• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    基于高阶磁异常导数与高阶统计量的地震短临预测方法

    刘欢 赵润卓 董浩斌

    刘欢, 赵润卓, 董浩斌, 2024. 基于高阶磁异常导数与高阶统计量的地震短临预测方法. 地球科学, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    引用本文: 刘欢, 赵润卓, 董浩斌, 2024. 基于高阶磁异常导数与高阶统计量的地震短临预测方法. 地球科学, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    Liu Huan, Zhao Runzhuo, Dong Haobin, 2024. Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic. Earth Science, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    Citation: Liu Huan, Zhao Runzhuo, Dong Haobin, 2024. Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic. Earth Science, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144

    基于高阶磁异常导数与高阶统计量的地震短临预测方法

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金 42274233

    国家重点研发计划项目 2018YFC1503702

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      刘欢(1989-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事智能地球物理仪器、信号与信息处理、健康监测与故障诊断方面的研究. ORCID:0000-0001-9316-4749. E-mail:huan.liu@cug.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P316

    Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic

    • 摘要: 中强级地震给我国人民生命财产安全带来不可磨灭的灾难,探索中强震发生时地球内部磁场与地震间的联系,获取地震发生的前兆信息,进而实现对中强级地震的预报,是亟待解决的关键问题. 近年来,地磁场垂直分量Z被普遍用来进行地震预警,但其存在预测周期长、阈值不易确定、对中强震预测精度不高等问题.为解决上述问题,提出一种基于高阶磁异常导数与高阶统计量的地震短临预测方法(简称:HMAD-HS),以有效减少高斯噪声对中强震前兆地磁信号的影响、缩短预测期、降低预测误报率,进而提高预测性能. 为验证该方法的可行性,以2017年新疆喀什地区中强震情况为例,将HMAD-HS与加卸载响应比、地磁逐日比等常用方法进行对比分析,实验表明:HMAD-HS处理得到的中强震前兆信号明显且漏报率与误报率降低30%以上,大幅提升了预报可信度. 此外,将HMAD-HS应用于我国多个地区的中强震短临预测,证明该方法具有普适性且对中强震预测效果良好.

       

    • 图  1  我国近5年地震分布

      底图据自然资源部审图号:GS(2020)4630号

      Fig.  1.  Earthquake distribution in China in recent 5 years

      图  2  地磁七要素示意图

      Fig.  2.  Schematic diagram of the seven elements of geomagnetic field

      图  3  地磁分量相关性热图

      Fig.  3.  Geomagnetic component correlation heat map

      图  4  高阶多项式获取示意图

      Fig.  4.  High order polynomial acquisition diagram

      图  5  地震短临预测方法比较

      Fig.  5.  Comparison of different short-impending earthquake forecasting methods

      图  6  基于HMAD-HS方法的成都地区地震短临预测结果

      Fig.  6.  Short-impending earthquake forecasting results of Chengdu using HMAD-HS

      图  7  基于HMAD-HS方法的海西地区地震短临预测结果

      Fig.  7.  Short-impending earthquake forecasting results of Haixi using HMAD-HS

      图  8  基于HMAD-HS方法的武汉地区地震短临预测结果

      Fig.  8.  Short-impending earthquake forecasting results of Wuhan using HMAD-HS

      图  9  2017—2022年使用HMAD-HS方法针对不同地区中强震预测结果对比

      Fig.  9.  Comparison of medium-strong earthquake forecasting results of multi-cities using HMAD-HS from 2017 to 2022

      表  1  地磁逐日比法、加卸载响应比法、以及HMAD-HS方法对比结果

      Table  1.   Quantified comparison using geomagnetic daily ratio, loading and unloading response ratio, and HMAD-HS

      方法 地磁逐日比 加卸载响应比 HMAD-HS
      阈值 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 \\
      漏报率 0 0 100% 0 0 50% 0
      误报率 81.8% 60% 0 75% 50% 50% 0
      涵盖率 100% 100% 0 100% 100% 50% 100%
      下载: 导出CSV
    • AiSa, Y., Feng, Z. S., Chen, J. H., et al., 2021. Geomagnetic Day by Day Ratio and Its Relationship with Strong Earthquakes in Xinjiang and Its Adjacent Areas. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 41(4): 617-625(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11728/cjss2021.04.617
      Chen, S. J., Hu, X. Y., Liu, S., et al., 2022. Application Study on High Precision Aeromagnetic Survey in Weilasituo, Inner Mongolia, China. Earth Science, 47(6): 2175-2189 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X., Huang, E. X., Cheng, W. L., 2021. Correlation Anomalies of Total Daily F Value of the Geomagnetic Field in Southern Henan and Adjacent Areas. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 42(3): 115-120(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cop, R., Rasson, J. L., Bilc, A., 2021. Accelerations in the Local Magnetic Field on the Adriatic Tectonic Microplate. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 10(3): 95-104. https://doi.rog/10.4236/ojer.2021.103007 doi: 10.4236/ojer.2021.103007
      Ding, J. H., Suo, Y. C., Yu, S. R., et al., 2005. Phenomena of Geomagnetic and Ionospheric Anomalies and Their Relation to Earthquakes. Chinese Journal of Space Science, (6): 44-50. (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Feng, Z. S., Wang, J. Y., Jiang, Y. L., et al., 2001. Ratio of Daily Variation Amplitude of Geomagnetic Vertical Component and Its Relation with Earthquake. South China Journal of Seismology, (2): 20-27(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2001.02.004
      Gavoret, J., Gibert, D., Menvielle, M., et al., 1986. Long‐term Variations of the External and Internal Components of the Earth's Magnetic Field. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B5): 4787-4796. https://doi.rog/10.1029/jb091ib05p04787 doi: 10.1029/jb091ib05p04787
      Hu, X. Y., Han, B., Yu, T., et al., 2022. How to effectively deal with geomagnetic disaster prevention and mitigation. Earth Science, 47(10): 3904-3905 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., Chen, J. L., Chen, G. F., et al., 2014. Continental Seismotectonic System : Example from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Its Adjacent Areas. Earth Science, 39(12): 1763-1775(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, H. Y., Yuan, G. P., 2018. Spatial Correlation Characteristics of Geomagnetic Total Field before Strong Earthquakes. Earthquake, 38(1): 157-166(in Chinese with English abstract)
      Nagata, T., 1972. Application of Tectonomagnetism to Earthquake Phenomena. Tectonophysics, 14(3/4): 263-271. https://doi.rog/10.1016/0040-1951(72)90074-1 doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(72)90074-1
      Ni, X. Y., Huang, S., Jiang, C. F., et al., 2021. Geomagnetic Diurnal Variation Anomalies Before 2019 Changning M6.0 Earthquake and Xiahe M5.7 Earthquake. Earthquake, 41(3): 202-218(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qi, G. Z., 1978. Dilatancy-Magnetic Effect. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, (1): 18-33(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qian, C., Chen, L. G., Zhang, Z. G., 2021. Daily Ratio Anomaly of Vertical Component of Geomagnetic Field and Its Prediction Efficiency before Baicheng M5.4 Earthquake. Inland Earthquake, 35(2): 129-135(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qin, L., 2020. Research and Implementation of Earthquake Precursor Data Analysis and Anomaly Monitoring(Dissertation). Anhui University, Hefei, 1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Stacey, F. D., 1963. Seismo-Magnetic Effect and the Possibility of Forecasting Earthquakes. Nature, 200(4911): 1083-1085. https://doi.rog/10.1038/2001083b0 doi: 10.1038/2001083b0
      Trotta, J. E., Tullis, T. E., 2006. An Independent Assessment of the Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) Proposed Method of Earthquake Prediction. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163(11/12): 2375-2387. https://doi.rog/10.1007/s00024-006-0128-9 doi: 10.1007/s00024-006-0128-9
      Wang, D. W., 1995. Geomagnetic Application of the Theory of Load-Unload Response Ration in the Prediction of Earthquake by Geomagnetism. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, (3): 26-30(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, T., Liu, Q. S., Fu, Y. Y., et al., 2005. Study on the Relationship between Seismo-Magnetic Effects and Seismicity in West Gansu and Its Adjacent Area with Higher-order Statistics. North China Earthquake Sciences, (1): 52-56(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yin, X. C., Yin, C., 1991. Precursors of Nonlinear System Instability and Exploration of New Methods for Earthquake Prediction: Response Ratio Theory and Its Application. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (3): 16-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yin, X. C., 2015. Response Ratio Theory of Loading and Unloading and Its Application. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Zeng, X. P., Xu, C. R., Zhao, M., et al., 1996. The Load-Unload Response Phenomena of Geomagnetic Field to Solar Wind and Earthquake Prediction. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, (1): 49-53(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Z. Y., Hu, X. Y., Wang, D. Y., et al., 2021. Geophysical Field Characteristics of Dongyang Region, Fujian Province. Earth Science, 46(10): 3717-3729(in Chinese with English abstract).
      艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 冯志生, 陈界宏, 等, 2021. 地磁逐日比与新疆及周边地区强震关系. 空间科学学报, 41(4): 617-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJKB202104012.htm
      陈思静, 胡祥云, 刘双, 2022. 内蒙古维拉斯托地区高精度航磁调查与应用研究. 地球科学, 47(6): 2175-2189. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.234
      陈贤, 黄恩贤, 成万里, 2021. 豫南及邻区地磁总场F日值相关性异常. 地震地磁观测与研究, 42(3): 115-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ202103014.htm
      丁鉴海, 索玉成, 余素荣, 2005. 地磁场与电离层异常现象及其与地震的关系. 空间科学学报, (6): 44-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJKB200506008.htm
      冯志生, 王建宇, 蒋延林, 等, 2001. 地磁垂直分量日变幅逐日比及其与地震关系的探讨. 华南地震, (2): 20-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDI200102003.htm
      胡祥云, 韩波, 余涛, 2022. 如何有效应对地磁灾害防灾减灾. 地球科学, 47(10): 3904-3905. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.858
      李德威, 陈继乐, 陈桂凡, 等, 2014. 大陆地震构造系统: 以青藏高原及邻区为例. 地球科学, 39(12): 1763-1775. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.160
      李鸿宇, 袁桂平, 2018. 强震前地磁总场F_(2)测值的空间相关特征研究. 地震, 38(1): 157-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201801015.htm
      倪晓寅, 黄颂, 姜楚峰, 2021. 2019年长宁6.0级与夏河5.7级地震前的地磁日变化异常. 地震, 41(3): 202-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN202103015.htm
      祁贵仲, 1978. "膨胀"磁效应. 地球物理学报, (1): 18-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX197801002.htm
      钱才, 陈鲁刚, 张治广, 2021. 拜城M_S5.4地震前地磁逐日比异常及其预报效能分析. 内陆地震, 35(2): 129-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ202102003.htm
      秦乐, 2020. 地震前兆数据分析与异常监测研究及实现(博士毕业论文). 合肥: 安徽大学
      王亶文, 1995. 加卸载响应比理论在以磁报震中的应用探索. 地震地磁观测与研究, (3): 26-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ503.004.htm
      杨涛, 刘庆生, 付媛媛, 等, 2005. 陇西及周边地区地震活动与震磁效应的高阶统计量研究. 华北地震科学, (1): 52-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD200501010.htm
      尹祥础, 尹灿, 1991. 非线性系统失稳的前兆与地震预测新方法的探索——响应比理论及其应用. 国际地震动态, (3): 16-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJZT199103007.htm
      尹祥础, 2015. 加卸载响应比理论及其应用. 北京: 科学出版社.
      曾小苹, 续春荣, 赵明, 等, 1996. 地球磁场对太阳风的加卸载响应与地震. 地震地磁观测与研究, (1): 49-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ601.007.htm
      张振宇, 胡祥云, 王大勇, 等, 2021. 福建东洋地区地球物理场特征. 地球科学, 46(10): 3717-3729. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.058
    • 加载中
    图(9) / 表(1)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  299
    • HTML全文浏览量:  72
    • PDF下载量:  36
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2023-01-22
    • 网络出版日期:  2024-08-27
    • 刊出日期:  2024-08-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回