• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    张广才岭福兴屯组的形成时代、物源及构造背景

    何雨思 高福红 修铭 许文良

    何雨思, 高福红, 修铭, 许文良, 2019. 张广才岭福兴屯组的形成时代、物源及构造背景. 地球科学, 44(10): 3223-3236. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.145
    引用本文: 何雨思, 高福红, 修铭, 许文良, 2019. 张广才岭福兴屯组的形成时代、物源及构造背景. 地球科学, 44(10): 3223-3236. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.145
    He Yusi, Gao Fuhong, Xiu Ming, Xu Wenliang, 2019. Age, Provenance and Tectonic Setting of Fuxingtun Formation in Zhangguangcai Range. Earth Science, 44(10): 3223-3236. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.145
    Citation: He Yusi, Gao Fuhong, Xiu Ming, Xu Wenliang, 2019. Age, Provenance and Tectonic Setting of Fuxingtun Formation in Zhangguangcai Range. Earth Science, 44(10): 3223-3236. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.145

    张广才岭福兴屯组的形成时代、物源及构造背景

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.145
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金项目 41272075

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      何雨思(1993—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事岩石学方面研究

      通讯作者:

      高福红(1963—)

    • 中图分类号: P588

    Age, Provenance and Tectonic Setting of Fuxingtun Formation in Zhangguangcai Range

    • 摘要: 前人对张广才岭福兴屯组研究程度较低,限制了对区域古生代构造演化的认识.福兴屯组凝灰岩锆石30个测点加权平均年龄为392±3 Ma,砂岩碎屑锆石最小一组年龄为393 Ma,指示福兴屯组形成于中泥盆世.Al2O3/TiO2平均值为19.58,稀土元素球粒陨石标准化曲线具有轻稀土富集、重稀土稳定和负Eu异常特征,结合碎屑锆石年龄峰值,确定福兴屯组物源主要为晚古生代中酸性火成岩和早古生代花岗质岩.地球化学和区域火山岩特征共同揭示福兴屯组形成于伸展构造环境.松嫩-张广才岭地块和佳木斯地块晚古生代早期地层均广泛分布有489~551 Ma的碎屑锆石,暗示两地块在福兴屯组沉积之前已完成拼合,为两地块于早古生代晚期拼合提供了新的证据.

       

    • 图  1  研究区地质简图

      Fig.  1.  Geological sketch map of the study area

      图  2  福兴屯组岩性柱状图及采样位置

      Fig.  2.  Column diagram of the Fuxingtun Formation showing lithology and sampling locations

      图  3  福兴屯组野外露头和样品显微照片

      Qz.石英;Pl.长石

      Fig.  3.  Outcrop photographs and photomicrographs of samples from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  4  福兴屯组锆石样品中典型阴极发光图像

      Fig.  4.  CL images of the selected typical zircons from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  5  福兴屯组流纹质晶屑凝灰岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄谐和图

      Fig.  5.  U-Pb concordia diagram summarizing the LA-ICP-MS zircon data for the rhyolitic crystalline tuff in the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  6  福兴屯组细粒长石砂岩碎屑锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄谐和图

      Fig.  6.  U-Pb concordia diagrams summarizing the LA-ICP-MS detrital zircon data for the fine-grained arkose in the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  7  福兴屯组风化特征图解

      Fig.  7.  The characteristics of weathering for the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  8  福兴屯组沉积岩稀土元素PAAS和球粒陨石标准化曲线

      Fig.  8.  PAAS-normalized and chondrite-normalized REE patterns of sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  9  福兴屯组沉积岩物源区判别图解

      Fig.  9.  Provenance discrimination diagrams of sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  10  福兴屯组碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄频率

      Fig.  10.  Relative probability of detrital zircons from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  11  福兴屯组沉积岩构造环境判别图

      PM.被动大陆边缘;ACM.活动大陆边缘;ARC.岛弧;A1.岛弧;A2.演化岛弧

      Fig.  11.  Tectonic setting discriminate diagrams of sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation

      图  12  福兴屯沉积岩和不同构造环境砂岩稀土元素PAAS和球粒陨石标准化曲线

      Fig.  12.  PAAS-normalized and chondrite-normalized REE patterns of sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation and sandstones from various tectonic settings

      表  1  福兴屯组沉积岩主量(%)和微量元素(10-6)分析结果

      Table  1.   Major and trace element compositions of the sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation

      样品号 14HYS-1-1 14HYS-1-2 14HYS-1-3 14HYS-1-4 14HYS-1-5 14HYS-1-6 14HYS-1-7 14HYS-1-8 14HYS-1-9 14HYS-1-10
      Fe2O3 2.91 1.66 2.56 2.53 0.85 2.59 1.74 3.41 2.46 2.06
      FeO 2.80 4.15 3.18 3.47 4.92 4.18 4.31 3.18 4.38 4.43
      TFe2O3 6.02 6.27 6.09 6.39 6.32 7.23 6.53 6.94 7.33 6.98
      MnO 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.20
      TiO2 0.70 0.86 0.79 0.74 0.74 0.81 0.76 0.70 0.84 1.32
      CaO 1.86 1.70 1.47 1.74 1.58 1.51 1.55 1.74 1.64 1.67
      K2O 1.87 2.04 1.66 1.73 2.53 1.95 1.96 1.47 2.18 1.56
      P2O5 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.29
      SiO2 64.22 64.94 65.04 63.38 63.53 61.02 64.56 62.66 62.56 62.90
      Al2O3 15.33 15.18 15.28 15.48 16.28 16.52 15.33 16.04 15.74 15.49
      MgO 2.36 2.66 2.17 2.51 2.28 2.82 2.51 2.29 2.77 2.66
      Na2O 4.64 4.73 4.96 4.84 4.82 5.49 4.80 4.58 4.45 5.18
      LOI 2.86 1.60 2.36 2.34 1.35 2.28 1.64 3.06 2.05 1.78
      Total 99.89 99.86 99.80 99.07 99.16 99.51 99.49 99.47 99.43 99.54
      Al2O3/TiO2 21.90 17.65 19.34 20.92 22.00 20.40 20.17 22.91 18.74 11.73
      CIA 54.04 53.72 54.75 54.36 54.59 54.33 54.43 56.62 55.42 53.90
      ICV 1.43 1.46 1.37 1.42 1.29 1.45 1.40 1.33 1.43 1.50
      PIA 54.71 54.40 55.45 55.02 55.63 55.03 55.21 57.46 56.50 54.42
      Sc 13.20 14.30 13.50 13.40 15.60 16.40 14.00 14.20 14.20 17.30
      V 108.00 117.00 108.00 112.00 102.00 128.00 117.00 116.00 125.00 149.00
      Cr 77.40 106.00 87.40 80.00 53.60 95.60 86.60 86.10 106.00 185.00
      Co 16.30 16.20 15.00 16.80 10.70 21.70 15.10 19.60 19.90 14.60
      Ni 33.30 37.70 32.40 40.40 27.60 46.60 41.20 40.10 41.10 39.10
      Rb 41.10 50.60 32.20 35.50 74.20 52.70 39.70 37.00 46.60 31.20
      Sr 244.00 246.00 226.00 259.00 198.00 290.00 245.00 268.00 251.00 204.00
      Y 20.30 23.10 18.90 20.90 27.50 29.20 19.50 23.60 22.00 21.30
      Zr 171.00 189.00 187.00 167.00 203.00 228.00 190.00 209.00 216.00 260.00
      Hf 5.69 5.32 5.12 5.12 6.16 7.19 5.27 6.68 7.12 7.60
      Th 6.36 5.24 4.11 4.64 8.54 9.04 4.85 6.05 5.40 3.66
      U 1.37 1.33 1.22 1.30 1.65 2.05 1.36 1.63 1.51 1.59
      Th/U 4.64 3.94 3.37 3.57 5.18 4.41 3.57 3.71 3.58 2.30
      Rb/Sr 0.17 0.21 0.14 0.14 0.37 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.19 0.15
      La 23.30 27.60 21.40 22.60 24.30 30.10 23.70 26.10 30.10 23.90
      Ce 47.50 57.20 44.80 45.80 50.80 66.40 51.30 53.20 60.70 48.90
      Pr 5.99 6.35 5.62 5.61 6.18 7.68 5.83 6.30 7.30 6.07
      Nd 24.50 28.70 22.80 24.90 26.80 34.90 25.50 27.10 30.20 26.60
      Sm 4.94 5.19 4.40 4.97 5.57 6.81 4.91 5.21 5.96 5.33
      Eu 1.25 1.35 1.09 1.26 1.18 1.60 1.22 1.31 1.34 1.43
      Gd 4.11 4.57 3.96 4.24 4.53 5.81 3.90 4.52 4.93 4.56
      Tb 0.69 0.72 0.67 0.66 0.79 0.94 0.65 0.77 0.74 0.74
      Dy 4.26 4.07 3.89 4.02 4.86 5.62 4.00 4.50 4.21 4.34
      Ho 0.75 0.82 0.77 0.78 0.97 1.03 0.77 0.90 0.81 0.83
      Er 2.15 2.15 1.94 2.27 2.91 3.13 2.14 2.48 2.28 2.20
      Tm 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.36 0.46 0.45 0.31 0.37 0.34 0.30
      Yb 2.08 1.97 1.74 1.96 2.97 2.65 1.97 2.22 2.08 1.90
      Lu 0.36 0.37 0.34 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.34 0.41 0.39 0.34
      ∑REE 122.23 141.38 113.71 119.79 132.82 167.62 126.54 135.39 151.38 127.44
      ∑LREE 107.48 126.39 100.11 105.14 114.83 147.49 112.46 119.22 135.60 112.23
      ∑HREE 14.75 14.99 13.60 14.65 17.99 20.13 14.08 16.17 15.78 15.21
      L/H 7.29 8.43 7.36 7.18 6.38 7.33 7.99 7.37 8.59 7.38
      La/Yb 11.20 14.01 12.30 11.53 8.18 11.36 12.03 11.76 14.47 12.58
      (La/Yb)N 7.55 9.45 8.29 7.77 5.52 7.66 8.11 7.93 9.76 8.48
      (Gd/Yb)N 1.59 1.87 1.84 1.75 1.23 1.77 1.60 1.64 1.91 1.94
      δEu 0.83 0.83 0.78 0.82 0.70 0.76 0.83 0.81 0.74 0.87
      δCe 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.97 1.03 1.02 0.97 0.96 0.95
      注:TFe2O3=Fe2O3+1.111FeO;化学蚀变指数(CIA)=[Al2O3/(Al2O3+CaO*+Na2O+K2O)]×100,成分变异指数(ICV)=(Fe2O3+K2O+Na2O+CaO*+MgO+MnO+TiO2)/Al2O3,斜长石风化程度指数(PIA)=[(Al2O3-K2O)/(Al2O3+CaO*+Na2O-K2O)]×100,以上式子中的主要成分指摩尔分数,CaO*为碳酸盐中的CaO,即全岩中的CaO扣除掉化学沉积的CaO的摩尔分数(McLennan,1993);∑REE不包括Sc和Y元素;L/H=∑LREE/∑HREE;N代表球粒陨石标准化值;δEu=2Eu N/(Sm N / Gd N);δCe=2Ce N/(La N /Pr N).
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  福兴屯组沉积岩与不同构造背景砂岩稀土元素特征比较

      Table  2.   Geochemical comparison between sedimentary rocks from the Fuxingtun Formation and sandstones from various tectonic settings

      构造背景 La(10-6) Ce(10-6) ∑REE(10-6) La/Yb (La/Yb)N L/H δEu
      大洋岛弧 8.00±1.70 19.00±3.70 58.00±10.00 4.20±1.30 2.80±0.90 3.80±0.90 1.04±0.11
      大陆岛弧 27.00±4.50 59.00±8.20 146.00±20.00 11.00±3.60 7.50±2.50 7.70±1.70 0.79±0.13
      活动大陆边缘 37.00 78.00 186.00 12.50 8.50 9.10 0.60
      被动大陆边缘 39.00 85.00 210.00 15.90 10.80 8.50 0.56
      样品(平均值) 25.31 52.66 133.83 11.94 8.05 7.53 0.80
      注:大洋岛弧、大陆岛弧、活动大陆边缘和被动大陆边缘数据据Bhatia(1985).
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Andersen, T., 2002. Correction of Common Lead in U-Pb Analyses That do not Report 204Pb. Chemical Geology, 192(1-2): 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2541(02)00195-x
      Bai, J.K., Chen, J.L., Zhu, X.H., et al., 2018.Provenance Characteristics of Kalamaili Formation in Northeastern Margin of Junggar Basin:Constraints of Geochemistry and Detrital Zircon U-Pb Geochronology. Earth Science, 43(12):4411-4426(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx201812012
      Bhatia, M. R., 1985. Rare Earth Element Geochemistry of Australian Paleozoic Graywackes and Mudrocks: Provenance and Tectonic Control. Sedimentary Geology, 45(1-2): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(85)90025-9
      Bi, J. H., Ge, W. C., Yang, H., et al., 2014. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of Early Paleozoic Granitic Magmatism in the Jiamusi Massif, NE China: Geochronological, Geochemical and Hf Isotopic Evidence. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 96: 308-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.09.013
      Cox, R., Lowe, D. R., Cullers, R. L., 1995. The Influence of Sediment Recycling and Basement Composition on Evolution of Mudrock Chemistry in the Southwestern United States. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59(14): 2919-2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00185-9
      Fedo, C. M., Wayne Nesbitt, H., Young, G. M., 1995. Unraveling the Effects of Potassium Metasomatism in Sedimentary Rocks and Paleosols, with Implications for Paleoweathering Conditions and Provenance. Geology, 23(10): 921. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)0230921:uteopm > 2.3.co; 2 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)0230921:uteopm>2.3.co;2
      Gao, F.H., Wang, F., Xu, W.L., et al., 2013. Age of the "Paleoproterozoic" Dongfengshan Group in the Lesser Xing'an Range, NE China, and Its Tectonic Implications: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Geochronology. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 43(2): 440-456(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Girty, G.H., Ridge, D.L., Knaack, C., et al., 1996. Provenance and Depositional Setting of Paleozoic Chert and Argillite, Sierra Nevada, California. SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research, 66(1): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1306/d42682ca-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d
      Guo, P., Xu, W. L., Wang, Z. W., et al., 2018. Geochronology and Geochemistry of Late Devonian-Carboniferous Igneous Rocks in the Songnen-Zhangguangcai Range Massif, NE China: Constraints on the Late Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana Research, 57: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.01.007
      Hao, W.L., Xu, W.L., Wang, F., et al., 2014. Geochronology of the "Neoproterozoic" Yimianpo Group in the Zhangguangcai Range, NE China: Constraints from U-Pb Ages of Detrial and Magmatic Zircons. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(7): 1867-1878(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hayashi, K. I., Fujisawa, H., Holland, H. D., et al., 1997. Geochemistry of ~1.9 Ga Sedimentary Rocks from Northeastern Labrador, Canada. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 61(19): 4115-4137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00214-7
      Heilongjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resource, 2008.Lithostratigraphy of Heilongjiang Province. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, 298(in Chinese).
      Li, J.Y., Zhang, J., Yang, T.N., et al., 2009.Crustal Tectonic Division and Evolution of the Southern Part of the North Asian Orogenic Region and Its Adjacent Areas. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 39(4):584-605(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cckjdxxb200904002
      Liu, Y. S., Hu, Z. C., Gao, S., et al., 2008. In Situ Analysis of Major and Trace Elements of Anhydrous Minerals by LA-ICP-MS without Applying an Internal Standard. Chemical Geology, 257(1-2): 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
      Ludwig, K.R., 2012.ISOPLOT 3.75: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Geochronology Centre Special Publication, Berkeley, 75.
      McLennan, S.M., 1993. Weathering and Global Denudation. The Journal of Geology, 101(2): 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1086/648222
      Meng, E., Xu, W.L., Pei, F.P., et al., 2010. Detrital-Zircon Geochronology of Late Paleozoic Sedimentary Rocks in Eastern Heilongjiang Province, NE China: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Tectonophysics, 485(1-4): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.11.015
      Meng, E., Xu, W.L., Pei, F.P., et al., 2011. Middle Devonian Volcanism in Eastern Heilongjiang Province and Its Tectonic Implications: Constraints from Petro-Geochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Chronology and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopes. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 30(5): 883-900(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yskwxzz201105012
      Nesbitt, H. W., Young, G. M., 1982. Early Proterozoic Climates and Plate Motions Inferred from Major Element Chemistry of Lutites. Nature, 299(5885): 715-717. https://doi.org/10.1038/299715a0
      Şengör, A. M. C., Natal'in, B. A., Burtman, V. S., 1993. Evolution of the Altaid Tectonic Collage and Palaeozoic Crustal Growth in Eurasia. Nature, 364(6435): 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1038/364299a0
      Sun, S. S., McDonough, W. F., 1989. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42(1): 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
      Wang, F., Xu, W. L., Gao, F. H., et al., 2014. Precambrian Terrane within the Songnen-Zhangguangcai Range Massif, NE China: Evidence from U-Pb Ages of Detrital Zircons from the Dongfengshan and Tadong Groups. Gondwana Research, 26(1): 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.06.017
      Wang, F., Xu, W. L., Gao, F. H., et al., 2012a. Tectonic History of the Zhangguangcailing Group in Eastern Heilongjiang Province, NE China: Constraints from U-Pb Geochronology of Detrital and Magmatic Zircons. Tectonophysics, 566-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.07.018
      Wang, F., Xu, W. L., Meng, E., et al., 2012b. Early Paleozoic Amalgamation of the Songnen-Zhangguangcai Range and Jiamusi Massifs in the Eastern Segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Geochronological and Geochemical Evidence from Granitoids and Rhyolites. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 49: 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.09.022
      Wang, Q.Y., Mou, C.L., He, J., et al., 2018. Provenance Analysis and Tectonic Setting Judgment in Shanglan Formation of Middle Triassic in Weixi Area. Earth Science, 43(8): 2811-2832(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx201808020
      Wang, Z. W., Xu, W. L., Pei, F. P., et al., 2016. Geochronology and Geochemistry of Early Paleozoic Igneous Rocks of the Lesser Xing'an Range, NE China: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Lithos, 261: 144-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2015.11.006
      Wang, Z. W., Xu, W. L., Pei, F. P., et al., 2017. Geochronology and Geochemistry of Early Paleozoic Igneous Rocks from the Zhangguangcai Range, Northeastern China: Constraints on Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Lithosphere, 9(5): 803-827. https://doi.org/10.1130/l639.1
      Wilde, S., 2003. Late Pan-African Magmatism in Northeastern China: SHRIMP U-Pb Zircon Evidence from Granitoids in the Jiamusi Massif. Precambrian Research, 122(1-4): 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(02)00217-6
      Wu, F. Y., Sun, D. Y., Ge, W. C., et al., 2011. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic Granitoids in Northeastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 41(1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.014
      Xu, M. J., Xu, W. L., Wang, F., et al., 2012. Age, Association and Provenance of the "Neoproterozoic" Fengshuigouhe Group in the Northwestern Lesser Xing'an Range, NE China: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Geochronology. Journal of Earth Science, 23(6): 786-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-012-0291-0
      Xu, ,W.L., Wang, ,F., Meng, ,E., et al., 2012.Paleozoic- Early Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution in Eastern Heilongjiang Province, NE China:Evidence from Igneous Rock Association and U-Pb Geochronology of Detrital Zircons.Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 42(5):1378-1389(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yu, J. J., Wang, F., Xu, W. L., et al., 2013. Late Permian Tectonic Evolution at the Southeastern Margin of the Songnen-Zhangguangcai Range Massif, NE China: Constraints from Geochronology and Geochemistry of Granitoids. Gondwana Research, 24(2): 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.11.015
      Yuan, H. L., Gao, S., Liu, X. M., et al., 2004. Accurate U-Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 28(3): 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb00755.x
      Zhou, J. B., Wilde, S. A., Zhang, X. Z., et al., 2009. The Onset of Pacific Margin Accretion in NE China: Evidence from the Heilongjiang High-Pressure Metamorphic Belt. Tectonophysics, 478(3-4): 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.009
      Zhou, J. B., Wilde, S. A., Zhang, X. Z., et al., 2011. A > 1 300 km Late Pan-African Metamorphic Belt in NE China: New Evidence from the Xing'an Block and Its Tectonic Implications. Tectonophysics, 509(3-4): 280-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.06.018
      Zhou, J. B., Wilde, S. A., Zhao, G. C., et al., 2010a. Was the Easternmost Segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt Derived from Gondwana or Siberia: An Intriguing Dilemma?. Journal of Geodynamics, 50(3-4): 300-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2010.02.004
      Zhou, J. B., Wilde, S. A., Zhao, G. C., et al., 2010b. Pan-African Metamorphic and Magmatic Rocks of the Khanka Massif, NE China: Further Evidence Regarding Their Affinity. Geological Magazine, 147(5): 737-749. doi: 10.1017/S0016756810000063
      Zhu, C. Y., Zhao, G. C., Sun, M., et al., 2017. Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Yilan Greenschists and Amphibolites in the Heilongjiang Complex, Northeastern China and Tectonic Implications. Gondwana Research, 43: 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2016.02.001
      白建科, 陈隽璐, 朱小辉, 等, 2018.准噶尔盆地东北缘卡拉麦里组物源区特征:碎屑岩地球化学及锆石U-Pb年代学的制约.地球科学, 43(12):4411-4426. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.587
      高福红, 王枫, 许文良, 等, 2013.小兴安岭"古元古代"东风山群的形成时代及其构造意义:锆石U-Pb年代学证据.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 43(2): 440-456.
      郝文丽, 许文良, 王枫, 等, 2014.张广才岭"新元古代"一面坡群的形成时代:来自岩浆锆石和碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄的制约.岩石学报, 30(7): 1867-1878.
      黑龙江省地质矿产局, 2008.黑龙江省岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 298.
      李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等, 2009.北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 39(4):584-605. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb200904002
      孟恩, 许文良, 裴福萍, 等, 2011.黑龙江省东部中泥盆世火山作用及其构造意义:来自岩石地球化学、锆石U-Pb年代学和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素的制约.岩石矿物学杂志, 30(5): 883-900. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2011.05.012
      王启宇, 牟传龙, 贺娟, 等, 2018.维西地区中三叠统上兰组物源分析及构造背景判断.地球科学, 43(8): 2811-2832. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.307
      许文良, 王枫, 孟恩, 等, 2012.黑龙江省东部古生代-早中生代的构造演化:火成岩组合与碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学证据.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 42(5):1378-1389.
    • dqkx-44-10-3223-TableS1.pdf
    • 加载中
    图(12) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  4297
    • HTML全文浏览量:  1472
    • PDF下载量:  65
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2019-06-13
    • 刊出日期:  2019-11-11

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回