The Study on the Influence and Application of Foundation Pier Height on Strong Motion Records
-
摘要: 强震动观测的加速度仪通常是固定安装在一定高度的混凝土基墩上，不能完全反映理想自由场地的地震动.为研究基墩高度对于强震动记录的影响，设计了3种高度不同、截面尺寸相同的基墩，通过地震模拟振动台实验，以基岩记录作为地震动输入，分析基墩高度对于强震动记录的时频特性影响，并结合数值模拟进行了验证，同时对泸定地震51SMM台站记录通过滤波修订到标准基墩.研究结果表明：不同高度基墩，对于水平向PGA、PGV、PGD影响整体随着高度增大而增大，对于垂直地震动，PGA与PGV幅值均缩小；与其他频带相比，0.5~7 Hz范围内的傅里叶幅值谱，0.6 m和1.2 m高的基墩影响较小，2.0 m高的基墩影响最大；高度较小基墩对反应谱影响较小.通过以上实验表明滤波修订不同高度的基墩效果较好，在代码为51SMM强震动台站记录中得到较好应用，同时应避免采用高度超过1.2 m的基墩用于强震动观测.Abstract: The accelerometer for strong motion observation is usually fixed on the concrete pier at a certain height, and the ground motion of ideal free field cannot be reflected completely. In order to study the influence of pier height on the strong motion records, three piers with different heights and the same cross-sectional dimension are designed, and the effect of the pier height on the time-frequency characteristics of the strong motion records is analyzed through seismic simulation shaking table tests, bedrock records are selected as the ground motion input, and numerical simulations are applied to verify the research results, at the same time, the strong motion records of station 51SMM in Luding earthquake is modified to standard pier by filtering. It shows that the effect of the piers on the horizontal PGA, PGV and PGD increases with the increasing height, while the PGA and PGV amplitudes decrease for the vertical ground motion. Fourier amplitude spectrum in the range of 0.5-7 Hz shows that 0.6 m and 1.2 m high piers have less influence than other frequency bands, while 2.0 m high piers have the greatest influence. The experiments above show the filtering effect is better for modifying the pier with different heights, and it is better used in strong motion records of station coded by 51SMM.The piers with the height exceeding 1.2m should be avoided for strong motion observations.
-
图 6 2.0 m基墩墩顶模拟与实验的加速度时程对比（东西向）
Fig. 6. Acceleration time history of 2.0 m foundation pier top simulation and experiment (EW)
图 7 模拟与实验得到的各基墩墩顶记录的傅里叶幅值谱以及两者的谱比（东西向）
Fig. 7. Fourier amplitude spectrum and spectrum ratio recorded at the top of the base pier for simulation and experiment (EW)
图 8 模拟与实验得到的各基墩墩顶记录的绝对加速度反应谱（东西）
Fig. 8. Absolute acceleration response spectra at the top of the base pier for simulation and experiment(EW)
图 9 模拟与实验得到的各基墩墩顶记录的相对速度反应谱（东西）
Fig. 9. Relative velocity response spectra at the top of the base pier for simulation and experiment(EW)
图 10 模拟与实验得到的各基墩墩顶记录的相对位移反应谱（东西）
Fig. 10. Relative displacement response spectra at the top of the base pier for simulation and experiment(EW)
图 11 振动台试验不同高度基墩加速度时程（东西向）
Fig. 11. Shaking table test acceleration time history of different height pier(EW)
图 12 振动台试验不同高度基墩傅里叶幅值谱（东西、南北、垂直向）
Fig. 12. Fourier amplitude spectrum of different height pier(EW, NS, UD)
图 13 校正与标准加速度时程及傅里叶幅值谱(EW)
Fig. 13. Correction and standard acceleration time history and Fourier amplitude spectra (EW)
表 1 加速度峰值
Table 1. PGA
方向 基墩高度（m） 0.6 1.2 2.0 东西 748.0(881.7) 825.0(897.5) 1 830.0(1 280.3) 南北 731.0(737.3) 1 030.0(763.4) 1 960.0(1 350.7) 垂直 510.0(561.8) 542.0(564.6) 331.0(568.7) 注：括号外为试验数据，括号内为模拟数据，单位：gal 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 振动台试验不同高度基墩速度峰值比（%）
Table 2. The ratios of PGV for different height pier(%)
方向 基墩高度（m） 0.6 1.2 2.0 东西 87.2 75.9 197.2 南北 103.6 102.7 225.9 垂直 95.6 98.2 58.8
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 振动台试验不同高度基墩位移峰值比（%）
Table 3. The ratios of PGD for different height pier(%)
方向 基墩高度（m） 0.6 1.2 2.0 东西 125.0 125.0 200.0 南北 116.7 166.7 233.3 垂直 100.0 100.0 60.0
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 校正记录和标准基墩记录傅里叶幅值谱的相关性（EW）
Table 4. Correlation of Fourier Amplitude Spectrum between Correction Record and Standard Base Pier Record(EW)
序号 高通截止频率 低通截止频率 PGA
（cm/s2）相关系数 ① 0.01 25 -542.4 0.96 ② 0.01 30 -618.3 0.97 ③ 0.01 32 -667.6 0.97 ④ 0.01 35 -738.2 0.97 ⑤ 0.01 36 -758.1 0.97 ⑥ 0.01 40 -819.7 0.96 ⑦ 0.05 30 -618.3 0.97 ⑧ 0.10 30 -617.8 0.97
下载: 导出CSV
-
China Earthquake Administration, 2005. Technical Specification of China Digital Strong Motion Network. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese). China Earthquake Administration, 2018. Specification for the Construction of Seismic Station-Strong Motion Station. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems, 2001. Guidelines for Installation of Advanced National Seismic System Strong-Motion Reference Stations. California, USA. Crouse, C. B., Hushmand, B., 1989. Soil-Structure Interaction at CDMG and USGS Accelerograph Stations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 79(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0790010001 Hu, J. J., Ding, Y. T., Zhang, H., et al., 2023. A Real-Time Seismic Intensity Prediction Model Based on Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network. Earth Science, 48(5): 1853-1864(in Chinese with English abstract). Huo, J. R., 1989. Study on the Attenuation Laws of Strong Eqrthquake Ground Motion near the Source(Dissertation). Institute Of Engineering Mechanics State Seismological Bureau, Harbin(in Chinese with English abstract). Lei, J. C., Gao, M. T., Yan, X., et al., 2007. Seismic Motion Attenuation Relations in Sichuan and Adjacent Areas. Seismologica Sinica, 29(5): 500-511(in Chinese with English abstract). Li, P. E., Liao, L., Feng, J. Z., 2022. Relationship between Stress Evolution and Aftershocks after Changning M 6.0 Earthquake in Sichuan on 17 June, 2019. Earth Science, 47(6): 2149-2164(in Chinese with English abstract). Stewart, J. P., 2000. Variations between Foundation-Level and Free-Field Earthquake Ground Motions. Earthquake Spectra, 16(2): 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586124 Tajima, H., 1984. Predicted and Measured Motional Characteristics of a Large-Scale Shaking Table Foundation. The Eighth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco, California, U.S.A. Wen, K. L., Peng, H. Y., Tsai, Y. B., et al., 2001. Why 1G was Recorded at TCU129 Site during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5): 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000707 Xie, L. L., 1982. Strong Motion Observation and Analysis Principle. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Yao, X. X., Ren, Y. F., Kishida, T., et al., 2022. The Procedure of Filtering the Strong Motion Record: Denoisng and Filtering. Engineering Mechanics, 39(S1): 320-329(in Chinese with English abstract). Yu, Y. X., Li, S. Y., Xiao, L., 2013. Development of Ground Motion Attenuation Relations for the New Seismic Hazard Map of China. Technology For Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 8(01): 24-33(in Chinese with English abstract). Yu, Y. X., Wang, S. Y., 2006. Attenuation Relations for Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Response Spectrum in Eastern and Western China. Technology For Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 3(5): 206-217(in Chinese with English abstract). Zhao, H. J., Ma, F. S., Li, Z. Q., et al., 2022. Optimization of Parameters and Application of Probabilistic Seismic Landslide Hazard Analysis Model Based on Newmark Displacement Model: A Case Study in Ludian Earthquake Area. Earth Science, 47(12): 4401-4416 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhou, B. F., Wen, R. Z., Xie, L. L., 2014. The Preliminary Study on the "Spike" in Strong Motion Records. Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(S2): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhou, Y. N., 2011. Strong Motion Observation Technology. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese). 中国地震局, 2005. 中国数字强震动台网技术规程. 北京: 地震出版社. 中国地震局, 2018. 地震台站建设规范强震动台站(DB/T 17-2018). 北京: 地震出版社. 霍俊荣, 1989. 近场强地面运动衰减规律的研究(博士学位论文). 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所. 胡进军, 丁祎天, 张辉, 等, 2023. 基于长短期记忆神经网络的实时地震烈度预测模型. 地球科学, 48(5): 1853-1864. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.338 雷建成, 高孟潭, 俞言祥, 2007. 四川及邻区地震动衰减关系. 地震学报, 29(5): 500-511. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200705008.htm 李平恩, 廖力, 奉建州, 2022.2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震震后应力演化与余震关系. 地球科学, 47(6): 2149-2164. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.143 谢礼立, 1982. 强震观测与分析原理. 北京: 地震出版社. 俞言祥, 汪素云, 2006. 中国东部和西部地区水平向基岩加速度反应谱衰减关系. 震灾防御技术, 3(5): 206-217. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY200603005.htm 俞言祥, 李山有, 肖亮, 2013. 为新区划图编制所建立的地震动衰减关系. 震灾防御技术, 8(1): 24-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY201301004.htm 姚鑫鑫, 任叶飞, 岸田忠大, 等, 2022. 强震动记录的数据处理流程: 去噪滤波. 工程力学, 39(S1): 320-329. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX2022S1040.htm 周雍年, 2011. 强震动观测技术. 北京: 地震出版社. 周宝峰, 温瑞智, 谢礼立, 2014. 强震记录中的"尖刺"现象初步研究. 土木工程学报, 47(S2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2014S2047.htm 赵海军, 马凤山, 李志清, 等, 2022. 基于Newmark模型的概率地震滑坡危险性模型参数优化与应用: 以鲁甸地震区为例. 地球科学, 47(12): 4401-4416. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.289 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 530
- HTML全文浏览量: 289
- PDF下载量: 42
- 被引次数: 0
