土体微观结构研究与土力学的发展方向——若干进展与思考

周萃英

Volume 25 Issue 2

Mar. 2000

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Earth Science > 2000 > 25(2): 215-220

ZHOU Cuiying, 2000. RESEARCH INTO SOIL MASS MICROSTRUCTURE AND SOME PROGRESSES ON SOIL MECHANICS. Earth Science, 25(2): 215-220.

Citation:

ZHOU Cuiying, 2000. RESEARCH INTO SOIL MASS MICROSTRUCTURE AND SOME PROGRESSES ON SOIL MECHANICS. Earth Science, 25(2): 215-220.

ZHOU Cuiying, 2000. RESEARCH INTO SOIL MASS MICROSTRUCTURE AND SOME PROGRESSES ON SOIL MECHANICS. Earth Science, 25(2): 215-220.

Citation:

ZHOU Cuiying, 2000. RESEARCH INTO SOIL MASS MICROSTRUCTURE AND SOME PROGRESSES ON SOIL MECHANICS. Earth Science, 25(2): 215-220.

PDF( 613 KB)

RESEARCH INTO SOIL MASS MICROSTRUCTURE AND SOME PROGRESSES ON SOIL MECHANICS

ZHOU Cuiying

Department of Geosciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275 China

Received Date: 1999-03-05
Publish Date: 2000-03-25

Abstract

Abstract

The research into soil microstructure is one of the frontal topics in the soil mass research. Such complex features as discontinuity, heterogeneity, anisotropy and uncertainty characteristics of the engineering soil mass on a macroscopic scale depend greatly on the discontinuity and uncertainty of the soil mass microstructure. In another word, the soil mass complexity is the direct actualization of the non-inearity of the soil mass microstructure and components. Therefore, the research into the soil mass microstructure and model has turned into one of the key issues. In this sense, the scientific establishment of the structural control model of the soil mass evolution, that of the soil-ass microstructural evolutionary mechanism-ased soil mechanic model and the constitutive relationship are new trends of the soil mechanic theoretical development. In this paper, the progresses in the soil microstructure are first presented. The characteristics are then discussed of the soil mass microstructural evolutionary mechanism and microstructural model. Finally, a new approach is proposed to the soil mechanic theoretical modeling.
- soil mass,
- structural control model,
- soil mechanics

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	沈珠江. 土体结构性的数学模型——21世纪土力学的核心问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(1): 5~97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC601.014.htm
[2]	李生林, 秦素娟, 薄遵昭, 等. 中国膨胀土工程地质研究[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1992. 171~177.
[3]	吴义祥. 工程粘性土微观结构的定量评价[J]. 中国地质科学院院报, 1991, 23: 143~151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB199102010.htm
[4]	Tovey N K, Krinsley D H. Mapping of the orientation of fine-grained minerals in soils and sediments[J]. Bulletin of IAEG, 1992, 46: 93~101.
[5]	Tovey N K. A digital computer technique for orientation analysis of micrographs soil fabric[J]. J of Microscopy, 1990, 120: 303~315.
[6]	Shi B, Li S L. Quantitative approach on SEM images of microstructure of clay soils[J]. Science in China(Series B), 1995, 38(6): 741~748.
[7]	胡瑞林, 官国琳, 李向东, 等. 粘性土微观结构定量模型及其工程地质特征研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1995.
[8]	施斌. 粘性土微观结构简易定量分析法[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1997, (1): 7~10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG199701002.htm
[9]	Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distribution analysis and limitations[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1992, 56: 362~369. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020005x
[10]	McBrathney A B. Comments on" Fractal distribution of soil aggregate-size distribution calculated by number and mass"[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1993, 57: 1393~1394. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700050038x
[11]	谢和平. 分形几何及其在岩土力学中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1992, 14(1): 14~24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1992.01.002
[12]	Kozak E, Pachepsky Ya A. A modified number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions of soils[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1996, 60: 1291~1297. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000050002x
[13]	刘松玉, 方磊. 试论粘性土粒度分布的分形结构[J]. 工程勘察, 1992, (2): 16~20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCKC199202000.htm
[14]	肖树芳. 泥化夹层的组构及强度蠕变特性[M]. 长春: 吉林科学技术出版社, 1991.
[15]	Delage P, Lefebvre G. Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1984, 21: 21~35. doi: 10.1139/t84-003
[16]	Garcia-Bengochea I, Lovell C W, Altschaeffl A G. Relation between pore size distribution and permeability of silty clay[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1979, 105(GT7): 839~856.
[17]	Griffith F J, Joshi R C. Change in pore size distribution due to consolidation of clays[J]. Geotechnique, 1989, 39 (1): 159~167. doi: 10.1680/geot.1989.39.1.159
[18]	Lapierre C, Leroueil S, Locat J. Mercury intrusion and permeability of Louiseville clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27: 761~773. doi: 10.1139/t90-090
[19]	谭罗荣, 张梅英, 邵捂敏, 等. 灾害性膨胀土的微观结构特征及其工程性质[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994, 16(2): 48~57. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1994.02.006
[20]	沈珠江. 结构性粘土的非线性损伤力学模型[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1993, (9): 247~255. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSY199303004.htm
[21]	苗天德, 王正贵. 考虑微结构失稳的湿陷性黄土变形机理[J]. 中国科学(B辑), 1990, (1): 48~57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBXK199001013.htm
[22]	胡瑞林, 官国琳, 李向东, 等. 黄土压缩变形的微结构效应[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1998, (3): 30~34 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG803.008.htm
[23]	施斌, 王宝军, 宁义务. 各向异性粘性土蠕变的微观力学模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1997, 19(3): 7~13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC703.001.htm
[24]	Pierre Delage, Martine A, Cui Y J, et al. Microstructure of a compacted silt[J]. Canada Geotechnical Journal, 1996, 33: 150~158. doi: 10.1139/t96-030
[25]	Nagaraj TS, Pandian N S, Narasimha Raju P S R. Compressibility behavior of soft cemented soil[J]. Geotechnique 1998, 48(2): 281~287. doi: 10.1680/geot.1998.48.2.281
[26]	张诚厚, 袁文明, 戴济军. 软粘土与结构性及其对沉降的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1995, 17(5): 25~32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC505.004.htm
[27]	程鉴基, 邝健政. 软弱地基中水泥类化学灌浆机理初探[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1993, 15(3): 81~86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC199303009.htm
[28]	周萃英, 汤连生. 岩石破裂过程的分维、自组织及其它[A]. 见: 何满潮, 蒋宇静编. 第二届中日地层环境力学会议论文集[C]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1996. 132~137.
[29]	姚振汉, 齐航, 富明慧. 蜂窝夹层壳体几何非线性分析的一种超参单元[J]. 计算力学学报, 1997, 14(增刊): 173~176.