• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带中北段发育特征及控藏作用

    王珍 唐大卿 康志江 黄孝特 曹自成 洪才均 刘秀岩

    王珍, 唐大卿, 康志江, 黄孝特, 曹自成, 洪才均, 刘秀岩, 2023. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带中北段发育特征及控藏作用. 地球科学, 48(11): 4117-4134. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.091
    引用本文: 王珍, 唐大卿, 康志江, 黄孝特, 曹自成, 洪才均, 刘秀岩, 2023. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带中北段发育特征及控藏作用. 地球科学, 48(11): 4117-4134. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.091
    Wang Zhen, Tang Daqing, Kang Zhijiang, Huang Xiaote, Cao Zicheng, Hong Caijun, Liu Xiuyan, 2023. Development Characteristics and Its Role in Controlling Oil and Gas Accumulation of Mid-North Part of Shunbei No. 5 Strike-Slip Fault Zone in Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 48(11): 4117-4134. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.091
    Citation: Wang Zhen, Tang Daqing, Kang Zhijiang, Huang Xiaote, Cao Zicheng, Hong Caijun, Liu Xiuyan, 2023. Development Characteristics and Its Role in Controlling Oil and Gas Accumulation of Mid-North Part of Shunbei No. 5 Strike-Slip Fault Zone in Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 48(11): 4117-4134. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.091

    塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带中北段发育特征及控藏作用

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.091
    基金项目: 

    “国家科技重大专项” 2016ZX05014

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      王珍(1999—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事构造地质学和油气成藏过程方面的研究工作. ORCID:0000-0002-3388-5816. E-mail:1597750696@qq.com

      通讯作者:

      唐大卿,E-mail:tangdqcug@sina.com

    • 中图分类号: P54

    Development Characteristics and Its Role in Controlling Oil and Gas Accumulation of Mid-North Part of Shunbei No. 5 Strike-Slip Fault Zone in Tarim Basin

    • 摘要: 顺北地区的主干断裂带是油气有利富集区带,为明确该地区走滑断裂对油气藏的控制作用,通过对顺北5号走滑断裂带中北段三维地震资料精细解释,并综合前人研究成果及油气勘探实践,探讨了顺北5号走滑断裂中北段的差异活动特征及其控藏作用.研究表明:(1)顺北5号走滑断裂带古生界以线形和雁列正断层展布为主,中新生界断裂平面展布与古生界断裂几乎无空间耦合关系;剖面上深层表现为陡直走滑断裂,中浅层呈花状构造样式.(2)顺北5号走滑断裂带分段差异活动特征明显,可细分出压扭、张扭和纯走滑共16段.(3)顺北5号走滑断裂带经历了多期构造运动叠加改造,其中以加里东中期Ⅰ幕、加里东中期Ⅲ幕、加里东晚期‒海西早期以及海西中晚期为主要活动时期.(4)走滑断裂带的平面分段样式、纵向结构样式和活动强度差异造成了同一断裂带不同部位储集体规模和油藏规模的差异.

       

    • 图  1  研究区构造区划及工区位置

      Fig.  1.  Structure units and location of study area

      图  2  顺北5号走滑断裂带T$ {}_{7}^{4} $界面断裂体系

      a.人工解释断裂体系;b.相干切片;c.相干切片叠合断裂;d.曲率切片;e.曲率切片叠合断裂

      Fig.  2.  Diagram of the T$ {}_{7}^{4} $ interface fault system in Shunbei No. 5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  3  顺北5号走滑断裂带古生界‒新生界主要层位界面断裂体系分布

      Fig.  3.  Distribution of main stratum fault systems of the Paleozoic-Cenozoic in Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  5  顺北5号走滑断裂带平面分段图及不同分段样式地震剖面

      a.平面分段图;b.压扭段;c.张扭段;d.纯走滑段

      Fig.  5.  Sublevel of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone and seismic profile of different sublevel patterns

      图  4  顺北5号走滑断裂带剖面构造样式(剖面位置见图 2

      Fig.  4.  Structural style of the section of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone(the profile locations are shown in Fig. 2)

      图  6  顺北5号走滑断裂带压扭变形特征及机制

      a.剖面图;b.平面图;c.物理模拟对比图

      Fig.  6.  Compression-uplift deformation characteristics and mechanism of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  7  顺北5号走滑断裂带张扭构造特征平/剖面图

      a.剖面图;b.平面图

      Fig.  7.  Plane/profile characteristics of transtensional structure in Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  8  顺北5号走滑断裂带纯走滑构造特征平/剖面

      a.剖面图;b.平面图

      Fig.  8.  Plane/profile characteristics of pure strike-slip structure in Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  9  顺北5号走滑断裂典型剖面特征

      Fig.  9.  Typical profile characteristics of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault

      图  10  顺北5号走滑断裂带活动范围及活动强度

      a.断裂平面展布图;b.断裂破碎带范围;c.断裂活动强度

      Fig.  10.  Activity range and activity intensity of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  11  顺北5号走滑断裂带加里东中期Ⅰ幕活动特征模式

      Fig.  11.  Model diagram of activity characteristics of Middle Caledonian Ⅰin Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  12  顺北5井实钻轨迹及标定图(据西北局资料)

      Fig.  12.  Actual drilling trajectory and calibration of Well Shunbei No.5 (according to the Northwest Bureau)

      图  14  顺北5号走滑断裂带不同断裂段形态特征及断缝体储层发育模式

      a.压扭段;b.张扭段;c.纯走滑段

      Fig.  14.  Geological modeling diagram of internal structure and reservoir fractures of different segments in Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      图  13  顺北5井成藏模式立体图(据漆立新2020, 修改)

      Fig.  13.  Stereo diagram of reservoir forming mode of Well Shunbei No.5(according to Qi, 2020, modified)

      表  1  顺北5号走滑断裂带分段差异活动特征统计

      Table  1.   Statistics of subsection differential activity characteristics of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      段裂名称 分段号 长度(km) 走向 活动性质 剖面特征 段层数(个) 断穿层位
      顺北5号走滑断裂带 5-1 4.75 NNW 右行压扭 两条、直立 9 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      5-2 1.50 NNW 右行张扭 半花状、直立 1 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      5-3 3.21 NNW 右行走滑 负花状、直立 6 基底-T$ {}_{7}^{0} $
      5-4 1.73 NNW 右行压扭 正花状、直立 6 基底-T$ {}_{7}^{0} $
      5-5 1.86 NNW 右行走滑 正花状、直立 3 基底-T$ {}_{7}^{0} $
      5-6 1.97 NNW 右行张扭 负花状、直立 2 基底-T$ {}_{7}^{0} $
      5-7 5.14 NNW 右行压扭 正花状、直立 15 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      5-8 3.20 NNW 右行走扭 单条、东倾 5 基底-T$ {}_{7}^{0} $
      5-9 3.41 NNW 右行压扭 正花状、直立 6 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      5-10 1.24 NNW 右行走扭 正花状、直立 2 基底-T$ {}_{5}^{0} $
      5-11 3.50 NNW 右行压扭 正花状、直立 6 基底-T$ {}_{5}^{0} $
      5-12 1.54 ~SN 右行张扭 负花状、直立 2 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      5-13 1.42 ~SN 右行走扭 半花状、直立 1 基底-T$ {}_{5}^{0} $
      5-14 1.81 ~SN 右行张扭 负花状、直立 2 基底-T$ {}_{5}^{0} $
      5-15 4.48 ~SN 右行走扭 半花状、直立 9 基底-T$ {}_{5}^{0} $
      5-16 7.25 ~SN 右行压扭 两条、直立 13 基底-T$ {}_{6}^{0} $
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  顺北5号走滑断裂带单井油气产量统计

      Table  2.   Statistics of single well oil and gas production in Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone

      断裂构造样式 井号 累计产油量(104t) 累计产气量(104m3
      张扭 SHB51X 4.31 1 005
      压扭 SHB5 4.81 347
      SHB5-1X 2.70 306
      SHB5-12H 1.92 158
      SHB5-6 0.80 205
      纯走滑 SHB5-10 1.04 334
      SHB5-4H 2.33 120
      SHB5-5H 0.56 173
      纯走滑+压扭 SHB5-2 1.78 134
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Cao, Z. C., Lu, Q, H., Gu, Y., et al., 2020. Characteristics of Ordovician Reservoirs in Shunbei 1 and 5 Fault Zones, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 41(5): 975-984 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, Q. L., Yang, X., Chu, C. L., et al., 2015. Recognition of Depositional Environment of Cambrian Source Rocks in Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 36(6): 880-887 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cheng, H., Wang, Y., Lu, X. B., 2020. Classifications and Characteristics of Deep Carbonate Fault-Karst Trap in Tahe Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41(3): 301-309 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Deng, S., Li, H., Zhang, Z., et al., 2019. Structural Characterization of Intracratonic Strike-Slip Faults in the Central Tarim Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 103(1): 109-137. doi: 10.1306/06071817354
      Deng, S., Li, H. L., Han, J., et al., 2019. Characteristics of the Central Segment of Shunbei No. 5 Strike-Slip Fault Zone in Tarim Basin and Its Geological Significance. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(5): 990-998, 1073 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Deng, S., Li, H. L., Zhang, Z. P., et al., 2018. Characteristics of Differential Activities in Major Strike-Slip Fault Zones and Their Control on Hydrocarbon Enrichment in Shunbei Area and its Surroundings, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 39(5): 878-888 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Deng, S., Liu, Y. Q., Liu, J., et al., 2021. Structural Styles and Evolution Models of Intracratonic Strike-Slip Faults and the Implications for Reservoir Exploration and Appraisal: A Case Study of the Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 45(6): 1111-1126 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Deng, S., Zhao, R., Kong, Q., et al., 2022. Two Distinct Strike-Slip Fault Networks in the Shunbei Area and Its Surroundings, Tarim Basin: Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Distribution and Controlling Factors. AAPG Bulletin, 106: 77-102. doi: 10.1306/07202119113
      Guo, C., Chen, D. Z., Fu, Y., et al., 2022. Origin of Burrow-Associated Dolomites and Its Reservoir Implications: A Case Study From the Lower-Middle Ordovician Carbonates of Tarim Basin (NW China). Journal of Earth Science, 1-53.
      Han, J. F., Su, Z., Chen, L. X., et al., 2019. Reservoir- Controlling and Accumulation-Controlling of Strike-Slip Faults and Exploration Potential in the Platform of Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 40(11): 1296-1310 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Han, X. Y., Tang, L. J., Cao, Z. C., et al., 2018. Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Composite Flower Structures Northern Slope of Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 43(2): 525-537 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Huang, C., 2019. Multi-Stage Activity Characteristics of Small-Scale Strike-Slip Faults in Superimposed Basin and Its Identification Method: A Case Study of Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 41(3): 379-389 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jiang, T., Han, J., Wu, G., et al., 2020. Differences and Controlling Factors of Composite Hydrocarbon Accumulations in the Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(2): 229-241. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60042-8
      Jiao, F. Z., 2017. Significance of Oil and Gas Exploration in NE Strike-Slip Fault Belts in Shuntuoguole Area of Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 38(5): 831-839 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jiao, F. Z., 2018. Significance and Prospect of Ultra-Deep Carbonate Fault-Karst Reservoirs in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 39(2): 207-216 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jin, Z. J., 2006. New Progresses in Research of China's Typical Superimposed Basins and Reservoiring of Hydrocarbons (PartⅡ) : Taking Tarim Basin as an Example. Oil & Gas Geology, 27(3): 281-288, 294 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, P. J., Chen, H. H., Tang, D. Q., et al., 2017. Coupling Relationship between NE Strike-Slip Faults and Hypogenic Karstification in Middle-Lower Ordovician of Shunnan Area, Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Earth Science, 42(1): 93-104 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Y. T., Qi, L. X., Zhang, S. N., et al., 2019. Characteristics and Development Mode of the Middle and Lower Ordovician Fault-Karst Reservoir in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 40(12): 1470-1484 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lin, B., Zhang, X., Kuang, A. P., et al., 2021. Strcutural Deformation Characteristics of Strike-Slip Faults in Tarim Basin and Their Hydrocarbon Significance: A Case Study of No. 1 Fault and No. 5 Fault in Shunbei Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 42(7): 906-923 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, B. Z., 2020. Analysis of Main Controlling Factors of Oil and Gas Differential Accumulationin Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin-Taking Shunbei No. 1 and No. 5 Strike Slip Fault Zones as Examples. China Petroleum Exploration, 25(3): 83-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lu, X. B., Hu, W. G., Wang, Y., et al., 2015. Characteristics and Development Practice of Fault-Karst Carbonate Reservoirs in Tahe Area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 36(3): 347-355 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Luo, M. X., Xia, Y. T., Shao, X. M., et al., 2019. Geochemical Characteristics and Origin of Oil from Different Strata in Shunbei Oil and Gas Field, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 41(6): 849-854 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lü, H. T., Han, J., Zhang, J. B., et al., 2021. Development Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of U-Deep Carbonate Fault-Dissolution Body in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 43(1): 14-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lü, X. X., Zhang, Y. P., Jing, B., et al., 2016. Characteristics of Ordovician Reservoirs in Shunbei 1 and 5 Fault Zones, Tarim Basin. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 35(5): 839-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ma, D., Wang, Z., Duan, S., et al., 2018. Strike-Slip Faults and Their Significance for Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Gaoshiti-Moxi Area, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 45(5): 851-861. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30088-0
      Ma, Q. Y., Sha, X. G., Li, Y. L., et al., 2012. Characteristics of Strike-Slip Fault and Its Controlling on Oil in Shuntuoguole Region, Middle Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 34(2): 120-124 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ma, Y. S., Cai, X, Y., Yun, L., et al., 2022. Practice and Theoretical and Technical Progress in Exploration and Development of Shunbei Ultra-Deep Carbonate Oil and Gas Field, Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 49(1): 1-17 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60001-6
      Qi, L. X., 2014. Exploration Practice and Prospects of Giant Carbonate Field in the Lower Paleozoic of Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 35(6): 771-779 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qi, L. X., 2020. Characteristics and Inspiration of Ultra-Deep Fault-Karst Reservoir in the Shunbei Area of the Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 25(1): 102-111 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qiu, B., Deng, S., Cao, Z., et al., 2019. The Evolution of the Complex Anticlinal Belt with Crosscutting Strike-Slip Faults in the Central Tarim Basin, NW China. Tectonics, 38(6): 2087-2113. doi: 10.1029/2018TC005229
      Sun, Q., Fan, T., Gao, Z., et al., 2021. New Insights on the Geometry and Kinematics of the Shunbei 5 Strike-Slip Fault in the Central Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Structural Geology, 150: 104400. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104400
      Tang, L. J., Qi, L. X., Qiu, H. J., et al., 2012. Poly-Phase Differential Fault Movement and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of the Tarim Basin, NW China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(8): 2569-2583 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, B., Zhao, Y. Q., He, S., et al., 2020. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Stages and Their Controlling Factors in the Northern Ordovician Shunbei No. 5 Fault Zone, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 41(5): 965-974 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yan, L., Zhu, G. Y., Chen, Y. Q., et al., 2019. Distribution of Lower Cambrian Source Rocks in the Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 30(11): 1569-1578 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, Y., Wang, B., Cao, Z. C., et al., 2021. Genesis and Formation Time of Calcite Veins of Middle-Lower Ordovician Reservoirs in Northern Shuntuoguole Low-Uplift, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 46(6): 2246-2257 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yun, L., Cao, Z. C., 2014. Hydrocarbon Enrichment Pattern and Exploration Potential of the Ordovician in Shunnan Area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 35(6): 788-797 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, R., Zhao, T., Li, H. L., et al., 2019. Fault- Controlled Fracture-Cavity Reservoir Characterization and Main-Controlling Factors in the Shunbei Hydrocarbon Field of Tarim Basin. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 26(5): 8-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zheng, X. L., An, H. T., Wang, Z. J., et al., 2018. The Segmentation Features of Strike-Slip Fault and Its Relation with the Fault and Reservoirs in Halahatang Area, North Tarim Basin. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 45(2): 219-225 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, B. W., Chen, H. H., Yun, L., et al., 2022. The Relationship between Fault Displacement and Damage Zone Width of the Paleozoic Strike-Slip Faults in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 47(2): 437-451 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      曹自成, 路清华, 顾忆, 等, 2020. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田1号和5号断裂带奥陶系油气藏特征. 石油与天然气地质, 41(5): 975-984. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005009.htm
      陈强路, 杨鑫, 储呈林, 等, 2015. 塔里木盆地寒武系烃源岩沉积环境再认识. 石油与天然气地质, 36(6): 880-887. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201506004.htm
      程洪, 汪彦, 鲁新便, 2020. 塔河地区深层碳酸盐岩断溶体圈闭类型及特征. 石油学报, 41(3): 301-309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202003007.htm
      邓尚, 李慧莉, 韩俊, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂中段活动特征及其地质意义. 石油与天然气地质, 40(5): 990-998, 1073. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905004.htm
      邓尚, 李慧莉, 张仲培, 等, 2018. 塔里木盆地顺北及邻区主干走滑断裂带差异活动特征及其与油气富集的关系. 石油与天然气地质, 39(5): 878-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805004.htm
      邓尚, 刘雨晴, 刘军, 等, 2021. 克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂发育、演化特征及其石油地质意义: 以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例. 大地构造与成矿学, 45(6): 1111-1126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK202106003.htm
      韩剑发, 苏洲, 陈利新, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地台盆区走滑断裂控储控藏作用及勘探潜力. 石油学报, 40(11): 1296-1310. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201911002.htm
      韩晓影, 汤良杰, 曹自成, 等, 2018. 塔中北坡"复合花状"构造发育特征及成因机制. 地球科学, 43(2): 525-537. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.600
      黄诚, 2019. 叠合盆地内部小尺度走滑断裂幕式活动特征及期次判别——以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例. 石油实验地质, 41(3): 379-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201903012.htm
      焦方正, 2017. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区北东向走滑断裂带的油气勘探意义. 石油与天然气地质, 38(5): 831-839. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705001.htm
      焦方正, 2018. 塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩断溶体油气藏发现意义与前景. 石油与天然气地质, 39(2): 207-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201802002.htm
      金之钧, 2006. 中国典型叠合盆地油气成藏研究新进展(之二): 以塔里木盆地为例. 石油与天然气地质, 27(3): 281-288, 294. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202201008.htm
      李培军, 陈红汉, 唐大卿, 等, 2017. 塔里木盆地顺南地区中‒下奥陶统NE向走滑断裂及其与深成岩溶作用的耦合关系. 地球科学, 42(1): 93-104. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.007
      李映涛, 漆立新, 张哨楠, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地顺北地区中‒下奥陶统断溶体储层特征及发育模式. 石油学报, 40(12): 1470-1484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201912005.htm
      林波, 张旭, 况安鹏, 等, 2021. 塔里木盆地走滑断裂构造变形特征及油气意义——以顺北地区1号和5号断裂为例. 石油学报, 42(7): 906-923. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202107007.htm
      刘宝增, 2020. 塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析——以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例. 中国石油勘探, 25(3): 83-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202003008.htm
      鲁新便, 胡文革, 汪彦, 等, 2015. 塔河地区碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏特征与开发实践. 石油与天然气地质, 36(3): 347-355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503003.htm
      罗明霞, 夏永涛, 邵小明, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田不同层系原油地球化学特征对比及成因分析. 石油实验地质, 41(6): 849-854. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201906009.htm
      吕海涛, 韩俊, 张继标, 等, 2021. 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深碳酸盐岩断溶体发育特征与形成机制. 石油实验地质, 43(1): 14-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202101003.htm
      吕修祥, 张艳萍, 敬兵, 等, 2016. 走滑断层弯曲破碎带特征及对深部岩溶储集层发育的控制作用. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 35(5): 839-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201605008.htm
      马庆佑, 沙旭光, 李玉兰, 等, 2012. 塔中顺托果勒区块走滑断裂特征及控油作用. 石油实验地质, 34(2): 120-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201202005.htm
      马永生, 蔡勋育, 云露, 等, 2022. 塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展. 石油勘探与开发, 49(1): 1-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202201001.htm
      漆立新, 2014. 塔里木盆地下古生界碳酸盐岩大油气田勘探实践与展望. 石油与天然气地质, 35(6): 771-779. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406006.htm
      漆立新, 2020. 塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示. 中国石油勘探, 25(1): 102-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001010.htm
      汤良杰, 漆立新, 邱海峻, 等, 2012. 塔里木盆地断裂构造分期差异活动及其变形机理. 岩石学报, 28(8): 2569-2583. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201208023.htm
      王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 等, 2020. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素. 石油与天然气地质, 41(5): 965-974. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005008.htm
      闫磊, 朱光有, 陈永权, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地下寒武统烃源岩分布. 天然气地球科学, 30(11): 1569-1578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201911004.htm
      杨毅, 王斌, 曹自成, 等, 2021. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒低隆起北部中下奥陶统储层方解石脉成因及形成时间. 地球科学, 46(6): 2246-2257. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.200
      云露, 曹自成, 2014. 塔里木盆地顺南地区奥陶系油气富集与勘探潜力. 石油与天然气地质, 35(6): 788-797. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406008.htm
      赵锐, 赵腾, 李慧莉, 等, 2019. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田断控缝洞型储层特征与主控因素. 特种油气藏, 26(5): 8-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201905002.htm
      郑晓丽, 安海亭, 王祖君, 等, 2018. 塔北哈拉哈塘地区走滑断裂分段特征及其与油气成藏的关系. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 45(2): 219-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZDX201802013.htm
      周铂文, 陈红汉, 云露, 等, 2022. 塔里木盆地顺北地区下古生界走滑断裂带断距分段差异与断层宽度关系. 地球科学, 47(2): 437-451. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.073
    • 加载中
    图(14) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  261
    • HTML全文浏览量:  670
    • PDF下载量:  51
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2021-04-13
    • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-30
    • 刊出日期:  2023-11-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回