• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 48 Issue 1
    Jan.  2023
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Article Navigation >  Earth Science  > 2023  >  48(1): 143-157
    Li Zhiming, Sun Zhongliang, Li Maowen, Cao Tingting, Li Zheng, Liu Peng, Jiang Qigui, Qian Menhui, Tao Guoliang, 2023. Cause Analyses of 'Failure' for First Round Shale Oil Exploration Wells in Jiyang Depression. Earth Science, 48(1): 143-157. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.444
    Citation: Li Zhiming, Sun Zhongliang, Li Maowen, Cao Tingting, Li Zheng, Liu Peng, Jiang Qigui, Qian Menhui, Tao Guoliang, 2023. Cause Analyses of "Failure" for First Round Shale Oil Exploration Wells in Jiyang Depression. Earth Science, 48(1): 143-157. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.444
    shu

    Cause Analyses of "Failure" for First Round Shale Oil Exploration Wells in Jiyang Depression

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.444
    • 1.

      Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, RIPEP, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, China

    • 2.

      State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi 214126, China

    • 3.

      State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi 214126, China

    • 4.

      SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi 214126, China

    • 5.

      Exploration and Development Research Institute of SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield Branch Company, Dongying 257015, China

    • Received Date: 2022-02-13
      Available Online: 2023-02-01
    • Publish Date: 2023-01-25
      Abstract
    • The formation conditions of shale oil for the Lower Es3 (Third Member of Shahejie Formation) and Upper Es4 (Fourth Member of Shahejie Formation) Sub-member in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, are excellent, but none of the production test results of four evaluation wells and four system coring wells at preferred favorable layers reach the level of scale breakthrough. In order to reveal the causes of "failure" for the first round shale oil exploration wells in Jiyang Depression, the characteristics of oiliness, reservoir property, compressibility and mobility of shale oil for coring section of four system coring wells and the implementation of engineering technologies to preferred favorable layers of four system coring wells and four evaluation wells, are systematically analyzed. The results of this study show that the oiliness, reservoir property, compressibility and mobility of shale oil for coring section from wells NY1 and LY1 are all good and preferred favorable layers are reasonable, but the oiliness, reservoir property, and mobility of shale oil for coring section from wells FY1 and L69 are obviously lower than results of wells NY1 and LY1 and preferred favorable layers are incorrect. The main causes of "failure" for four evaluation wells are the maturity of shales rich in organic matter of horizontal intervals are low and the fracturing engineering technologies are poorly adaptable. The cause of "failure" for NY1 and LY1 of system coring wells at preferred favorable layer is mainly related to only conventional oil and gas test and production tools are used for joint measurement. The causes of "failure" for FY1 and L69 of system coring wells for preferred favorable layer are not only the preferred favorable layers are wrong, but also only conventional oil and gas test and production tools are used for joint measurement.

       

      • FullText(HTML)
      • References(89)
    • Abrams, M. A., Gong, C. R., Garnier, C., et al., 2017. A New Thermal Extraction Protocol to Evaluate Liquid Rich Unconventional Oil in Place and In-Situ Fluid Chemistry. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 88: 659-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.014
      Bao, Y. S., 2018a. Influence of Overpressure and Stress on Shale Oil Enrichment in Jiyang Depression. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 25(5): 585-588 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Bao, Y. S., 2018b. Effective Reservoir Spaces of Paleogene Shale Oil in the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 40(4): 479-484 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Bao, Y. S., Zhang, L. Y., Zhang, J. G., et al., 2016. Factors Influencing Mobility of Paleogene Shale Oil in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 37(3): 408-414 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cao, Q., Wang, X. Z., Qi, M. H., et al., 2020. Research Progress on Experimental Technologies of Shale Oil Geological Evaluation. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 39(3): 337-349 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Capuano, R. M., 1993. Evidence of Fluid Flow in Microfractures in Geopressured Shales. AAPG Bulletin, 77(8): 1303-1314. https://doi.org/10.1306/bdff8e70-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d
      Hu, S. Y., Zhao, W. Z., Hou, L. H., et al., 2020. Development Potential and Technical Strategy of Continental Shale Oil in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(4): 819-828 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jarvie, D. M., 2012. Shale Resource Systems for Oil and Gas: Part 2-Shale-Oil Resource Systems. In: Breyer, J. A., Shale Reservoirs: Giant Resources for the 21st Century American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Houston. https://doi.org/10.1306/13321446m973489
      Jarvie, D. M., 2014. Components and Processes Affecting Producibility and Commerciality of Shale Resource Systems. Geologica Acta, 12(4): 307-325.
      Jiang, T. X., Bian, X. B., Su, Y., et al., 2014. A New Method for Evaluating Shale Fracability Index and Its Application. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 42(5): 16-20 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jin, Z. J., Bai, Z. R., Gao, B., et al., 2019. Has China Ushered in the Shale Oil and Gas Revolution? Oil & Gas Geology, 40(3): 451-458 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Larter, S., Huang, H. P., Bennett, B., et al., 2012. What don't We Know about Self Sourced Oil Reservoirs: Challenges and Potential Solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Calgary.
      Lei, Q., Weng, D. W., Xiong, S. C., et al., 2021. Progress and Development Directions of Shale Oil Reservoir Stimulation Technology of China National Petroleum Corporation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(5): 1035-1042 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, M. W., Chen, Z. H., Cao, T. T., et al., 2018a. Expelled Oils and Their Impacts on Rock-Eval Data Interpretation, Eocene Qianjiang Formation in Jianghan Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 191: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.03.001
      Li, M. W., Chen, Z. H., Ma, X. X., et al., 2018b. A Numerical Method for Calculating Total Oil Yield Using a Single Routine Rock-Eval Program: A Case Study of the Eocene Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 191: 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.03.004
      Li, Y., Liu, K. Y., Pu, X. G., et al., 2020. Lithofacies Characteristics and Formation Environments of Mixed FineGrained Sedimentary Rocks in Second Member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Earth Science, 45(10): 3779-3796 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Liu, P., Qian, M. H., et al., 2018a. Quantitative Comparison of Different Occurrence Oil for Lacustrine Shale: A Case from Cored Interval of Shale Oil Special Drilling Wells in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 47(6): 1252-1263 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Zheng, L. J., Jiang, Q. G., et al., 2018b. Simulation of Hydrocarbon Generation and Expulsion for Lacustrine Organic-Rich Argillaceous Dolomite and Its Implications for Shale Oil Exploration. Earth Science, 43(2): 566-576 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Qian, M. H., Li, M. W., et al., 2020. Favorable Conditions of Inter-Salt Shale Oil Formation and Key Parameters for Geological Sweet Spots Evaluation: A Case Study of Eq34-10 Rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 42(4): 513-523 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Rui, X. Q., Li, M. W., et al., 2015. Characteristics of Typical Hybrid Shale-Oil System in North America and Its Implications. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 45(4): 1060-1072 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Sun, Z. L., Li, M. W., et al., 2021. Maturity Limit of Sweet Spot Area for Continental Matrix Type Shale Oil: A Case Study of Lower Es3 and Upper Es4 Sub-Members in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 43(5): 767-775 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Tao, G. L., Li, M. W., et al., 2019a. Discussion on Prospecting Potential of Shale Oil in the 3rd Sub-Member of the Triassic Chang 7 Member in Binchang Block, Southwestern Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(3): 558-570 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Z. M., Tao, G. L., Li, M. W., et al., 2019b. Favorable Interval for Shale Oil Prospecting in Coring Well L69 in the Paleogene Es3L in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(2): 236-247 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, H. M., Zhang, S., Bao, Y. S., et al., 2019. Geological Characteristics and Effectiveness of the Shale Oil Reservoir in Dongying Sag. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(3): 512-523 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, P., Tao, G. L., Li, M. W., et al., 2020. Characteristics of Nitrogen-Containing Compounds in Shale Oil and Adjacent Shales in Well FY 1, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 42(4): 552-557 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, Q., Zhang, L. Y., Shen, Z. M., et al., 2004. Microfracture Occurrence and Its Significance to the Hydrocarbons Expulsion in Source Rocks with High Organic Matter Abundance, Dongying Depression. Geological Review, 50(6): 593-597, 669 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2004.06.010
      Liu, Y., 2018. Study on Shale Oil Reservoir Characteristics of Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin (Dissertation). Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lu, Y. X., Pan, R. F., Tang, L. Y., et al., 2017. Rock Mechanics and Brittleness of Shale Reservoirs in the Lower Sha 3 Member in Luojia Area, Zhanhua Sag. China Petroleum Exploration, 22(6): 69-77 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.06.008
      Ma, Y. S., Cai, X. Y., Zhao, P. R., et al., 2022. Geological Characteristics and Exploration Practices of Continental Shale Oil in China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 96(1): 155-171 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.01.013
      Peters, K. E., 1986. Guidelines for Evaluating Petroleum Source Rock Using Programmed Pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin, 70(3) : 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1306/94885688-1704-11d7-8645000102c1865d
      Snowdon, L. R., 1995. Rock-Eval Tmax Suppression: Documentation and Amelioration. AAPG Bulletin, 79(9): 1337-1348. https://doi.org/10.1306/7834d4c2-1721-11d7-8645000102c1865d
      Song, M. S., 2019. Practice and Current Status of Shale Oil Exploration in Jiyang Depression. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 26(1): 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Song, M. S., Liu, H. M., Wang, Y., et al., 2020. Enrichment Rules and Exploration Practices of Paleogene Shale Oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(2): 225-235 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60041-6
      Sun, H. Q., 2017. Exploration Practice and Cognitions of Shale Oil in Jiyang Depression. China Petroleum Exploration, 22(4): 1-14 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.04.001
      Sun, H. Q., Cai, X. Y., Zhou, D. H., et al., 2019. Practice and Prospect of SINOPEC Shale Oil Exploration. China Petroleum Exploration, 24(5): 569-575 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004
      Sun, L. D., Liu, H., He, W. Y., et al., 2021. An Analysis of Major Scientific Problems and Research Paths of Gulong Shale Oil in Daqing Oilfield, NE China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(3): 453-463 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, F. Y., Meng, X. H., Feng, W. P., et al., 2013. Evaluating Techniques for the Resource Extent and Its Recoverability of Lacustrine-Facies Tight Oil. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 32(3): 144-149 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2013.03.030
      Wang, G. M., Xiong, Z. H., Zhang, J., 2016. The Impact of Lithology Differences to Shale Fracturing. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 46(4): 1080-1089 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, X. J., Ning, F. X., Hao, X. F., et al., 2017. Paleogene Shale Oil Occurrence Features: A Case of Jiyang Depression. Science Technology and Engineering, 17(29): 39-48 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.29.006
      Wang, Y., Liu, H. M., Song, G. Q., et al., 2017. Enrichment Controls and Models of Shale Oil in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities, 23(2): 268-276 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Y., Zhang, S., 2021. Types and Characteristics of Lacustrine Shale Fine-Grained Depositional System: A Case Study of Upper Es4 and Lower Es3 Member in Jiyang Depression. Geological Review, 67(S1): 135-136 (in Chinese).
      Wang, Y. S., Li, Z., Gong, J. Q., et al., 2013. Discussion on an Evaluation Method of Shale Oil and Gas in Jiyang Depression: A Case Study on Luojia Area in Zhanhua Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 34(1): 83-91 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, W. Q., 2018. Shale Lithofacies Characteristics and Development Rule of the Lower Es3 and Upper Es4, Dongying Depression (Dissertation). China University of Petroleum, Qingdao (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, L. Y., 2005. A Restudy on the Hydrocarbon Occurrence of " Enriched Organic Matter": A Case Study of Dongying Depression. Geochimica, 34(6): 619-625 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2005.06.009
      Zhang, L. Y., Kong, X. X., Zhang, C. R., et al., 2003. High Quality Oil Prone Source Rocks in Jiyang Depression. Geochimica, 32(1): 35-42 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2003.01.005
      Zhang, L. Y., Li, J. Y., Li, Z., et al., 2015. Development Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Intra-Organic Reservoir Space in Lacustrine Shales. Earth Science, 40(11): 1824-1833 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, L. Y., Li, J. Y., Li, Z., et al., 2017. Study and Practice on Continental Shale Oil and Gas Geology. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Zhao, B., Chen, E. D., 2021. Drilling Technologies for Horizontal Shale Oil Well Fan Yeping 1 in the Shengli Oilfield. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 49(4): 53-58 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, W. Z., Hu, S. Y., Hou, L. H., et al., 2020. Types and Resource Potential of Continental Shale Oil in China and Its Boundary with Tight Oil. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(1): 1-10 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60001-5
      包友书, 2018a. 济阳坳陷超压和应力场对页岩油富集的影响. 断块油气田, 25(5): 585-588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201805009.htm
      包友书, 2018b. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系页岩油主要赋存空间探索. 石油实验地质, 40(4): 479-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201804004.htm
      包友书, 张林晔, 张金功, 等, 2016. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系页岩油可动性影响因素. 石油与天然气地质, 37(3): 408-414. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201603015.htm
      曹茜, 王兴志, 戚明辉, 等, 2020. 页岩油地质评价实验测试技术研究进展. 岩矿测试, 39(3): 337-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKCS202003003.htm
      胡素云, 赵文智, 侯连华, 等, 2020. 中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策. 石油勘探与开发, 47(4): 819-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202004021.htm
      蒋廷学, 卞晓冰, 苏瑗, 等, 2014. 页岩可压性指数评价新方法及应用. 石油钻探技术, 42(5): 16-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT201405003.htm
      金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等, 2019. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗? 石油与天然气地质, 40(3): 451-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903002.htm
      雷群, 翁定为, 熊生春, 等, 2021. 中国石油页岩油储集层改造技术进展及发展方向. 石油勘探与开发, 48(5): 1035-1042. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202105016.htm
      李圯, 刘可禹, 蒲秀刚, 等, 2020. 沧东凹陷孔二段混合细粒沉积岩相特征及形成环境. 地球科学, 45(10): 3779-3796. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.167
      李志明, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等, 2018a. 湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例. 中国矿业大学学报, 47(6): 1252-1263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201806010.htm
      李志明, 郑伦举, 蒋启贵, 等, 2018b. 湖相富有机质泥质白云岩生排烃模拟及其对页岩油勘探的启示. 地球科学, 43(2): 566-576. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.025
      李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 等, 2020. 盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜34‒10韵律为例. 石油实验地质, 42(4): 513–523. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202004006.htm
      李志明, 芮晓庆, 黎茂稳, 等, 2015. 北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 45(4): 1060-1072. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201504010.htm
      李志明, 孙中良, 黎茂稳, 等, 2021. 陆相基质型页岩油甜点区成熟度界限探讨——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙三下‒沙四上亚段为例. 石油实验地质, 43(5): 767-775. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202105006.htm
      李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等, 2019a. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨. 石油与天然气地质, 40(3): 558-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903012.htm
      李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等, 2019b. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段. 石油与天然气地质, 40(2): 236-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902004.htm
      刘惠民, 张顺, 包友书, 等, 2019. 东营凹陷页岩油储集地质特征与有效性. 石油与天然气地质, 40(3): 512-523. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903008.htm
      刘鹏, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等, 2020. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷樊页1井页岩油与临近页岩中含氮化合物组成特征. 石油实验地质, 42(4): 552-557. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202004010.htm
      刘庆, 张林晔, 沈忠民, 等, 2004. 东营凹陷富有机质烃源岩顺层微裂隙的发育与油气运移. 地质论评, 50(6): 593-597, 669. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200406006.htm
      刘毅, 2018. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沙河街组页岩油储层特征研究(博士学位论文). 成都: 成都理工大学.
      陆益祥, 潘仁芳, 唐廉宇, 等, 2017. 沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下亚段页岩储层的岩石力学与脆性评价研究. 中国石油勘探, 22(6): 69-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201706008.htm
      马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等, 2022. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践. 地质学报, 96(1): 155-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE202201010.htm
      宋明水, 2019. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与现状. 油气地质与采收率, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm
      宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等, 2020. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践. 石油勘探与开发, 47(2): 225-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002003.htm
      孙焕泉, 2017. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与认识. 中国石油勘探, 22(4): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201704001.htm
      孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等, 2019. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望. 中国石油勘探, 24(5): 569-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905004.htm
      孙龙德, 刘合, 何文渊, 等, 2021. 大庆古龙页岩油重大科学问题与研究路径探析. 石油勘探与开发, 48(3): 453-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103002.htm
      王飞宇, 孟晓辉, 冯伟平, 等, 2013. 湖相致密油资源量和可采性评价技术. 大庆石油地质与开发, 32(3): 144-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK201303030.htm
      王冠民, 熊周海, 张婕, 2016. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 46(4): 1080-1089. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201604008.htm
      王学军, 宁方兴, 郝雪峰, 等, 2017. 古近系页岩油赋存特征——以济阳坳陷为例. 科学技术与工程, 17(29): 39-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201729006.htm
      王勇, 刘惠民, 宋国奇, 等, 2017. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集要素与富集模式研究. 高校地质学报, 23(2): 268-276. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201702009.htm
      王勇, 张顺, 2021. 细粒沉积体系类型及特征——以济阳坳陷沙四上‒沙三下亚段为例. 地质论评, 67(S1): 135-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP2021S1062.htm
      王永诗, 李政, 巩建强, 等, 2013. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法: 以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例. 石油学报, 34(1): 83-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301008.htm
      杨万芹, 2018. 东营凹陷沙三下‒沙四上亚段页岩岩相特征及发育规律(博士学位论文). 青岛: 中国石油大学.
      张林晔, 2005. "富集有机质"成烃作用再认识: 以东营凹陷为例. 地球化学, 34(6): 619-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200506009.htm
      张林晔, 孔祥星, 张春荣, 等, 2003. 济阳坳陷下第三系优质烃源岩的发育及其意义. 地球化学, 32(1): 35-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200301004.htm
      张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 等, 2015. 湖相页岩有机储集空间发育特点与成因机制. 地球科学, 40(11): 1824-1833. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2015.163
      张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 等, 2017. 陆相盆地页岩油气地质研究与实践. 北京: 石油工业出版社.
      赵波, 陈二丁, 2021. 胜利油田页岩油水平井樊页平1井钻井技术. 石油钻探技术, 49(4): 53-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT202104009.htm
      赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等, 2020. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界. 石油勘探与开发, 47(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001002.htm
      • Relative Articles

    • Relative Articles

      • Supplements(0)
      • Cited By

    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(4)

      1. 郭旭升，申宝剑，李志明，万成祥，李楚雄，李倩文. 论我国页岩油气的统一性. 石油实验地质. 2024(05): 889-905 .
      2. 杜玉山，蒋龙，程紫燕，李伟忠，任敏华，刘巍，倪良田，陈建勋，蔡鑫，郭士博，王云鹤，刘艳，方正，彭艳霞，隆佳佳. 胜利济阳页岩油开发进展与攻关方向. 油气地质与采收率. 2024(05): 77-98 .
      3. 李志明，金芸芸，李楚雄，黄帅博，周圆圆，贾梦瑶，冷筠滢，余梦丽，徐二社，刘雅慧，刘鹏，何晋译. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷渐新统核桃园组三Ⅲ亚段页岩油富集模式——以中部深凹带YYY1井取心段为例. 石油实验地质. 2023(05): 952-962 .
      4. 李志明，刘雅慧，何晋译，孙中良，冷筠滢，李楚雄，贾梦瑶，徐二社，刘鹏，黎茂稳，曹婷婷，钱门辉，朱峰. 陆相页岩油“甜点”段评价关键参数界限探讨. 石油与天然气地质. 2023(06): 1453-1467 .

      Other cited types(0)

    • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05020406080
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 39.3 %FULLTEXT: 39.3 %META: 55.8 %META: 55.8 %PDF: 4.9 %PDF: 4.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.0 %其他: 7.0 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.1 %[]: 0.0 %[]: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东营: 1.2 %东营: 1.2 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚: 0.2 %加利福尼亚: 0.2 %北京: 26.7 %北京: 26.7 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 1.2 %台州: 1.2 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大庆: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %大理: 0.0 %大理: 0.0 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %奇诺: 0.1 %奇诺: 0.1 %宁波: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %张家口: 0.5 %张家口: 0.5 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %承德: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %无锡: 0.8 %无锡: 0.8 %旧金山: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.1 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沧州: 0.5 %沧州: 0.5 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 1.0 %湖州: 1.0 %滨州: 0.5 %滨州: 0.5 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潜江: 0.0 %潜江: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.4 %莫斯科: 0.4 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 21.8 %西宁: 21.8 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %诺伊达: 0.0 %诺伊达: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 0.8 %运城: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %釜山: 0.1 %釜山: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.7 %锦州: 0.7 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %青岛: 1.6 %青岛: 1.6 %鹤壁: 0.0 %鹤壁: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %其他其他Central DistrictFalls Church[]三亚上海东莞东营中卫临汾丽水休斯顿克拉玛依兰州加利福尼亚北京十堰南京南宁南昌厦门台州呼和浩特咸阳哈密哈尔滨哥伦布唐山嘉兴大庆大理天津奇诺宁波安康宣城巴音郭楞常州广州张家口成都扬州承德抚州抚顺无锡旧金山昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳沧州洛杉矶济南海口淄博深圳温州湖州滨州漯河潜江濮阳盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科衡水衢州襄阳西宁西安诺伊达诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆金华釜山银川锦州长春长沙长治青岛鹤壁黄冈齐齐哈尔

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

      Get Citation
      PDF
      XML
      Article views (1660) PDF downloads(150) Cited by(4)
      Proportional views

      Address：湖北省武汉市洪山区鲁磨路388号《地球科学》编辑部 China Pos：430074

      Tel：027-67885075 Fax：027-67885075

      Copyright ©2020 鄂ICP备15021562号-2

      Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return