• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 49 Issue 8
    Aug.  2024
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Liu Huan, Zhao Runzhuo, Dong Haobin, 2024. Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic. Earth Science, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    Citation: Liu Huan, Zhao Runzhuo, Dong Haobin, 2024. Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic. Earth Science, 49(8): 2952-2960. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144

    Short-Impending Earthquake Prediction Method Based on High-Order Magnetic Anomaly Derivative and High-Order Statistic

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.144
    • Received Date: 2023-01-22
      Available Online: 2024-08-27
    • Publish Date: 2024-08-25
    • In recent years, moderate-strong earthquakes have brought indelible disasters to the safety of people's lives and properties. Hence, exploring the connection between geomagnetic fields and earthquakes, obtaining precursor information, and then realizing the prediction of moderate-strong earthquakes are vital issues that need to be solved urgently. For now, the vertical component Z of the geomagnetic field has been widely used for moderate-strong earthquake early warning. However, it still has numerous problems such as long prediction periods, difficulty in determining the threshold, and low prediction accuracy. To solve the above problems, a short-impending earthquake prediction method based on high-order magnetic anomaly derivative and high-order statistic, dubbed HMAD-HS, is proposed, which can effectively reduce the influence of Gaussian noise on the precursor geomagnetic field, shorten the prediction period, and then improve the prediction accuracy. To verify the feasibility of this method, taking the moderate-strong earthquakes of Kashgar, Xinjiang in 2017 as an example, the HMAD-HS was compared with two commonly used methods, i.e., load-unload response ratio and geomagnetic daily ratio. The experimental results show that the precursor signals of moderate-strong earthquakes obtained by HMAD-HS are obvious, and the missing report rate and false report rate are reduced by more than 30%, which greatly improves the forecast credibility. Further, the applications of HMAD-HS for the short-term prediction of moderate-strong earthquakes in many regions of our country prove that the proposed method is universal and has a good effect on predicting moderate-strong earthquakes.

       

    • loading
    • AiSa, Y., Feng, Z. S., Chen, J. H., et al., 2021. Geomagnetic Day by Day Ratio and Its Relationship with Strong Earthquakes in Xinjiang and Its Adjacent Areas. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 41(4): 617-625(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11728/cjss2021.04.617
      Chen, S. J., Hu, X. Y., Liu, S., et al., 2022. Application Study on High Precision Aeromagnetic Survey in Weilasituo, Inner Mongolia, China. Earth Science, 47(6): 2175-2189 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X., Huang, E. X., Cheng, W. L., 2021. Correlation Anomalies of Total Daily F Value of the Geomagnetic Field in Southern Henan and Adjacent Areas. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 42(3): 115-120(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cop, R., Rasson, J. L., Bilc, A., 2021. Accelerations in the Local Magnetic Field on the Adriatic Tectonic Microplate. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 10(3): 95-104. https://doi.rog/10.4236/ojer.2021.103007 doi: 10.4236/ojer.2021.103007
      Ding, J. H., Suo, Y. C., Yu, S. R., et al., 2005. Phenomena of Geomagnetic and Ionospheric Anomalies and Their Relation to Earthquakes. Chinese Journal of Space Science, (6): 44-50. (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Feng, Z. S., Wang, J. Y., Jiang, Y. L., et al., 2001. Ratio of Daily Variation Amplitude of Geomagnetic Vertical Component and Its Relation with Earthquake. South China Journal of Seismology, (2): 20-27(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2001.02.004
      Gavoret, J., Gibert, D., Menvielle, M., et al., 1986. Long‐term Variations of the External and Internal Components of the Earth's Magnetic Field. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B5): 4787-4796. https://doi.rog/10.1029/jb091ib05p04787 doi: 10.1029/jb091ib05p04787
      Hu, X. Y., Han, B., Yu, T., et al., 2022. How to effectively deal with geomagnetic disaster prevention and mitigation. Earth Science, 47(10): 3904-3905 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., Chen, J. L., Chen, G. F., et al., 2014. Continental Seismotectonic System : Example from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Its Adjacent Areas. Earth Science, 39(12): 1763-1775(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, H. Y., Yuan, G. P., 2018. Spatial Correlation Characteristics of Geomagnetic Total Field before Strong Earthquakes. Earthquake, 38(1): 157-166(in Chinese with English abstract)
      Nagata, T., 1972. Application of Tectonomagnetism to Earthquake Phenomena. Tectonophysics, 14(3/4): 263-271. https://doi.rog/10.1016/0040-1951(72)90074-1 doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(72)90074-1
      Ni, X. Y., Huang, S., Jiang, C. F., et al., 2021. Geomagnetic Diurnal Variation Anomalies Before 2019 Changning M6.0 Earthquake and Xiahe M5.7 Earthquake. Earthquake, 41(3): 202-218(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qi, G. Z., 1978. Dilatancy-Magnetic Effect. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, (1): 18-33(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qian, C., Chen, L. G., Zhang, Z. G., 2021. Daily Ratio Anomaly of Vertical Component of Geomagnetic Field and Its Prediction Efficiency before Baicheng M5.4 Earthquake. Inland Earthquake, 35(2): 129-135(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qin, L., 2020. Research and Implementation of Earthquake Precursor Data Analysis and Anomaly Monitoring(Dissertation). Anhui University, Hefei, 1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Stacey, F. D., 1963. Seismo-Magnetic Effect and the Possibility of Forecasting Earthquakes. Nature, 200(4911): 1083-1085. https://doi.rog/10.1038/2001083b0 doi: 10.1038/2001083b0
      Trotta, J. E., Tullis, T. E., 2006. An Independent Assessment of the Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) Proposed Method of Earthquake Prediction. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163(11/12): 2375-2387. https://doi.rog/10.1007/s00024-006-0128-9 doi: 10.1007/s00024-006-0128-9
      Wang, D. W., 1995. Geomagnetic Application of the Theory of Load-Unload Response Ration in the Prediction of Earthquake by Geomagnetism. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, (3): 26-30(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, T., Liu, Q. S., Fu, Y. Y., et al., 2005. Study on the Relationship between Seismo-Magnetic Effects and Seismicity in West Gansu and Its Adjacent Area with Higher-order Statistics. North China Earthquake Sciences, (1): 52-56(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yin, X. C., Yin, C., 1991. Precursors of Nonlinear System Instability and Exploration of New Methods for Earthquake Prediction: Response Ratio Theory and Its Application. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (3): 16-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yin, X. C., 2015. Response Ratio Theory of Loading and Unloading and Its Application. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Zeng, X. P., Xu, C. R., Zhao, M., et al., 1996. The Load-Unload Response Phenomena of Geomagnetic Field to Solar Wind and Earthquake Prediction. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, (1): 49-53(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Z. Y., Hu, X. Y., Wang, D. Y., et al., 2021. Geophysical Field Characteristics of Dongyang Region, Fujian Province. Earth Science, 46(10): 3717-3729(in Chinese with English abstract).
      艾萨·伊斯马伊力, 冯志生, 陈界宏, 等, 2021. 地磁逐日比与新疆及周边地区强震关系. 空间科学学报, 41(4): 617-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJKB202104012.htm
      陈思静, 胡祥云, 刘双, 2022. 内蒙古维拉斯托地区高精度航磁调查与应用研究. 地球科学, 47(6): 2175-2189. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.234
      陈贤, 黄恩贤, 成万里, 2021. 豫南及邻区地磁总场F日值相关性异常. 地震地磁观测与研究, 42(3): 115-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ202103014.htm
      丁鉴海, 索玉成, 余素荣, 2005. 地磁场与电离层异常现象及其与地震的关系. 空间科学学报, (6): 44-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJKB200506008.htm
      冯志生, 王建宇, 蒋延林, 等, 2001. 地磁垂直分量日变幅逐日比及其与地震关系的探讨. 华南地震, (2): 20-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDI200102003.htm
      胡祥云, 韩波, 余涛, 2022. 如何有效应对地磁灾害防灾减灾. 地球科学, 47(10): 3904-3905. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.858
      李德威, 陈继乐, 陈桂凡, 等, 2014. 大陆地震构造系统: 以青藏高原及邻区为例. 地球科学, 39(12): 1763-1775. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.160
      李鸿宇, 袁桂平, 2018. 强震前地磁总场F_(2)测值的空间相关特征研究. 地震, 38(1): 157-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201801015.htm
      倪晓寅, 黄颂, 姜楚峰, 2021. 2019年长宁6.0级与夏河5.7级地震前的地磁日变化异常. 地震, 41(3): 202-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN202103015.htm
      祁贵仲, 1978. "膨胀"磁效应. 地球物理学报, (1): 18-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX197801002.htm
      钱才, 陈鲁刚, 张治广, 2021. 拜城M_S5.4地震前地磁逐日比异常及其预报效能分析. 内陆地震, 35(2): 129-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ202102003.htm
      秦乐, 2020. 地震前兆数据分析与异常监测研究及实现(博士毕业论文). 合肥: 安徽大学
      王亶文, 1995. 加卸载响应比理论在以磁报震中的应用探索. 地震地磁观测与研究, (3): 26-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ503.004.htm
      杨涛, 刘庆生, 付媛媛, 等, 2005. 陇西及周边地区地震活动与震磁效应的高阶统计量研究. 华北地震科学, (1): 52-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD200501010.htm
      尹祥础, 尹灿, 1991. 非线性系统失稳的前兆与地震预测新方法的探索——响应比理论及其应用. 国际地震动态, (3): 16-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJZT199103007.htm
      尹祥础, 2015. 加卸载响应比理论及其应用. 北京: 科学出版社.
      曾小苹, 续春荣, 赵明, 等, 1996. 地球磁场对太阳风的加卸载响应与地震. 地震地磁观测与研究, (1): 49-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ601.007.htm
      张振宇, 胡祥云, 王大勇, 等, 2021. 福建东洋地区地球物理场特征. 地球科学, 46(10): 3717-3729. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.058
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

      Article views (299) PDF downloads(36) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return