• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 51 Issue 6
    Jun.  2026
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Liao Jin, Li Cai, Yang Qihui, Jin Aohan, Wang Quanrong, 2026. Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanism Simulation during Geological CO2 Storage in Heterogeneous Saline Aquifers. Earth Science, 51(6): 2347-2356. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.250
    Citation: Liao Jin, Li Cai, Yang Qihui, Jin Aohan, Wang Quanrong, 2026. Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanism Simulation during Geological CO2 Storage in Heterogeneous Saline Aquifers. Earth Science, 51(6): 2347-2356. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.250

    Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanism Simulation during Geological CO2 Storage in Heterogeneous Saline Aquifers

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.250
    • Received Date: 2025-09-17
    • Publish Date: 2026-06-25
    • A deep understanding of reservoir heterogeneity and multi-field coupling effects is important for assessing CO2 flow and migration behavior during geological CO2 storage. This study comprehensively considers the two-phase flow mechanism, the dynamic evolution of reservoir porosity and permeability structures, and the influence of temperature on the physical properties of CO2 under non-isothermal conditions. A thermal-hydraulic-gas-mechanical (THGM) coupled model is developed to investigate CO2 migration behavior and storage efficiency behavior in heterogeneous saline aquifers. Simulation results indicate that reservoir heterogeneity significantly influences average pressure build-up within the reservoir. In low-porosity reservoirs, the increase in pore pressure is approximately 1.96 MPa, whereas in higher-porosity reservoirs, it is only approximately 1.64 MPa, thereby affecting the physical properties and migration pathways of injected CO2. Additionally, the maximum migration distance of the thermal front is only approximately 161 m, while the maximum lateral migration distance of the CO2 plume can reach approximately 1 782 m. The permeability and porosity within the reservoir vary at a ratio of approximately 1.01-1.13 and an amplitude of 2.10%-12.8% during CO2 injection, respectively. The porosity and permeability of low-permeability reservoirs is more sensitive to pressure disturbances. The maximum CO2 storage efficiency factor reached approximately 0.88 in low-permeability heterogeneous reservoirs, significantly higher than those in high-permeability reservoirs, demonstrating that maintaining an injection rate below the rock fracture pressure in such formations helps enhance the effective storage capacity and long-term stability of CO2.

       

    • loading
    • Ali, M., Yekeen, N., Ali, M., et al., 2022. Effects of Various Solvents on Adsorption of Organics for Porous and Nonporous Quartz/CO2/Brine Systems: Implications for CO2 Geo-Storage. Energy Fuels, 36(18): 11089-11099 doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01696
      Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Friedlingstein, P., et al., 2025. Geological Net Zero and the Need for Disaggregated Accounting for Carbon Sinks. Nature, 638: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08326-8
      Bachu, S., 2015. Review of CO2 Storage Efficiency in Deep Saline Aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40: 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007
      Bashir, A., Ali, M., Patil, S., et al., 2024. Comprehensive Review of CO2 Geological Storage: Exploring Principles, Mechanisms, and Prospects. Earth-Science Reviews, 249: 104672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.10467
      Brooks, R. H., Corey, A. T., 1966. Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 92(2): 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1061/jrcea4.0000425
      Buckley, S. E., Leverett, M. C., 1942. Mechanism of Fluid Displacement in Sands. Transactions of the AIME, 146(1): 107-116. https://doi.org/10.2118/942107-g
      Costa, A., 2006. Permeability-Porosity Relationship: A Reexamination of the Kozeny-Carman Equation Based on a Fractal Pore-Space Geometry Assumption. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(2): 2005GL025134. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025134
      Dong, J. J., Hsu, J. Y., Wu, W. J., et al., 2010. Stress-Dependence of the Permeability and Porosity of Sandstone and Shale from TCDP Hole-A. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 47(7): 1141-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.019
      Ershadnia, R., Wallace, C. D., Soltanian, M. R., 2020. CO2 Geological Sequestration in Heterogeneous Binary Media: Effects of Geological and Operational Conditions. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 4(4): 392-405. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2020.04.05
      Fujii, T., Oikawa, Y., Lei, X. L., et al., 2024. Experimental Investigation of the Hydro-Mechanical Response of Soft Rocks in the CO2 Injection Process—Impacts of Fracture Roughness and Brittleness Index on the Evolution of Permeability Behavior. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 177: 105742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105742
      GhojehBeyglou, M., 2021. Geostatistical Modeling of Porosity and Evaluating the Local and Global Distribution. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11(12): 4227-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01308-w
      Gudala, M., Govindarajan, S. K., Yan, B. C., et al., 2023. Comparison of Supercritical CO2 with Water as Geofluid in Geothermal Reservoirs with Numerical Investigation Using Fully Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Geomechanical Model. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 145(6): 061302. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055538
      Guo, X., Zou, G. F., Wang, Y. H., et al., 2017. Investigation of the Temperature Effect on Rock Permeability Sensitivity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 156: 616-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.045
      Hosseini, M., Ali, M., Fahimpour, J., et al., 2024. Energy Storage in Carbonate and Basalt Reservoirs: Investigating Secondary Imbibition in H2 and CO2 Systems. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 11(2): 132-140. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.02.05
      Jiang, S., Zhang, K., Du, F. S., et al., 2023. Progress and Prospects of CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil, Gas and Geothermal Recovery. Earth Science, 48(7): 2733-2749 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jonk, R., Bohacs, K. M., Davis, J. S., 2022. Evaluating Top Seals within a Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework: Impact on Geological Carbon Sequestration. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 146: 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105920
      Keykhosravi, A., Nguyen, C., Loi, G., et al., 2025. Permeability Decline Due to Fines Migration during CO2 Injection in Sandstones. Gas Science and Engineering, 138: 205613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205613
      Kim, M., Kim, K. Y., Han, W. S., et al., 2019. Density-Driven Convection in a Fractured Porous Media: Implications for Geological CO2 Storage. Water Resources Research, 55(7): 5852-5870. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024822
      Leverett, M. C., 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. Transactions of the AIME, 142(1): 152-169. https://doi.org/10.2118/941152-g
      Li, B. X., Benson, S. M., 2015. Influence of Small-Scale Heterogeneity on Upward CO2 Plume Migration in Storage Aquifers. Advances in Water Resources, 83: 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.07.010
      Liang, T., Yang, J. H., Hao, Q. Y., et al., 2024. Research Progress on CO2 Storage Potential in Saltwater Layers at Sea. Geological Review, 70(S1): 201-204(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lin, Z. T., Kuang, Y. M., Li, W. Q., et al., 2024. Research Status and Prospects of CO2 Geological Sequestration Technology from Onshore to Offshore: A Review. Earth-Science Reviews, 258: 104928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104928
      Massarweh, O., Abushaikha, A. S., 2024. CO2 Sequestration in Subsurface Geological Formations: A Review of Trapping Mechanisms and Monitoring Techniques. Earth-Science Reviews, 253: 104793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104793
      Nath, F., Mahmood, M. N., Yousuf, N., 2024. Recent Advances in CCUS: A Critical Review on Technologies, Regulatory Aspects and Economics. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 238: 212726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212726
      Pavan, T. N. V., Devarapu, S. R., Govindarajan, S. K., 2024. Numerical Investigations on the Performance of Sc-CO2 Sequestration in Heterogeneous Deep Saline Aquifers under Non-Isothermal Conditions. Gas Science and Engineering, 130: 205437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205437
      Pettersson, P., Tveit, S., Gasda, S. E., 2022. Dynamic Estimates of Extreme-Case CO2 Storage Capacity for Basin-Scale Heterogeneous Systems under Geological Uncertainty. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 116: 103613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103613
      Pini, R., Benson, S. M., 2017. Capillary Pressure Heterogeneity and Hysteresis for the Supercritical CO2/Water System in a Sandstone. Advances in Water Resources, 108: 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.08.011
      Qu, Z. Q., Zhang, W., Guo, T. K., 2017. Influence of Different Fracture Morphology on Heat Mining Performance of Enhanced Geothermal Systems Based on COMSOL. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(29): 18263-18278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.168
      Safari, H., Balcom, B. J., Afrough, A., 2021. Characterization of Pore and Grain Size Distributions in Porous Geological Samples—An Image Processing Workflow. Computers Geosciences, 156: 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104895
      Sheng, D. N., Wang, H. M., Sheng, J. C., et al., 2025. Effect of Random Fracture Network Orientations on Sealing Performance of Caprock in CO2 Geological Sequestration. Earth Science, 50(1): 349-360 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shi, J. Q., Xue, Z. Q., Durucan, S., 2011. Supercritical CO2 Core Flooding and Imbibition in Tako Sandstone—Influence of Sub-Core Scale Heterogeneity. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(1): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.07.003
      Wei, Z. J., Gao, K., 2025. CO2 Sequestration in Deep Saline Aquifers with Integrated Thermo-Hydromechanical Model. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 44(4): 129-141(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wei, Z. J., Gao, K., Li, S. B., 2025. Integrated Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Workflow for Modeling CO2 Storage with Fault Activation Risk. SPE Journal, 30(5): 2975-2995. https://doi.org/10.2118/225428-pa
      Wen, D. G., Guo, J. Q., Zhang, S. Q., et al., 2014. The Progress in the Research on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage in China. Geology in China, 41(5): 1716-1723(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yuan, Z., Ren, P. G., Liu, J. H., et al., 2025. Research on Whole Strata Geological Modeling Technology for CO2 Geological Storage in Salt Water Layer. Earth Science, 50(5): 1987-1998(in Chinese with English abstract).
      蒋恕, 张凯, 杜凤双, 等, 2023. 二氧化碳地质封存及提高油气和地热采收率技术进展与展望. 地球科学, 48(7): 2733-2749. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.084
      梁涛, 杨婧晖, 郝清源, 等, 2024. 海上咸水层CO2封存潜力研究进展. 地质论评, 70(增刊1): 201-204.
      盛丹娜, 王惠民, 盛金昌, 等, 2025. CO2地质封存中随机裂隙网络走向对盖层密封性影响. 地球科学, 50(1): 349-360. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.192
      魏子俊, 高科, 2025. 深部咸水层CO2封存的热-水-力模型研究. 地质科技通报, 44(4): 129-141.
      文冬光, 郭建强, 张森琦, 等, 2014. 中国二氧化碳地质储存研究进展. 中国地质, 41(5): 1716-1723.
      袁哲, 任培罡, 刘金华, 等, 2025. 咸水层CO2地质封存全地层地质建模技术研究. 地球科学, 50(5): 1987-1998. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2024.107
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(9)  / Tables(2)

      Article views (394) PDF downloads(53) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return