闽西南龙岩地区印支期天宫山花岗岩体成因

康丛轩; 周延; 宗雯; 范飞鹏; 李凤春; 孙建东; 吕劲松

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2017.602

闽西南龙岩地区印支期天宫山花岗岩体成因

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.602

1.
中国地质调查局南京地质调查中心, 江苏南京 210016
2.
河海大学地球科学与工程学院, 江苏南京 210016
3.
江苏省地质调查研究院, 江苏南京 210018
4.
中国冶金地质总局山东局测试中心, 山东济南 250014

基金项目:

中国地质调查局项目 D20160037

中国地质调查局项目 12120113071400

详细信息

作者简介:
康丛轩(1985-), 男, 博士研究生, 助理研究员, 主要从事矿物、岩石、矿床学研究

中图分类号: P59
计量
- 文章访问数: 5369
- HTML全文浏览量: 2039
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-12-19
- 刊出日期: 2018-12-15

Petrogenesis of Tiangongshan Indosinian Granites in Longyan Area, Southwest Fujian

1.
Nanjing Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, China
2.
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210016, China
3.
Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210018, China
4.
Testing Center of Shandong Bureau, China Metallurgy and Geology Bureau, Jinan 250014, China

摘要

摘要: 天宫山花岗岩体成因的研究对闽西南地区岩浆演化及动力学过程有重要意义.天宫山岩体岩性主要为正长花岗岩.前人于天宫山岩体中利用K-Ar法测得年龄值为146~149 Ma，天宫山正长花岗岩中测得锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄为233±2.0 Ma、230±2.8 Ma，为晚三叠世，属印支期.该岩体富硅，富碱，σ=1.21~2.55，A/CNK=0.97~1.73，属钙碱性系列，准铝质到过铝质范畴.岩石ΣREE较高，LREE相对富集，贫Al₂O₃和Sr，富Y和Yb，发育有明显的显微文象结构，具有较强的铕负异常，中等铈负异常到弱正异常；亏损大离子亲石元素，富集高场强元素.Ga/Al值高，具有A型花岗岩特征.w（P₂O₅）平均值为0.02%，低于高分异S型花岗岩；w（Na₂O）平均值为2.93%，高于高分异S型花岗岩；全铁含量w（TFeO）平均值为1.15%，高于高分异I型花岗岩.锆石饱和温度平均值为729.8℃.ε_Hf（t）全部为负值（-5.29~-10.69），表明其物质起源可能主要为古元古代下地壳物质.参与成岩作用的岩浆来源于地壳物质的部分熔融，为同碰撞环境下形成的壳源型铝质A型花岗岩.在印支期碰撞-挤压为主的造山运动背景下，岩体在高温环境中经历了古元古代下地壳物质的初步熔融，经印支期运动伸展，部分地幔物质参与了经底侵作用.
- 天宫山岩体 /
- 印支期 /
- 锆石U-Pb年龄 /
- 岩体成因 /
- Lu-Hf同位素 /
- 地球化学
Abstract: The research of petrogenesis about Tiangongshan Indosinian granites have great significance on the magmatic evolution and dynamic process in Southwest Fujian. The Tiangongshan pluton is dominated by syenogranite. Previous studies obtained the K-Ar age of 146-149 Ma from its granites, while U-Pb zircon analyses yielded consistent age of 233±2.0 Ma and 230±2.8 Ma by LA-ICP-MS in our study, indicating that the pluton was formed in Late Triassic and Indosinian tectonic movement. The granites are characterized by high silicon and alkali (σ=1.21-2.55, A/CNK=0.97-1.73), belonging to quasi aluminum to peraluminous calc-alkaline series. The granites have high ΣREE and relative accumulation of LREE, and are deficient in Al₂O₃ and Sr, and rich in Y and Yb, showing obvious micrographic texture with relatively high negative Eu anomaly and moderately negative to weak positive Ce anomaly; the granites are depleted in LILE and enriched in HFSE.The Tiangongshan pluton has the characteristics of A-type granite with high Ga/Al value. Its w (P₂O₅) averages on 0.02%, lower than that of highly fractionated S-type granite, w (Na₂O) on average of 2.93%, higher than that of highly fractionated S-type granite, and w (TFeO) on average of 1.15%, higher than that of highly fractionated I-type granite.The average saturation temperature of zircon is 729.8℃.The ε_Hf(t) all is negative (-5.29 to -10.69), suggesting possible material sources from the lower crustal material of Paleoproterozoic. The magma of the diagenetic stage, derived from partial melting of the crustal material, is crust-derived aluminous A-type granite formed in the syn-collisional settings. Through the stage of Indosinian collisional-compressional orogeny, the Paleoproterozoic lower crustal material of the pluton initially melted. Stretched by Indosinian tectonic movements, part of the mantle material was involved in the underplating.
- Tiangongshan granite /
- Indosinian /
- U-Pb age of zircon /
- rock formation cause /
- Lu-Hf isotope /
- geochemistry

HTML全文

图 1 天宫山岩体区域地质简图及采样位置

据福建省地质调查研究院, 2005.1：250 000龙岩市幅区域地质调查报告.1.第四纪地层；2.晚三叠-白垩世地层；3.泥盆-三叠世地层；4.早古生代地层；5.侵入岩；6.采样位置及编号；7.断层

Fig. 1. Geological sketch and sampling location map of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 天宫山岩体正长花岗岩标本及显微照片

a.浅肉红色正长花岗岩；b, c.花岗结构，钾长石、斜长石具卡式双晶；d.显微文象结构(花斑结构).Q.石英；Pl.斜长石；Kfs.钾长石；Bt.黑云母

Fig. 2. Specimen and microphotographs of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 岩浆岩系统全碱-硅(TAS)分类图解

据Middlemost(1994).Ir.Irvine分界线，上方为碱性，下方为亚碱性

Fig. 3. Total alkali silica (TAS) classification of magmatic rock system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 岩体K₂O-SiO₂图解(a)及A/CNK-A/NK图解(b)

a.实线据Peccerillo and Taylor(1976); 虚线据Middlemost(1985).b.底图据Middlemost(1994)

Fig. 4. K₂O-SiO₂ diagram (a) and A/CNK-A/NK diagram (b) of the granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 岩体球粒陨石标准化稀土元素配分图(a)及原始地幔标准化微量元素蛛网图(b)

蛛网标准化数值据Sun and McDonough(1989)

Fig. 5. Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns (a) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagram (b) of the granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 天宫山岩体代表性锆石阴极发光图像

Fig. 7. Representative zircon cathodoluminescence images of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 天宫山岩体锆石稀土元素球粒陨石标准化分布型式图

标准化数值据Sun and McDonough(1989)

Fig. 8. Zircon chondrite standard curves of REE abundance patterns of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 天宫山岩体锆石U-Pb谐和图和加权平均年龄

Fig. 6. U-Pb concordia diagram and weighted average age of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 天宫山岩体锆石Lu-Hf同位素组成和模式年龄统计直方图

Fig. 10. Statistical histogram of zircon Lu-Hf isotopic composition and model ages of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 天宫山岩体锆石Hf同位素特征

Fig. 9. Zircon Hf isotopic features of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 天宫山岩体成因类型判别图解

据Whalen et al.(1987)

Fig. 11. Genetic types of discrimination diagram of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 天宫山岩体A型花岗岩亚类判别图

底图据Eby(1990, 1992)

Fig. 12. A-type granite subclass discrimination diagrams of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 天宫山岩体Y-Nb(a)及Yb-Ta(b)构造环境判别图解

syn-COLG.同碰撞花岗岩；WPG.板内花岗岩；VAG.火山弧花岗岩；ORG.洋脊花岗岩

Fig. 13. Y-Nb (a) and Yb-Ta (b) structural environment discrimination diagrams of the Tiangongshan pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 岩体主量元素组成(%)

Table 1. Major element compositions of the granites (%)

样号	TGS-1	TGS-2	TGS-3	TGS-4	TGS-5	TGS-6	TGS-7
SiO₂	76.16	76.20	75.01	78.20	75.64	75.85	76.20
TiO₂	0.11	0.11	0.06	0.14	0.12	0.12	0.08
Al₂O₃	12.77	12.97	12.76	11.93	12.30	11.84	12.12
Fe₂O₃	1.23	0.54	0.49	0.44	0.54	0.38	0.41
FeO	0.27	0.36	0.58	0.57	0.81	1.22	0.92
MnO	0.07	0.01	0.05	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.03
MgO	0.21	0.08	0.05	0.27	0.20	0.19	0.15
CaO	0.22	0.12	0.72	0.22	0.86	0.56	0.81
Na₂O	0.24	1.27	3.83	4.61	3.36	3.79	3.38
K₂O	6.09	5.37	5.20	2.05	4.82	4.74	4.63
P₂O₅	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02
LOI	2.14	2.47	0.74	1.06	0.86	0.94	0.73
Total	99.53	99.52	99.50	99.54	99.56	99.69	99.48
Na₂O+K₂O	6.33	6.64	9.03	6.66	8.18	8.53	8.01
K₂O/Na₂O	25.38	4.23	1.36	0.44	1.43	1.25	1.37
σ	1.21	1.33	2.55	1.26	2.05	2.21	1.93
A/CNK	1.73	1.60	0.97	1.17	1.00	0.96	1.01
A/NK	1.840	1.620	1.070	1.220	1.144	1.040	1.150
注：TGS-1~TGS-4数据为本文实测，TGS-5~TGS-7测试数据来源于1：25万龙岩市幅区域地质调查报告(福建省地质调查研究院，2005).

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 岩体微量元素组成(10^-6)

Table 2. Trace element compositions of the granites (10^-6)

样号	TGS-1	TGS-2	TGS-3	TGS-4	TGS-5	TGS-6	TGS-7
Rb	585.00	425.00	547.00	153.00	—	—	—
Sr	20.50	16.10	12.30	66.50	—	—	—
Nb	49.30	50.60	59.10	22.80	20.00	30.00	32.00
Mo	17.10	1.10	0.45	1.08	14.00	5.00	2.00
Cd	0.16	0.04	0.05	0.05	—	—	—
Sn	27.60	9.92	14.80	5.24	38.00	22.00	18.00
Cs	13.50	9.01	11.30	4.97	—	—	—
Ba	110.00	128.00	16.80	96.10	100.00	120.00	113.00
Ta	6.47	5.86	10.10	2.83	—	—	—
W	5.74	3.47	4.33	1.19	—	—	—
Tl	3.46	2.11	2.62	0.81	—	—	—
Pb	73.50	49.20	59.80	60.70	44.00	43.00	58.00
Bi	2.10	0.29	0.19	1.48	—	—	—
Th	56.20	92.10	74.80	42.90	—	—	—
U	7.66	10.20	16.60	14.20	—	—	—
Sc	4.22	3.46	3.21	3.22	—	—	—
V	7.03	1.53	0.91	10.60	8.00	6.00	9.00
Cr	5.44	3.98	4.80	5.02	5.00	5.00	5.00
Co	1.22	1.28	0.39	1.08	—	—	—
Ni	2.40	3.96	1.66	2.90	—	—	—
Cu	3.53	2.86	2.58	26.40	2.00	3.00	4.00
Zn	31.70	56.90	39.70	22.00	24.00	22.00	28.00
Ga	23.30	21.70	23.30	15.50	—	—	—
Zr	107.00	157.00	99.10	87.50	56.00	78.00	80.00
Hf	3.90	5.90	4.80	3.60	—	—	—
F	941.00	959.00	3 879.00	850.00	800.00	840.00	3340.00
As	12.90	0.64	0.48	0.57	—	—	—
Sb	0.23	0.13	0.13	0.09	—	—	—
Ag	0.15	0.02	0.01	0.88	—	—	—
注：TGS-1~TGS-4数据为本文实测，TGS-5~TGS-7测试数据来源于1：25万龙岩市幅区域地质调查报告(福建省地质调查研究院，2005)，“—”表示未测.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 岩体稀土元素组成(10^-6)

Table 3. Rare earth element compositions of the granites (10^-6)

样号	TGS-1	TGS-2	TGS-3	TGS-4	TGS-5	TGS-6	TGS-7
La	60.60	231.00	38.50	45.90	37.52	61.39	46.05
Ce	62.50	114.00	79.20	79.60	63.50	105.83	50.47
Pr	18.50	72.90	10.40	7.09	6.67	13.34	8.00
Nd	65.10	252.00	37.00	21.30	29.49	55.72	31.55
Sm	16.20	60.10	12.10	3.56	4.14	9.14	4.14
Eu	0.34	1.40	0.16	0.50	0.59	0.56	0.55
Gd	12.80	29.60	13.70	2.69	2.08	5.64	1.87
Tb	1.99	4.11	2.75	0.40	0.71	1.28	0.61
Dy	11.80	20.30	18.40	2.25	2.06	5.14	1.74
Ho	2.38	3.28	4.12	0.47	0.65	1.15	0.51
Er	7.22	9.00	12.30	1.72	1.96	3.87	1.61
Tm	1.02	1.26	1.93	0.28	0.33	0.57	0.28
Yb	7.18	8.25	13.00	2.18	2.11	3.78	2.04
Lu	0.91	1.13	1.92	0.33	0.47	0.74	0.46
Y	55.10	80.50	130.00	14.60	13.23	24.57	10.39
ΣREE	317.94	705.33	223.78	218.47	152.28	268.15	149.88
LREE	272.64	628.40	155.66	208.15	141.91	245.98	140.76
HREE	45.30	76.93	68.12	10.32	10.37	22.17	9.12
LREE/HREE	6.02	8.17	2.29	20.17	13.68	11.10	15.43
La_N/Yb_N	10.99	11.13	0.93	31.62	12.76	11.65	16.19
δEu	0.07	0.09	0.04	0.47	0.55	0.22	0.52
δCe	0.31	0.28	1.44	0.54	0.91	0.87	0.59
注：TGS-1~TGS-4数据为本文实测，TGS-5~TGS-7测试数据来源于1：25万龙岩市幅区域地质调查报告(福建省地质调查研究院，2005).

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 岩体锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb测试结果

Table 4. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb data of the granites

测点号	含量(10^-6)		Th/U	同位素比值								年龄(Ma)
测点号	Th	U	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ
T1-1	727	862	0.84	0.051 8	0.001 1	0.262 0	0.006 6	0.036 3	0.000 5	0.010 8	0.000 3	276.0	45.4	236.2	5.3	230.1	3.0	217.3	5.3
T1-3	162	192	0.84	0.052 3	0.002 1	0.268 3	0.011 0	0.037 3	0.000 6	0.010 4	0.000 3	298.2	88.0	241.4	8.8	236.3	3.6	208.7	6.8
T1-4	577	941	0.61	0.051 0	0.001 3	0.260 5	0.006 6	0.036 8	0.000 5	0.011 3	0.000 3	242.7	57.4	235.1	5.3	233.3	3.2	227.6	6.1
T1-5	368	318	1.16	0.055 7	0.002 4	0.278 7	0.011 8	0.036 3	0.000 7	0.009 6	0.000 4	442.6	128.7	249.6	9.3	230.0	4.1	194.1	7.8
T1-8	160	199	0.81	0.048 6	0.002 0	0.244 6	0.010 2	0.036 8	0.000 7	0.010 9	0.000 5	127.9	93.5	222.2	8.3	232.7	4.2	219.6	9.8
T1-9	218	287	0.76	0.048 6	0.001 9	0.244 6	0.009 7	0.036 3	0.000 6	0.010 4	0.000 4	127.9	90.7	222.1	8.0	230.1	3.9	209.1	8.2
T1-10	117	125	0.93	0.047 3	0.002 9	0.237 7	0.014 3	0.037 1	0.000 8	0.011 1	0.000 5	64.9	146.3	216.6	11.7	235.1	4.9	222.9	10.0
T1-11	602	844	0.71	0.049 6	0.001 3	0.255 5	0.006 5	0.037 1	0.000 5	0.011 3	0.000 3	176.0	59.2	231.0	5.3	235.1	3.1	227.7	7.0
T1-12	250	321	0.78	0.049 2	0.001 7	0.245 4	0.008 5	0.036 4	0.000 6	0.011 1	0.000 4	166.8	83.3	222.8	6.9	230.6	3.7	223.1	8.1
T1-13	223	211	1.06	0.045 3	0.002 1	0.222 0	0.010 3	0.035 7	0.000 6	0.011 0	0.000 4	—	—	203.6	8.5	225.9	4.0	220.6	8.4
T1-14	96	133	0.72	0.069 3	0.006 3	0.371 6	0.037 5	0.037 5	0.001 0	0.013 6	0.001 0	905.6	187.0	320.9	27.8	237.5	6.0	272.8	20.3
T1-15	204	211	0.97	0.055 7	0.002 6	0.281 1	0.013 0	0.036 9	0.000 7	0.012 0	0.000 5	442.6	99.1	251.5	10.3	233.8	4.4	241.5	10.4
T1-17	78	90	0.86	0.067 6	0.004 6	0.319 3	0.023 4	0.036 8	0.001 0	0.011 5	0.000 6	857.4	141.5	281.4	18.0	233.2	6.1	231.0	12.0
T1-18	129	154	0.83	0.054 3	0.003 6	0.271 5	0.017 7	0.036 8	0.000 9	0.012 7	0.000 6	383.4	148.1	243.9	14.2	233.2	5.3	255.2	12.7
T1-19	140	163	0.86	0.049 5	0.002 9	0.251 4	0.014 0	0.037 5	0.000 9	0.012 0	0.000 5	172.3	135.2	227.7	11.4	237.6	5.4	240.4	10.5
T1-20	286	460	0.62	0.050 7	0.001 9	0.262 1	0.010 0	0.037 3	0.000 7	0.011 5	0.000 5	233.4	54.6	236.4	8.1	236.0	4.6	230.7	9.6
T3-2	314	509	0.62	0.049 6	0.001 6	0.255 4	0.008 3	0.037 5	0.000 6	0.013 4	0.000 4	176.0	77.8	230.9	6.7	237.2	3.5	268.4	8.1
T3-3	105	134	0.78	0.047 9	0.002 5	0.229 0	0.011 7	0.035 3	0.000 7	0.012 2	0.000 5	100.1	112.9	209.4	9.7	223.6	4.1	244.2	10.0
T3-4	157	197	0.80	0.051 7	0.002 3	0.259 3	0.010 3	0.037 2	0.000 6	0.014 4	0.000 5	272.3	101.8	234.1	8.3	235.4	4.0	289.3	10.5
T3-5	158	173	0.91	0.052 6	0.002 8	0.258 9	0.012 7	0.036 4	0.000 6	0.014 6	0.000 5	309.3	122.2	233.8	10.2	230.4	3.9	292.4	10.5
T3-6	239	288	0.83	0.051 6	0.002 0	0.262 9	0.010 2	0.037 0	0.000 6	0.015 7	0.000 6	333.4	95.4	237.0	8.2	234.4	3.7	314.8	11.4
T3-7	274	348	0.79	0.054 7	0.002 1	0.254 5	0.008 5	0.034 2	0.000 5	0.014 7	0.000 6	398.2	80.5	230.2	6.9	216.6	3.3	294.9	11.1
T3-8	425	646	0.66	0.052 0	0.001 9	0.247 5	0.008 6	0.034 4	0.000 6	0.015 9	0.000 6	287.1	78.7	224.5	7.0	217.8	3.5	318.6	12.4
T3-9	185	188	0.98	0.050 5	0.002 6	0.249 0	0.011 4	0.037 0	0.000 7	0.018 2	0.000 8	216.7	122.2	225.8	9.3	234.2	4.2	365.0	15.6
T3-10	432	710	0.61	0.050 8	0.001 5	0.254 0	0.007 5	0.036 3	0.000 6	0.016 2	0.000 6	227.8	66.7	229.8	6.1	230.1	3.4	324.6	12.4
T3-11	168	147	1.14	0.059 1	0.003 2	0.281 5	0.015 6	0.035 4	0.000 8	0.015 7	0.000 7	572.3	116.7	251.8	12.3	224.4	4.8	315.7	13.5
T3-12	443	537	0.83	0.053 0	0.001 8	0.269 3	0.010 3	0.036 3	0.000 7	0.015 4	0.000 6	331.5	77.8	242.1	8.3	229.6	4.4	308.5	11.2
T3-13	106	84	1.26	0.055 2	0.003 4	0.263 9	0.014 5	0.036 6	0.000 9	0.014 3	0.000 6	420.4	140.7	237.8	11.6	232.0	5.5	286.7	11.4
T3-14	155	153	1.01	0.052 9	0.002 6	0.259 1	0.014 3	0.036 3	0.000 8	0.013 7	0.000 6	324.1	109.2	233.9	11.5	230.0	5.1	275.4	12.0
T3-15	167	217	0.77	0.053 9	0.002 1	0.274 7	0.010 6	0.037 0	0.000 7	0.013 5	0.000 5	364.9	87.0	246.5	8.5	234.3	4.4	272.0	10.3
T3-16	132	127	1.04	0.061 9	0.003 2	0.309 2	0.015 5	0.037 3	0.000 8	0.012 3	0.000 5	733.3	104.6	273.5	12.0	236.3	4.9	247.5	9.2
T3-17	336	422	0.79	0.049 4	0.001 6	0.253 4	0.008 5	0.037 0	0.000 6	0.011 4	0.000 3	168.6	71.3	229.3	6.9	234.0	3.8	229.6	6.7
T3-19	228	305	0.75	0.054 7	0.002 3	0.273 7	0.011 7	0.036 9	0.000 7	0.011 2	0.000 4	398.2	99.1	245.7	9.3	233.8	4.5	224.9	7.4
T3-20	151	190	0.80	0.056 5	0.002 3	0.280 3	0.012 1	0.036 1	0.000 7	0.011 7	0.000 4	472.3	86.1	250.9	9.6	228.7	4.5	234.4	8.6
T3-21	175	183	0.96	0.051 8	0.002 5	0.258 1	0.011 6	0.036 9	0.000 7	0.011 7	0.000 4	276.0	109.2	233.1	9.3	233.8	4.1	235.2	8.1
T3-22	170	190	0.90	0.053 9	0.002 8	0.259 4	0.012 8	0.035 4	0.000 6	0.011 6	0.000 3	368.6	112.0	234.2	10.3	224.4	3.9	233.2	6.6
T3-24	169	143	1.18	0.055 1	0.002 8	0.273 5	0.014 5	0.036 2	0.000 7	0.011 5	0.000 3	416.7	114.8	245.5	11.6	229.3	4.4	231.4	6.9
T3-25	202	251	0.80	0.051 4	0.002 2	0.260 0	0.011 0	0.037 0	0.000 7	0.011 6	0.000 4	261.2	96.3	234.7	8.8	234.4	4.2	233.1	7.8
注：数据为本文实测，测试单位为中国冶金地质总局山东局测试中心；“—”表示未测出.

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 岩体Lu-Hf同位素分析结果

Table 6. Zircon Lu-Hf isotopic compositions of the granites

测点编号	t(Ma)	¹⁷⁶Yb/¹⁷⁷Hf	¹⁷⁶Lu/¹⁷⁷Hf	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	ε_Hf(t)	T_DM1(Ga)	T_DM2(Ga)	f_Lu-Hf
T1-1	230	0.021 047	0.000 677	0.282 406	0.000 019	0.282 403	-8.39	1.19	1.77	-0.98
T1-2	222	0.017 015	0.000 563	0.282 422	0.000 024	0.282 419	-8.01	1.16	1.74	-0.98
T1-3	236	0.017 513	0.000 569	0.282 406	0.000 020	0.282 404	-8.25	1.18	1.77	-0.98
T1-4	233	0.016 979	0.000 560	0.282 416	0.000 020	0.282 414	-7.94	1.17	1.75	-0.98
T1-5	230	0.029 125	0.000 925	0.282 400	0.000 018	0.282 396	-8.66	1.20	1.79	-0.97
T1-6	222	0.022 929	0.000 753	0.282 431	0.000 021	0.282 428	-7.69	1.15	1.72	-0.98
T1-7	213	0.014 228	0.000 466	0.282 425	0.000 021	0.282 423	-8.07	1.15	1.74	-0.99
T1-8	233	0.040 871	0.001 196	0.282 420	0.000 025	0.282 415	-7.91	1.18	1.74	-0.96
T1-9	230	0.021 081	0.000 684	0.282 416	0.000 023	0.282 413	-8.04	1.17	1.75	-0.98
T1-10	235	0.062 914	0.002 099	0.282 392	0.000 028	0.282 383	-9.01	1.25	1.81	-0.94
T1-11	235	0.017 466	0.000 578	0.282 417	0.000 021	0.282 414	-7.90	1.17	1.74	-0.98
T1-12	231	0.019 854	0.000 668	0.282 366	0.000 026	0.282 363	-9.80	1.24	1.86	-0.98
T1-13	226	0.032 511	0.001 085	0.282 423	0.000 023	0.282 418	-7.96	1.18	1.74	-0.97
T1-14	238	0.022 421	0.000 772	0.282 454	0.000 029	0.282 451	-6.54	1.12	1.66	-0.98
T1-15	234	0.011 114	0.000 381	0.282 412	0.000 030	0.282 411	-8.05	1.17	1.75	-0.99
T1-16	225	0.018 516	0.000 620	0.282 497	0.000 022	0.282 494	-5.29	1.06	1.57	-0.98
T1-17	233	0.035 832	0.001 140	0.282 412	0.000 033	0.282 407	-8.18	1.19	1.76	-0.97
T1-18	233	0.019 791	0.000 668	0.282 425	0.000 028	0.282 422	-7.68	1.16	1.73	-0.98
T1-19	238	0.019 598	0.000 653	0.282 445	0.000 024	0.282 442	-6.85	1.13	1.68	-0.98
T1-20	236	0.042 546	0.001 394	0.282 341	0.000 025	0.282 335	-10.69	1.30	1.92	-0.96
注：本文实测测试单位：南京大学内生金属矿床成矿机制国家重点实验室.

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 天宫山岩体锆石Ti含量地质温度计计算结果

Table 5. Calculation results of zircon Ti content geological thermometer of the Tiangongshan pluton

点号	t(℃)	点号	t(℃)	点号	t(℃)	点号	t(℃)
T1-01	572.3	T1-14	739.0	T3-01	717.3	T3-14	776.6
T1-02	765.9	T1-15	725.0	T3-02	692.8	T3-15	768.0
T1-03	761.6	T1-16	833.8	T3-03	736.9	T3-16	770.1
T1-04	680.1	T1-17	713.4	T3-04	763.7	T3-17	692.8
T1-05	689.1	T1-18	637.4	T3-05	739.0	T3-18	741.0
T1-06	732.9	T1-19	698.3	T3-06	729.0	T3-19	751.2
T1-07	713.4	T1-20	713.4	T3-07	741.0	T3-20	700.2
T1-08	774.4			T3-08	536.0	T3-21	761.6
T1-09	768.0			T3-09	751.2	T3-22	772.3
T1-10	753.3			T3-10	702.1	T3-23	723.1
T1-11	705.8			T3-11	763.7	T3-24	780.9
T1-12	725.0			T3-12	732.9	T3-25	749.1
T1-13	755.3			T3-13	789.8

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(92)

Amelin, Y., Lee, D.C., Halliday, A.N., et al., 1999.Nature of the Earth's Earliest Crust from Hafnium Isotopes in Single Detrital Zircons.Nature, 399(6733):252-255. doi: 10.1038/20426
Anderson, T., 2002.Correction of Common Lead in U-Pb Zircon Ages that do not Report ²⁰⁴Pb.Chemical Geology, 192:59-79. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X
Belousova, E.A., Griffin, W.L., O'Reilly, S.Y., 2005.Zircon Crystal Morphology, Trace Element Signatures and Hf Isotope Composition as a Tool for Petrogenetic Modelling:Examples from Eastern Australian Granitoids.Journal of Petrology, 47(2):329-353. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egi077
Belousova, E., Griffin, W., O'Reilly, S.Y., et al., 2002.Igneous Zircon:Trace Element Composition as an Indicator of Source Rock Type.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 143(5):602-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-002-0364-7
Chappell, B.W., White, A.J.R., 1974.Two Contrasting Granite Types.Pacific Geol., 8:173-174. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ027419645/
Chen, P.R., Kong, X.G., Wang, Y.X., et al., 1999.Rb-Sr Isotopic Dating and Significance of Early Yanshanian Bimodal Volcanic-Inrusive Complex from South Jiangxi Province.Geological Journal of China Universities, 5(4):378-383 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GXDX199904002.htm
Chen, Y.C., Wang, D.H., Xu, Z.G., et al., 2014.Outline of Regional Metallogeny of Ore Deposits Associated with the Mesozoic Magmatism in South China.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 38(2):219-229 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ddgzyckx201402002
Collins, W.J., Beams, S.D., White, A.J.R., et al., 1982.Nature and Origin of A-Type Granites with Particular Reference to Southeastern Australia.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 80(2):189-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00374895
Deng, J.F., Feng, Y.F., Di, Y.J., et al., 2016.The Intrusive Spatial Temporal Evolutional Framework in the Southeast China.Geological Review, 62(1):3-16 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlp201601002
Deng, X.G., Chen, Z.G., Li, X.H., et al., 2004.SHRIMP U-Pb Zircon Dating of the Darongshan-Shiwandashan Granitoid Belt in Southeastern Guangxi, China.Geological Review, 50(4):426-432 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000005441
Eby, G.N., 1990.The A-Type Granitoids:A Review of Their Occurrence and Chemical Characteristics and Speculations on Their Petrogenesis.Lithos, 26(1-2):115-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937(90)90043-z
Eby, G.N., 1992.Chemical Subdivision of the A-Type Granitoids:Petrogenetic and Tectonic Implications.Geology, 20(7):641.https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0641:csotat>2.3.co;2 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0641:csotat>2.3.co;2
Ferry, J.M., Watson, E.B., 2007.New Thermodynamic Models and Revised Calibrations for the Ti-in-Zircon and Zr-in-Rutile Thermometers.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 154(4):429-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-007-0201-0
Frost, C.D., Ronald Frost, B., 1997.Reduced Rapakivi-Type Granites:The Tholeiite Connection.Geology, 25(7):647.https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0647:rrtgtt>2.3.co;2 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0647:rrtgtt>2.3.co;2
Gilder, S.A., Gill, J., Coe, R.S., et al., 1996.Isotopic and Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of South China.Journal of Geophysical Research(Solid Earth), 101(B7):16137-16154. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb00662
Griffin, W.L., Wang, X., Jackson, S.E., et al., 2002.Zircon Chemistry and Magma Mixing, SE China:In-Situ Analysis of Hf Isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan Igneous Complexes.Lithos, 61(3-4):237-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-4937(02)00082-8
Guo, C.L., Zheng, J.H., Lou, F.S., et al., 2012.Petrography, Genetic Types and Geological Dynamical Settings of the Indosinian Granitoids in South China.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 36(3):457-472 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ddgzyckx201203020
Hoskin, P.W.O., 2003.The Composition of Zircon and Igneous and Metamorphic Petrogenesis.Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 53(1):27-62. https://doi.org/10.2113/0530027
Jian, P., Cheng, Y.Q., Liu, D.Y., 2001.Petrographical Study of Metamorphic Zircon:Basic Roles in Interpretation of U-Pb Age of High Grade Metamorphic Rocks.Earth Science Frontiers, 8(3):183-191 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Kang, C.X., Zhou, Y., Fan, F.P., et al., 2017.Geochemical Characteristic, Zircon U-Pb Ages, and Lu-Hf Isotopic Compositions of the Yongfu Pluton in Longyan, Fujian Province.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 41(5):960-973 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ddgzyckx201705012
Kemp, A.I.S., Wormald, R.J., Whitehouse, M.J., et al., 2005.Hf Isotopes in Zircon Reveal Contrasting Sources and Crystallization Histories for Alkaline to Peralkaline Granites of Temora, Southeastern Australia.Geology, 33(10):797. https://doi.org/10.1130/g21706.1
King, P.L., White, A.J.R., Chappell, B.W., et al., 1997.Characterization and Origin of Aluminous A-Type Granites from the Lachlan Fold Belt, Southeastern Australia.Journal of Petrology, 38(3):371-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/38.3.371
Li, R.B., Pei, X.Z., Ding, S.P., et al., 2009.LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Dating of the Pipasi Basic Volcanic Rocks within the Mian-Lue Tectonic Zone in the Southern Margin of West Qinling and Its Geological Implication.Acta Geologica Sinica, 83(11):1612-1623 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu, C.S., Chen, X.M., Chen, P.R., et al., 2003.Subdivision, Discrimination Criteria and Genesis for A Type Rock Suites.Geological Journal of China Universities, 9(4):573-591 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxdzxb200304011
Liu, Y., Deng, J., Wang, Z.L., et al., 2014.Zircon U-Pb Age Lu-Hf Isotopes and Petrogeochemistry of the Monzogranites from Xincheng Gold Deposit, Northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula, China.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(9):2559-2573 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201409009
Loiselle, M., Wones, D., 1979.Characteristics and Origin of Anorogenic Granites.Geological Society of America, 11(7):468. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=9108a701005035f04fb9accc13dc243b
Ludwig, K.R., 2008.Isoplot 3.0-A Geochronological Tool Kit for Microsoft Excel.Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley.
Mao, J.R., Li, Z.L., Ye, H.M., 2014.Mesozoic Tectono-Magmatic Activities in South China:Retrospect and Prospect.Science in China (Series D:Earth Sciences), 44(12):2593-2617 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1007/s11430-014-5006-1
Mao, J.R., Xu, N.Z., Hu, Q., et al., 2004.The Mesozoic Rock-Forming and Ore-Forming Processes and Tectonic Environment Evolution in Shanghang-Datian Region, Fujian.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 20(2):285-296 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200402010
Middlemost, E.A.K., 1985.Magmas and Magmatic Rocks: An Introduction to Igneous Petrology.Longman, London.
Middlemost, E.A.K., 1994.Naming Materials in the Magma/Igneous Rock System.Earth-Science Reviews, 37(3-4):215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9
Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B.W., Tindle, A.G., 1984.Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks.Journal of Petrology, 25(4):956-983. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
Peccerillo, A., Taylor, S.R., 1976.Geochemistry of Eocene Calc-Alkaline Volcanic Rocks from the Kastamonu Area, Northern Turkey.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 58(1):63-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00384745
Qiu, J.S., Li, Z., Liu, L., et al., 2012.Petrogenesis of the Zhangpu Composite Granite Pluton in Fujian Province:Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Ages, Elemental Geochemistry and Nd-Hf Isotopes.Acta Geologica Sinica, 86(4):561-576 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZXE201204003.htm
Rowley, D.B., Ziegler, A.M., Gyou, N., et al., 1989.Comment and Reply on "Mesozoic Overthrust Tectonics in South China".Geology, 17(4):384. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1989)017<0384:CAROMO>2.3.CO;2
Sláma, J., Košler, J., Condon, D.J., et al., 2008.Plešovice Zircon-A New Natural Reference Material for U-Pb and Hf Isotopic Microanalysis.Chemical Geology, 249(1-2):1-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.11.005
Sun, S.S., McDonough, W.F., 1989.Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts:Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42(1):313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
Turner, S.P., Foden, J.D., Morrison, R.S., 1992.Derivation of Some A-Type Magmas by Fractionation of Basaltic Magma:An Example from the Padthaway Ridge, South Australia.Lithos, 28(2):151-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937(92)90029-x
Vervoort, J.D., Patchett, P.J., Blichert-Toft, J., et al., 1999.Relationships between Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd Isotopic Systems in the Global Sedimentary System.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 168(1-2):79-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(99)00047-3
Wang, Q., Zhao, Z.H., Xiong, X.L., 2000.The Ascertainment of Late-Yanshanian A-Type Granite in Tongbai-Dabie Orogenic Belt.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 19(4):297-306 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz200004002
Wang, Y.J., Fan, W.M., Guo, F., et al., 2003.Geochemistry of Mesozoic Mafic Rocks Adjacent to the Chenzhou-Linwu Fault, South China:Implications for the Lithospheric Boundary between the Yangtze and Cathaysia Blocks.International Geology Review, 45(3):263-286. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.45.3.263
Wang, Y.J., Fan, W.M., Peng, T.P., et al., 2004.Elemental and Sr-Nd Isotopic Systematics of the Early Mesozoic Volcanic Sequence in Southern Jiangxi Province, South China:Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications.International Journal of Earth Sciences, 94(1):53-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-004-0441-4
Wang, Z.L., Gong, Q.J., Sun, X., et al., 2012.LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Geochronology of Quartz Porphyry from the Niutougou Gold Deposit in Songxian County, Henan Province.Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 86(2):370-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6724.2012.00666.x
Watson, E.B., Harrison, T.M., 1983.Zircon Saturation Revisited:Temperature and Composition Effects in a Variety of Crustal Magma Types.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 64(2):295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(83)90211-x
Watson, E.B., Wark, D.A., Thomas, J.B., 2006.Crystallization Thermometers for Zircon and Rutile.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 151(4):413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-006-0068-5
Whalen, J.B., Currie, K.L., Chappell, B.W., 1987.A-Type Granites:Geochemical Characteristics, Discrimination and Petrogenesis.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 95(4):407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00402202
Wu, F.Y., Li, X.H., Yang, J.H., et al., 2007.Discussions on the Petrogenesis of Granites.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(6):1217-1238 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200706001
Wu, S.P., Wang, M.Y., Qi, K.J., 2007.Present Situation of Researches on A-Type Granites:A Review.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 26(1):57-66 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Wu, Y.B., Zheng, Y.F., 2004.Genesis of Zircon and Its Constraints on Interpretation of U-Pb Age.Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(15):1554-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03184122
Xu, B.L., Yan, G.H., Zhang, C., et al., 1998.Petrological Subdivision and Source Material of A-Type Granites.Earth Science Frontiers, 5(3):113-124 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Xu, X.B., Li, Y., Xue, D.J., et al., 2014.Deformation Characteristics and Geochronological Constraints of Late Mesozoic Extensional Structures in Quanzhou, Fujian Province.Earth Science, 39(1):45-63 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx201401005
Xu, X.B., Zhang, Y.Q., Jia, D., et al., 2009.Early Mesozoic Geotectonic Processes in South China.Geology in China, 36(3):573-593 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi200903007
Xu, X.S., O'Reilly, S.Y., Griffin, W.L., et al., 2003.Enrichment of Upper Mantle Peridotite:Petrological, Trace Element and Isotopic Evidence in Xenoliths from SE China.Chemical Geology, 198(3-4):163-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2541(03)00004-4
Yang, J.H., Wu, F.Y., Chung, S.L., et al., 2006a.A Hybrid Origin for the Qianshan A-Type Granite, Northeast China:Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Evidence.Lithos, 89(1-2):89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2005.10.002
Yang, J.H., Wu, F.Y., Wilde, S.A., et al., 2006b.Tracing Magma Mixing in Granite Genesis:In Situ U-Pb Dating and Hf-Isotope Analysis of Zircons.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 153(2):177-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-006-0139-7
Zhang, C.S., Su, H.M., Yu, M., et al., 2012.Zircon U-Pb Age and Nd-Sr-Pb Isotopic Characteristics of Dayang-Juzhou Granite in Longyan, Fujian Province and Its Geological Significance.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(1):225-242 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201201017
Zhang, K.X., Pan, G.T., He, W.H., et al., 2015.New Division of Tectonic-Strata Superregion in China.Earth Science, 40(2):206-233 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2015.016
Zhang, Q., 2013.The Criteria and Discrimination for A-Type Granites:A Reply to the Question Put forward by Wang Yang and Some Other Persons for A-Type Granite:What is the Essence?.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 32(2):267-274 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSKW201302014.htm
Zhang, Q., Pan, G.Q., Li, C.D., et al., 2007.Are Discrimination Diagrams always Indicative of Correct Tectonic Settings of Granites? Some Crucial Questions on Granite Study (3).Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(11):2683-2698 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200711003.htm
Zhang, Q., Ran, H., Li, C.D., 2012.A-Type Granite:What is the Essence?.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 31(4):621-626 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_doaj-articles_8c2890609571b9a5f39733c2b59b003c
Zhang, W.L., Hua, R.M., Wang, R.C., et al., 2004.Single Zircon U-Pb Isotopic Age of the Wuliting Granite in Dajishan Area of Jiangxi, and Its Geological Implication.Acta Geologica Sinica, 78(3):352-358 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200403008
Zhang, Y.Q., Xu, X.B., Jia, D., et al., 2009.Deformation Record of the Change from Indosinian Collision-Related Tectonic System to Yanshanian Subduction-Related Tectonic System in South China during the Early Mesozoic.Earth Science Frontiers, 16(1):234-247 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200901033.htm
Zhao, J.L., Qiu, J.S., Li, Z., et al., 2012.Petrogenesis of the Taiwushan Granite Pluton in Fujian Province:Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Ages and Hf Isotopes.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(12):3938-3950 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201212012
Zhao, X.L., Mao, J.R., Ye, H.M, et al., 2009.The Geochemical Characteristics of Biotite and Its Petrogenesis Implication in the Caixi Pluton and Sifang Pluton from Shanghang Area of Fujian Province.Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 28(2):162-168 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kwysdqhxtb200902010
陈培荣, 孔兴功, 王银喜, 等, 1999.赣南燕山早期双峰式火山-侵入杂岩的Rb-Sr同位素定年及意义.高校地质学报, 5(4):378-383. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900178513
陈毓川, 王登红, 徐志刚, 等, 2014.华南区域成矿和中生代岩浆成矿规律概要.大地构造与成矿学, 38(2):219-229. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201402002
邓晋福, 冯艳芳, 狄永军, 等, 2016.华南地区侵入岩时空演化框架.地质论评, 62(1):3-16. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlp201601002
邓希光, 陈志刚, 李献华, 等, 2004.桂东南地区大容山-十万大山花岗岩带SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年.地质论评, 50(4):426-432. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2004.04.014
郭春丽, 郑佳浩, 楼法生, 等, 2012.华南印支期花岗岩类的岩石特征、成因类型及其构造动力学背景探讨.大地构造与成矿学, 36(3):457-472. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2012.03.020
简平, 程裕淇, 刘敦一, 2001.变质锆石成因的岩相学研究——高级变质岩U-Pb年龄解释的基本依据.地学前缘, 8(3):183-191. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2001.03.022
康丛轩, 周延, 范飞鹏, 等, 2017.福建龙岩永福岩体锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及Lu-Hf同位素组成.大地构造与成矿学, 41(5):960-973. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201705012
李瑞保, 裴先治, 丁仨平, 等, 2009.西秦岭南缘勉略带琵琶寺基性火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义.地质学报, 83(11):1612-1623. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2009.11.006
刘昌实, 陈小明, 陈培荣, 等, 2003.A型岩套的分类、判别标志和成因.高校地质学报, 9(4):573-591. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.04.011
刘跃, 邓军, 王中亮, 等, 2014.胶西北新城金矿床二长花岗岩岩石地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄及Lu-Hf同位素组成.岩石学报, 30(9):2559-2573. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201409009
毛建仁, 厉子龙, 叶海敏, 2014.华南中生代构造-岩浆活动研究:现状与前景.中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 44(12):2593-2617. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JDXK201412001.htm
毛建仁, 许乃政, 胡青, 等, 2004.福建省上杭-大田地区中生代成岩成矿作用与构造环境演化.岩石学报, 20(2):285-296. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200402010
邱检生, 李真, 刘亮, 等, 2012.福建漳浦复式花岗岩体的成因:锆石U-Pb年代学、元素地球化学及Nd-Hf同位素制约.地质学报, 86(4):561-576. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2012.04.003
王强, 赵振华, 熊小林, 2000.桐柏-大别造山带燕山晚期A型花岗岩的厘定.岩石矿物学杂志, 19(4):297-306. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2000.04.002
吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等, 2007.花岗岩成因研究的若干问题.岩石学报, 23(6):1217-1238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.06.001
吴锁平, 王梅英, 戚开静, 2007.A型花岗岩研究现状及其述评.岩石矿物学杂志, 26(1):57-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2007.01.009
许保良, 阎国翰, 张臣, 等, 1998.A型花岗岩的岩石学亚类及其物质来源.地学前缘, 5(3):113-124. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1998.03.011
徐先兵, 李源, 薛德杰, 等, 2014.福建泉州晚中生代伸展构造变形特征与年代学制约.地球科学, 39(1):45-63. http://earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=2828
徐先兵, 张岳桥, 贾东, 等, 2009.华南早中生代大地构造过程.中国地质, 36(3):573-593. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2009.03.007
张承帅, 苏慧敏, 于淼, 等, 2012.福建龙岩大洋-莒舟花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄和Sr-Nd-Pb同位素特征及其地质意义.岩石学报, 28(1):225-242. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201201017
张克信, 潘桂棠, 何卫红, 等, 2015.中国构造-地层大区划分新方案.地球科学, 40(2):206-233. http://earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3179
张旗, 2013.A型花岗岩的标志和判别——兼答汪洋等对"A型花岗岩的实质是什么"的质疑.岩石矿物学杂志, 32(2):267-274. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2013.02.014
张旗, 潘国强, 李承东, 等, 2007.花岗岩构造环境问题:关于花岗岩研究的思考之三.岩石学报, 23(11):2683-2698. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.11.002
张旗, 冉皞, 李承东, 2012.A型花岗岩的实质是什么?.岩石矿物学杂志, 31(4):621-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2012.04.014
张文兰, 华仁民, 王汝成, 等, 2004.江西大吉山五里亭花岗岩单颗粒锆石U-Pb同位素年龄及其地质意义探讨.地质学报, 78(3):352-358. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2004.03.008
张岳桥, 徐先兵, 贾东, 等, 2009.华南早中生代从印支期碰撞构造体系向燕山期俯冲构造体系转换的形变记录.地学前缘, 16(1):234-247. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2009.01.026
赵姣龙, 邱检生, 李真, 等, 2012.福建太武山花岗岩体成因:锆石U-Pb年代学与Hf同位素制约.岩石学报, 28(12):3938-3950. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7863327
赵希林, 毛建仁, 叶海敏, 等, 2009.福建省上杭地区晚中生代花岗质岩体黑云母的地球化学特征及成因意义.矿物岩石地球化学通报, 28(2):162-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2009.02.010