• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    断陷盆地火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义: 以吉林省九台全取心井下白垩统营城组为例

    户景松 唐华风 余雪英 黄玉龙 王璞珺 高有峰

    户景松, 唐华风, 余雪英, 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 高有峰, 2024. 断陷盆地火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义: 以吉林省九台全取心井下白垩统营城组为例. 地球科学, 49(1): 155-173. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.123
    引用本文: 户景松, 唐华风, 余雪英, 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 高有峰, 2024. 断陷盆地火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义: 以吉林省九台全取心井下白垩统营城组为例. 地球科学, 49(1): 155-173. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.123
    Hu Jingsong, Tang Huafeng, Yu Xueying, Huang Yulong, Wang Pujun, Gao Youfeng, 2024. Characteristics of Volcano Stratigraphic Elements in Faulted Depression Basin and Its Geologic Significance: A Case Analysis of Full Coring Well of Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Jiutai, Jilin Province. Earth Science, 49(1): 155-173. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.123
    Citation: Hu Jingsong, Tang Huafeng, Yu Xueying, Huang Yulong, Wang Pujun, Gao Youfeng, 2024. Characteristics of Volcano Stratigraphic Elements in Faulted Depression Basin and Its Geologic Significance: A Case Analysis of Full Coring Well of Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Jiutai, Jilin Province. Earth Science, 49(1): 155-173. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.123

    断陷盆地火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义: 以吉林省九台全取心井下白垩统营城组为例

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.123
    基金项目: 

    国家重点研发计划项目 2019YFC0605402

    国家自然科学基金重大项目 41790453

    国家科学技术部重大专项 2016ZX05026-004-001

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      户景松(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事火山地层和火山岩储层研究. ORCID:0000-0002-9418-3981. E-mail:hujingsong98@163.com

      通讯作者:

      高有峰,E-mail: gaoyoufeng@jlu.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P618.13

    Characteristics of Volcano Stratigraphic Elements in Faulted Depression Basin and Its Geologic Significance: A Case Analysis of Full Coring Well of Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Jiutai, Jilin Province

    • 摘要: 火山地层具有特殊的时空属性和地质记录特征,但在盆地充填分析时未引起足够重视.为进一步明确火山地层的地质属性,利用松辽盆地下白垩统营城组全取心浅钻井(营一D1和营三D1井)资料开展火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义研究.营一D1井营城组一段和营三D1井营城组三段火山地层分别识别出3个和2个喷发间断不整合界面、10个和8个喷发整合/不整合界面.根据喷发间断不整合界面属性可知,营一D1井和营三D1井火山地层可分别划分为4个和3个火山机构,稀土和微量元素对火山机构有较好的响应.堆积单元有简单熔岩流、辫状熔岩流、穹丘、热碎屑流、热基浪和火山泥石流6类,熔岩类单元喷发时的火山气体排放强度弱于火山碎屑岩类单元.火山地层具有建造时间短暂和间断时间长久的时间属性,火山地层的建造速率不能简单地利用地层厚度和测试的顶底时间差来计算.

       

    • 图  1  松辽盆地及研究区地质概况

      孙晓猛等,2011王璞珺等,2015b;K1y1为营城组一段,K1y2为营城组二段,K1y3为营城组三段;a.松辽盆地地层综合柱状图;b.研究区位置

      Fig.  1.  Geological survey of Songliao Basin and study area

      图  2  松辽盆地营一D1井和营三D1井营城组火山地层界面特征

      Fig.  2.  Characteristics of stratigraphic boundaries of volcano stratigraphy in Yingcheng Formation of Y1D1 and Y3D1 wells in Songliao Basin

      图  3  松辽盆地营一D1井(a)和营三D1井(b)营城组火山地层堆积单元及岩相特征

      Fig.  3.  Characteristics of deposit units and lithofacies of volcano stratigraphy in Yingcheng Formation of Well Y1D1 (a) and Well Y3D1 (b) in Songliao Basin

      图  4  穹丘和简单熔岩流堆积单元特征

      n为统计的气孔数量

      Fig.  4.  Characteristics of simple lava flow and dome deposit units

      图  5  辫状熔岩流堆积单元特征

      Fig.  5.  Characteristics of braided lava flow deposit unit

      图  6  热碎屑流堆积单元特征

      Fig.  6.  Characteristics of pyroclastic flow deposit unit

      图  7  热基浪堆积单元特征

      n为统计的角砾和凝灰的总数量

      Fig.  7.  Characteristics of base surge deposit unit

      图  8  火山泥石流堆积单元特征

      Fig.  8.  Characteristics of lahar deposit unit

      图  9  营一D1井和营三D1井营城组火山岩球粒陨石标准化稀土配分图(a、b)和微量元素原始地幔标准化图解(c、d)

      标准化值据Sun and McDonough, 1989. 图a、图c中样品为中基性岩;图b、图d中样品为酸性岩

      Fig.  9.  Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized patterns of trace element of the volcanic rocks from Yingcheng Formation of Y1D1 and Y3D1 wells in Songliao Basin

      图  10  营一D1井和营三D1井地层时间属性和温室气体排放特征示意图

      SLF. simple lava flow,简单熔岩流;BLF. braided lava flow,辫状熔岩流;D. dome,穹丘;PF. pyroclastic flow,热碎屑流;BS. based surge,热基浪;L. lahar,火山泥石流

      Fig.  10.  Sketch map of temporal attributes and greenhouse gas emissions of wells Y1D1 and Y3D1

      图  11  营一D1井和营三D1井营城组火山岩强不相容元素交汇图

      Fig.  11.  The diagrams of strong incompatible elements of Yingcheng Formation of Y1D1 and Y3D1 wells in Songliao Basin

      图  12  九台地区营城组一段凝灰岩中的固‒气两相熔融包裹体

      a.营一D1井97.95 m,辉石内成群分布,由气体和玻璃质组成的熔融包裹体,正交偏光;b. 营一D1井126.9 m,石英内成群分布,由气体和玻璃质组成的熔融包裹体,正交偏光;c.吉林省九台地区露头JT1-02,石英内孤立分布,由气体和玻璃质组成的熔融包裹体,正交偏光;d. 样品JT1-02的激光拉曼光谱,1 652.84 cm‒1峰值处挥发份成分不确定

      Fig.  12.  Solid-gas two phase melt inclusions in the tuff of the first member of Yingcheng Formation, Jiutai area

      表  1  营城组火山岩稀土和微量元素(10‒6)分析结果

      Table  1.   Rare earth and trace elements (10‒6) analyses of the volcanic rocks from Yingcheng Formation

      营一D1
      (205.50 m)
      营一D1
      (203.30 m)
      营一D1
      (75.25 m)
      营一D1
      (67.15 m)
      营一D1
      (36.35 m)
      营一D1
      (20.20 m)
      营三D1
      (187.20 m)
      营三D1 (181.90 m) 营三D1
      (57.30 m)
      营三D1 (28.00 m)
      La 54.97 56.38 15.08 18.66 51.76 33.77 61.53 60.25 29.92 32.89
      Ce 108.67 115.94 30.97 38.97 101.48 62.98 116.77 107.53 69.02 76.43
      Pr 12.04 12.90 3.11 3.92 11.65 7.60 12.74 12.67 6.71 7.98
      Nd 49.70 52.68 13.16 16.44 46.93 29.62 48.68 48.89 29.62 35.33
      Sm 8.53 8.87 2.95 3.62 9.43 6.12 7.98 7.97 5.86 7.28
      Eu 2.04 2.01 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 1.43 1.41 1.80 2.17
      Gd 7.28 7.41 1.52 2.25 7.22 4.03 7.51 7.53 3.99 4.99
      Tb 0.90 0.87 0.40 0.50 1.77 0.84 0.70 0.81 0.68 0.86
      Dy 6.19 5.86 2.86 4.01 12.43 6.11 4.89 5.21 4.55 6.33
      Ho 1.23 1.14 0.70 0.83 2.83 1.20 0.93 0.99 0.86 1.21
      Er 4.08 3.86 1.95 2.22 7.60 3.62 3.21 3.34 2.49 3.51
      Tm 0.56 0.52 0.38 0.42 1.20 0.59 0.40 0.43 0.37 0.51
      Yb 3.71 3.38 2.34 2.44 7.01 3.72 2.59 2.70 2.22 3.26
      Lu 0.59 0.53 0.41 0.37 1.15 0.56 0.39 0.41 0.33 0.50
      ∑REE 260.49 272.35 75.98 94.79 262.61 160.90 269.75 260.14 158.42 183.25
      ∑LREE 235.95 248.78 65.42 81.75 221.40 140.23 249.13 238.72 142.93 162.08
      ∑HREE 24.54 23.57 10.56 13.04 41.21 20.67 20.62 21.42 15.49 21.17
      ∑LREE/ ∑HREE 9.61 10.55 6.20 6.27 5.37 6.78 12.08 11.14 9.23 7.66
      (La/Yb)N 9.99 11.25 4.34 5.16 4.98 6.12 16.02 15.04 9.09 6.80
      Sm/Nd 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.21
      δEu 0.74 0.77 0.19 0.14 0.05 0.08 0.56 0.55 1.07 1.04
      Li 19.62 15.87 18.82 23.38 25.83 30.04 22.70 11.58 11.10 21.47
      Sc 13.88 14.65 4.07 3.00 3.60 3.24 15.31 19.57 19.63 21.81
      V 89.09 111.71 3.20 3.90 4.79 3.59 91.76 88.29 67.26 93.74
      Cr 109.43 136.84 139.64 60.89 61.66 2.95 91.76 88.29 67.26 93.74
      Co 25.55 15.39 0.87 1.00 1.50 0.80 21.66 24.07 29.74 24.58
      Ni 84.23 63.82 1.92 1.55 3.75 0.47 63.54 63.14 23.50 12.53
      Cu 22.89 21.00 0.67 6.68 8.47 17.18 27.95 19.20 29.67 20.83
      Rb 86.88 68.03 173.14 222.74 206.51 214.10 57.33 38.39 32.18 37.14
      Sr 288.33 509.69 51.28 40.22 43.78 42.12 514.44 492.40 676.17 564.62
      Y 37.95 34.96 16.58 22.48 83.13 33.72 27.57 29.59 25.34 32.46
      Zr 277.69 331.51 575.45 554.76 521.91 305.31 314.35 230.86 172.15 244.96
      Nb 36.19 41.60 39.08 41.01 21.47 18.34 15.73 14.31 13.53 16.88
      Cs 9.66 3.47 23.48 1.21 3.50 3.65 2.03 1.43 1.09 1.52
      Ba 1273.40 778.90 50.25 62.52 99.90 99.00 863.40 828.60 696.70 1090.40
      Hf 6.67 7.62 13.79 11.67 11.79 7.92 5.68 5.61 4.40 6.32
      Ta 1.31 1.57 3.63 2.72 3.41 3.51 1.09 1.02 1.17 1.36
      Tl 0.32 0.32 3.44 0.64 0.58 0.47 0.25 0.17 0.15 0.22
      Pb 14.53 11.61 22.72 20.45 24.20 20.06 11.22 15.51 8.67 14.86
      Th 5.87 6.73 4.43 3.46 9.48 9.61 3.71 4.43 2.09 4.29
      U 1.34 1.22 1.32 1.75 2.14 1.55 0.86 1.04 0.65 1.33
      Rb/Sr 0.30 0.13 3.38 5.54 4.72 5.08 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.07
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  火山熔岩和火山碎屑岩中熔融包裹体的CO2含量

      Table  2.   CO2 content of molt inclusions in lava and pyroclastic rocks

      地点 岩石类型 赋存矿物 CO2含量(10‒6) 参考文献
      波利尼西亚群岛 玄武岩 橄榄石 350~7 600 Hanyu et al., 2020
      维多利亚北部大陆 玄武岩 橄榄石 304±64 Giacomoni et al., 2020
      Garibaldi火山 玄武岩 橄榄石 750±55 Venugopal et al., 2020
      Cayley火山 玄武岩 橄榄石 861~1 123
      Meager火山 玄武岩 橄榄石 1 328~1 372
      冰岛东部火山带 火山灰 - 262~2 070 Neave et al., 2015
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Bergfeld, D., Evans, W. C., Lowenstern, J. B., et al., 2012. Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Degassing and Cryptic Thermal Input to Brimstone Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Chemical Geology, 330-331: 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.001
      Cao, M. Q., Rong, H., Chen, Z. Y., et al., 2021. Quantitative Characterization and Controlling Factors of the Interlayer Oxidation Zone of Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Earth Science, 46(10): 3453-3466 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, C. Y., Gao, Y. F., Zhang, X. D., et al., 2018. Sedimentary Interlayer in Volcano Strata: Characteristics and Significance of Stratigraphic Correlation: Taking Yingcheng Formation, Songliao Basin as an Example. Earth Science, 43(3): 812-826 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cheng, Z. H., Guo, Z. F., Zhang, M. L., et al., 2014. Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Tengchong Cenozoic Volcanic Field, Yunnan Province, SW China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(12): 3657-3670 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Colin, A., Burnard, P., Marty, B., 2013. Mechanisms of Magma Degassing at Mid-Oceanic Ridges and the Local Volatile Composition (4He-40Ar-CO2) of the Mantle by Laser Ablation Analysis of Individual MORB Vesicles. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 361: 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.022
      Fu, S. C., Lu, Q. D., 2010. New Progress of Mapping Method in the Nonmarine Volcanic Terrain—"Volcanic Construction-Lithologic Rock Facies-Volcanic Strata" Mapping Method. Geological Bulletin of China, 29(11): 1640-1648 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Giacomoni, P. P., Bonadiman, C., Casetta, F., et al., 2020. Long-Term Storage of Subduction-Related Volatiles in Northern Victoria Land Lithospheric Mantle: Insight from Olivine-Hosted Melt Inclusions from McMurdo Basic Lavas (Antarctica). Lithos, 378-379: 105826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105826
      Hanyu, T., Yamamoto, J., Kimoto, K., et al., 2020. Determination of Total CO2 in Melt Inclusions with Shrinkage Bubbles. Chemical Geology, 557: 119855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119855
      Jia, J. T., Wang, P. J., Shao, R., et al., 2007. Stratigraphical Sequence and Regional Correlation of Yingcheng Formation in the Southeast of Songliao Basin. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 37(6): 1110-1123 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lockwood, J. P., Hazlett, R. W., 2010. Volcanoes: Global Perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey.
      Min, F. Q., Wang, P. J., Yu, S. Q., et al., 2007. Meticulous Depiction of Lithology, Lithofacies and Reservoir Porosity and Permeability in the Third & Second Member of Yingcheng Formation-Based on Whole Coring Ying-3 D1 Well Drilled in the Standard Section. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 37(6): 1203-1216 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Neave, D. A., MacLennan, J., Thordarson, T., et al., 2015. The Evolution and Storage of Primitive Melts in the Eastern Volcanic Zone of Iceland: The 10 ka Grímsvötn Tephra Series (i. e. the Saksunarvatn Ash). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 170(2): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1170-3
      Shen, Y. J., 2012. Pyroclastic Rock of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin: Fades·Architecture·Application (Dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Sigurdsson, H., 2000. The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes. Academic Press, New York.
      Sun, S. S., McDonough, W. F., 1989. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42(1): 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
      Sun, X. M., Liu, C., Zhu, D. F., et al., 2011. Geophysical Features and Tectonic Attribute of the Derbugan Fault in the Western Slope of Da Hinggan Ling Mountains. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(2): 433-440 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Venugopal, S., Schiavi, F., Moune, S., et al., 2020. Melt Inclusion Vapour Bubbles: The Hidden Reservoir for Major and Volatile Elements. Scientific Reports, 10: 9034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65226-3
      Tang, H. F., Phiri, C., Gao, Y. F., et al., 2015. Types and Characteristics of Volcanostratigraphic Boundaries and Their Oil-Gas Reservoir Significance. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 89(1): 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.12402
      Tang, H. F., Sun, H. B., Gao, Y. F., et al., 2013. Types and Characteristics of Volcanostratigraphic Boundary and Its Signification of Reservoirs. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 43(5): 1320-1329 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, H. F., Tao, P., Bischoff, A. P., et al., 2022. High-Resolution Stratigraphic Framework of Miocene Kora Volcano in Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Earth Science, 47(7): 2631-2645 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, H. F., Wang, P. J., Bian, W. H., et al., 2020. Review of Volcanic Reservoir Geology. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41(12): 1744-1773 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, H. F., Yang, D., Shao, M. L., et al., 2016. Constraint of Volcano-Stratigraphic Emplacement Environment on the Reservoir Distribution: A Case Analysis of Rhyolitic Volcanic Strata in the 2nd Member of Jurassic Huoshiling Formation in Wangfu Fault Depression, Songliao Basin, East China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43(4): 573-579 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, H. F., Zhao, M. F., Shan, X. L., et al., 2012. Characteristics of Volcanic Stratigraphy Units and Seismic Stratigraphy of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, NE China. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 47(2): 323-330 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, H. F., Zhao, P. J., Gao, Y. F., et al., 2017. Spatio-Temporal Attributes of Volcano Stratigraphy and Its Lithostratigraphic Units in a Basin. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 47(4): 949-973 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wallace, P. J., Jr Anderson, A. T., Davis, A. M., 1995. Quantification of Pre-Eruptive Exsolved Gas Contents in Silicic Magmas. Nature, 377(6550): 612-616. https://doi.org/10.1038/377612a0
      Wang, P. J., Zhao, R. L., Meng, Q. A., et al., 2015a. Cretaceous Songliao Basin: Dynamic Environment from Volcanic Rift to Intracontinental Depression. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(3): 99-117 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, P. J., Chen, C. Y., Zhang, Y., et al., 2015b. Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoirs and Distribution Rules of Effective Reservoirs in the Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 35(8): 10-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, P. J., Mattern, F., Didenko, N. A., et al., 2016. Tectonics and Cycle System of the Cretaceous Songliao Basin: An Inverted Active Continental Margin Basin. Earth-Science Reviews, 159: 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.004
      Wang, Y., Rong, H., Jiao, Y. Q., et al., 2021. Effects of Basic Intrusions on Shale Mineralogy: A Case Study from Nenjiang Formation in Songliao Basin. Earth Science, 46(6): 2188-2203 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wu, Y. X., Wang, P. J., Qu, L. C., et al., 2007. Detailed Description of Lithology, Lithofacies and Porosity and Permeability of the First and the Lower Member of Yingcheng Formation: Based on the Latest Data of Ying-1D1 Well Cores in Standard Section. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 37(6): 1192-1202 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xu, Y. B., 2014. Study on Sedimentary Characteristics of Yingcheng Formation of Lower Cretaceous in Lishu Fault Depression (Dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zha, Y. M., Wu, X. S., Yu, D., 2016. Relationship between Total Organic Carbon Content and Sedimentation Rate of the Upper Cretaceous Source Rocks in Well CCSD-SK-I in Songliao Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 18(5): 857-864 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, C. F., Wang, J. Z., Xu, M., et al., 2008. The Identification Symbols of the E'mei Mountain Basalt Lava Lay-Series in Baihetan Hydropower Plant. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(2): 217-219 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, F. Q., Cheng, X. G., Chen, H. L., et al., 2009. Zircon Chronological and Geochemical Constraints on the Late Mesozoic Volcanic Events in the Southeastern Margin of the Songliao Basin, NE China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 25(1): 39-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, M. L., Guo, Z. F., Cheng, Z. H., et al., 2011. Greenhouse Gases Flux Estimation of Hot Springs in Changbaishan Volcanic Field, NE China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(10): 2898-2904 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, Y. C., 1990. Stratigraphic Division of Mesozoic Volcanic Strata and Their Characteristics in Nanjing-Wuhu Area. Chinese Journal of Geology, 25(3): 243-258 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      曹民强, 荣辉, 陈振岩, 等, 2021. 松辽盆地钱家店铀矿床层间氧化带结构定量表征及制约因素. 地球科学, 46(10): 3453-3466. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.375
      陈崇阳, 高有峰, 张晓东, 等, 2018. 火山地层中的沉积层特征及其地层对比意义: 以松辽盆地营城组为例. 地球科学, 43(3): 812-826. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.511
      成智慧, 郭正府, 张茂亮, 等, 2014. 腾冲新生代火山区CO2气体释放通量及其成因. 岩石学报, 30(12): 3657-3670.
      傅树超, 卢清地, 2010. 陆相火山岩区填图方法研究新进展——"火山构造‒岩性岩相‒火山地层"填图方法. 地质通报, 29(11): 1640-1648.
      贾军涛, 王璞珺, 邵锐, 等, 2007. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 37(6): 1110-1123.
      闵飞琼, 王璞珺, 于世泉, 等, 2007. 营城组三段及二段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画——基于标准剖面营三D1井全取心钻孔资料. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 37(6): 1203-1216.
      沈艳杰, 2012. 松辽盆地营城组火山碎屑岩: 相·结构·应用(博士学位论文). 长春: 吉林大学.
      孙晓猛, 刘财, 朱德丰, 等, 2011. 大兴安岭西坡德尔布干断裂地球物理特征与构造属性. 地球物理学报, 54(2): 433-440.
      唐华风, 孙海波, 高有峰, 等, 2013. 火山地层界面的类型、特征和储层意义. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 43(5): 1320-1329.
      唐华风, 陶鹏, Alan Patrick Bischoff, 等, 2022. 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山高精度地层格架. 地球科学, 47(7): 2631-2645. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.084
      唐华风, 王璞珺, 边伟华, 等, 2020. 火山岩储层地质研究回顾. 石油学报, 41(12): 1744-1773.
      唐华风, 杨迪, 邵明礼, 等, 2016. 火山地层就位环境对储集层分布的约束——以松辽盆地王府断陷侏罗系火石岭组二段流纹质火山地层为例. 石油勘探与开发, 43(4): 573-579.
      唐华风, 赵密福, 单玄龙, 等, 2012. 松辽盆地营城组火山地层单元和地震地层特征. 石油地球物理勘探, 47(2): 323-330.
      唐华风, 赵鹏九, 高有峰, 等, 2017. 盆地火山地层时空属性和岩石地层单位. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 47(4): 949-973.
      王璞珺, 赵然磊, 蒙启安, 等, 2015a. 白垩纪松辽盆地: 从火山裂谷到陆内拗陷的动力学环境. 地学前缘, 22(3): 99-117.
      王璞珺, 陈崇阳, 张英, 等, 2015b. 松辽盆地长岭断陷火山岩储层特征及有效储层分布规律. 天然气工业, 35(8): 10-18.
      王岩, 荣辉, 焦养泉, 等, 2021. 基性岩侵入对页岩矿物学特征的影响: 以松辽盆地嫩江组为例. 地球科学, 46(6): 2188-2203. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.177
      吴颜雄, 王璞珺, 曲立才, 等, 2007. 营城组一段及下段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画——基于标准剖面营一D1井全取心钻孔资料. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 37(6): 1192-1202.
      徐银波, 2014. 梨树断陷下白垩统营城组沉积特征研究(硕士学位论文). 长春: 吉林大学.
      查宇铭, 吴欣松, 余达, 2016. 松辽盆地松科1井上白垩统烃源岩有机碳含量与沉积速率的关系. 古地理学报, 18(5): 857-864.
      张春芳, 王奖臻, 许模, 等, 2008. 白鹤滩峨眉山玄武岩系熔岩层界面的鉴别标志. 水土保持研究, 15(2): 217-219.
      章凤奇, 程晓敢, 陈汉林, 等, 2009. 松辽盆地东南缘晚中生代火山事件的锆石年代学与地球化学制约. 岩石学报, 25(1): 39-54.
      张茂亮, 郭正府, 成智慧, 等, 2011. 长白山火山区温泉温室气体排放通量研究. 岩石学报, 27(10): 2898-2904.
      赵玉琛, 1990. 宁芜地区中生代火山岩地层划分及其特征. 地质科学, 25(3): 243-258.
    • 加载中
    图(12) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  231
    • HTML全文浏览量:  527
    • PDF下载量:  44
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2022-01-07
    • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-24
    • 刊出日期:  2024-01-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回