• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 51 Issue 1
    Jan.  2026
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Yu Teng, Xiang Jianbin, Zhu Yimin, Zhang Dandan, Zhao Yilin, 2026. Multi-Source Geophysical Parameter Dataset of Earthquake Cases in Sichuan-Yunnan Region for Deep Learning and Its Application. Earth Science, 51(1): 116-129. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.281
    Citation: Yu Teng, Xiang Jianbin, Zhu Yimin, Zhang Dandan, Zhao Yilin, 2026. Multi-Source Geophysical Parameter Dataset of Earthquake Cases in Sichuan-Yunnan Region for Deep Learning and Its Application. Earth Science, 51(1): 116-129. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.281

    Multi-Source Geophysical Parameter Dataset of Earthquake Cases in Sichuan-Yunnan Region for Deep Learning and Its Application

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.281
    • Received Date: 2025-10-30
    • Publish Date: 2026-01-25
    • The Sichuan-Yunnan region is characterized by intense neotectonic movements and seismic activities. Over the past two decades, a large amount of geophysical observation data have been accumulated. Among them, earthquakes with magnitudes ≥4.5 are particularly concerned due to the significant damage they cause. Deep learning technology, based on the principle of data-driven, can mine the implicit features among data, such as the correlation between geophysical parameter characteristics and their variations and the occurrence of moderate to strong earthquakes. However, while seismic event-based single-sample seismic wave detection datasets are abundant, geophysical background datasets are currently relatively scarce.Based on this, in this article it uses the dataset of 798 earthquakes with magnitudes ≥4.5 that occurred in the Sichuan-Yunnan region over the past 20 years. Historical earthquake catalogs, gravity, faults, crustal velocity, crustal thickness, Moho depth, lithology, and groundwater with strong correlation to earthquake occurrence within a certain spatial range centered on the earthquake source were collected. Through data processing methods such as calculation, cleaning, and normalization, an annotated dataset was created. In order to ensure the balance of positive and negative samples, it also selected geophysical data from the same region with an equal number of non-significant earthquakes (magnitude 3 and below, which have a significant energy difference from earthquakes above magnitude 4.5) as positive examples, and created a labeled negative example dataset. Examples, negative examples, and data composition were elaborated based on accuracy. The evaluation indicators such as recall rate were used to analyze the performance of the dataset in four classic learning models, all of which achieved an accuracy of about 80%. Finally, the quality of the dataset was verified through transfer learning in other regions, which was not lower than the accuracy of the dataset testset. These indicate that the constructed dataset has good quality, applicability, and generalization. This article can provide reference for the construction of other deep learning seismology datasets.

       

    • loading
    • Archana, R., Jeevaraj, P. S. E., 2024. Deep Learning Models for Digital Image Processing: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10631-z
      Chai, C. P., Maceira, M., Santos-Villalobos, H. J., et al., 2020. Using a Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning to Bridge Scales for Seismic Phase Picking. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(16): e2020GL088651. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088651
      Cheng, J. W., Liu, C. C., Zhou, L., et al., 2022. Deblending of Simultaneous-Source Seismic Data Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 5912613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3153642
      Cofré, A., Marín, M., Pino, O. V., et al., 2022. End-to-End LSTM-Based Earthquake Magnitude Estimation with a Single Station. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19: 3006905. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2022.3175108
      Dou, J., Tang, H. M., Dong, A. N., et al., 2025. Intelligent Recognition and Feature Analysis of Seismic Surface Cracks Integrating Multi‐Scale Features and Attention Mechanism: A Case Study of the 2025 Dingri, Xizang Ms 6.8 Earthquake. Earth Science, 50(5): 1744-1758 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Fang, L. H., Wu, J. P., Su, J. R., et al., 2018. Relocation of Mainshock and Aftershock Sequence of the Ms7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou Earthquake. Chinese Science Bulletin, 63(7): 649-662 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/N972017-01184
      Hu, J. J., Ding, Y. T., Zhang, H., et al., 2023. A Real-Time Seismic Intensity Prediction Model Based on Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network. Earth Science, 48(5): 1853-1864 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Huamani, R. J., Auqui, O. J., Aguirre Madrid, E. M., et al., 2025. A Systematic Review about the Use of Machine Learning Related to Earthquake Studies. Advances in Civil Engineering, (1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/4432234
      Jiang, C., Lyu, Z. Y., Fang, L. H., 2024. Earthquake Detection Model Trained on Velocity and Acceleration Records and Its Application in Xinfengjiang Reservoir. Earth Science, 49(2): 469-479 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, S. T., Song, W. W., Fang, L. Y., et al., 2019. Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9): 6690-6709. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2907932
      Liu, Y., Yu, Z. Y., Zhang, Z. Q., et al., 2023. The High-Resolution Community Velocity Model V2.0 of Southwest China, Constructed by Joint Body and Surface Wave Tomography of Data Recorded at Temporary Dense Arrays. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 53(10): 2407-2424 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2022-0394
      Lyu, S., Fang, L. H., Ren, H. Y., et al., 2024. Overview of the Earthquake Monitoring Status in the United States. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 46(2): 431-448 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Mooney, D. W., Carol Barrera-Lopez, C., Suárez, G. M., et al., 2023. Earth Crustal Model 1 (ECM1): A 1° x 1° Global Seismic and Density Model. Earth-Science Reviews, 243: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104493
      Mousavi, S. M., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhu, W. Q., et al., 2020. Earthquake Transformer—An Attentive Deep-Learning Model for Simultaneous Earthquake Detection and Phase Picking. Nature Communications, 11: 3952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w
      Ranganath, R., Rao, T., Kodipalli, A., et al., 2025. Revolutionizing Earthquake Prediction: Harnessing Machine Learning and Deep Learning. In: 5th International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Aspects for Sustainable Energy. AIP Publishing, Dehradun. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0261607
      Ren, C., Sun, A. H., Wang, W. T., et al., 2025. Revealing the Seismogenic Structural Characteristics of the Menyuan MS6.4 Earthquake in 2016 Based on Dense Array and Deep Learning. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 68(4): 1287-1303 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shi, X. Y., Wang, X. Q., Qiu, Y. R., et al., 2020. Analysis of the Minimum Magnitude of Completeness for Earthquake Catalog in China Seismic Experimental Site. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 63(10): 3683-3697 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shi, Y. L., Li, L. F., Cheng, S., 2022. Application of LSTM Neural Network for Intermediate-Term Earthquake Prediction: Retrospective Prediction of 2008 Wenchuan MS8.0 Earthquake. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39(1): 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, S. Y., Wang, J., Yu, Y. X., et al., 2010. The Empirical Relation between ML and MS Based on Bulletin of Seismological Observations of Chinese Stations. Earthquake Research in China, 26(1): 14-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xia, H. B., Wu, J. J., Yao, J. Q., et al., 2023. A Deep Learning Application for Building Damage Assessment Using Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery in Turkey Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14(6): 947-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00526-6
      Xiang, J. B., Yu, T., Zhang, D. D., et al., 2024. Application of High Generalization Model in the b-Value and Medium and Strong Earthquake Backtracking of the Central and Southern Section of the Tanlu Fault Zone. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 54(12): 868-877 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xu, X. W., Wu, X. Y., Yu, G. H., et al., 2017. Seismo-Geological Signatures for Identifying M≥7.0 Earthquake Risk Area and Their Preliminary Application in Mainland China. Seismology and Geology, 39(2): 219-275 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yao, H. J., 2020. Building the Community Velocity Model in the Sichuan-Yunnan Region, China: Strategies and Progresses. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 50(9): 1319-1322 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2020-0106
      Yao, Q., Wang, H., Liu, J., et al., 2023. A Hybrid Method of Earthquake Forecasting Based on Numerical Simulation and Seismicity Statistics: An Application to China Seismic Experimental Site. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 66(10): 4162-4175 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yu, T., Zhu, Y. M., Wang, X., et al., 2020. Research on the b-Value Space-Time Characteristics of Jiangsu-Shandong Intersection Area of Tanlu Fault Zone. Progress in Geophysics, 35(6): 2134-2142 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yu, Z. Y., Chu, R. S., Sheng, M. H., 2018. Pick Onset Time of P and S Phase by Deep Neural Network. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(12): 4873-4886 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, B., Hu, Z. A., Wu, P., et al., 2023. EPT: A Data-Driven Transformer Model for Earthquake Prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123: 106176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106176
      Zhang, P. Z., 2008. Contemporary Tectonic Deformation, Strain Partitioning, and Deep-Seated Dynamic Processes in the Eastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau, Western Sichuan Region. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 38(9): 1041-1056 (in Chinese).
      Zhao, M., Chen, S., Yuen, D., 2019. Waveform Classification and Seismic Recognition by Convolution Neural Network. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(1): 374-382 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zheng, Z., Lin, B. H., Jin, X., et al., 2024a. Predicting Instrumental Seismic Intensity Using Deep Learning and Physical Features. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 67(7): 2712-2728 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zheng, Z., Lin, B. H., Yu, W. H., et al., 2024b. Research on the Application of Transformer Model and Transfer Learning in Earthquake P-Wave and Noise Discrimination. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 67(11): 4189-4203 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, J. B., Liu, H. Y., Luan, S. C., et al., 2025. Prediction of On-Site Peak Ground Motion Based on Machine Learning and Transfer Learning. Earth Science, 50(5): 1842-1860 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, W. Q., Beroza, G. C., 2019. PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method. Geophysical Journal International, 216(1): 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy423
      窦杰, 唐辉明, 董傲男, 等, 2025. 融合多尺度特征与注意力机制的地震地表裂缝智能识别与特征分析: 以2025年西藏定日MS 6.8地震为例. 地球科学, 50(5): 1744-1758. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.058
      房立华, 吴建平, 苏金蓉, 等, 2018. 四川九寨沟Ms7.0地震主震及其余震序列精定位. 科学通报, 63(7): 649-662.
      胡进军, 丁祎天, 张辉, 等, 2023. 基于长短期记忆神经网络的实时地震烈度预测模型. 地球科学, 48(5): 1853-1864. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.338
      蒋策, 吕作勇, 房立华, 2024. 融合处理速度和加速度记录的地震检测模型及其在新丰江水库的应用. 地球科学, 49(2): 469-479. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2023.186
      刘影, 于子叶, 张智奇, 等, 2023. 基于密集流动台阵构建的川滇地区高分辨率公共速度模型2.0版本. 中国科学: 地球科学, 53(10): 2407-2424.
      吕帅, 房立华, 任华育, 等, 2024. 美国地震监测现状综述. 地震工程学报, 46(2): 431-448.
      任超, 孙安辉, 王伟涛, 等, 2025. 密集台阵和深度学习方法揭示的2016年门源MS6.4地震发震构造特征. 地球物理学报, 68(4): 1287-1303.
      史翔宇, 王晓青, 邱玉荣, 等, 2020. 川滇地震科学实验场地震目录最小完整性震级分析. 地球物理学报, 63(10): 3683-3697.
      石耀霖, 李林芳, 程术, 2022. 运用LSTM神经网络对川滇地区的地震中期预报——回溯性预测2008年汶川MS8.0地震的探索. 中国科学院大学学报, 39(1): 1-12.
      汪素云, 王健, 俞言祥, 等, 2010. 基于中国地震台网观测报告的MLMS经验关系. 中国地震, 26(1): 14-22.
      向健斌, 余腾, 张丹丹, 等, 2024. 高泛化性模型在郯庐断裂带中南段b值与中强震回溯中的应用. 地震科学进展, 54(12): 868-877.
      徐锡伟, 吴熙彦, 于贵华, 等, 2017. 中国大陆高震级地震危险区判定的地震地质学标志及其应用. 地震地质, 39(2): 219-275.
      姚华建, 2020. 中国川滇地区公共速度模型构建: 思路与进展. 中国科学: 地球科学, 50(9): 1319-1322.
      姚琪, 王辉, 刘杰, 等, 2023. 基于数值模拟和地震活动性统计的混合地震预测: 在中国地震科学实验场的应用. 地球物理学报, 66(10): 4162-4175.
      余腾, 朱益民, 王鑫, 等, 2020. 郯庐断裂带苏鲁交汇区b值时空特征研究. 地球物理学进展, 35(6): 2134-2142.
      于子叶, 储日升, 盛敏汉, 2018. 深度神经网络拾取地震P和S波到时. 地球物理学报, 61(12): 4873-4886
      张培震, 2008. 青藏高原东缘川西地区的现今构造变形、应变分配与深部动力过程. 中国科学: 地球科学, 38(9): 1041-1056.
      赵明, 陈石, Dave Yuen, 2019. 基于深度学习卷积神经网络的地震波形自动分类与识别. 地球物理学报, 62(1): 374-382.
      郑周, 林彬华, 金星, 等, 2024a. 利用深度学习与物理特征预测仪器地震烈度. 地球物理学报, 67(7): 2712-2728.
      郑周, 林彬华, 于伟恒, 等, 2024b. Transformer模型和迁移学习在地震P波和噪声判别中的应用研究. 地球物理学报, 67(11): 4189-4203.
      朱景宝, 刘赫奕, 栾世成, 等, 2025. 基于机器学习和迁移学习的现地地震动峰值预测. 地球科学, 50(5): 1842-1860. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2024.071
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(9)  / Tables(5)

      Article views (136) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return