• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Cao Minqiang, Rong Hui, Chen Zhenyan, Jiao Yangquan, Li Hongliang, Wang Yan, Li Qingchun, 2021. Quantitative Characterization and Controlling Factors of the Interlayer Oxidation Zone of Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Earth Science, 46(10): 3453-3466. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.375
    Citation: Cao Minqiang, Rong Hui, Chen Zhenyan, Jiao Yangquan, Li Hongliang, Wang Yan, Li Qingchun, 2021. Quantitative Characterization and Controlling Factors of the Interlayer Oxidation Zone of Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Earth Science, 46(10): 3453-3466. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.375

    Quantitative Characterization and Controlling Factors of the Interlayer Oxidation Zone of Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.375
    • Received Date: 2020-06-22
      Available Online: 2021-11-03
    • Publish Date: 2021-11-03
    • Quantitative characterization of architecture of the interlayer oxidation zone is very important to reveal the regularity of uranium mineralization. In this study, the interlayer oxidation zone of the Qianjiadian uranium deposits in the Songliao basin was quantitatively characterized by sedimentological and geochemistry mappings. It is found that the interlayer oxidation zone of the deposit is mainly composed of red sandstone, light yellow sandstone, gray white sandstone, gray mineralized sandstone and primary gray sandstone, respectively corresponding to strong oxidised subzone, weak oxidised subzone, faint oxidised subzone, transitional zone and reduction zone. The uranium mineralization is closely related to the internal architecture of interlayer oxidation zone. The main industrial uranium ore bodies are strictly developed in the transitional zone. A few ore bodies whose continuity is poor occur in the faint oxidised subzone. The ore bodies are sporadically distributed in the weak oxidation subzone. The low-grade uranium ore bodies are found in the side of reduction zone close to transitional zone. Formation of the interlayer oxidation zone is restricted by the heterogeneity of uranium reservoir sandstones and depositional systems. The oxidised zone is mainly developed in sand bodies of the braided river and braided distributary channel, and the transition zone primarily distributed at the edge of the braided distributary channel or in the crevasse fan.

       

    • Cai, J.F., Nie, F.J., Yang, W.D., et al., 2013. Analysis of Uranium Metallogenic Characteristics and Ore-Controlling Factors of the Baolongshan Area, Kailu Sub-Basin. Journal of East China Institute of Technology (Natural Science), 36(1): 10-16(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, F.H., Zhang, M.Y., Lin, C.S., 2005. Sedimentary Environments and Uranium Enrichment in the Yaojia Formation, Qianjiadian Depression, Kailu Basin, Nei Mongol. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 25(3): 74-79(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X.L., Fang, X.H., Guo, Q.Y., et al., 2008a. Re-Disscussion on Uranium Metallogenesis in Qianjiadian Sag, Songliao Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 82(4): 553-561(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X.L., Guo, Q.Y., Fang, X.H., et al., 2008b. Discussion on the Differences between Epigenetic Oxidized and Primary Red Beds. World Nuclear Geoscience, 25(4): 187-194(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X.L., Xiang, W.D., Li, T.G., et al., 2006. Distribution Characteristics of Interlayer Oxidation Zone and Its Relationship with Sedimentary Facies and Uranium Mineralization in QJD Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin, NE China. World Nuclear Geoscience, 23(3): 137-144(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GWYD200603002.htm
      Chen, X.L., Xiang, W.D., Li, T.G., et al., 2007. Lithofacies Characteristics of Ore-Hosting Horizon and Its Relationship to Uranium Mineralization in Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Uranium Geology, 23(6): 335-341, 355(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Galloway, W.E., 1978. Uranium Mineralization in a Coastal-Plain Fluvial Aquifer System; Catahoula Formation, Texas. Economic Geology, 73(8): 1655-1676. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.73.8.1655
      Gao, Y.Y., Yu, B.L., Yu, W.B., et al., 2008. Analysis on Uranium Metallogenic Conditions and Ore-Controlling Factors of Qianjiadian-Jiamatu Area, Southwest of Songliao Basin. World Nuclear Geoscience, 25(3): 150-156(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GWYD200803009.htm
      Granger, H. C., Warren, C.G., 1969. Unstable Sulfur Compounds and the Origin of Roll-Type Uranium Deposits. Economic Geology, 64(2): 160-171. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.64.2.160
      Granger, H.C., Warren, C.G., 1974. Zoning in the Altered Tongue Associated with Roll-Type Uranium Deposits. In: Symposium on the Formation of Uranium Ore Deposits. IAEA, Vienna, 185-199.
      Granger, H.C., Warren, C.G., 1979. The Importance of Dissolved Free Oxygen during Formation of Sandstone Type Uranium Deposits. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 79-1603, 1-19.
      Guo, S.B., Sun, S.B., 1998. Geochemistry of the Permian Sedimentary Rocks in the Lower Yangtze Area. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 18(1): 54-60(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hall, S. M., Mihalasky, M. J., Tureck, K. R., et al., 2017. Genetic and Grade and Tonnage Models for Sandstone-Hosted Roll-Type Uranium Deposits, Texas Coastal Plain, USA. Ore Geology Reviews, 80: 716-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.06.013
      Hobday, D.K., Galloway, W.E., 1999. Groundwater Processes and Sedimentary Uranium Deposits. Hydrogeology Journal, 7(1): 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050184
      Jiao, Y.Q., Wu, L.Q., Peng, Y.B., et al., 2015. Sedimentary-Tectonic Setting of the Deposition-Type Uranium Deposits Forming in the Paleo-Asian Tectonic Domain, North China. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(1): 189-205(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281907888_Sedimentary-tectonic_setting_of_the_deposition-type_uranium_deposits_forming_in_the_Paleo-Asian_tectonic_domain_North_China
      Jiao, Y.Q., Wu, L.Q., Rong, H., 2018. Model of Inner and Outer Reductive Media within Uranium Reservoir Sandstone of Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits and Its Ore-Controlling Mechanism: Case Studies in Daying and Qianjiadian Uranium Deposits. Earth Science, 43(2): 459-474(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201802009.htm
      Lehmann, B., 2008. Uranium Ore Deposits. Economic Geology, 2: 16-26.
      Li, J.G., Jin, R.S., Zhang, B., et al., 2018. Characteristics of Primary Clay Minerals in the Upper Cretaceous Yaojia Formation of Southwest Songliao Basin and Their Significance. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 39(3): 295-305(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Luo, Y., He, Z.B., Ma, H.F., et al., 2012. Metallogenic Characteristics of Qianjiadian Sandstone Uranium Deposit in Songliao Basin. Mineral Deposits, 31(2): 391-400(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ201202019.htm
      Ma, H.F., Luo, Y., Li, Z.Y., et al., 2009. Sedimentary Features and Uranium Metallogenic Conditions of Yaojia Formation in Southern Songliao Basin. Uranium Geology, 25(3): 144-149(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ma, H.F., Luo, Y., Li, Z.Y., et al., 2010. Constrain of Sedimentary Characteristics on the Mineralization Type of Sandstone Hosted Uranium Deposits-A Case Study of Yaojia Formation in the Southern Songliao Basin. World Nuclear Geoscience, 27(1): 6-10, 61(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Pang, Y.Q., Chen, X.L., Fang, X.H., et al., 2010. Discussion on the Interlayer Oxidation and Uranium Metallogenesis in Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Uranium Geology, 26(1): 9-16, 23(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YKDZ201001001.htm
      Reynolds, R. L., Goldhaber, M.B., 1983. Iron Disulfide Minerals and the Genesis of Roll-Type Uranium Deposits. Economic Geology, 78(1): 105-120. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.78.1.105
      Rong, H., Jiao, Y. Q., Wu, L. Q., et al., 2019. Origin of the Carbonaceous Debris and Its Implication for Mineralization within the Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Southern Songliao Basin. Ore Geology Reviews, 107: 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.02.036
      Rong, H., Jiao, Y.Q., Wu, L.Q., et al., 2016. Epigenetic Alteration and Its Constraints on Uranium Mineralization from the Qianjiadian Uranium Deposit, Southern Songliao Basin. Earth Science, 41(1): 153-166(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Suh, C. E., Dada, S. S., Ajayi, T. R., et al., 1998. Integrated Structural and Mineral Alteration Study of the Zona Uranium Anomaly, Northeast Nigeria. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 27(1): 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(98)00051-7
      Sun, Y., Zhong, J.H., Jiang, Z.X., et al., 2006. Study of Sequence Stratigraphy of Depression Period in Southern Songliao Basin. Journal of China University of Petroeum (Edition of Natural Science), 30(5): 1-7(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tian, S.F., 2005. Analysis of Uranium Deposit Diagenesis in Qianjiadian Sag of Songliao Basin. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 12(5): 26-29, 34(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ200505006.htm
      Wang, S.L., Zan, G.J., Chen, Z.Y., et al., 2014. Sedimentary Features of Uranium Deposit in Qianjiadian and Its Relationship with Uranium Mineralization. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 21(4): 73-75, 154(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201404017.htm
      Wu, B.L., Quan, Z.G., Wei, G.H., et al., 2005. Basic Geological and Geochemical Characteristics of Sandstone Type Uranium Deposits in Southwestern Margin of TurpanHami Basin. Mineral Deposits, 24(1): 34-43(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200501005.htm
      Xia, Y.L., Lin, J.R., Li, Z.Y., et al., 2003. Perspective and Resource Evaluation and Metallogenic Studies on Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposit in Qianjiadian Depression of Songliao Basin. China Nuclear Science and Technology Report, (3): 105-117(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZHBG200303008.htm
      Xu, K., Li, Y., 1995. Late Mesozoic Strata of the Kailu Basin. Journal of Stratigraphy, 19(2): 88-95(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yin, J.H., Zhang, H., Zan, G.J., et al., 2000. Sedimentation Factors Analysis of Uranium Mineralization of Qianjiadian Depression, Kailu Basin, East Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2(4): 76-83(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GDLX200004012.htm
      Yu, W.B., 2009. Research on Metallogenic Conditions of Sandstone Type Uranium Deposit of Cretaceous in southern Songliao Basin(Dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zammit, C. M., Brugger, J., Southam, G., et al., 2014. In Situ Recovery of Uranium-The Microbial Influence. Hydrometallurgy, 150: 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.06.003
      Zhao, L., Cai, C. F., Jin, R. S., et al., 2018. Mineralogical and Geochemical Evidence for Biogenic and Petroleum-Related Uranium Mineralization in the Qianjiadian Deposit, NE China. Ore Geology Reviews, 101: 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.07.025
      Zhao, Z.H., Zhang, Z.Q., Yu, W.B., et al., 2012. The Major Controlling Factors and Prospecting Guide of Sandstone-Type Uranium Mineralization in Southern Songliao Basin. World Nuclear Geoscience, 29(4): 199-202, 226(in Chinese with English abstract).
      蔡建芳, 聂逢君, 杨文达, 等, 2013. 开鲁坳陷宝龙山地区铀矿化特征及控矿因素分析. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 36(1): 10-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2013.01.002
      陈方鸿, 张明瑜, 林畅松, 2005. 开鲁盆地钱家店凹陷含铀岩系姚家组沉积环境及其富铀意义. 沉积与特提斯地质, 25(3): 74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2005.03.012
      陈晓林, 方锡珩, 郭庆银, 等, 2008a. 对松辽盆地钱家店凹陷铀成矿作用的重新认识. 地质学报, 82(4): 553-561. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200804013.htm
      陈晓林, 郭庆银, 方锡珩, 等, 2008b. 试论后生氧化红层与原生红层的区别. 世界核地质科学, 25(4): 187-194. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYD200804003.htm
      陈晓林, 向伟东, 李田港, 等, 2006. 松辽盆地QJD铀矿床层间氧化带的展布特征及其与沉积相、铀成矿的关系. 世界核地质科学, 23(3): 137-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2006.03.003
      陈晓林, 向伟东, 李田港, 等, 2007. 松辽盆地钱家店铀矿床含矿层位的岩相特征及其与铀成矿的关系. 铀矿地质, 23(6): 335-341, 355. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0658.2007.06.003
      高玉友, 禹宝利, 于文斌, 等, 2008. 松辽盆地西南部钱家店-架玛吐地区姚家组铀成矿条件及控矿因素分析. 世界核地质科学, 25(3): 150-156. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2008.03.005
      郭少斌, 孙少波, 1998. 松辽盆地层序地层学研究新认识. 岩相古地理, 18(1): 54-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXGD801.005.htm
      焦养泉, 吴立群, 彭云彪, 等, 2015. 中国北方古亚洲构造域中沉积型铀矿形成发育的沉积-构造背景综合分析. 地学前缘, 22(1): 189-205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201501018.htm
      焦养泉, 吴立群, 荣辉, 2018. 砂岩型铀矿的双重还原介质模型及其联合控矿机理: 兼论大营和钱家店铀矿床. 地球科学, 43(2): 459-474. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.512
      李建国, 金若时, 张博, 等, 2018. 松辽盆地西南部上白垩统姚家组原生黏土矿物组合特征及其找铀意义. 地球学报, 39(3): 295-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201803004.htm
      罗毅, 何中波, 马汉峰, 等, 2012. 松辽盆地钱家店砂岩型铀矿成矿地质特征. 矿床地质, 31(2): 391-400. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2012.02.018
      马汉峰, 罗毅, 李子颖, 等, 2009. 松辽盆地南部姚家组沉积特征及铀成矿条件. 铀矿地质, 25(3): 144-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0658.2009.03.003
      马汉峰, 罗毅, 李子颖, 等, 2010. 沉积特征对砂岩型铀成矿类型的制约: 以松辽盆地南部姚家组为例. 世界核地质科学, 27(1): 6-10, 61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2010.01.002
      庞雅庆, 陈晓林, 方锡珩, 等, 2010. 松辽盆地钱家店铀矿床层间氧化与铀成矿作用. 铀矿地质, 26(1): 9-16, 23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0658.2010.01.002
      荣辉, 焦养泉, 吴立群, 等, 2016. 松辽盆地南部钱家店铀矿床后生蚀变作用及其对铀成矿的约束. 地球科学, 41(1): 153-166. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2016.012
      孙钰, 钟建华, 姜在兴, 等, 2006. 松辽盆地南部坳陷期层序地层研究. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 30(5): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2006.05.001
      田时丰, 2005. 松辽盆地钱家店凹陷铀成矿条件分析. 特种油气藏, 12(5): 26-29, 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2005.05.007
      王世亮, 昝国军, 陈泽亚, 等, 2014. 钱家店铀矿床沉积特征及其与铀成矿的关系. 特种油气藏, 21(4): 73-75, 154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2014.04.017
      吴伯林, 权志高, 魏观辉, 等, 2005. 吐哈盆地西南缘砂岩型铀矿地质地球化学基本特征. 矿床地质, 24(1): 34-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2005.01.004
      夏毓亮, 林锦荣, 李子颖, 等, 2003. 松辽盆地钱家店凹陷砂岩型铀矿预测评价和铀成矿规律研究. 中国核科技报告, (3): 105-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHBG200303008.htm
      许坤, 李瑜, 1995. 开鲁盆地晚中生代地层. 地层学杂志, 19(2): 88-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ502.002.htm
      殷敬红, 张辉, 昝国军, 等, 2000. 内蒙古东部开鲁盆地钱家店凹陷铀矿成藏沉积因素分析. 古地理学报, 2(4): 76-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2000.04.009
      于文斌, 2009. 松辽盆地南部白垩系砂岩型铀矿成矿条件研究(博士学位论文). 长春: 吉林大学.
      赵忠华, 张振强, 于文斌, 等, 2012. 松辽盆地南部砂岩型铀矿成矿主控因素及找矿方向. 世界核地质科学, 29(4): 199-202, 226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2012.04.003
    • Relative Articles

    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(18)

      1. 宁君,宫天琦,何春生,马树松,卢天军,张亮亮,李继木,武飞,周荣辉,黄少华. 松辽盆地南部姚家组下段层间氧化特征及其与铀成矿关系研究. 铀矿地质. 2025(01): 74-85 .
      2. 户景松,唐华风,余雪英,黄玉龙,王璞珺,高有峰. 断陷盆地火山地层构成要素特征及地质意义:以吉林省九台全取心井下白垩统营城组为例. 地球科学. 2024(01): 155-173 . 本站查看
      3. 段美铃,宋昊,范元清,王泽鑫,黄晓东,周靖,张成江,谭亚辉. 松辽盆地钱家店铀矿床钱Ⅳ块中性地浸工艺矿物学特征. 矿物岩石. 2024(01): 40-49 .
      4. 李彤,俞礽安,王铁军,殷栋法,司庆红,朱强,文思博,涂家润. 松辽盆地东南缘卡伦湖地区上白垩统泉头组地球化学特征、碎屑锆石年龄与物源分析. 地球科学. 2024(05): 1759-1777 . 本站查看
      5. 李文灏,许德如,颜照坤,张成勇,丁波,肖柯相. 鄂尔多斯盆地与四川盆地砂岩型铀矿成矿条件对比初探. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 116-130 .
      6. 张宇辰,荣辉,焦养泉,曹民强,李清春,郭亮亮,郭长琪,周明旺. 钱家店铀矿床层间氧化带中铁钛氧化物的赋存状态及其对铀成矿的响应. 地球科学. 2024(06): 2024-2043 . 本站查看
      7. 彭虎,焦养泉,荣辉,逄礴,吕东霖,郭晓丹,王庆双,宇文晓依. 松辽盆地铁法地区砂岩型铀矿关键控矿因素的时空耦合. 地球科学. 2024(09): 3182-3198 . 本站查看
      8. Zhibing Feng,Fengjun Nie,Li Jiang,Fei Xia,Jianfang Cai,Bocheng Zhang,Yayun Lu,Liangliang Zhang. Roles of Multisourced Fluids in the Formation of SandstoneHosted Uranium Deposits in the SW Songliao Basin, NE China. Journal of Earth Science. 2023(01): 54-69 .
      9. 江文剑,秦明宽,范洪海,贾立城,郭强,黄少华,宁君,肖菁. 松辽盆地西南部含铀岩系沉积时的古气候演变及其与铀成矿关系. 地球科学. 2023(03): 1232-1245 . 本站查看
      10. 宁君,李继木,卢天军,佟术敏,张亮亮,王海涛,黄少华. 松辽盆地南部海力锦铀矿床姚家组下段黏土矿物特征及其铀成矿意义. 铀矿地质. 2023(02): 188-201 .
      11. 臧亚辉,姜山,李继木,宁君,张亮亮,翁海蛟,崔磊,蔺鹏飞,严兆彬,尹烁. 松辽盆地南部海力锦铀矿床铀矿物赋存状态及富集机理——试论“潮汐式”成矿作用过程. 大地构造与成矿学. 2023(03): 546-569 .
      12. 刘晓文,于婕,胡慧婷,魏佳林,谷社峰,胡霞,王静怡,刘宗堡. 油气运聚影响下三维地震精细解译的砂岩型铀矿控矿因素分析——以松辽盆地大庆长垣南端铀矿为例. 地质通报. 2023(11): 1834-1842 .
      13. 吴兆剑,韩效忠,李紫楠,胡航,来强. 准噶尔盆地中生代“下煤上铀”地层结构的沉积机理. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(12): 52-64 .
      14. Liqun Wu,Yangquan Jiao,Yunbiao Peng,Hui Rong. Uranium Metallogeny in Fault-Depression Transition Region:A Case Study of the Tamusu Uranium Deposit in the Bayingobi Basin. Journal of Earth Science. 2022(02): 409-421 .
      15. 王海涛. 开鲁坳陷姚家组下段沉积特征与铀成矿作用. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 223-233 .
      16. 焦养泉,吴立群,荣辉,张帆,乐亮,宋昊,陶振鹏,彭虎,孙钰函,向尧. 沉积、成岩与铀成矿:中国砂岩型铀矿研究的创新发现与认知挑战. 地球科学. 2022(10): 3580-3602 . 本站查看
      17. 陈长伟,宋舜尧,杨飞,梁传国,邹红丽,王翊超. 渤海湾盆地黄骅拗陷砂岩型铀成矿条件及找矿方向. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 687-696 .
      18. 彭爽,汪劲草,王佩华,邵金全,陈晓,张磊. 钱家店铀矿床(钱Ⅳ块)层间氧化带分布特征与铀矿化关系. 桂林理工大学学报. 2022(03): 549-556 .

      Other cited types(4)

    • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-032025-042025-05020406080
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 46.1 %FULLTEXT: 46.1 %META: 50.3 %META: 50.3 %PDF: 3.7 %PDF: 3.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.7 %其他: 8.7 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %Canada: 0.1 %Canada: 0.1 %China: 2.1 %China: 2.1 %France: 0.1 %France: 0.1 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凤凰城: 0.1 %凤凰城: 0.1 %包头: 0.3 %包头: 0.3 %北京: 16.6 %北京: 16.6 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吐鲁番地区: 0.1 %吐鲁番地区: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 1.7 %呼和浩特: 1.7 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %宣城: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.2 %岳阳: 0.2 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞蒙古自治州: 0.0 %巴音郭楞蒙古自治州: 0.0 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %抚州: 0.4 %抚州: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %昆明: 1.2 %昆明: 1.2 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %松原: 0.1 %松原: 0.1 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 3.1 %武汉: 3.1 %汉中: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %沈阳: 1.6 %沈阳: 1.6 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %甘孜藏族自治州: 0.1 %甘孜藏族自治州: 0.1 %盘锦: 1.3 %盘锦: 1.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %荆门: 0.2 %荆门: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %萍乡: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 22.2 %西宁: 22.2 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵港: 0.0 %贵港: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.1 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %通辽: 0.3 %通辽: 0.3 %邢台: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %鄂州: 0.4 %鄂州: 0.4 %酒泉: 0.1 %酒泉: 0.1 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %钦州: 0.0 %钦州: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %锦州: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %陇南: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %马哈拉施特拉邦: 0.0 %马哈拉施特拉邦: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.2 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他CanadaChinaFranceIndiaJapanNorwayUnited States[]上海临汾丽水乌鲁木齐九江克孜勒苏兰州凤凰城包头北京南京南宁南昌台州合肥吉安吐鲁番地区呼和浩特哈尔滨大同大庆大连天津太原娄底孝感宣城岳阳巴音郭楞巴音郭楞蒙古自治州常州广州廊坊延安张家口徐州忻州惠州成都扬州承德抚州拉贾斯坦邦昆明晋城杭州松原柳州榆林武汉汉中沈阳沧州洛阳济南淄博深圳温州湖州漯河烟台甘孜藏族自治州盘锦石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥荆门莫斯科萍乡衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵港贵阳赤峰辽阳达州运城通辽邢台邯郸郑州鄂州酒泉重庆金华钦州铁岭锦州镇江长春长沙长治陇南青岛韶关马哈拉施特拉邦黄冈齐齐哈尔

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

      Article views (1335) PDF downloads(99) Cited by(22)
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return