• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Song Dongjun, Wu Chenjun, Chen Ke, Zhang Mingfeng, He Wei, Su Long, Zhang Dongwei, Fu Shuang, Tuo Jincai, 2019. Gas Generation from Marine and Terrestrial Shales by Semi-Closed Pyrolysis Experiments. Earth Science, 44(11): 3639-3652. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.197
    Citation: Song Dongjun, Wu Chenjun, Chen Ke, Zhang Mingfeng, He Wei, Su Long, Zhang Dongwei, Fu Shuang, Tuo Jincai, 2019. Gas Generation from Marine and Terrestrial Shales by Semi-Closed Pyrolysis Experiments. Earth Science, 44(11): 3639-3652. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.197

    Gas Generation from Marine and Terrestrial Shales by Semi-Closed Pyrolysis Experiments

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.197
    • Received Date: 2019-08-05
    • Publish Date: 2019-11-15
    • Understanding differences of shale gas generation in different sedimentary environments has great significance to fully elucidate genesis mechanisms and geochemical characteristics of shale gas. In this study,semi-closed pyrolysis experiments were conducted on two lower-mature shales,including a marine shale from Hongshuizhuang Formation of Mesoproterozoic and a terrestrial mudstone from the Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic. The pyrolyzed gas productions were performed for gas constituent and carbon isotope analysis,aiming to investigate influences on gas generation from the nature of organic matter,mineralogical characteristics and rock fabric. The results show the discrepancy of sources of organic matter exists in the two shales,causing the amount of gas generated from Hongshuizhuang shale was lower than that of the Chang 7 Member under the same pyrolysis temperature. Meanwhile,the secondary cracking content of gas productions in the Chang 7 Member mudstone was relatively high. Organic matter in Hongshuizhuang Formation is oil-prone,but organic matter in the Chang 7 Member mudstone is relatively gas-prone due to mixture of continental materials. Moreover,the transformation process from pyrite to pyrrhotine also can be conducive to advancing the generation of hydrocarbon gas in the Chang 7 Member mudstone. The rock fabrics used in the pyrolysis experiments would lead to different cracking behaviors of gas. In this scenario,the characteristics of high methane composition and rollover of carbon isotope of shale gas in the South China may be associated with higher retention of oil and gas in those thick shales.

       

    • 致谢: 感谢匿名审稿人对本文提出的宝贵意见和建议.
    • Bakr, M. Y., Yokono, T., Sanada, Y., et al., 1991. Role of Pyrite during the Thermal Degradation of Kerogen Using In-situ High-Temperature ESR Technique. Energy & Fuels, 5(3):441-444. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00027a014
      Bao, Z.D., Chen, J.F., Zhang, S.C., et al., 2004. Sedimentary Environment and Development Controls of the Hydrocarbon Source Beds:Middle and Upper Proterozoic in Northern North China. Science in China(Series D:Earth Sciences), 34(Suppl.1):114-119 (in Chinese).
      Behar, F., Kressmann, S., Rudkiewicz, J. L., et al., 1992. Experimental Simulation in a Confined System and Kinetic Modelling of Kerogen and Oil Cracking. Organic Geochemistry, 19(1/2/3):173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(92)90035-v
      Boudou, J. P., Espitalié, J., 1995. Molecular Nitrogen from Coal Pyrolysis:Kinetic Modelling. Chemical Geology, 126(3/4):319-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(95)00125-5
      Chen, X.Y., Tian, F.Q., Zou, H.Y., et al., 2018. Study on Hydrocarbon-Generation of Lacustrine Source Rocks Based on Hydrous Pyrolysis Experiments of Source Rocks from Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 29(1):103-113 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201801010
      Curtis, J.B., 2002. Fractured Shale-Gas Systems. AAPG Bulletin, 86(11):1921-1938. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dkyqt201704025
      Dai, J. X., Zou, C. N., Dong, D. Z., et al., 2016. Geochemical Characteristics of Marine and Terrestrial Shale Gas in China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 76:444-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.04.027
      Dong, D.Z., Wang, Y.M., Li, X.J., et al., 2016. Breakthrough and Prospect of Shale Gas Exploration and Development in China. Natural Gas Industry, 36(1):19-32 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201601003
      Gai, H. F., Tian, H., Cheng, P., et al., 2019. Influence of Retained Bitumen in Oil-Prone Shales on the Chemical and Carbon Isotopic Compositions of Natural Gases:Implications from Pyrolysis Experiments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 101:148-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.11.048
      Gai, R. H., Jin, L. J., Zhang, J. B., et al., 2014. Effect of Inherent and Additional Pyrite on the Pyrolysis Behavior of Oil Shale. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 105(5):342-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.11.022
      Han, Y. J., Mahlstedt, N., Horsfield, B., 2015. The Barnett Shale:Compositional Fractionation Associated with Intraformational Petroleum Migration, Retention, and Expulsion. AAPG Bulletin, 99(12):2173-2202. https://doi.org/10.1306/06231514113
      Hill, R. J., Zhang, E. T., Katz, B. J., et al., 2007. Modeling of Gas Generation from the Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):501-521. https://doi.org/10.1306/12060606063
      İnan, S., 2000. Gaseous Hydrocarbons Generated during Pyrolysis of Petroleum Source Rocks Using Unconventional Grain-Size:Implications for Natural Gas Composition. Organic Geochemistry, 31(12):1409-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00070-x
      Inan, S., Yalçin, M. N., Mann, U., 1998. Expulsion of Oil from Petroleum Source Rocks:Inferences from Pyrolysis of Samples of Unconventional Grain Size. Organic Geochemistry, 29(1/2/3):45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(98)00091-6
      Jarvie, D. M., Hill, R. J., Ruble, T. E., et al., 2007. Unconventional Shale-Gas Systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of North-Central Texas as One Model for Thermogenic Shale-Gas Assessment. AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):475-499. https://doi.org/10.1306/12190606068
      Li, W., Zhu, Y. M., Liu, Y., 2018. Gas Evolution and Isotopic Fractionations during Pyrolysis on Coals of Different Ranks. International Journal of Coal Geology, 188:136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.02.009
      Liu, Q., Yuan, X.J., Lin, S.H., et al., 2018. Depositional Environment and Characteristic Comparison between Lacustrine Mudstone and Shale:A Case Study from the Chang 7 Member of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 39(3):531-540 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201803010
      Liu, Q.Y., Liu, W.H., Chen, J.F., et al., 2003. Thermal Simulation Experiment of Jurassic Coals in Talimu Basin-Geochemical Characteristics and Significance of Nitrogen. Natural Gas Industry, 23(1):26-29, 10 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy200301007
      Luo, Q. Y., George, S. C., Xu, Y. H., et al., 2016. Organic Geochemical Characteristics of the Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation from Northern China:Implications for Thermal Maturity and Biological Sources. Organic Geochemistry, 99:23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.05.004
      Ma, X. X., Zheng, J. J., Zheng, G. D., et al., 2016. Influence of Pyrite on Hydrocarbon Generation during Pyrolysis of Type-Ⅲ Kerogen. Fuel, 167:329-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.069
      Pan, C. C., Jiang, L. L., Liu, J. Z., et al., 2012. The Effects of Pyrobitumen on Oil Cracking in Confined Pyrolysis Experiments. Organic Geochemistry, 45(2):29-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.01.008
      Qin, J., Zhong, N.N., Qi, W., et al., 2010. Organic Petrology of the Hongshuizhuang Formation in Northern North China. Oil & Gas Geology, 31(3):367-374 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syytrqdz201003015
      Shao, D. Y., Ellis, G. S., Li, Y. F., et al., 2018. Experimental Investigation of the Role of Rock Fabric in Gas Generation and Expulsion during Thermal Maturation:Anhydrous Closed-System Pyrolysis of a Bitumen-Rich Eagle Ford Shale. Organic Geochemistry, 119:22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.01.012
      Smith, J. W., Rigby, D., Gould, K. W., et al., 1985. An Isotopic Study of Hydrocarbon Generation Processes. Organic Geochemistry, 8(5):341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(85)90013-0
      Song, D. J., Tuo, J. C., Zhang, M. F., et al., 2019. Hydrocarbon Generation Potential and Evolution of Pore Characteristics of Mesoproterozoic Shales in North China:Results from Semi-Closed Pyrolysis Experiments. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 62:171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.12.011
      Song, Y., Xu, Y.C., 2005. Origin and Identification of Natural Gases. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 32(4):24-29 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf200504004
      Tang, Q.Y., Zhang, M.J., Yu, M., et al., 2013. Pyrolysis Constraints on the Generation Mechanism of Shale Gas. Journal of China Coal Society, 38(5):742-747 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201305004
      Tang, Y., Perry, J. K., Jenden, P. D., et al., 2000. Mathematical Modeling of Stable Carbon Isotope Ratios in Natural Gases. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64(15):2673-2687. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00377-x
      Tian, H., Xiao, X. M., Wilkins, R. W. T., et al., 2012. An Experimental Comparison of Gas Generation from Three Oil Fractions:Implications for the Chemical and Stable Carbon Isotopic Signatures of Oil Cracking Gas. Organic Geochemistry, 46:96-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.01.013
      Tuo, J. C., Wu, C. J., Zhang, M. F., 2016. Organic Matter Properties and Shale Gas Potential of Paleozoic Shales in Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28(57):434-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.003
      Xia, X. Y., Chen, J., Braun, R., et al., 2013. Isotopic Reversals with Respect to Maturity Trends Due to Mixing of Primary and Secondary Products in Source Rocks. Chemical Geology, 339(2):205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.07.025
      Xie, L. J., Sun, Y. G., Yang, Z. W., et al., 2013. Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Generation of the Xiamaling Formation Shale in Zhangjiakou and Its Significance to the Petroleum Geology in North China. Science in China(Series D:Earth Sciences), 43(9):1436-1444 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4538-5
      Xu, S.L, Bao, S.J., 2009. Preliminary Analysis of Shale Gas Resource Potential and Favorable Areas in Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 20(3):460-465 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx200903024
      Yuan, X.J., Lin, S.H., Liu, Q., et al., 2015. Lacustrine Fine-Grained Sedimentary Features and Organic-Rich Shale Distribution Pattern:A Case Study of Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 42(1):34-43 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhai, G.Y., Wang, Y.F., Bao, S.J., et al., 2017. Major Factors Controlling the Accumulation and High Productivity of Marine Shale Gas and Prospect Forecast in Southern China. Earth Science, 42(7):1057-1068 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.085
      Zhang, G.T., Chen, X.H., Zhang, B.M., et al., 2019. Gas-Bearing Characteristics and Origin Analysis of Shale Gas in Longtan Formation, Permian, Shaoyang Sag, Central Hunan. Earth Science, 44(2):539-550 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2018.182
      Zhang, J.C., Xu, B., Nie, H.K., et al., 2008. Exploration Potential of Shale Gas Resources in China. Natural Gas Industry, 28(6):136-140, 159-160 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qdhydxxb-e201804008
      Zhang, M., Huang, G. H., Hu, G. Y., et al., 2008. Geochemical Study on Oil-Cracked Gases and Kerogen-Cracked Gases (Ⅰ):Experimental Simulation and Products Analysis. Science in China (Series D:Earth Sciences), 38(Suppl.2):1-8 (in Chinese).
      Zhang, M.Z., Ji, L.M., Du, B.X., et al., 2017. New Understanding to the Cutinite from Source Rocks of Triassic Yanchang Formation and Its Hydrocarbon-Generation Contribution. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 38(5):525-532, 606(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201705005
      Zou, C.N., Dong, D.Z., Wang, S.J., et al., 2010. Geological Characteristics, Formation Mechanism and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 37(6):641-653 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60001-3
      鲍志东, 陈践发, 张水昌, 等, 2004.北华北中上元古界烃源岩发育环境及其控制因素.中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 34(S1):114-119. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd2004z1013
      陈晓艳, 田福清, 邹华耀, 等, 2018.湖相烃源岩热演化生烃研究:基于冀中坳陷烃源岩加水热模拟实验.天然气地球科学, 29(1):103-113. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201801010
      董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景, 等, 2016.中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考.天然气工业, 36(1):19-32. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201601003
      耳闯, 罗安湘, 赵靖舟, 等, 2016.鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系延长组长7段富有机质页岩岩相特征.地学前缘, 23(2):108-117. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201602011
      刘群, 袁选俊, 林森虎, 等, 2018.湖相泥岩、页岩的沉积环境和特征对比:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例.石油与天然气地质, 39(3):531-540. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201803010
      刘全有, 刘文汇, 陈践发, 等, 2003.塔里木盆地侏罗系煤热模拟实验:氮的地化特征与意义.天然气工业, 23(1):26-29, 10. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2003.01.007
      秦婧, 钟宁宁, 齐雯, 等, 2010.华北北部洪水庄组有机岩石学.石油与天然气地质, 31(3):367-374. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201003015
      宋岩, 徐永昌, 2005.天然气成因类型及其鉴别.石油勘探与开发, 32(4):24-29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.04.004
      汤庆艳, 张铭杰, 余明, 等, 2013.页岩气形成机制的生烃模拟研究.煤炭学报, 38(5):742-747. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201305004
      谢柳娟, 孙永革, 杨中威, 等, 2013.华北张家口地区中元古界下马岭组页岩生烃演化特征及其油气地质意义.中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 43(9):1436-1444. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-cd201309005
      徐士林, 包书景, 2009.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组页岩气形成条件及有利发育区预测.天然气地球科学, 20(3):460-465. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx200903024
      袁选俊, 林森虎, 刘群, 等, 2015.湖盆细粒沉积特征与富有机质页岩分布模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7油层组为例.石油勘探与开发, 42(1):34-43. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201501004
      翟刚毅, 王玉芳, 包书景, 等, 2017.我国南方海相页岩气富集高产主控因素及前景预测.地球科学, 42(7):1057-1058. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.085
      张国涛, 陈孝红, 张保民, 等, 2019.湘中邵阳凹陷二叠系龙潭组页岩含气性特征与气体成因.地球科学, 44(2):539-550. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.182
      张金川, 徐波, 聂海宽, 等, 2008.中国页岩气资源勘探潜力.天然气工业, 28(6):136-140, 159-160. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.06.040
      张敏, 黄光辉, 胡国艺, 等, 2008.原油裂解气和干酪根裂解气的地球化学研究(Ⅰ):模拟实验和产物分析.中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 38(S2):1-8.
      张明震, 吉利明, 杜宝霞, 等, 2017.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组陆相烃源岩中角质体组分新认识及生烃贡献.石油学报, 38(5):525-532, 606. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syxb201705005
      邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等, 2010.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力.石油勘探与开发, 37(6):641-653. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201006001
    • Relative Articles

    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(7)

      1. 谢再波,郭子栋,何卫军,张文,苏龙. 烃源岩生烃模拟实验发展现状与研究方向. 山西化工. 2025(02): 53-56 .
      2. 张宇,周妮,李际,高秀伟,谢再波,马东正,陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃特征. 科学技术与工程. 2024(32): 13695-13707 .
      3. Yanqi Zhang,Li Liu. Insights into the Formation Mechanism of Low Water Saturation in Longmaxi Shale in the Jiaoshiba Area, Eastern Sichuan Basin. Journal of Earth Science. 2021(04): 863-871 .
      4. 栾治盛,杜江峰,孙平昌,侯丽云,丁聪. 生烃热模拟研究进展及对非常规油气成藏研究约束. 中国煤炭地质. 2021(07): 19-26+71 .
      5. 马中良,申宝剑,潘安阳,腾格尔,宁传祥,郑伦举. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成因与碳同位素倒转机制——来自热模拟实验的认识. 石油实验地质. 2020(03): 428-433 .
      6. 戴海亮,沈斌,李开开,张小涛,徐学敏,许智超,周晶晶. 地质条件约束下川北二叠系大隆组富有机质页岩热模拟生烃过程及特征研究. 南京大学学报(自然科学). 2020(03): 382-392 .
      7. 曹磊. 单轴压缩测试条件下泥岩的力学特性综述. 河南科技. 2020(14): 135-140 .

      Other cited types(2)

    • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05010203040
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 37.2 %FULLTEXT: 37.2 %META: 60.3 %META: 60.3 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.5 %其他: 4.5 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %Czech Republic: 0.1 %Czech Republic: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.2 %Seattle: 0.2 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 2.0 %兰州: 2.0 %北京: 33.5 %北京: 33.5 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %承德: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %武汉: 3.3 %武汉: 3.3 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %焦作: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.8 %芒廷维尤: 10.8 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %莫斯科: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 31.6 %西宁: 31.6 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %遂宁: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaCzech RepublicIndiaRochesterRussian FederationSeattle[]上海东莞临汾临沂丽水乌鲁木齐六安兰州北京十堰南京南昌南通台州合肥呼和浩特哥伦布唐山商丘嘉兴大连天津娄底宜昌宣城巴音郭楞常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口徐州成都扬州承德无锡晋城杭州武汉洛阳淄博深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河烟台焦作盘锦石家庄福州美国伊利诺斯芝加哥芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科衢州西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳运城遂宁邯郸郑州重庆金华长沙阳泉青岛齐齐哈尔

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

      Article views (2971) PDF downloads(73) Cited by(9)
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return