3 68.79 23.433 5 0.98 2.35 302.4 3.1
      3 840 24.9599 0.005 2 0.032 1 0.013 6 93.84 23.422 6 1.47 5.34 302.3 2.9
      4 880 24.4288 0.001 6 0.000 0 0.012 6 98.07 23.957 4 4.26 14.01 308.7 2.9
      5 920 24.1891 0.000 3 0.0000 0.012 4 99.63 24.099 2 14.34 43.23 310.3 2.9
      6 950 23.9250 0.000 2 0.000 0 0.012 3 99.79 23.8738 6.15 55.76 307.7 2.8
      7 990 23.7561 0.000 3 0.004 6 0.012 3 99.55 23.648 7 4.81 65.56 305.0 2.8
      8 1030 23.7545 0.000 7 0.000 0 0.012 4 99.11 23.544 0 2.72 71.09 303.8 2.8
      9 1070 23.9970 0.000 6 0.000 0 0.012 5 99.21 23.807 8 2.81 76.81 306.9 2.8
      10 1100 24.1220 0.000 7 0.012 9 0.012 4 99.10 23.904 1 2.92 82.75 308.0 2.8
      11 1150 24.0357 0.000 2 0.006 1 0.012 3 99.72 23.968 1 5.86 94.69 308.8 2.8
      12 1200 23.9635 0.000 3 0.000 0 0.012 1 99.65 23.878 8 2.46 99.70 307.7 2.8
      13 1300 25.1150 0.002 7 0.041 5 0.014 8 96.82 24.316 8 0.12 99.94 312.9 7.0
      14 1400 32.5910 0.025 7 0.000 0 0.012 5 76.69 24.992 8 0.03 100.00 321.0 23.0
      LW01-6(样品重量W=46.75 mg,照射参数J=0.009 837)
      1 600 26.895 6 0.075 1 0.000 0 0.028 8 17.45 4.693 4 0.05 0.06 81.0 46.0
      2 700 7.536 1 0.016 3 0.000 0 0.018 1 36.20 2.728 4 0.31 0.44 47.8 2.8
      3 800 12.520 6 0.005 8 0.002 3 0.013 5 86.24 10.797 4 2.96 4.13 182.1 1.8
      4 880 17.512 4 0.005 4 0.000 6 0.012 8 90.84 15.907 6 14.19 21.81 262.3 2.4
      5 910 16.648 2 0.001 3 0.000 0 0.011 9 97.65 16.256 4 16.46 42.31 267.6 2.5
      6 940 15.774 7 0.001 7 0.007 5 0.012 2 96.84 15.276 4 5.56 49.22 252.6 2.4
      7 970 16.141 8 0.002 4 0.004 5 0.012 5 95.53 15.419 9 3.36 53.41 254.8 2.4
      8 1000 16.811 8 0.002 2 0.009 5 0.012 2 96.15 16.165 4 3.89 58.26 266.2 2.5
      9 1040 17.349 9 0.002 1 0.000 5 0.012 0 96.39 16.723 7 6.59 66.46 274.8 2.6
      10 1080 17.709 6 0.002 4 0.011 0 0.012 1 96.05 17.011 1 10.28 79.26 279.1 2.6
      11 1120 17.400 3 0.001 0 0.001 7 0.011 7 98.34 17.111 1 13.80 96.45 280.6 2.6
      12 1200 17.593 5 0.001 4 0.000 0 0.011 6 97.64 17.178 6 2.70 99.81 281.7 2.7
      13 1300 21.499 6 0.013 9 0.000 0 0.013 8 80.83 17.378 3 0.15 100.00 284.7 8.0
      XY30-10(样品重量W=28.10 mg,照射参数J=0.008 578)
      1 700 21.733 6 0.024 8 0.000 0 0.019 4 66.22 14.392 7 0.23 0.44 210.0 5.3
      2 800 22.253 8 0.009 3 0.006 5 0.014 5 87.58 19.491 0 1.31 2.90 278.9 2.6
      3 840 20.664 7 0.002 4 0.018 9 0.013 2 96.50 19.942 7 1.98 6.61 284.9 2.7
      4 880 20.380 1 0.001 6 0.000 6 0.012 7 97.72 19.916 4 3.01 12.24 284.5 2.7
      5 920 20.554 6 0.001 3 0.017 6 0.012 6 98.14 20.172 8 8.35 27.87 287.9 2.7
      6 960 20.326 3 0.000 6 0.002 8 0.012 5 99.09 20.141 9 10.23 47.02 287.5 2.7
      7 1000 20.214 6 0.000 9 0.003 1 0.012 6 98.63 19.937 7 4.75 55.92 284.8 2.6
      8 1040 20.325 1 0.001 5 0.024 9 0.012 7 97.74 19.865 4 3.17 61.86 283.9 2.6
      9 1080 20.433 3 0.001 4 0.022 6 0.012 7 97.90 20.004 4 3.03 67.53 285.7 2.7
      10 1120 20.453 7 0.001 1 0.030 1 0.012 7 98.33 20.113 2 3.19 73.49 287.1 2.7
      11 1160 20.452 1 0.000 8 0.001 9 0.012 6 98.86 20.219 1 5.43 83.66 288.5 2.7
      12 1200 20.490 7 0.000 4 0.002 6 0.012 5 99.44 20.375 1 6.43 95.70 290.6 2.7
      13 1300 20.711 2 0.000 6 0.007 2 0.012 4 99.19 20.542 7 1.93 99.31 292.8 2.7
      14 1400 21.316 2 0.002 0 0.000 0 0.011 9 97.16 20.711 1 0.37 100.00 295.0 3.7
      XY32-1(样品重量W=26.85 mg,照射参数J=0.009 058)
      1 700 20.792 2 0.015 1 0.000 0 0.017 1 78.52 16.326 6 0.52 0.99 248.8 2.6
      2 800 22.291 1 0.008 0 0.000 7 0.014 3 89.40 19.929 1 2.08 4.98 299.4 2.8
      3 840 20.803 4 0.002 8 0.001 0 0.012 9 96.00 19.970 5 3.00 10.77 300.0 2.8
      4 880 20.267 6 0.001 5 0.015 4 0.012 5 97.79 19.820 5 4.48 19.41 297.9 2.8
      5 910 19.974 4 0.000 7 0.000 0 0.012 4 98.89 19.753 3 6.32 31.58 296.9 2.7
      6 950 19.910 5 0.000 4 0.003 2 0.012 4 99.31 19.773 1 8.83 48.57 297.2 2.7
      7 980 19.873 5 0.000 6 0.001 7 0.012 4 99.07 19.689 5 4.13 56.53 296.1 2.7
      8 1020 19.915 4 0.001 1 0.003 9 0.012 6 98.32 19.580 4 3.11 62.52 294.5 2.7
      9 1060 20.016 9 0.001 1 0.000 9 0.012 5 98.41 19.699 4 3.20 68.68 296.2 2.7
      10 1100 20.086 2 0.001 0 0.005 6 0.012 4 98.53 19.791 0 3.53 75.47 297.5 2.8
      11 1140 20.078 5 0.000 9 0.009 2 0.012 5 98.72 19.821 9 5.02 85.14 297.9 2.8
      12 1180 19.972 2 0.000 4 0.003 7 0.012 5 99.46 19.863 8 6.14 96.97 298.5 2.8
      13 1300 20.150 3 0.000 3 0.000 0 0.012 3 99.51 20.051 8 1.32 99.52 301.1 2.9
      14 1400 21.582 6 0.005 9 0.000 0 0.014 4 91.88 19.829 7 0.25 100.00 298.0 3.6
      XY13-6(样品重量W=28.03 mg,照射参数J=0.008 219)
      1 700 24.919 7 0.025 1 0.000 0 0.020 9 70.23 17.500 0 0.23 0.39 242.4 3.9
      2 800 25.137 0 0.011 9 0.025 9 0.015 1 85.95 21.605 1 0.91 1.90 294.9 2.8
      3 850 22.690 5 0.003 8 0.000 0 0.013 1 95.03 21.562 2 2.75 6.48 294.3 2.7
      4 890 22.268 5 0.002 6 0.000 0 0.012 8 96.51 21.490 2 4.91 14.64 293.4 2.7
      5 920 21.869 4 0.001 5 0.014 2 0.012 7 97.95 21.421 9 8.59 28.92 292.6 2.7
      6 960 21.684 4 0.001 0 0.003 4 0.012 6 98.57 21.373 5 12.31 49.37 292.0 2.7
      7 1000 21.719 8 0.001 3 0.001 0 0.012 6 98.21 21.330 1 10.56 66.93 291.4 2.7
      8 1040 21.937 6 0.001 9 0.005 1 0.012 7 97.41 21.369 0 7.16 78.83 291.9 2.7
      9 1080 21.857 9 0.001 5 0.000 0 0.012 7 97.93 21.405 4 6.13 89.03 292.4 2.7
      10 1120 21.684 6 0.000 6 0.005 4 0.012 4 99.17 21.504 9 4.24 96.08 293.6 2.7
      11 1160 21.653 2 0.000 4 0.000 0 0.012 4 99.43 21.530 8 1.71 98.93 293.9 2.7
      12 1240 22.097 7 0.002 7 0.000 0 0.012 8 96.39 21.300 7 0.44 99.65 291.0 3.1
      13 1400 23.892 4 0.004 4 0.000 0 0.013 3 94.58 22.597 1 0.21 100.00 307.3 3.8
      XY22-6(样品重量W=26.38 mg,照射参数J=0.008 578)
      1 700 19.206 0 0.026 8 0.120 8 0.037 5 58.78 11.289 5 0.32 0.57 166.8 2.6
      2 800 22.135 7 0.009 7 0.012 0 0.029 1 87.04 19.266 6 1.07 2.49 275.9 2.6
      3 840 20.440 1 0.002 5 0.000 0 0.012 7 96.38 19.700 8 1.46 5.13 281.7 2.6
      4 880 19.999 3 0.001 5 0.015 3 0.012 5 97.71 19.542 0 2.12 8.95 279.6 2.6
      5 920 20.246 7 0.001 5 0.000 0 0.012 7 97.82 19.805 5 5.93 19.63 283.1 2.6
      6 960 19.953 9 0.000 7 0.001 8 0.012 5 98.93 19.739 5 13.56 44.07 282.2 2.6
      7 990 19.737 0 0.000 6 0.008 5 0.012 5 99.08 19.555 1 6.94 56.56 279.8 2.6
      8 1030 19.849 3 0.001 2 0.002 8 0.012 7 98.25 19.501 5 5.52 66.51 279.0 2.6
      9 1070 19.894 0 0.001 4 0.011 5 0.012 7 97.89 19.473 8 4.52 74.66 278.7 2.6
      10 1130 19.837 9 0.000 6 0.007 7 0.012 5 99.12 19.663 5 9.67 92.08 281.2 2.6
      11 1180 20.017 5 0.000 4 0.012 0 0.012 5 99.45 19.908 5 4.19 99.63 284.4 2.6
      12 1300 21.108 0 0.002 3 0.000 0 0.012 9 96.73 20.417 9 0.18 99.94 291.2 4.4
      13 1400 27.964 4 0.013 1 0.000 0 0.018 3 86.16 24.093 9 0.03 100.00 339.0 19.0
      注:m代表样品中测定的同位素比值;F为40Ar*/39Ar比值,即放射性成因40Ar与39Ar比值;39Ar(cum.)代表39Ar累积.
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Chen, L.Y., Liu, X.C., Qu, W., et al., 2014.U-Pb Zircon Ages and Geochemistry of the Wuguan Complex in the Qinling Orogen, Central China:Implications for the Late Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution between the Sino-Korean and Yangtze Cratons.Lithos, 192-195:192-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2014.01.014
      Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y.Q., et al., 2006.Late Cenozoic Episodic Uplifting in Southeastern Part of the Tibetan Plateau-Evidence from Ar-Ar Thermochronology.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(4):867-872 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200604010.htm
      Cheng, H., King, R.L., Nakamura, E., et al., 2009.Transitional Time of Oceanic to Continental Subduction in the Dabie Orogen:Constraints from U-Pb, Lu-Hf, Sm-Nd and Ar-Ar Multichronometric Dating.Lithos, 110(1-4):327-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.01.013
      Cheng, H., Liu, X.C., Vervoort, J.D., et al., 2016.Micro-Sampling Lu-Hf Geochronology Reveals Episodic Garnet Growth and Multiple High-P Metamorphic Events.Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 34(4):363-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12185
      Cheng, H., Zhang, C., Vervoort, J.D., et al., 2011.New Lu-Hf Geochronology Constrains the Onset of Continental Subduction in the Dabie Orogen.Lithos, 121(1-4):41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.10.004
      Faure, M., Lin, W., Schärer, U., et al., 2003.Continental Subduction and Exhumation of UHP Rocks:Structural and Geochronological Insights from the Dabieshan (East China).Lithos, 70(3-4):213-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-4937(03)00100-2
      Hames, W.E., Bowring, S.A., 1994.An Empirical Evaluation of the Argon Diffusion Geometry in Muscovite.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 124(1-4):161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(94)00079-4
      Huang, P., Song, C.Z., Ren, S.L., et al., 2016.Tectonic Property of the Beihuaiyang Tectonic Belt and Its Implications for the Location of the Suture Zone between Yangtze Block and North China Block.Acta Geologica Sinica, 90(6):1112-1129 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4093-4
      Huang, S.Y., Xu, B., Wang, C.Q., et al., 2006.Geometry, Kinematics and Evolution of the Tongbai Orogenic Belt.Science in China (Series D), 36(3):242-251 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1007/s11430-006-0828-0
      Jian, P., Yang, W.R., Li, Z.C., et al., 1997.Isotopic Geochronological Evidence for the Caledonian Xiongdian Eclogite in the Western Dabie Mountains, China.Acta Geologica Sinica, 71(2):133-141 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1007/BF03183215
      Liu, X.C., Jahn, B.M., Cui, J.J., et al., 2010.Triassic Retrograded Eclogites and Cretaceous Gneissic Granites in the Tongbai Complex, Central China:Implications for the Architecture of the HP/UHP Tongbai-Dabie-Sulu Collision Zone.Lithos, 119(3-4):211-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.06.005
      Liu, X.C., Jahn, B.M., Dong, S.W., et al., 2008.High-Pressure Metamorphic Rocks from Tongbaishan, Central China:U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar Age Constraints on the Provenance of Protoliths and Timing of Metamorphism.Lithos, 105(3-4):301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.04.009
      Liu, X.C., Jahn, B.M., Hu, J., et al., 2011a.Metamorphic Patterns and SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Medium-to-High Grade Rocks from the Tongbai Orogen, Central China:Implications for Multiple Accretion/Collision Processes Prior to Terminal Continental Collision.Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 29(9):979-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2011.00952.x
      Liu, X., Li, S.Z., Suo, Y.H., et al., 2011b.Structural Anatomy of the Exhumation of High-Pressure Rocks:Constraints from the Tongbai Collisional Orogen and Surrounding Units.Geological Journal, 46(2-3):156-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.1245
      Liu, X.C., Jiang, B.M., Li, S.Z., 2013.Diachroneity of Continental Subduction and Exhumation:Constraints from the Permian-Triassic HP Metamorphic Terrane in the Tongbai Orogen, Central China.Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(23):2251-2258 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-6067-9.pdf
      Liu, X.C., Jahn, B.M., Li, S.Z., et al., 2013.U-Pb Zircon Age and Geochemical Constraints on Tectonic Evolution of the Paleozoic Accretionary Orogenic System in the Tongbai Orogen, Central China.Tectonophysics, 599:67-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.04.003
      Liu, X.C., Jahn, B.M., Liu, D.Y., et al., 2004a.SHRIMP U-Pb Zircon Dating of a Metagabbro and Eclogites from Western Dabieshan (Hong'an Block), China, and Its Tectonic Implications.Tectonophysics, 394(3-4):171-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2004.08.004
      Liu, X., Wei, C., Li, S., et al., 2004b.Thermobaric Structure of a Traverse across Western Dabieshan:Implications for Collision Tectonics between the Sino-Korean and Yangtze Cratons.Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 22(4):361-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2004.00519.x
      Liu, X.C., Li, S.Z., Jiang, B.M., 2015.Tectonic Evolution of the Tongbai-Hong'an Orogen in Central China:From Oceanic Subduction/Accretion to Continent-Continent Collision.Science in China (Series D), 45(8):1088-1108 (in Chinese). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282540270_Tectonic_evolution_of_the_Tongbai-Hong%27an_orogen_in_central_China_From_oceanic_subductionaccretion_to_continent-continent_collision
      Liu, X., Li, S.Z., Suo, Y.H., et al., 2012.Structural Analysis of the Northern Tongbai Metamorphic Terranes, Central China:Implications for Paleozoic Accretionary Process on the Southern Margin of the North China Craton.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 47:143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.09.002
      Liu, X.C., Lou, Y.X., Dong, S.W., 2005.P-T Path of Low-Temperature Eclogites from the Tongbaishan Area.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 21(4):1081-1093 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.academia.edu/2049908/Metamorphic_structure_of_the_Western_and_Ligurian_Alps
      Liu, Z.G., Fu, Y.L., Niu, B.G., et al., 1993.40Ar/39Ar Dating of Metabasic Complexes from the Sujiahe Group and the Guishan Formation of the Xinyang Group at the Northern Foot of the Dabie Mountains and Its Geological Implications.Chinese Science Bulletin, 38(13):1214-1218 (in Chinese).
      Liu, Z.G., Niu, B.G., Fu, Y.L., et al., 1994.The Tectonostratigraphic Units at the Northern Foot of the Dabie Mountains.Regional Geology of China, (3):246-253 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1007/BF02882254
      Liu, Z.G., Niu, B.G., Ren, J.S., 1992.Disintegration of the Xinyang Group and Its Tectonic Implications.Geological Review, 38 (4):293-301 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ198201001.htm
      Mattauer, M., Matte, P., Malavieille, J., et al., 1985.Tectonics of the Qinling Belt:Build-up and Evolution of Eastern Asia.Nature, 317(6037):496-500. https://doi.org/10.1038/317496a0
      Meng, Q.R., Zhang, G.W., 2000.Geologic Framework and Tectonic Evolution of the Qinling Orogen, Central China.Tectonophysics, 323(3-4):183-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(00)00106-2
      Niu, B.G., Fu, Y.L., Liu, Z.G., et al., 1994.Main Tectonothermal Events and 40Ar/39Ar Dating of the Tongbai-Dabie Mts.Acta Geoscientia Sinica, (1-2):20-34 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQXB4Z1.004.htm
      Niu, H.J., 1995.The Redivision of Liuling Group in Eastern Qinling Area of Central China.Scientia Geologica Sinica, 30 (4):313-320 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/jsedres/article-abstract/82/1/9/99462/geochemical-constraints-on-the-provenance-and
      Ratschbacher, L., Franz, L., Enkelmann, E., et al., 2006. The Sino-Korean-Yangtze Suture, the Huwan Detachment, and the Paleozoic-Tertiary Exhumation of (Ultra)High-Pressure Rocks along the Tongbai-Xinxian-Dabie Mountains. In: Hacker, B. R., McClelland, W. C., Liou, J. G., eds., Ultrahigh-Pressure Metamorphism: Deep Continental Subduction. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 226: 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2403(03)
      Ratschbacher, L., Hacker, B.R., Calvert, A., et al., 2003.Tectonics of the Qinling (Central China):Tectonostratigraphy, Geochronology, and Deformation History.Tectonophysics, 366(1-2):1-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(03)00053-2
      Ren, J.S., Chen, T.Y., Niu, B.G., et al., 1990.Tectonic Evolution of the Continental Lithosphere and Metallogeny in Eastern China and Adjacent Areas.Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Ren, J.S., Jiang, C.F., Zhang, Z.K., et al., 1980.The Geotectonic Evolution of China.Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Ren, J. S., Zhang, Z. K., Niu, B. G., et al., 1991. On the Qinling Orogenic Belt Integration of the Sino-Korean and Yangtze Blocks. In: Ye, L. J., Qian, X. L., Zhang, G. W., eds., A Selection of Papers Presented at the Conference on the Qinling Orogenic Belt. Northwest University Press, Xi'an, 99-110 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Sun, W.D., Williams, I.S., Li, S.G., 2002.Carboniferous and Triassic Eclogites in the Western Dabie Mountains, East-Central China:Evidence for Protracted Convergence of the North and South China Blocks.Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 20(9):873-886. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00418.x
      Wu, Y.B., Hanchar, J.M., Gao, S., et al., 2009.Age and Nature of Eclogites in the Huwan Shear Zone, and the Multi-Stage Evolution of the Qinling-Dabie-Sulu Orogen, Central China.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 277(3-4):345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.031
      Xu, B., Grove, M., Wang, C.Q., et al., 2000.40Ar/39Ar Thermochronology from the Northwestern Dabie Shan:Constraints on the Evolution of Qinling-Dabie Orogenic Belt, East-Central China.Tectonophysics, 322(3-4):279-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(00)00092-5
      Xu, Z.Q., Lu, Y.L., Tang, Y.Q., et al., 1988.Formation and Evolution of the Composition Eastern Qinling Chains and Plate Dynamics.China Ervironmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Xue, F., Lerch, M.F., Kröner, A., et al., 1996.Tectonic Evolution of the East Qinling Mountains, China, in the Palaeozoic:A Review and New Tectonic Model.Tectonophysics, 253(3-4):271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(95)00060-7
      Yu, Z. P., Sun, Y., Zhang, G. W., 1988. Preliminary Research on Fore-Arc Sedimentary Wedge on the Qinling Suture in Shangdan Area. In: Zhang, G. W., et al., eds., Orogenesis and Evolution of the Qinling Orogen. Northwest University Press, Xi'an, 75-85 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhai, X.M., Day, H.W., Hacker, B.R., et al., 1998.Paleozoic Metamorphism in the Qinling Orogen, Tongbai Mountains, Central China.Geology, 26(4):371.https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0371:pmitqo>2.3.co;2 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0371:pmitqo>2.3.co;2
      Zhang, G.W., et al., 1988.Formation and Evolution of the Qinling Orogen.Northwest University Press, Xi'an (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, G.W., Zhang B.R., Yuan X.C., et al., 2001.Qinling Orogenic Belt and Continental Dynamics.Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Chen, K.L., et al., 2006.Study on the Ar-Ar Age Spectrum of Diagenetic I/S and the Mechanism of 39Ar Recoil Loss-Example from the Clay Minerals of P-T Boundary in Changxing, Zhejiang Province.Geological Review, 52(4):556-561 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200604018.htm
      陈文, 张彦, 张岳桥, 等, 2006.青藏高原东南缘晚新生代幕式抬升作用的Ar-Ar热年代学证据.岩石学报, 22(4):867-872. http://www.ysxb.ac.cn/ysxb/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060492&journal_id=ysxb
      黄鹏, 宋传中, 任升莲, 等, 2016.北淮阳构造带的属性及其对板块缝合线位置的启示.地质学报, 90(6):1112-1129. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/magadetail/DZXE201606.htm
      黄少英, 徐备, 王长秋, 等, 2006.桐柏造山带几何学、运动学和演化.中国科学(D辑), 36(3):242-251. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4152365
      简平, 杨巍然, 李志昌, 等, 1997.大别山西部熊店加里东期榴辉岩——同位素年代学的证据.地质学报, 71(2):133-141. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4893962
      刘晓春, 江博明, 李三忠, 2013.大陆岩板俯冲与折返的穿时性:桐柏造山带晚二叠-三叠纪高压变质地体提供的制约.科学通报, 58(23):2251-2258. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4152365
      刘晓春, 李三忠, 江博明, 2015.桐柏-红安造山带的构造演化:从大洋俯冲/增生到陆陆碰撞.中国科学(D辑), 45(8):1088-1108. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4152365
      刘晓春, 娄玉行, 董树文, 2005.桐柏山地区低温榴辉岩变质作用的P-T轨迹.岩石学报, 21(4):1081-1093. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200504006
      刘志刚, 富云莲, 牛宝贵, 等, 1993.大别山北坡苏家河群及原信阳群龟山组变基性杂岩40Ar/39Ar测年及其地质意义.科学通报, 38(13):1214-1218. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=kxtb199313017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
      刘志刚, 牛宝贵, 富云莲, 等, 1994.大别山北麓主要构造岩相带浅析-以信阳地区为例.中国区域地质, (3):246-253. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDZ502.001.htm
      刘志刚, 牛宝贵, 任纪舜, 1992.信阳群的解体及其大地构造意义.地质论评, 38(4):293-301. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200404007.htm
      牛宝贵, 富云莲, 刘志刚, 等, 1994.桐柏-大别山主要构造热事件及40Ar/39Ar地质定年研究.地球学报, (1-2):20-34. http://www.doc88.com/p-0894779254553.html
      牛宏建, 1995.东秦岭地区"刘岭群"的重新划分.地质科学, 30(4):313-320. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD201409011.htm
      任纪舜, 陈廷愚, 牛宝贵, 等, 1990中国东部及邻区大陆岩石圈的构造演化与成矿.北京:科学出版社.
      任纪舜, 姜春发, 张正坤, 等, 1980.中国大地构造及其演化.北京:科学出版社.
      任纪舜, 张正坤, 牛宝贵, 等, 1991. 论秦岭造山带-中朝扬子板块的拼合过程. 见: 叶连俊, 钱祥麟, 张国伟主编, 秦岭造山带学术讨论会论文选集. 西安: 西北大学出版社, 99-110.
      许志琴, 卢一伦, 汤耀庆, 等, 1988.东秦岭复合山链的形成-变形、演化及板块动力学.北京:中国环境科学出版社.
      于在平, 孙勇, 张国伟, 1988. 商丹地区秦岭缝合带弧前沉积楔形体初探. 见: 张国伟等著, 秦岭造山带的形成及其演化. 西安: 西北大学出版社, 75-85.
      张国伟, 等, 1988.秦岭造山带的形成及其演化.西安:西北大学出版社.
      张国伟, 张本仁, 袁学诚, 等, 2001.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.北京:科学出版社, 1-885.
      张彦, 陈文, 陈克龙, 等, 2006.成岩混层(I/S)Ar-Ar年龄谱型及39Ar核反冲丢失机理研究——以浙江长兴地区P-T界线粘土岩为例.地质论评, 52(4):556-561. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=OA000005036
    • 加载中
    图(3) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  5894
    • HTML全文浏览量:  1951
    • PDF下载量:  42
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2017-09-03
    • 刊出日期:  2018-01-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回