• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    塔里木盆地顺北地区下古生界走滑断裂带断距分段差异与断层宽度关系

    周铂文 陈红汉 云露 唐大卿

    周铂文, 陈红汉, 云露, 唐大卿, 2022. 塔里木盆地顺北地区下古生界走滑断裂带断距分段差异与断层宽度关系. 地球科学, 47(2): 437-451. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073
    引用本文: 周铂文, 陈红汉, 云露, 唐大卿, 2022. 塔里木盆地顺北地区下古生界走滑断裂带断距分段差异与断层宽度关系. 地球科学, 47(2): 437-451. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073
    Zhou Bowen, Chen Honghan, Yun Lu, Tang Daqing, 2022. The Relationship between Fault Displacement and Damage Zone Width of the Paleozoic Strike-Slip Faults in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 47(2): 437-451. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073
    Citation: Zhou Bowen, Chen Honghan, Yun Lu, Tang Daqing, 2022. The Relationship between Fault Displacement and Damage Zone Width of the Paleozoic Strike-Slip Faults in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 47(2): 437-451. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073

    塔里木盆地顺北地区下古生界走滑断裂带断距分段差异与断层宽度关系

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073
    基金项目: 

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)课题 2012CB214804

    国家重点自然科学基金 41730421

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      周铂文(1988-), 男, 博士, 主要从事地球物理学、碳酸盐岩走滑断裂和油气成藏过程方面的研究.ORCID: 0000-0001-8479-4597.E-mail: bwzhou@cug.edu.cn

      通讯作者:

      陈红汉, ORCID: 0000-0001-6968-412X.E-mail: hhchen@cug.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P548

    The Relationship between Fault Displacement and Damage Zone Width of the Paleozoic Strike-Slip Faults in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin

    • 摘要: 学者们对塔里木盆地顺北地区的下古生界走滑断裂带活动期次、发育时间、分段性和内部结构差异展开过一些研究,但尚未达成共识.厘清断距和断层宽度的分段差异.有助于对该地区走滑断裂展开更详细的研究.以200 m水平间距统计下古生界走滑断裂断距和断层宽度,采用线性拟合的方式落实断距与断层宽度之间的定量关系.结果表明:(1)顺北1号走滑断裂上覆志留系中的雁列正断层以T70界面为主要活动界面且以向上发育为主.顺北5号断裂T74界面的压脊活动在加里东中期Ⅰ幕开始并在加里东中期Ⅲ幕之前停止,对应上覆加里东晚期的地堑构造以T70为主要活动界面且主要向下发育.(2)以T74界面为基准,认为走滑断层断距(x)与断层宽度(y)呈良好的正相关关系.顺北1号断裂:y=42.206x+137.74,r2=0.7404;顺北5号断裂:y=0.072 6x2+15.85x+196.95,r2=0.774 9.相关系数受走滑断裂的分段性和晚期活动叠加影响.拉分活动容易产生更宽的破碎带.

       

    • 图  1  塔里木盆地顺北三维工区地理位置及中-下奥陶统岩性综合柱状图

      Fig.  1.  The location of Shunbei area and its synthesized lithological column of the Middle and Lower Ordovician in Tarim basin

      图  2  SB F1走滑断裂带T74界面断裂体系图(左)及分段特征(右)

      Fig.  2.  The map of SB F1 strike⁃slip faulton T74 boundary and its segmental feature (right)

      图  3  SB F5断裂带T74界面断裂体系图(左)及其相干体显示的分段性特征(右)

      Fig.  3.  The map of SB F5 strike⁃slip fault (left) and segmental feature indicated by coherent imaging (right) on T74 boundary

      图  4  SB F5走滑断裂带典型花状构造剖面特征

      剖面位置如图 3左所示

      Fig.  4.  The typical flower structure on seismic profiles of SB F5 strike⁃slip fault

      图  5  SB F1断裂带典型花状构造剖面

      剖面位置如图 2左所示

      Fig.  5.  The typical flower structure on seismic profiles of SB F1 fault

      图  6  SB F1断裂带走滑断层落差沿走向变化

      剖面号位置见图 2

      Fig.  6.  The vertical displacement of strike⁃slip fault of SB F1 from SW to NE

      图  7  SB F1断裂雁列正断层断距沿走向变化

      剖面号位置见图 2

      Fig.  7.  The vertical displacement of en⁃echelon faults of SB F1

      图  8  SB F5走滑断裂下古生界各界面上升断距

      剖面号位置见图 3

      Fig.  8.  The vertical uplifting displacement of each boundaries of the Lower Paleozoic of SB F5 strike⁃slip fault

      图  9  SB F5走滑断裂下古生界各界面下降断距

      剖面号位置见图 3

      Fig.  9.  The vertical declining displacement of each boundaries of the Lower Paleozoic of SB F5 strike⁃slip fault

      图  10  SB F1走滑断裂带T74界面分段差异落差(绝对值)与断裂带宽度的关系

      Fig.  10.  The relationship betweenvertical displacement and width of damage zone on T74 boundary for different segments of SB F1 strike⁃slip fault

      图  11  SB F5走滑断裂带T74界面上升断距与断裂带宽度的关系

      Fig.  11.  The relationship between vertical displacement and width of damage zone on T74 boundary for different segments of SB F5 strike⁃slip fault

    • Bao, D., Zhang, H.T., 2017. Description of the Separation in Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoirs in TAHE Oilfield. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 13(1): 25-30(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Bastesen, E., Braathen, A, 2010. Extensional Faults in Fine Grained Carbonates: Analysis of Fault Core Lithology and Thickness-Displacement Relationships. Journal of Structural Geology, 32(11): 1609-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2010.09.008
      Billi, A., Salvini, F., Storti, F, 2003. The Damage Zone-Fault Core Transition in Carbonate Rocks: Implications for Fault Growth, Structure and Permeability. Journal of Structural Geology, 25(11): 1779-1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00037-3
      Chang, S.Y., Zhuang, X.J., Deng, X.L., et al., 2017. Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoir Prediction: a Case Study in Ordovician Buried Hills, HLHT Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 52(S1): 199-206, 13(in Chinese with English abstract). http://search.cnki.net/down/default.aspx?filename=SYDQ2017S1033&dbcode=CJFD&year=2017&dflag=pdfdown
      Choi, J. H., Edwards, P., Ko, K., et al., 2016. Definition and Classification of Fault Damage Zones: aReview and a New Methodological Approach. Earth-Science Reviews, 152: 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.11.006
      Deng, S., Li, H. L., Han, J., et al., 2019. Characteristics of the Central Segment of Shunbei 5 Strike-Slip Fault in Tarim Basin and Its Geological Significance. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(5): 990-998(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Deng, S., Li, H. L., Zhang, Z. P., et al., 2019. Structural Characterization of Intracratonic Strike-Slip Faults in the Central Tarim Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 103(1): 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1306/06071817354
      Deng, S., Li, H.L., Zhang, Z.P., et al., 2018. Characteristics of Differential Activities in Major Strike-Slip Fault Zones and Their Control on Hydrocarbon Enrichment in Shunbei Area and Its Surroundings, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 39(5): 878-888(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SYYT201805004.htm
      Han, X. Y., Tang, L. J., Cao, Z. C. et al., 2018. Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Composite Flower Structures in Northern Slope of Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 43(2): 525-537(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Huang, C., 2019. Multi-Stage Activity Characteristics of Small-Scale Strike-Slip Faults in Superimposed Basin and ItsIdentification Method: a Case Study of Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Ecperiment, 41(3): 379-389(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Huang, L., Liu, C. Y., 2019. Genesis and Significance of Hybrid Flower Structure in a Transnational Fault Zone. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 40(12): 1460-1469(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jiao, F. Z, 2018. Significance and Prospect of Ultra-Deep Carbonate Fault-Karst Reservoirs in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 39(2): 207-216(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/325534119_Significance_and_prospect_of_ultra-deep_carbonate_fault-karst_reservoirs_in_Shunbei_area_Tarim_Basin
      Li, P. J., Chen, H. H., Tang, D. Q., et al., 2017. Coupling Relationship between NE Strike-Slip Faults and Hypogenic Karstification in Middle-Lower Ordovician of Shunnan Area, Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Earth Science, 42(1): 93-104(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201701008.htm
      Li, P.F., Cui, D.Y., Tian, H. N, 2017. Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoir Description with GeoEast Interpretation Sub-System in the Tabei Area, Tarim Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 52(S1): 189-194, 13(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ2017S1031.htm
      Liu, B. Z., Qi, L. X., Li, Z. J., et al., 2020. Spatial Characterization and Quantitative Description Technology for Ultra-Deep Fault-Karst Reservoirs in the Shunbei Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41(4): 412-420(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lu, X.B., Hu, W.G., Wang, Y., et al., 2015. Characteristics and Development Practice of Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoirs in Tahe Area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 36(3): 347-355(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/syytrqdz201503001
      Qi, L. X., 2020. Characteristics and Inspiration of Ultra-Deep Fault-Karst Reservoir in The Shunbei Area of the Tarim Basin. China Petroleum, 25(1): 102-111(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, X., Wang, G.M., Liu, D.Q., et al., 2012. Analysis of Seismic Volume Attributes and Their Application. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 47(S1): 45-49, 165, 162(in Chinese with English abstract). http://search.cnki.net/down/default.aspx?filename=SYDQ2012S1010&dbcode=CJFD&year=2012&dflag=pdfdown
      Wang, Y.W., Chen, H.H., Cao, Z.C., et al., 2019. Forming Mechanism of Ordovician Microbial Carbonate Reservoir in Northern Slope of Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 44(2): 559-571(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Z., Wen, H., Deng, G.X., et al., 2019. Fault-Karst Characterization Technology in the Tahe Oilfield, China. Geophysical Prospectingfor Petroleum, 58(1): 149-154(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Welbon, A. I., Brockbank, P. J., McCallum, J. E., etal., 1999. Reservoir Damage around Faults; Outcrop Examples from the Suez Rift. Petroleum Geoscience, 5(2): 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.5.2.109
      Wibberley, C. A.J., Yielding, G., diToro, G., 2008. Recent Advances in the Understanding of Fault Zone Internal Structure: a Review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 299(1): 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp299.2
      Xu, H.X., Shen, C.G., Li, B., et al., 2017. Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoir Prediction with Comprehensive Multi-Attribute Analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 52(S2): 158-163, 8(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yuan, Y. X., 2020. Study on the Characteristics of Strike-Slip Faults in the North Section of No. 5 Shunbei and Its Controlling and Storage Effect(Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing(in Chinese with English abstract).
      鲍典, 张慧涛, 2017. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏分隔性描述方法研究. 新疆石油与天然气, 13(1): 25-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY201701006.htm
      常少英, 庄锡进, 邓兴梁, 等, 2017. 断溶体油藏离效井预测方法与应用效果——以HLHT油田奥陶系潜山区为例. 石油地球物理勘探, 52(S1): 199-206. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ2017S1033.htm
      邓尚, 李慧莉, 韩俊, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂中段活动特征及其地质意义. 石油与天然气地质, 40(5): 990-998. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905004.htm
      邓尚, 李慧莉, 张仲培, 等, 2018. 塔里木盆地顺北及邻区主干走滑断裂带差异活动特征及其与油气富集关系. 石油与天然气地质, 39(5): 878-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805004.htm
      韩晓影, 汤良杰, 曹自成, 等, 2018. 塔中北坡"复合花状"构造发育特征及成因机制. 地球科学, 43(2): 525-537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201802014.htm
      黄诚, 2019. 叠合盆地内部小尺度走滑断裂幕式活动特征及期次判别-以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例. 石油实验地质, 41(3): 379-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201903012.htm
      黄雷, 刘池洋, 2019. 张扭断裂带内复合花状构造的成因与意义. 石油学报, 40(12): 1460-1469. doi: 10.7623/syxb201912005
      焦方正, 2018. 塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩断溶体油气藏发现意义与前景. 石油与天然气地质, 39(2): 207-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201802002.htm
      李培军, 陈红汉, 唐大卿, 等, 2017. 塔里木盆地顺南地区中-下奥陶统NE向走滑断裂及其与深成岩溶作用的耦合关系. 地球科学, 42(1): 93-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201701008.htm
      李鹏飞, 崔德育, 田浩男, 2017. 塔里木盆地塔北地区X区块断溶体刻画方法与效果. 石油地球物理勘探, 52(S1): 189-194. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ2017S1031.htm
      刘宝增, 漆立新, 李宗杰, 等, 2020. 顺北地区超深层断溶体储层空间雕刻及量化描述技术. 石油学报, 41(4): 412-420. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202004006.htm
      鲁新便, 胡文革, 汪彦, 等, 2015. 塔河地区碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏特征与开发实践. 石油与天然气地质, 36(3): 347-355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503003.htm
      漆立新, 2020. 塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示. 中国石油勘探, 25(1): 102-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.01.010
      王霞, 汪关妹, 刘东琴, 等, 2012. 地震体属性分析技术及应用. 石油地球物理勘探, 47(S1): 45-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ2012S1010.htm
      王玉伟, 陈红汉, 曹自成, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地塔中北坡奥陶系微生物碳酸盐岩储层形成机制与评价. 地球科学, 44(2): 209-221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2019.02.007
      王震, 文欢, 邓光校, 等, 2019. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩断溶体刻画技术研究与应用. 石油物探, 58(1): 149-154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2019.01.017
      徐红霞, 沈春光, 李斌, 等, 2017. 多属性分析技术在碳酸盐岩断溶体预测中的应用. 石油地球物理勘探, 52(S2): 158-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ2017S2027.htm
      苑雅轩, 2020. 顺北5号北段走滑断裂特征及其控储作用研究(博士毕业论文). 北京: 中国地质大学.
    • 加载中
    图(11)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  1051
    • HTML全文浏览量:  471
    • PDF下载量:  119
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2021-10-11
    • 刊出日期:  2022-02-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回