• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 51 Issue 1
    Jan.  2026
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Lyu Shuai, Fang Lihua, Peng Yuxiang, Cao Ying, Xia Dengke, Fan Liping, Zhu Jie, Guo Yaru, 2026. Development of a Heterogeneous Waveform Dataset and Evaluation of Phase Picking Models for Yunnan Earthquake Early Warning Network. Earth Science, 51(1): 74-89. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.287
    Citation: Lyu Shuai, Fang Lihua, Peng Yuxiang, Cao Ying, Xia Dengke, Fan Liping, Zhu Jie, Guo Yaru, 2026. Development of a Heterogeneous Waveform Dataset and Evaluation of Phase Picking Models for Yunnan Earthquake Early Warning Network. Earth Science, 51(1): 74-89. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.287

    Development of a Heterogeneous Waveform Dataset and Evaluation of Phase Picking Models for Yunnan Earthquake Early Warning Network

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.287
    • Received Date: 2025-08-17
    • Publish Date: 2026-01-25
    • In recent years, deep learning methods have been widely applied to seismic detection and phase picking. However, existing models are mainly trained on high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) velocity-type waveform data, with limited evaluation of their generalization to accelerometer and intensity meter data. To investigate the performance of existing models on accelerometer data and their generalization capability in Yunnan, this study constructed a high-quality, multi-source heterogeneous waveform dataset based on the latest observations from the Yunnan Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) network, including velocity meters, accelerometers, and intensity meters, with all phase arrival times manually annotated. It systematically evaluated the phase-picking performance of nine models-on the Yunnan dataset five domain-specific models (e.g., PhaseNet, USTC-Pickers) and four large models (e.g., SeisMoLLM, SeisT). The locally fine-tuned USTC-Pickers achieved the best overall performance, with mean F1 scores of 0.779 for Pg and Sg phase picking (Δt≤0.1 s), significantly outperforming other models, and effectively mitigating phase-picking delays for accelerometer and intensity meter data. Large models demonstrated stronger generalization in Sg picking and low-SNR conditions. The study also revealed performance variations of mainstream seismic detection models under different waveform lengths, magnitudes, and epicentral distances, underscoring the importance of localized training and model architecture selection in practical applications. The research findings provide references for seismic detection and phase picking in earthquake early warning systems, as well as for the real-time automatic processing of seismic data at the China Earthquake Science Experiment Site.

       

    • loading
    • An, Y. R., 2024. Introduction to a Recently Released Dataset Entitled CSNCD: A Comprehensive Dataset of Chinese Seismic Network. Earthquake Research Advances, 4(1): 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100255
      Bormann, P., Wendt, S., Klinge, K., 2013. Data Analysis and Seismogram Interpretation. New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP-2), 11: 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_CH11
      Bornstein, T., Lange, D., Münchmeyer, J., et al., 2024. PickBlue: Seismic Phase Picking for Ocean Bottom Seismometers with Deep Learning. Earth and Space Science, 11(1): e2023EA003332. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003332
      Chai, C. P., Maceira, M., Santos-Villalobos, H. J., et al., 2020. Using a Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning to Bridge Scales for Seismic Phase Picking. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(16): e2020GL088651. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088651
      Du, M. N., He, F. X., Zou, N., et al., 2024. Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understanding. Communications of the ACM, 67(1): 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596490
      Fang, L. H., Wu, Z. L., Song, K., 2017. SeismOlympics. Seismological Research Letters, 88(6): 1429-1430. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170134
      Feng, C. Y., Yang, Y., Hu, X., et al., 2023. MSNet: A Seismic Phase Picking Network Applicable to Microseismic Monitoring. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 20: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2023.3314029
      Huangfu, G., 2009. Research on the Seismicity in Yunnan, China (Dissertation). University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, J., Chen, J. Y., Tang, Y. C., et al., 2023. Transforming Medical Imaging with Transformers? A Comparative Review of Key Properties, Current Progresses, and Future Perspectives. Medical Image Analysis, 85: 102762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102762
      Li, S., Yang, X., Cao, A. Y., et al., 2024. SeisT: A Foundational Deep-Learning Model for Earthquake Monitoring Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3371503
      Liu, T. L., Münchmeyer, J., Laurenti, L., et al., 2024. SeisLM: A Foundation Model for Seismic Waveforms. arXiv: 2410.15765. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.15765
      Mousavi, S. M., Beroza, G. C., 2022. Deep-Learning Seismology. Science, 377(6607): eabm4470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm4470
      Mousavi, S. M., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhu, W. Q., et al., 2020. Earthquake Transformer—An Attentive Deep-Learning Model for Simultaneous Earthquake Detection and Phase Picking. Nature Communications, 11: 3952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w
      Mousavi, S. M., Sheng, Y. X., Zhu, W. Q., et al., 2019. STanford EArthquake Dataset (STEAD): A Global Data Set of Seismic Signals for AI. IEEE Access, 7: 179464-179476. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947848
      Münchmeyer, J., Woollam, J., Rietbrock, A., et al., 2022. Which Picker Fits My Data? A Quantitative Evaluation of Deep Learning Based Seismic Pickers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(1): e2021JB023499. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023499
      Niksejel, A., Zhang, M., 2024. OBSTransformer: A Deep-Learning Seismic Phase Picker for OBS Data Using Automated Labelling and Transfer Learning. Geophysical Journal International, 237(1): 485-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae049
      Pecher, B., Srba, I., Bielikova, M., 2025. Comparing Specialised Small and General Large Language Models on Text Classification: 100 Labelled Samples to Achieve Break-Even Performance. In: Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhou, 165-184. https://10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.9
      Peng, C. Y., Jiang, P., Ma, Q., et al., 2022. Chinese Nationwide Earthquake Early Warning System and Its Performance in the 2022 Lushan M6.1 Earthquake. Remote Sensing, 14(17): 4269. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174269
      Ross, Z. E., Meier, M. A., Hauksson, E., et al., 2018. Generalized Seismic Phase Detection with Deep Learning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(5A): 2894-2901. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180080
      Saad, O. M., Savvaidis, A., Chen, Y. K., 2024. Transfer Learning for Seismic Phase Picking with Significantly Higher Precision in Faraway Seismic Stations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3422612
      Si, X., Wu, X. M., Li, Z. F., et al., 2024. An All-in-One Seismic Phase Picking, Location, and Association Network for Multi-Task Multi-Station Earthquake Monitoring. Communications Earth & Environment, 5: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01188-4
      Wang, X. H., Liu, F., Su, R., et al., 2025. SeisMoLLM: Advancing Seismic Monitoring via Cross-Modal Transfer with Pre-Trained Large Language Model. arXiv: 2502.19960. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19960
      Woollam, J., Münchmeyer, J., Tilmann, F., et al., 2022. SeisBench-A Toolbox for Machine Learning in Seismology. Seismological Research Letters, 93(3): 1695-1709. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210324
      Yu, Z. Y., Cai, Y. Q., Wang, W. T., et al., 2024. PRIME-DP: Pre-Trained Integrated Model for Earthquake Data Processing. arXiv: 2408.01919. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.01919
      Yu, Z. Y., Wang, W. T., 2022. LPPN: A Lightweight Network for Fast Phase Picking. Seismological Research Letters, 93(5): 2834-2846. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210309
      Yu, Z. Y., Wang, W. T., Chen, Y. N., 2023. Benchmark on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Several Neural Network Based Phase Pickers Using Datasets from China Seismic Network. Earthquake Science, 36(2): 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2022.10.001
      Zhao, M., Xiao, Z. W., Chen, S., et al., 2023. DiTing: A Large-Scale Chinese Seismic Benchmark Dataset for Artificial Intelligence in Seismology. Earthquake Science, 36(2): 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2022.01.022
      Zhu, J., Li, Z. F., Fang, L. H., 2023. USTC-Pickers: A Unified Set of Seismic Phase Pickers Transfer Learned for China. Earthquake Science, 36(2): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2023.03.001
      Zhu, J., Zhong, Y. S., 2025. Evaluation of the Monitoring Capability of the Yunnan Earthquake Early Warning Network. Journal of Seismological Research, 48(3): 422-431 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, W. Q., Beroza, G. C., 2019. PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method. Geophysical Journal International, 216(1): 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy423
      皇甫岗, 2009. 云南地震活动性研究(博士学位论文). 合肥: 中国科学技术大学.
      朱杰, 钟玉盛, 2025. 云南地震预警站网监测效能评估. 地震研究, 48(3): 422-431.
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(14)  / Tables(3)

      Article views (261) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return