• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 51 Issue 7
    Jul.  2026
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Chen Wenwen, Li Qiang, Hou Shihui, Bie Shizhen, Luo Wenxing, Ding Rui, Zhang Hailin, 2026. Pore-Water Occurrence Characteristics in High-Rank Coal Based on NMR and Its Water-Blocking on Coalbed Methane Production. Earth Science, 51(7): 2555-2566. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.240
    Citation: Chen Wenwen, Li Qiang, Hou Shihui, Bie Shizhen, Luo Wenxing, Ding Rui, Zhang Hailin, 2026. Pore-Water Occurrence Characteristics in High-Rank Coal Based on NMR and Its Water-Blocking on Coalbed Methane Production. Earth Science, 51(7): 2555-2566. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.240

    Pore-Water Occurrence Characteristics in High-Rank Coal Based on NMR and Its Water-Blocking on Coalbed Methane Production

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.240
    • Received Date: 2026-03-08
    • Publish Date: 2026-07-25
    • Significant productivity differences exist among high-rank coalbed methane (CBM) wells in the southern Qinshui Basin, and the water-blocking effect is a key microscopic factor limiting CBM desorption and efficient production. To reveal the pore-water occurrence law, water-blocking effect, and the control on CBM production in high-rank coal, the southern Fanzhuang Block (Block A) and eastern Qinnan Block (Block C) were selected, and the No.3 coal samples were collected from Sihe Coal Mine (SH, anthracite) and Gucheng Coal Mine (GC, lean coal). Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) pore-fluid test and high-pressure methane isothermal adsorption experiment were conducted. Combined with long-term production data from CBM wells, the differences in pore-water occurrence and water-phase distribution in coal pores were systematically analyzed, and the coupling response mechanism of pore-water occurrence, water-blocking effect, and CBM desorption-production was clarified. SH coal is dominated by water in transition pores (10-100 nm) with a proportion of 55.97%, while micropores (<10 nm) account for 40.87%. In contrast, GC coal has a micropore water proportion of 81.72% and a transition pore proportion of 14.51%. After centrifugation at 1.61 MPa, the adsorbed water proportion of SH coal is 73.89%, significantly lower than 97.94% of GC coal, indicating that Block C has well-developed micropores, a high volume of adsorbed water, and strong capillary binding forces, making the risk of damage from water-blocking effect significantly higher than that in Block A. Under reservoir pressure, the average methane desorption rate of Block A reaches 5.27 m3·t-1·MPa-1, far exceeding 1.45 m3·t-1·MPa-1 of Block C, demonstrating stronger desorption driving force and lower fluid migration resistance. Production data confirm that Block C exhibits a longer single-phase water drainage period, greater difficulty in pressure reduction and desorption, limited pressure-drop funnel expansion during the two-phase flow stage, and slow productivity improvement. Both the cumulative gas production and the peak daily gas production capacity in Block A are significantly higher than those in Block C. This paper analyzes the effect of the microscopic pore-water occurrence on macroscopic CBM production performance of high-rank coal. It is clarified that enriched adsorbed water in micropores induces high-intensity water blocking and restricts efficient gas-water migration, which is the core cause of block productivity differentiation. The results provide theoretical support for productivity evaluation, water-blocking damage prevention, and production parameter optimization of high-rank coal reservoirs.

       

    • loading
    • Chen, S. D., Tang, D. Z., Tao, S., et al., 2018. Characteristics of In-Situ Stress Distribution and Its Significance on the Coalbed Methane (CBM) Development in Fanzhuang-Zhengzhuang Block, Southern Qinshui Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 161: 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.042.
      Chen, W. W., 2024. Study on Gas-Water Occurrence Law of Coal Reservoirs in Southern Qinshui Basin and Response of Coalbed Methane Production Characteristics (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, W. W., Yang, Y. H., Wang, S. W., et al., 2016. Study on Water Occurrence Features and Migration Rules in High Rank Coalbed Methane Reservoir. Coal Science and Technology, 44(S1): 154-159 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, Z. H., Wang, Y. B., Song, Y., et al., 2008. Comparison of Adsorption/Desorption Properties of CBM in Different-Rank Coals. Natural Gas Industry, 28(3): 30-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Dong, J. X., 2022. Study on Spontaneous Imbibition Characteristics and Temporal and Spatial Distribution Law of Water in Remolded Coal without Gas (Dissertation). Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hou, W., Xu, F. Y., Zhang, L., et al., 2022. Influence of Coal Lithotypes on Adsorption/Desorption Characteristics in Coal Reservoirs and Its Practical Significance: A Case Study in Baode Block. Coal Geology & Exploration, 50(3): 110-118 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Langmuir, I., 1917. The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 183(1): 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(17)90938-X
      Li, X. F., Shi, J. T., Du, X. Y., et al., 2012. Transport Mechanism of Desorbed Gas in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 39(2): 203-213 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lu, Y., Li, H., Lu, J. X., et al., 2020. Clean Up Water Blocking Damage in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs by Microwave Heating: Laboratory Studies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 138: 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.007.
      Meng, Y. J., Tang, D. Z., Xu, H., et al., 2014. Division of Coalbed Methane Desorption Stages and Its Significance. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 41(5): 612-617 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ni, G. H., Li, Z., Xie, H. C., 2018. Experimental Research on the Methods to Remove Water Blocking Effect Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Testing. Journal of China Coal Society, 43(8): 2280-2287 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Su, X. B., Wang, Q., Song, J. X., et al., 2017. Experimental Study of Water Blocking Damage on Coal. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 156: 654-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.048
      Sun, X. X., Yao, Y. B., Chen, J. Y., et al., 2015. Determination of Coal Wettability by Using Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Geoscience, 29(1): 190-197 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Z. W., Liu, S. M., Qin, Y., 2021. Coal Wettability in Coalbed Methane Production: A Critical Review. Fuel, 303: 121-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121277
      Wu, J., Wang, P., Huang, K., et al., 2026. Research on the Evaluation of Deep Coal Seam Water Lock Damage and Optimization of Water Lock Release Agents Based on Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology. Progress in Geophysics, 41(2): 719-731 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xu, K., Cui, B., 2015. Application of Isothermal Adsorption Curves in Coalbed Methane Production—A Case Study in Zhijin Block. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 5(6): 73-75, 80 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yan, X., Fang, J. L., Mou, C., et al., 2026. Advances and Prospects of Design Optimization Technologies for Differential Development with Three-Dimensional Well Patterns for Deep Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: A Case Study of the No. 8 Coal Seam in the Ordos Basin. Coal Geology & Exploration, 54(6): 179-197 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, Z. B., Lu, B. J., Zhou, G. X., et al., 2025. Geological Particularities and Desorption-Production Patterns of Deep Coalbed Methane. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 46(8): 1464-1476 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yao, Y. B., Liu, D. M., 2012. Comparison of Low-Field NMR and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry in Characterizing Pore Size Distributions of Coals. Fuel, 95: 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.039.
      Yao, Y. B., Liu, D. M., 2013. Advanced Quantitative Characterization and Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
      Yao, Y. B., Liu, D. M., 2016. Petrophysics and Fluid Properties Characterizations of Coalbed Methane Reservoir by Using NMR Relaxation Time Analysis. Coal Science and Technology, 44(6): 14-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yao, Y. B., Ma, R. Y., Sun, X. X., 2025. Mechanism of Enhanced Coalbed Methane Desorption Regulated by Fracturing Fluid Imbibition in Deep Coal Seams. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 52(6): 1388-1400 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ye, J. P., 2025. China's CBM Exploration and Production and Associated Technological Advancements: A Review and Reflections. Coal Geology & Exploration, 53(1): 114-127 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, J. F., Li, G. X., Jia, C. Z., et al., 2026. Coal-Rock Gas Accumulation Mechanisms, Resource Potential, and Its Strategic Significance for China's Natural Gas Industry. World Petroleum Industry, 33(1): 130-141 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, S. C., Tian, T., Yang, Y. C., et al., 2026. Influence of Coal Reservoir Sensitivity on CBM Well Drainage and Production in Binchang Block. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 13(4): 84-91 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zheng, S. J., 2021. Quantitative Analysis Method of Coal Reservoir Characteristics Based on Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, Q. Z., Yang, Y. H., Zuo, Y. Q., et al., 2018. CBM Development in China: Challenges and Solutions. Natural Gas Industry, 38(4): 96-100 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, Q. Z., Zuo, Y. Q., Yang, Y. H., 2015. How to Solve the Technical Problems in the CBM Development: A Case Study of a CMB Gas Reservoir in the Southern Qinshui Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 35(2): 106-109 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zou, C. N., Yu, R. Z., Sun, Q. P., et al., 2026. Insights into CBM and Coal-Rock Gas Development Performance, Key Technology and Prospects from Thousands Well Data Analysis. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 50(3): 94-108 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      陈文文, 2024. 沁水盆地南部煤储层气水赋存规律及煤层气生产特征响应研究(博士学位论文). 武汉: 中国地质大学.
      陈文文, 杨延辉, 王生维, 等, 2016. 高煤阶煤层气藏内水赋存特征与运移规律研究. 煤炭科学技术, 44(S1): 154-159.
      陈振宏, 王一兵, 宋岩, 等, 2008. 不同煤阶煤层气吸附、解吸特征差异对比. 天然气工业, 28(3): 30-32.
      董家昕, 2022. 不含瓦斯重塑煤自发渗吸特征及水分时空分布规律研究(博士学位论文). 焦作: 河南理工大学.
      侯伟, 徐凤银, 张雷, 等, 2022. 煤岩类型对煤储层吸附/解吸特征影响及实践意义: 以保德区块为例. 煤田地质与勘探, 50(3): 110-118.
      李相方, 石军太, 杜希瑶, 等, 2012. 煤层气藏开发降压解吸气运移机理. 石油勘探与开发, 39(2): 203-213.
      孟艳军, 汤达祯, 许浩, 等, 2014. 煤层气解吸阶段划分方法及其意义. 石油勘探与开发, 41(5): 612-617.
      倪冠华, 李钊, 解宏超, 2018. 基于核磁共振测试的煤层水锁效应解除方法. 煤炭学报, 43(8): 2280-2287.
      孙晓晓, 姚艳斌, 陈基瑜, 等, 2015. 基于低场核磁共振的煤润湿性分析. 现代地质, 29(1): 190-197.
      吴见, 王鹏, 黄凯, 等, 2026. 基于低场核磁共振技术的深煤层水锁伤害评价及解水锁剂优选研究. 地球物理学进展, 41(2): 719-731.
      许科, 崔彬, 2015. 等温吸附曲线在煤层气排采中的应用——以织金区块为例. 油气藏评价与开发, 5(6): 73-75, 80.
      闫霞, 方建龙, 牟春, 等, 2026. 深部煤层气藏差异化立体开发优化设计技术进展与展望——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 煤田地质与勘探, 54(6): 179-197.
      杨兆彪, 卢本举, 周国晓, 等, 2025. 深部煤层气地质特殊性与释放产出规律. 石油学报, 46(8): 1464-1476.
      姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 2013. 煤储层精细定量表征与综合评价模型. 北京: 地质出版社.
      姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 2016. 基于核磁共振弛豫谱的煤储层岩石物理与流体表征. 煤炭科学技术, 44(6): 14-22.
      姚艳斌, 马如英, 孙晓晓, 2025. 深部煤层压裂液渗吸调控煤层气解吸增效机制. 石油勘探与开发, 52(6): 1388-1400.
      叶建平, 2025. 中国煤层气勘探开发及其科技进步历程回顾与思考. 煤田地质与勘探, 53(1): 114-127.
      张君峰, 李国欣, 贾承造, 等, 2026. 煤岩气成藏机理、资源潜力及其对中国天然气产业的战略意义. 世界石油工业, 33(1): 130-141.
      张世春, 田涛, 杨云成, 等, 2026. 彬长区块煤储层敏感性对煤层气井排采的影响. 非常规油气, 13(4): 84-91.
      郑司建, 2021. 基于低场核磁共振的煤储层特性定量分析方法(博士学位论文). 北京: 中国地质大学.
      朱庆忠, 杨延辉, 左银卿, 等, 2018. 中国煤层气开发存在的问题及破解思路. 天然气工业, 38(4): 96-100.
      朱庆忠, 左银卿, 杨延辉, 2015. 如何破解我国煤层气开发的技术难题——以沁水盆地南部煤层气藏为例. 天然气工业, 35(2): 106-109.
      邹才能, 于荣泽, 孙钦平, 等, 2026. 万口井数据透视煤层气和煤岩气开发特征、关键技术及前景. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 50(3): 94-108.
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(10)  / Tables(9)

      Article views (129) PDF downloads(27) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return