• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    Volume 29 Issue 6
    Jun.  2004
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    SUN Ze, BAI Zhi-qiang, FAN Guang-ming, SHI Bin, 2004. Application of Decision Tree Method in Remote Sensing Geological Mapping. Earth Science, 29(6): 753-758.
    Citation: SUN Ze, BAI Zhi-qiang, FAN Guang-ming, SHI Bin, 2004. Application of Decision Tree Method in Remote Sensing Geological Mapping. Earth Science, 29(6): 753-758.

    Application of Decision Tree Method in Remote Sensing Geological Mapping

    • Received Date: 2004-08-28
    • Publish Date: 2004-11-25
    • The decision tree is an effective and accurate method in remote sensing classification. We use this method to classify the remote sensing data-ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper plus), which covers most of the area of Minhe County, Qinghai Province. The acquisition date of ETM+ is October 29, 1999. We get digital elevation model (DEM) data from (1:) 250 000 topography map of Minhe area. The format of DEM is MapInfo exchange format *.mif which converted to (geography) coordinate. After primary treatment of the raw data, the DEM data is derived from the contour line. The ETM+ scenes are rectified using the DEM and sun-illumination model. NDVI and other three indexes from Tasseled Cap transform were calculated from RS data. All these indexes are stacked with five RS bands. The target objects are selected. The sampling of the target object is based on visual observation. First, false color composed imagery is essential, and the sampling process is interactive. The digital information of the target object is derived from the program, which compiled by IDL. The decision tree model was calculated by Clementine7.2 software suite. About 10% raw data were used to validate the accuracy of the model. Meantime others were used to build the model. Ten iterative numbers and 75% trim radio are the suit parameters for this model. Then we get the most suitable layer and numerical value for distinguishing different target objects. For instance, distinguishing Tertiary red clastic and loess's best layer is band 1 and band 3. In the next step, we import the model to Envi 4.0 and classify the raw data into different target objects. After some basic treatments, for example clump and (assign) class color, we get the final result map. The map is contrasted with 1:250 000 geology map of Minhe area and achieved the accuracy of classification. The result is that the decision tree method is better than traditional classify methods. Another conclusion is that the rules from decision tree could help geologists to gain a appropriate geological conclusion.

       

    • loading
    • Bauer, E., Kohavi, R., 1999. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning, 36: 105-139. doi: 10.1023/A:1007515423169
      Clark, R.N., Swayze, G.A., 1995. Mapping minerals, amorphous materials, environmental materials, vegetation, water, ice and snow, and other materials: The USGS tricorder algorithm. Summaries of the Fifth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, January 23-26, R.O. Green, Ed., JPL Publication 95-1, 39-40.
      Friedl, M.A., Brodley, C.E., 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Enviro. , 61(3): 399-409. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7
      Friedl, M.A., Strahler, C.E., 1999. Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Remote Sensing, 37(2): 969-977. doi: 10.1109/36.752215
      Heath, D., Kasif, S., Salzberg, S., 1993. Learning oblique decision trees. In: Proc. 13th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 1002-1007.
      Menenti, M., Lorkeers, A., Vissers, M., 1986. An application of thematic mapper data in Tunisia. ITC Journal, (1): 35-42.
      Mulders, M.A., Epema, G.F., 1986. The thematic mapper: A new tool for soil mapping in arid areas. ITC Journal, (1): 24-29.
      Paul, L.R., 2001. Robust pixel unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(9): 1978-1983. doi: 10.1109/36.951088
      Quinlan, J.R., 1993. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA.
      Rasoul, S.S., David, L., 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21(3): 660-674. doi: 10.1109/21.97458
      Ricchetti, E., 2001. Bisible-infrared and radar imagery fusion for geological application: A new approach using DEM and sun-illumination model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(11): 2219-2230.
      Safavin, S.R., Langrebe, D., 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21(3): 660-674. doi: 10.1109/21.97458
      Swain, P.H., Hauska, H., 1997. The decision tree classifier: Design and potential. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, GE-15: 142-147.
      Yoav, F., Robert, E.S., 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal ofComputer and System Sciences, 55(1): 119-139. doi: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
    • 加载中

    Catalog

      通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
      • 1. 

        沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

      1. 本站搜索
      2. 百度学术搜索
      3. 万方数据库搜索
      4. CNKI搜索

      Figures(4)

      Article views (3978) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
      Proportional views

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return