• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    高山峡谷区MPSIAC侵蚀模型适用性研究

    武彬彬 常鸣 唐亮亮 刘沛源 罗超鹏

    武彬彬, 常鸣, 唐亮亮, 刘沛源, 罗超鹏, 2024. 高山峡谷区MPSIAC侵蚀模型适用性研究. 地球科学, 49(10): 3815-3825. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.134
    引用本文: 武彬彬, 常鸣, 唐亮亮, 刘沛源, 罗超鹏, 2024. 高山峡谷区MPSIAC侵蚀模型适用性研究. 地球科学, 49(10): 3815-3825. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.134
    Wu Binbin, Chang Ming, Tang Liangliang, Liu Peiyuan, Luo Chaopeng, 2024. Study on Surface Erosion Intensity in Alpine Valley Area. Earth Science, 49(10): 3815-3825. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.134
    Citation: Wu Binbin, Chang Ming, Tang Liangliang, Liu Peiyuan, Luo Chaopeng, 2024. Study on Surface Erosion Intensity in Alpine Valley Area. Earth Science, 49(10): 3815-3825. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.134

    高山峡谷区MPSIAC侵蚀模型适用性研究

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.134
    基金项目: 

    第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究 2019QZKK0902

    四川省自然科学基金项目 2024NSFSC0071

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      武彬彬(1998-),硕士研究生,主要从事遥感与地质灾害早期识别研究. ORCID:0000-0001-5409-2682. E-mail:wubinbin@stu.cdut.edu.cn

      通讯作者:

      常鸣(1985-),教授,博士,E-mail:changmxq@126.com

    • 中图分类号: P642.23

    Study on Surface Erosion Intensity in Alpine Valley Area

    • 摘要: 地表侵蚀能够对环境产生巨大的影响,强烈的地表侵蚀是崩塌、滑坡和泥石流等地质灾害的诱发因素.高山峡谷地区地质地貌条件复杂、地表水动力高度发育,区内大范围存在高强度的地表侵蚀.以川西典型高山峡谷区松潘县为研究区,在详细调查区域侵蚀现状的基础上,基于MPSIAC模型建立了高山峡谷地表侵蚀能力评价体系,对松潘县全域进行地表侵蚀强度评价并利用InSAR技术对评价结果进行检验.结果表明,松潘县地表侵蚀强度较高处主要分布于县域东南部岷江乡、镇江关乡等地,较低处主要分布于北部毛儿盖镇、川主寺镇等地.MPSIAC模型经过修正后可以对高山峡谷地区地表侵蚀能力做出准确的评价.

       

    • 图  1  研究区地理位置

      Fig.  1.  The location of the study area

      图  2  研究区地质岩组分布

      Fig.  2.  The distribution of lithology in the study area

      图  3  研究区土壤分布

      Fig.  3.  The distribution of soil in the study area

      图  4  研究区降雨分布

      Fig.  4.  The distribution of rainfall in the study area

      图  5  研究区土地利用类型(a)和地表径流(b)

      Fig.  5.  The distribution of land use (a) and runoff (b) in the study area

      图  6  研究区坡度

      Fig.  6.  The distribution of slope in the study area

      图  7  研究区NDVI

      Fig.  7.  The distribution of NDVI in the study area

      图  8  研究区河流侵蚀指数

      Fig.  8.  The distribution of SPI in the study area

      图  9  研究区泥石流分布(a)和野外调查(b~e)

      Fig.  9.  The distribution of debris flow (a) and field investigation of debris flow (b-e) in the study area

      图  10  研究区高地侵蚀及相关因子

      Fig.  10.  Upland erosion and factors in the study area

      图  11  研究区侵蚀强度

      Fig.  11.  Erosion intensity in the study area

      图  12  InSAR技术对比验证

      Fig.  12.  InSAR comparison validation

      图  13  青川县验证区侵蚀强度与InSAR形变对比验证图

      Fig.  13.  The InSAR comparison validation and erosion intensity of Qingchuan County verification area

      表  1  地表地质得分

      Table  1.   The weight scores of surface geological

      分类 评价指标 Y1
      松散土体 非均质, 欠固结 8
      碎屑岩 高度易碎岩石 6
      碳酸岩 软硬相间的块状岩石 2
      变质岩 完整性差,呈薄片-碎片状结构 7
      岩浆岩 坚硬的整体状侵入岩岩组 0
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  不同土地利用下的CN

      Table  2.   CN values under the different land use

      土壤湿度 干燥 适中 湿润
      耕地 55 74 88
      灌木地 36 56 76
      林地 35 55 74
      草地 38 58 76
      裸荒地 72 86 94
      沼泽地 40 60 78
      建筑用地 57 79 93
      旱地 51 70 85
      水域 100 100 100
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  3  研究区SAR数据参数

      Table  3.   SAR data parameters in the study area

      轨道方向 成像模式 波段 波长(cm) 地面分辨率(m) 重访周期(d) 视角(°) 极化方式
      降轨 IW C 5.6 5×20 12 39 VV
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Abdullah, M., Feagin, R., Musawi, L., 2017. The Use of Spatial Empirical Models to Estimate Soil Erosion in Arid Ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(2): 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5784-y
      Abuzied, S. M., Pradhan, B., 2021. Hydro-Geomorphic Assessment of Erosion Intensity and Sediment Yield Initiated Debris-Flow Hazards at Wadi Dahab Watershed, Egypt. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 15(3): 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1753781
      Alijani, A., Alijani, A., Ghadimvand, N. K., et al., 2017. Analyzing Factors Affecting Erosion and Sedimentary Deposits Using the Empirical Method of PSIAC. Open Journal of Geology, 7(8): 1078-1093. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.78072
      Arabameri, A., Tiefenbacher, J. P., Blaschke, T., et al., 2020. Morphometric Analysis for Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping Using Novel GIS-Based Ensemble Model. Remote Sensing, 12(5): 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050874
      Cruslock, E. M., Naylor, L. A., Foote, Y. L., et al., 2010. Geomorphologic Equifinality: A Comparison between Shore Platforms in Höga Kusten and FÅRÖ, Sweden and the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, UK. Geomorphology, 114(1-2): 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.019
      Daneshvar, M. R. M., Bagherzadeh, A., 2012. Evaluation of Sediment Yield in PSIAC and MPSIAC Models by Using GIS at Toroq Watershed, Northeast of Iran. Frontiers of Earth Science, 6(1): 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0189-7
      Dragičević, N., Karleuša, B., Ožanić, N., 2019. Different Approaches to Estimation of Drainage Density and Their Effect on the Erosion Potential Method. Water, 11(3): 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030593
      Guo, B., Tao, H. P., Liu, B. T., et al., 2012. Characteristics and Analysis of Soil Erosion in Li Count after Wenchuan Earthquake Based on GIS and USLE. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(14): 118-126 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hou, N., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., et al., 2021. Effects of Tillage Erosion on Sediment Yield of Purple Soil under Different Slopes. Mountain Research, 39(4): 495-505 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lee, S., An, H., Kim, M., et al., 2022. A Simple Deposition Model for Debris Flow Simulation Considering the Erosion-Entrainment-Deposition Process. Remote Sensing, 14(8): 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081904
      Li, G., 2015. The Assessment of Debris Flow Risk Based on GIS (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. X., Zhao, H., Zou, H. T., et al., 2019. Comparison of Soil Erosion Estimation Methods at County Scale Based on CSLE Model and Sampling Unit. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 35(14): 141-148 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ling, H. P., Tang, C., Su, X. Q., 2008. Division of Geological Disaster Prevention and Control in Qingchuan County, Sichuan Province. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 19(1): 134-136, 140 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, P. Y., Chang, M., Wu, B. B., et al., 2022. Route Selection of Landslide Prone Area in Wenchuan Section of ChengduWenchuan Expressway Based on SBAS-InSAR. Earth Science, 47(6): 2048-2057 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lü, K. X., Wang, Z. Y., Jiang, Q. O., et al., 2021. Effect of Vegetation Coverage Change on Soil Erosion Control Efficiency in Guishui River Basin. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 19(4): 69-77 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lü, X. T., 2018. The Response of Debris Flow to Forest Vertical Differentiation in the Upper Reaches of Min River (Dissertation). Southwest University of Science and Technology, Chengdu (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ma, P. H., Peng, J. B., Zhuang, J. Q., et al., 2022. Initiation Mechanism of Loess Mudflows by Flume Experiments. Journal of Earth Science, 33(5): 1166-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-022-1660-y
      Noori, H., Karami, H., Farzin, S., et al., 2018. Investigation of RS and GIS Techniques on MPSIAC Model to Estimate Soil Erosion. Natural Hazards, 91(1): 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3123-9
      Pal, S. C., Chakrabortty, R., 2019. Simulating the Impact of Climate Change on Soil Erosion in Sub-Tropical Monsoon Dominated Watershed Based on RUSLE, SCS Runoff and MIROC5 Climatic Model. Advances in Space Research, 64(2): 352-377. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.04.033
      Saha, A., Ghosh, M., Pal, S. C., 2020. Understanding the Morphology and Development of a Rill-Gully: An Empirical Study of Khoai Badland, West Bengal, India. Gully Erosion Studies from India and Surrounding Regions. Springer, Cham: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23243-6_9
      Sun, C., Tang, C. S., Cheng, Q., et al., 2022. Stability of Soil Slope under Soil-Atmosphere Interaction. Earth Science, 47(10): 3701-3722 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wu, A. P., Wang, X. Y., Huang, J. Y., et al., 2021. Improvement of SCS-CN Model Based on Antecedent Precipitation and Rainfall Duration. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37(22): 85-94 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xiao, J. B., Sun, Z. X., Liu, Z., et al., 2017. Effects of Rainfall Erosion Factor, Vegetation Type and Coverage on Soil Erosion of Sloping Farmland. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 33(22): 159-166 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yan, Y. Q., Guo, C. B., Zhong, N., et al., 2022. Deformation Characteristics of Jiaju Ancient Landslide Based on InSAR Monitoring Method, Sichuan, China. Earth Science, 47(12): 4681-4697(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, T., Zhang, Z. J., Wang, X. K., et al., 2021. Feasibility Study on Monitoring Soil Erosion Using Persistent Scatterer Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry Technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37(14): 127-134 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, J. H., Yao, F. M., 2004. Soil Erosion in Xingguo County of Jiangxi Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 26(1): 53-56 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, S., Xiong, D. H., Wu, H., et al., 2021. Research on Spatial Variation of Soil Erosion in Sunshui River Basin Based on RUSLE Model. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 35(5): 24-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Y. Y., Li, T. H., 2018. Soil Erosion in Shenzhen City Based on GIS and RUSLE Model. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 26(6): 1189-1202 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, C., Chang, M., Xu, L., et al., 2020. Risk Assessment of Typical Urban Mine Geological Disasters in Guizhou Province. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 45(11): 1782-1791 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, B. B., Li, Z. B., Li, P., et al., 2009. Dynamic Changes of Soil Erodibility during Process of Land Degradation and Restoration. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 25(2): 56-61 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      郭兵, 陶和平, 刘斌涛, 等, 2012. 基于GIS和USLE的汶川地震后理县土壤侵蚀特征及分析. 农业工程学报, 28(14): 118-126.
      侯宁, 王勇, 赵虎, 等, 2021. 耕作侵蚀对不同坡度下紫色土侵蚀产沙的影响. 山地学报, 39(4): 495-505.
      李果, 2015. 基于GIS的泥石流危险性评价研究(硕士学位论文). 北京: 中国地质大学(北京).
      李子轩, 赵辉, 邹海天, 等, 2019. 基于CSLE模型和抽样单元法的县域土壤侵蚀估算方法对比. 农业工程学报, 35(14): 141-148.
      凌昊平, 唐川, 苏小琴, 2008. 四川省青川县地质灾害防治区划. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 19(1): 134-136, 140.
      刘沛源, 常鸣, 武彬彬, 等, 2022. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的成汶高速汶川段滑坡易发区选线研究. 地球科学, 47(6): 2048-2057. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.069
      律可心, 王子晔, 姜群鸥, 等, 2021. 妫水河流域植被覆盖变化对土壤侵蚀控制效率的影响. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 19(4): 69-77.
      吕夏婷, 2018. 岷江上游泥石流活动对森林植被垂直分异的响应研究(硕士学位论文). 成都: 西南科技大学.
      孙畅, 唐朝生, 程青, 等, 2022. 土体-大气相互作用下土质边坡稳定性研究. 地球科学, 47(10): 3701-3722. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.275
      吴艾璞, 王晓燕, 黄洁钰, 等, 2021. 基于前期雨量和降雨历时的SCS-CN模型改进. 农业工程学报, 37(22): 85-94.
      肖继兵, 孙占祥, 刘志, 等, 2017. 降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响. 农业工程学报, 33(22): 159-166.
      闫怡秋, 郭长宝, 钟宁, 等, 2022. 基于InSAR形变监测的四川甲居古滑坡变形特征. 地球科学, 47(12): 4681-4697. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.162
      杨通, 张智杰, 王效科, 等, 2021. 基于PS-InSAR技术监测土壤侵蚀可行性研究. 农业工程学报, 37(14): 127-134.
      张佳华, 姚凤梅, 2004. 江西兴国土壤侵蚀动态的研究. 北京林业大学学报, 26(1): 53-56.
      张素, 熊东红, 吴汉, 等, 2021. 基于RUSLE模型的孙水河流域土壤侵蚀空间分异特征. 水土保持学报, 35(5): 24-30.
      张园眼, 李天宏, 2018. 基于GIS和RUSLE模型的深圳市土壤侵蚀研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 26(6): 1189-1202.
      周超, 常鸣, 徐璐, 等, 2020. 贵州省典型城镇矿山地质灾害风险评价. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 45(11): 1782-1791.
      朱冰冰, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等, 2009. 土地退化/恢复中土壤可蚀性动态变化. 农业工程学报, 25(2): 56-61.
    • 加载中
    图(13) / 表(3)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  298
    • HTML全文浏览量:  109
    • PDF下载量:  34
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2022-07-07
    • 网络出版日期:  2024-11-08
    • 刊出日期:  2024-10-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回