• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 34 Issue 6
    Jun.  2009
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Article Navigation >  Earth Science  > 2009  >  34(6): 914-920
    CAO Sheng-hua, LI De-wei, YU Zhong-zhen, XU Zu-feng, TANG Feng-lin, 2009. Characteristics and Mechanism of the Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co NS-Trending Graben in the Gangdese, Tibet. Earth Science, 34(6): 914-920.
    Citation: CAO Sheng-hua, LI De-wei, YU Zhong-zhen, XU Zu-feng, TANG Feng-lin, 2009. Characteristics and Mechanism of the Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co NS-Trending Graben in the Gangdese, Tibet. Earth Science, 34(6): 914-920.
    shu

    Characteristics and Mechanism of the Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co NS-Trending Graben in the Gangdese, Tibet

    • 1.

      Faculty of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

    • 2.

      Jiangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Jiangxi 330030, China

    • 3.

      Faculty of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

    • Received Date: 2008-09-12
    • Publish Date: 2009-11-25
      Abstract
    • The Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co NS-trending graben located at central section of the Gangdese, is controlled by NS-trending high-angle normal faults and consists of the Dangqung Co, Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co. Miocene alkati volcanic rock distributed along the graben indicates an intraplate extensional tectonic environment by its petrochemical and geochemical analyses. A 12.6 Ma age is determined for leucite phonolite by the K-Ar method, and it is found that graben occurred at the late time of Miocene (about 13 Ma), and remained active until Holocene. There are Middle Pliocene to Holocene lacustrine deposits in the graben. The Dangra Yun Co and Xuru Co graben, as well as other NS-trending grabens, is the results of extension of upper crust driven by the thermal upderplating of the lower crust flowing and thickening. S-N extension became E-W extension with the change of flow direction in the lower crust.

       

      • FullText(HTML)
      • References(26)
    • Armijo, R., Mercier, P., Tapponnier, J. L., et al., 1986. Quaternary extension in southern Tibet: Field observations and tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res., 91 (B14): 13803-13872. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB14p13803
      Blisniuk, P. M., Hacker, B. R., Glodny, J., et al., 2001. Normal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myrago. Nature, 412 (6847): 628-632. doi: 10.1038/35088045
      Burchfiel, B. C., Chen, Z. L., Hodges, K. V., et al., 1992. The South Tibetan detachment system, Himalayan orogen: Extension contemporaneous with and parallel to shortening in a collisional mountain belt. Geological Society of America, Special paper, 1-51.
      Burg, J. P., Chen, G. M., 1984. Tectonics and structural zonation of southern Tibet, China. Nature, 311 (5983): 219-223. doi: 10.1038/311219a0
      Li, C., Zhai, Q. G., Xu, F., et al., 2005. Kinematics of the active north-south-trending Chazang Co-Xainza tectonic belt, Xizang (Tibet). Geological Review, 51 (4): 353-359 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., 1992. On tectonic asymmetrical evolution of the Himalayan orogenic belt. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 17 (5): 539-545 (inChinese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., 1995. On continental tectonics and its dynamics. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 20 (1): 19-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., 2003. A new model for uplifting mechanism of Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 28 (6): 593-600 (in Chi-nese with English abstract).
      Li, D. W., Liu, D. M., Liao, Q. A., et al., 2003. Definition and significance of the Lhagoi Kangri metamorphic core complexes in Sa'gya, southern Tibet. Geological Bulletin of China, , 22 (5): 303-307 (in Chinese with Eng-lish abstract).
      Li, D. W., Zhuang, Y. X., 2006. Scientific problems of continental dynamics in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Geological Science and Technology Information, 25 (2): 1-10, 18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Y. L., Wang, C. S., Yi, H. S., et al., 2005. A discussion on several problems regarding to the Cenozoic grabens in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Geological Review, 51 (5): 493-501 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liao, S. P., Chen, Z. H., Luo, X. C., et al., 2002. Discovery of leucite phonolite in the Tangra Yumco area, Tibet and its geological significance. Geological Bulletin of China, 21 (11): 735-738 (in Chinese with English ab-stract).
      Wu, Z. H., Jiang, W., Wu, Z. H., et al., 2002. Dating of typical basin and range tectonic in central Tibetan plateau. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 23 (4): 289-294 (in Chinesewith English abstract).
      Xu, Z. F., Liu, X. Y., Luo, X. C., et al., 2006. Basic characteristic of the Neogene-Quaternary graben in the Tangqung Co Xuru Co area, Gangdise, Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Geological Bulletin of China, 25 (7): 822-826 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, J. J., Ding, L., 2003. East-west extension in Tibetan plateau and its significance to tectonic evolution. Chinese Journal of Geology, 38 (2): 179-189 (in Chinese withEnglish abstract).
      李才, 翟庆国, 徐锋, 等, 2005. 西藏查藏错-申扎南北向活动构造带运动学特点. 地质论评, 51 (4): 353-359. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2005.04.001
      李德威, 1992. 喜马拉雅造山带的构造不对称演化. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 17 (5): 539-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199205008.htm
      李德威, 1995. 再论大陆构造与动力学. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 20 (1): 19-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX501.002.htm
      李德威, 2003. 青藏高原隆升机制新模式. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 28 (6): 593-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200306002.htm
      李德威, 刘德民, 廖群安, 等, 2003. 藏南萨迦拉轨岗日变质核杂岩的厘定及其成因. 地质通报, 22 (5): 303-307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2003.05.002
      李德威, 庄育勋, 2006. 青藏高原大陆动力学的科学问题. 地质科技情报, 25 (2): 1-10, 18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200602000.htm
      李亚林, 王成善, 伊海生, 等, 2005. 青藏高原新生代地堑构造研究中几个问题的讨论. 地质论评, 51 (5): 493-501. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2005.05.002
      廖思平, 陈振华, 罗小川, 等, 2002. 西藏当惹雍错地区白榴石响岩的发现及地质意义. 地质通报, 21 (11): 735-738. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2002.11.008
      吴珍汉, 江万, 吴中海, 等, 2002. 青藏高原腹地典型盆-山构造形成时代. 地球学报, 23 (4): 289-294. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2002.04.001
      徐祖丰, 刘细元, 罗小川, 等, 2006. 青藏高原冈底斯当穹错-许如错一带新近纪-第四纪地堑的基本特征. 地质通报, 25 (7): 822-826. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2006.07.008
      张进江, 丁林, 2003. 青藏高原东西向伸展及其地质意义. 地质科学, 38 (2): 179-189. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2003.02.005
      • Relative Articles

    • Relative Articles

      • Supplements(0)
      • Cited By
    • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06020406080
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 33.0 %FULLTEXT: 33.0 %META: 65.2 %META: 65.2 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
      Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.2 %其他: 5.2 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %中卫: 0.0 %中卫: 0.0 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 21.6 %北京: 21.6 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉森: 0.1 %吉森: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉峪关: 0.1 %嘉峪关: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %宁波: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 2.1 %张家口: 2.1 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉萨: 0.2 %拉萨: 0.2 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.5 %日喀则: 0.5 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %江门: 0.0 %江门: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %泉州: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.2 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.2 %舟山: 0.1 %舟山: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 17.1 %芒廷维尤: 17.1 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莆田: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 32.3 %西宁: 32.3 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.0 %连云港: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %鞍山: 0.0 %鞍山: 0.0 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %其他其他ChinaSeattleUnited States[]上海中卫佛山保定北京十堰南京南平南昌厦门台州合肥吉安吉森呼和浩特哈尔滨唐山嘉兴嘉峪关大同天津宁波宜春宣城常州平顶山广州张家口成都扬州拉萨无锡日喀则昆明朝阳杭州武汉江门沈阳泉州洛阳淄博深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河珠海石家庄福州美国伊利诺斯芝加哥舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田莫斯科萍乡葫芦岛衡阳衢州襄阳西宁诺沃克达州运城连云港邯郸郑州重庆金华铁岭锦州长沙青岛鞍山香港马鞍山

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(4)  / Tables(1)

      Get Citation
      PDF
      XML
      Article views (4759) PDF downloads(103) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      Address：湖北省武汉市洪山区鲁磨路388号《地球科学》编辑部 China Pos：430074

      Tel：027-67885075 Fax：027-67885075

      Copyright ©2020 鄂ICP备15021562号-2

      Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return