华北克拉通北缘中段多伦地区早二叠世双峰式岩浆作用

李天瑜; 李世超; 李鹏川; 彭云彪; 那木吉拉; 雒德利; 赵庆英; 孙加鹏

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2021.210

华北克拉通北缘中段多伦地区早二叠世双峰式岩浆作用

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.210

李天瑜^{1, 2,},
李世超^{1, 3, ,},
李鹏川⁴,
彭云彪²,
那木吉拉²,
雒德利²,
赵庆英¹,
孙加鹏¹

1.
吉林大学地球科学学院, 吉林长春 130061
2.
核工业二〇八大队, 内蒙古包头 014010
3.
自然资源部东北亚矿产资源评价重点实验室, 吉林长春 130061
4.
中国地质科学院地质研究所, 北京 100037

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 41872234

国家自然科学基金 41872194

内蒙古自治区地质勘查基金项目 NMKD2015-35

中国核工业地质局项目 202101

中国核工业地质局项目 202203-4

中国核工业地质局项目 202204-1

详细信息

作者简介:
李天瑜（1989-），男，硕士研究生，构造地质学专业. E-mail：tyli18@mails.jlu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李世超, E-mail: lsc@jlu.edu.cn

中图分类号: P597
计量
- 文章访问数: 127
- HTML全文浏览量: 47
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-28
- 刊出日期: 2023-08-25

Early Permian Bimodal Magmatism in the Duolun Area of the Central Section of the Northern Margin of the North China Craton

1.
College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
2.
No. 208 Geological Party, CNNC, Baotou 014010, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
4.
Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China

摘要

摘要: 东大山地区双峰式岩浆岩位于内蒙古多伦县东部，处于华北板块北缘. 岩体由石英二长岩和玄武岩组成. 对其开展了全岩地球化学、锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素组成研究. 研究结果表明：石英二长岩和玄武岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年结果分别为283±1.6 Ma、280±2.9 Ma，形成于早二叠世；二者锆石Hf同位素组成整体较相似，两阶段模式年龄（t_DM2）普遍较为古老（1 760~2 354 Ma，仅玄武岩内测得324 Ma、824 Ma两个较新年龄），与华北板块基底接近；岩体SiO₂含量在50.64%~65.87%存在明显的间断，具有双峰式岩浆岩特征，都相对富K、Na、Al，亏Ca、Mg，石英二长岩较玄武岩明显亏损Ti、P，具有明显的互补迹象. 结合前人研究成果，认为东大山地区双峰式岩浆岩可能是板块俯冲、后撤引起的伸展背景下，古亚洲洋俯冲板片脱水引起上地幔部分熔融形成的幔源岩浆向上运移、聚集于华北板块之下引起古老基底部分熔融的产物，研究区早二叠世期间构造环境为活动大陆边缘.
- 双峰式岩浆岩 /
- 华北板块北缘 /
- 伸展背景 /
- 活动大陆边缘 /
- 早二叠世 /
- 地球化学
Abstract: This paper presents petrological, Hf isotopes, geochronological and geochemical study on the early Permian Bimodal magmatites in Duolun area, Inner Mongolia, which is tectonically located in the northern margin of North China Craton, comprising quartz monzonite and basalt. U-Pb dating of zircons from the samples by LA-ICP-MS yield weighed mean ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U ages of 283±1.6 Ma and 280±2.9 Ma respectively. They have similar Hf isotopes. Hf isotopes t_DM2 was oldgenerally (from 1 760 to 2 354 Ma, merely two youngs: 324 Ma and 824 Ma) and closed to these reported in ancient basement of North China Plate. The quartz monzonite and basalt exhibit SiO₂ geochemical discontinuity (50.64%~65.87%), showing typically bimodal features. They also significantly enrich K, Na, Al and deplete Ca, Mg. Besides, the quartz monzonite show significantly depletions in Ti and P compared with the basalt, showing complementary relations. This paper, combined with previous data, suggest that Bimodal magmatitesare the products of partial melting of the ancient basement of the North China Plate under the background of extension, which was caused by the upward migrating and gathering of the mantle magma formed from partial melting of mantle resulted in dewatering of subducted plate of the ancient Asian Ocean. In the early Permian, Dongdashan area is under the background of active continental margin.
- bimodal magmatites /
- Northern margin of North China Craton /
- extension setting /
- active continental margin /
- the early Permian /
- geochemistry

HTML全文

图 1 研究区大地构造背景(a)及地质简图(b)

1. 第四系；2. 下白垩统义县组；3. 下白垩统玛尼吐组；4. 下白垩满克头鄂博组；5. 下二叠统额里图组；6. 中元古界白云鄂博群；7. 早白垩世二长花岗岩；8. 早二叠世石英二长岩；9. 采样点

Fig. 1. Geological regional location(a) and geological sketch map of research area(b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 石英二长岩野外（a）及显微照片（b）、玄武岩野外（c）及显微照片（d）

Q. 石英；Pl. 斜长石；Or. 正长石；Am. 角闪石

Fig. 2. Photographs of field and micro for the quartz monzonite(a, b) and basalt(c, d)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 石英二长岩、玄武岩锆石CL图像

白圈代表测试位置，数字代表U-Pb、Lu-Hf测试序号

Fig. 3. CL images of quartz monzonite and basalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 石英二长岩、玄武岩锆石U-Pb谐和图

Fig. 4. U-Pb concordia diagrams of zircon for quartz monzonite and basalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 石英二长岩(a)、玄武岩(b)锆石ε_Hf(t)-锆石年龄图解

Fig. 5. ε_Hf(t) vs. zircon ages plots for quartz monzonite and basalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 石英二长岩TAS图解(a, 据Irvine and Baragar, 1971)和玄武岩Zr/Tio₂-Nb/Y图解(b, 据Wilson, 1989）

Fig. 6. TAS(a, after Irvine and Baragar, 1971) and Zr/Tio₂ vs. Nb/Y(b, after Wilson, 1989) classification diagrams for quartz monzonite(a) and basalt(b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 石英二长岩、玄武岩稀土元素配分模式图（a, 据Boynton, 1984）和微量元素原始地幔标准化图解（b，据Sun and McDonough，1989）

Fig. 7. Chondrite-normalized REE pstterns (a, normalization values after Boynton, 1984) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams (b, normalization values after Sun and McDonough, 1989) for quartz monzonite (a) and basalt (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 石英二长岩Ⅰ型-A型花岗岩判别图解(a, 据Collins et al., 1982)和玄武岩La/Yb-Sm/Yb图解(b, 据Xu et al., 2005)

Fig. 8. Ⅰ model vs. A model (a, after Collins et al., 1982) and La/Yb vs.Sm/Yb (b, after Xu et al., 2005) classification diagrams for quartz monzonite (a) and basalt (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 东大山地区双峰式岩浆岩Harker图解

Fig. 9. Harker diagram of Bimodal magmatites in Duolun area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 石英二长岩微量元素w(Y+Nb)-w(Rb)构造环境判别图（a，据Pearce et al., 1984）及玄武岩Th-Ta协变判别图解（b, 据Pearce et al., 1982）

ORG. 大洋中脊花岗岩；WPG. 板内花岗岩；VAG. 火山弧花岗岩；Syn-COLG. 同碰撞花岗岩；MORB. 洋中脊玄武岩；WPB. 板内玄武岩；IAB. 岛弧玄武岩；SHO. 橄榄玄武岩；TH. 拉斑玄武岩；TR. 过渡性玄武岩；ALK. 碱性火山弧玄武岩；ICA. 钙碱性玄武岩

Fig. 10. w(Y+Nb) vs. w(Rb) (a, after Pearce et al., 1984) and Th vs. Ta (b, after Pearce et al., 1982) classification diagrams for quartz monzonite (a) and basalt (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 东大山地区双峰式岩浆岩形成模型

据朱日祥和徐日刚（2019）改

Fig. 11. Aschematic diagram showing the mechanism in formation of Bimodal magmatites in Duolun area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 东大山双峰式岩浆岩中的锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年数据

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results for quartz monzonite and basalt

测点	含量		Th/U	同位素比值						年龄
测点	Th	U	Th/U	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ		²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ
石英二长岩
1	135.1	191	0.82	0.044	0.000 6	0.328	0.014 7	0.054	0.002 4	280	4	288	11	369	106
2	298.5	261	1.26	0.045	0.000 7	0.309	0.013 4	0.051	0.002 2	281	4	274	10	232	102
3	156.3	236	0.82	0.044	0.000 6	0.325	0.015 4	0.053	0.002 4	279	4	286	12	339	104
4	210.2	258	0.99	0.044	0.000 6	0.313	0.013 3	0.052	0.002 3	280	4	276	10	333	100
5	331.4	342	1.31	0.044	0.000 7	0.325	0.012 7	0.053	0.002 0	280	4	285	10	343	90
6	648.7	763	0.99	0.045	0.000 7	0.351	0.011 5	0.057	0.002 0	281	4	305	9	502	71
7	203.8	180	1.39	0.046	0.000 8	0.327	0.015 6	0.052	0.002 6	289	5	287	12	295	139
8	218.3	258	0.94	0.044	0.000 6	0.347	0.016 0	0.057	0.002 7	280	4	302	12	494	106
9	160.7	206	0.93	0.044	0.000 8	0.344	0.016 5	0.057	0.002 7	280	5	300	12	483	107
10	416.3	424	1.26	0.044	0.000 8	0.333	0.018 7	0.054	0.003 0	280	5	292	14	383	122
11	157.1	221	0.97	0.045	0.000 9	0.371	0.024 5	0.060	0.003 7	283	5	320	18	606	140
12	831.6	408	2.86	0.045	0.000 9	0.303	0.019 3	0.049	0.003 4	285	5	269	15	169	156
13	681.7	435	1.90	0.045	0.000 6	0.340	0.013 2	0.056	0.002 1	282	4	297	10	435	83
14	145.6	162	1.05	0.046	0.000 8	0.347	0.016 7	0.055	0.002 6	289	5	302	13	433	104
15	233.0	232	1.31	0.045	0.000 7	0.316	0.014 7	0.051	0.002 4	286	4	279	11	243	107
16	148.4	221	0.78	0.044	0.000 8	0.379	0.020 6	0.062	0.003 4	281	5	326	15	700	117
17	182.3	240	0.93	0.045	0.000 6	0.356	0.013 7	0.058	0.002 3	283	4	309	10	539	92
18	183.6	268	0.88	0.045	0.000 6	0.311	0.011 4	0.051	0.002 0	286	4	275	9	233	95
19	148.9	214	0.85	0.046	0.000 7	0.330	0.015 3	0.052	0.002 4	293	4	289	12	272	105
20	326.3	382	1.06	0.045	0.000 6	0.326	0.012 4	0.052	0.001 9	285	3	286	10	283	83
21	222.9	242	1.07	0.045	0.000 6	0.363	0.015 6	0.059	0.002 6	282	4	315	12	576	127
22	220.3	361	0.70	0.046	0.000 6	0.328	0.011 8	0.051	0.001 8	293	4	288	9	261	75
23	1615	521	3.56	0.044	0.000 6	0.310	0.012 9	0.051	0.002 2	278	4	274	10	256	100
24	156.6	148	1.31	0.045	0.000 9	0.350	0.022 9	0.057	0.003 8	283	6	305	17	498	148
25	362.1	504	0.82	0.045	0.000 6	0.323	0.001 0	0.053	0.001 6	282	3	285	8	309	69
玄武岩
1	186	256	0.73	0.04	0.000 8	0.34	0.015	0.055	0.002 0	280	5	296	12	433	94
2	351	292	1.20	0.05	0.000 6	0.36	0.016	0.058	0.003 0	287	4	313	12	522	96
3	185	250	0.74	0.04	0.000 8	0.32	0.015	0.053	0.003 0	281	5	282	12	309	119
4	194	272	0.71	0.04	0.000 8	0.36	0.018	0.06	0.003 0	277	5	313	14	611	111
5	170	177	0.96	0.04	0.001 8	0.33	0.047	0.055	0.009 0	271	11	288	36	432	373
6*	112	140	0.80	0.04	0.000 9	0.33	0.026	0.064	0.006 0	243	6	286	20	744	198
7*	788	683	1.15	0.03	0.000 5	0.26	0.008	0.057	0.002 0	207	3	231	6	500	67
8	290	397	0.73	0.04	0.000 8	0.39	0.015	0.065	0.002 0	277	5	337	11	783	78
9*	81	107	0.76	0.05	0.000 9	0.58	0.028	0.084	0.004 0	314	5	462	18	1 302	90
10*	168	248	0.68	0.04	0.000 8	0.33	0.012	0.053	0.002 0	281	5	286	9	324	112
11	201	364	0.55	0.04	0.000 9	0.32	0.018	0.052	0.003 0	280	5	283	13	306	116
12*	873	870	1.00	0.03	0.000 5	0.28	0.009	0.061	0.002 0	208	3	248	7	633	59
13*	1 259	1679	0.75	0.02	0.000 4	0.2	0.006	0.069	0.002 0	135	2	185	5	900	61
14	319	441	0.72	0.04	0.000 7	0.33	0.012	0.056	0.002 0	274	4	293	9	450	76
15*	133	198	0.67	0.05	0.000 9	0.37	0.014	0.054	0.002 0	313	6	318	11	391	93
16*	322	337	0.95	0.04	0.000 8	0.38	0.027	0.072	0.006 0	243	5	324	20	972	159
17	217	509	0.43	0.04	0.000 6	0.35	0.010	0.059	0.002 0	277	4	308	8	561	64
注：标*号的数据因不协和而未参加统计

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 石英二长岩、玄武岩中锆石的Hf同位素分析结果

Table 2. Zircon Hf isotopic data for quartz monzonite and basalt

测点号	Age(Ma)	¹⁷⁶Yb/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Lu/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	ε_Hf()	ε_Hf(t)	T_DM	T_DMc	f_Lu/Hf
石英二长岩
1	280	0.037 074	0.000 429	0.001 154	0.000 014	0.282 132	0.000 020	-22.64	-16.70	1 583	2 354	-0.97
2	281	0.038 734	0.000 140	0.001 201	0.000 004	0.282 202	0.000 024	-20.17	-14.24	1 487	2 198	-0.96
3	279	0.028 828	0.000 247	0.000 881	0.000 009	0.282 196	0.000 019	-20.37	-14.39	1 482	2 208	-0.97
4	280	0.054 428	0.000 439	0.001 617	0.000 015	0.282 285	0.000 023	-17.21	-11.34	1 385	2 017	-0.95
5	280	0.041 198	0.000 270	0.001 215	0.000 008	0.282 253	0.000 020	-18.35	-12.41	1 415	2 084	-0.96
6	281	0.046 922	0.000 353	0.001 371	0.000 009	0.282 312	0.000 018	-16.28	-10.37	1 339	1 955	-0.96
7	289	0.044 059	0.001 810	0.001 303	0.000 054	0.282 245	0.000 022	-18.65	-12.54	1 431	2 100	-0.96
8	280	0.048 764	0.000 347	0.001 487	0.000 015	0.282 311	0.000 020	-16.32	-10.42	1 345	1 960	-0.96
9	280	0.052 770	0.000 749	0.001 535	0.000 026	0.282 213	0.000 024	-19.76	-13.91	1 484	2 177	-0.95
10	280	0.048 744	0.000 135	0.001 414	0.000 005	0.282 288	0.000 022	-17.11	-11.21	1 374	2 009	-0.96
11	283	0.038 939	0.000 132	0.001 153	0.000 002	0.282 290	0.000 023	-17.04	-11.03	1 361	1 999	-0.97
12	285	0.041 294	0.000 628	0.001 190	0.000 022	0.282 207	0.000 025	-19.98	-13.92	1 479	2 183	-0.96
13	282	0.058 001	0.000 598	0.001 646	0.000 021	0.282328	0.000 024	-15.69	-9.79	1 325	1 920	-0.95
14	289	0.046 676	0.000 511	0.001 329	0.000 010	0.282 297	0.000 025	-16.81	-10.74	1 359	1 984	-0.96
15	286	0.056 501	0.001 133	0.001 579	0.000 032	0.282 239	0.000 025	-18.86	-12.88	1 450	2 117	-0.95
16	281	0.059 493	0.000 144	0.001 677	0.000 008	0.282 401	0.000 022	-13.11	-7.27	1 223	1 760	-0.95
17	283	0.034 540	0.000 511	0.000 937	0.000 016	0.282 261	0.000 021	-18.07	-12.03	1 394	2 062	-0.97
18	286	0.039 795	0.000 275	0.001 110	0.000 005	0.282 197	0.000 024	-20.35	-14.27	1 491	2 207	-0.97
玄武岩
1	280	0.051 617	0.000 453	0.001 463	0.000 013	0.282 292	0.000 029	-16.96	-11.08	1 369	1 999	-0.96
2	287	0.039 388	0.000 622	0.001 058	0.000 016	0.282 282	0.000 024	-17.34	-11.24	1 370	2 015	-0.97
3	281	0.098 110	0.000 979	0.002 717	0.000 027	0.282 296	0.000 032	-16.84	-11.18	1 412	2 006	-0.92
4	277	0.043 547	0.000 114	0.001 188	0.000 003	0.282 270	0.000 019	-17.77	-11.87	1 391	2 048	-0.96
5	271	0.075 961	0.000 978	0.002 194	0.000 033	0.282 222	0.000 026	-19.45	-13.89	1 498	2 170	-0.93
8	277	0.056 354	0.000 476	0.001 568	0.000 007	0.282 308	0.000 021	-16.42	-10.59	1 352	1 969	-0.95
10	281	0.045 425	0.000 527	0.001 275	0.000 015	0.282 311	0.000 019	-16.32	-10.38	1 337	1 956	-0.96
11	280	0.034 278	0.000 075	0.000 988	0.000 004	0.282 814	0.000 019	1.48	7.47	620	824	-0.97
14	274	0.058 519	0.000 619	0.001 873	0.000 027	0.282 225	0.000 022	-19.34	-13.67	1 481	2 158	-0.94
17	277	0.051 655	0.000 323	0.001 707	0.000 015	0.283 039	0.000 025	9.44	15.23	307	324	-0.95

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 石英二长岩、玄武岩的主量元素(%)、稀土微量元素(×10^-6)分析结果表

Table 3. Major (%), rare earth and trace element (×10^－6)for quartz monzonite and basalt

样品号	P09-01	P09-03	P09-04	P09-05	P09-06	P13-02	P13-03	P13-04	P13-05
岩性	石英二长岩					玄武岩
SiO₂	66.37	66.59	66.85	67.17	65.87	50.64	49.31	50.36	48.83
TiO₂	0.33	0.43	0.42	0.35	0.40	3.18	3.18	3.08	3.24
Al₂O₃	16.10	16.55	15.89	16.54	16.62	14.63	15.07	14.66	15.81
Fe₂O3	2.77	1.46	1.71	1.37	1.95	9.33	6.65	6.76	6.71
P₂O₅	0.12	0.15	0.15	0.12	0.14	0.85	0.88	0.86	0.91
CaO	1.59	1.84	1.98	1.76	1.85	1.76	2.08	1.81	1.61
K₂O	5.15	4.75	4.72	4.99	4.93	2.68	3.66	3.54	3.92
MgO	0.62	0.81	0.77	0.68	0.8	4.07	5.02	4.68	5.14
MnO	0.09	0.09	0.09	0.08	0.08	0.12	0.11	0.12	0.086
Na₂O	4.67	4.72	4.82	4.76	4.9	4.48	2.94	3.45	2.92
FeO	1.47	1.84	1.81	1.56	1.74	4.35	6.44	6.14	6.48
LOS	0.37	0.77	0.75	0.65	0.70	3.71	4.25	3.82	3.83
Total	99.64	100	99.99	100	99.98	99.8	99.59	99.28	99.48
Mg#	0.23	0.33	0.30	0.32	0.30	0.37	0.43	0.42	0.44
A/CNK	1.02	1.04	0.97	1.02	1.01	1.28	1.44	1.36	1.61
AR	3.23	3.11	3.31	3.17	3.26	2.55	2.04	2.44	2.01
Cr	0.0008	12.8	12.1	13.8	10.8	39.6	27.4	23.8	25.5
Ni	2.324	4.71	6.5	6.25	5.2	18.7	41.9	17.4	72.4
Co	3.354	4.28	5.6	3.93	3.97	38.3	42.5	40.4	45.7
Rb	68.237	69.9	67.2	66.9	66.6	59.8	78.7	72.1	85.7
Cs	2.949	3.14	2.9	2.72	2.2	1.55	1.26	1.16	1.40
Sr	323.45	294	319	304	308	181	180	183	164
Ba	1339.8	1228	1322	1551	1399	1527	2750	2645	2836
V	0.002	28.7	29.4	26.1	26.5	277	293	272	296
Sc	4.497	2.98	3.49	2.75	2.46	22.760 3	21.750 9	20.98	22.10
Nb	8.038	8.75	9.68	7.91	8.13	14.6	14.3	12.8	14.7
Ta	0.736	1.08	1.43	0.93	0.86	1.64	2.22	2.75	1.53
Zr	260.25	252	246	241	229	258	226	222	233
Hf	6.606	1.3	0.5	2.1	1.9	1.20	0.60	0.70	0.50
U	0.585	0.6	0.62	0.5	0.57	0.93	0.73	0.65	0.68
Th	12.055	8.46	9.08	7.93	8.58	5.42	3.47	5.02	3.28
La	66.896	72.676	85.126	59.8	77.342	31.26	26.86	26.41	29.62
Ce	125.365	129.558	150.264	111.596	140.327	69.75	65.81	60.47	68.21
Pr	12.16	12.145	14.726	10.867	13.728	10.09	8.96	8.89	10.16
Nd	36.32	36.513	43.294	32.586	41.365	40.35	39.37	38.11	40.47
Sm	4.654	4.603	5.27	4.005	4.979	1.2	0.6	0.7	0.5
Eu	1.067	1.097	1.093	0.913	0.983	2.31	2.33	2.1	2.38
Gd	4.358	5.848	6.532	4.886	6.244	6.59	6.56	6.33	6.94
Tb	0.447	0.593	0.626	0.527	0.632	1.2	1.23	1.14	1.26
Dy	2.267	2.113	2.511	2.063	2.113	6.71	6.81	5.93	7.05
Ho	0.431	0.372	0.411	0.360	0.376	1.21	1.27	1.12	1.28
Er	1.172	1.314	1.514	1.211	1.321	3.57	3.62	3.21	3.83
Tm	0.181	0.163	0.168	0.146	0.151	0.51	0.52	0.49	0.59
Yb	1.039	1.054	1.168	0.909	1.041	3.17	3.51	3.29	3.73
Lu	0.159	0.151	0.183	0.142	0.158	0.5	0.52	0.47	0.55
Y	10.429	10.929	11.449	9.622	10.264	32.99	32	31.48	35.96
ΣREE	290.7	256.5	268.2	312.9	230.0	185.4	175.66	165.5	184.6
ΣLREE	278.7	246.5	256.6	299.8	219.8	162.0	151.6	143.5	159.4
ΣHREE	12.04	10.06	11.61	13.11	10.24	23.44	24.03	21.96	25.22
LREE/HREE	23.15	24.51	22.11	22.87	21.45	6.91	6.31	6.53	6.32
δEu	0.54	0.72	0.65	0.57	0.63	0.96	0.97	0.93	0.95

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(78)

[1]	Boynton, W. V., 1984. Geochemistry of the Rare Earth Elements: Meteoritestudies. In: Henderson, P., ed., Rare Earth Element Geochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 63-144.
[2]	Cao, D. Y., Zhao, F. Liu, D., et al., 2014. Geochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Implications of the Early Permian Volcanic Rocks from Ongniud Banner, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 29(3): 38-43 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	Chu, H., Wang, H. C., Wei, C. J., et al., 2012. The Metamorphic Evolution History of High Pressure Granulites in Chengde Area, Northern Margin of North China: Zircon Chronology and Geochemical Evidence. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 33(6): 977-987 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	Cheng, J. S., 2018. Petrogenesis of the Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic Granitic from the Chifeng Region and Their Tectonic Implication(Dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun, 151-155(in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	Cheng, T. S., Yang, W. J., Wang, D. H., 2013. Zircon U-Pb Age of the Spilite-Keratophyre Sequence of the Dashizhai Formation in Maodeng of Xilinhaote Inner Mongolia and Its Geological Significance. Geoscience, 27(3): 526-535 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6]	Collins, W. J., Beams, S. D., White, A. J. R., et al., 1982. Nature and Origin of A-Type Granites with Particular Reference to Southeastern Australia. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 80(2): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00374895
[7]	Cui, Y. L., Qu, H. J., et al., 2019. First Identification of ~2.61 Ga Amphibolite in Jiefangyingzi Area on the Northern Margin of the North China Craton. Geology in China, 46(2)436-437 (in Chinese).
[8]	Dong, X. J., Wang, W. Q., Sha, Q., et al., 2016. Suzy Volcanic Rocks in the Northern Margin of the North China Craton and Its Formation Mechanism. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 32(9): 2765-2779(in Chinese with English abstract).
[9]	Guan, Q. B., Liu, Z. H., Bai, X. H., et al., 2016. Age and Tectonic Setting of Volcanic Rocks of the Dashizhai Formation from Xinkaiba, Balinyouqi Area, Inner Mongolia. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 32(7): 2029-2040(in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	Hao, B. W., Jiang, J., 2010. Chronology, Geochemistry of the Hadamiao Complex Related to Gold Depositsin Xianghuang Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 29(6): 750-762(in Chinese with English abstract).
[11]	Hou, K. J., Li, Y. H., Zou, T. R., et al., 2007. Laser Ablation-MC-ICP-MS Technique for Hf Isotope Microanalysis of Zircon and Its Geological Applications. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(10): 2595-2604(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.10.025
[12]	Irvine, T. N., Baragar, W. R. A., 1971. A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8(5): 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055
[13]	Li, J. Y., Gao, L. M., Sun G. H., et al., 2007. Shuangjingzi Middle Triassic Syn-Collisional Crust-Derived Granite in the East Inner Mongolia and Its Constraint on the Timing of Collision between Siberian and Sino-Korean Paleo-Plates. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(3): 566-578(in Chinese with English abstract).
[14]	Li, S. C., Wang, H. T., Li, G., et al., 2020. Northward Plate Subduction Process of the Paleo-Asian Ocean in the Middle Part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Evidence from Adakites. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 36(8): 2521-2536. https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2020.08.14
[15]	Liu, J., Wu, G., Liu, T. G., et al., 2014. SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Dating, Geochemistry, Sr-Nd Isotope Analysis of the Late Paleozoic Intermediate-Acidic Intrusive Rocks in the Hadamiao ARea, Xianghuang Banner, Inner Mongolia and Its Geological Significances. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(1) : 96-104(in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	Liu, Y. J., Li, W. M., Feng, Z. Q., et al., 2017. A Review of the Paleozoic Tectonics in the Eastern Part of Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana Research, 43(4): 123-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2016.03.013
[17]	Liu, Y. J., Feng, Z. Q., et al., 2019. Ophiolite in the Eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt, NE China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 35(10): 3017-3047. https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2019.10.05
[18]	Lü, Z. C., Hao, L. B., Duan, G. Z., et al., 2002. Lithogeochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Implications of Two Series of Volcanic Rocks from Early Permian Dashizhai Formation in the south section of Da Hinggan Mountains. Geochimica, 31(4): 339-345. https://doi.org/10.19700/j.0379-1726.2002.04.005
[19]	Mei, K. C., Li, Q. G., Wang, Z. Q., et al., 2015. SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemistry and Tectonic Significance of the Dashizhai Formation Rhyolites in Sunid Left Banner, Middle Part of Inner Mongolia. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(12): 2182-2193(in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	Peng, B., Wang, G. Q., Liu, L., et al., 2016. Recognition of the Early Permian Volcanic Rocks and Its Geological Significance in Chifeng Region of Inner Mongolia. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 35(6): 1330-1339(in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	Pearce, J. A., 1982. Trace Element Characteristics of Lavas from Destructive Plate Boundaries. In: Thorpe, R. S., ed., Andesits. Wiley, Chichester, 525-548.
[22]	Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., Tindle, A. G., 1984. Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4): 956-983. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
[23]	Shang, Q. H. 2004. Occurrences of Permian Radio Larians in Central and Eastern Inner Mongolia and Their Geological Significance to the Northern China Orogen. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(24): 2574-2578(in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/csb2004-49-24-2574
[24]	Shao, J. A., Tang, K. D., He, G. Q., 2014. Early Permian Tectono-Palaeo Geographic Reconstruction of Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(7): 1858-1866(in Chinese with English abstract).
[25]	Sun, S. S., McDonough, W. F., 1989. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42(1): 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
[26]	Tong, Y., Hong, D. W., Wang T., et al., 2016. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Granitoids in the Middle Segment of the Sino-Mongolian Border and Its Tectonic and Metallogenic Implications. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 31(3): 395-412(in Chinese with English abstract).
[27]	Wang, W. Q., Xu, Z. Y., Liu, Z. H., et al., 2013. Early Middle Permian Tectonic Evolution of the Central Northern Margin of the North China Craton: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Ages and Geochemistry of the Granitoids. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(9): 2988-3000 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28]	Wang, Y. J., Fan, Z. Y., 1997. Discovery of Permian Radiolarians in Ophiolite Belt on Northern Side of Xarmoron River, Nei Monggol and Its Geological Significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 36(1): 58-61 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	Wang, Y. G., 2018. The Tectonic Significance of the Early Permian Volcanic Rocks in the North Margin of North China Block: A Case Study in Siziwang Banner Area(Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 1-30(in Chinese with English abstract).
[30]	Wilson, M., 1989. Igneous Petrogenesis. Unwin Hyman, London, 1-466.
[31]	Wu, F. Y., Zhao, G. C., Sun, D. Y., et al., 2007. The Hulan Group: Its Role in the Evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt of NE China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30(3/4): 542-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.01.003
[32]	Wu, F. Y., Li, X. H., Yang, J. H, et al., 2007a. Discussions on the Petrogenesis of Granites. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(6) : 1220-1233(in Chinese with English abstract).
[33]	Wu, F. Y., Li, X. H., Zheng, Y. F., et al., 2007b. Lu-Hf Isotopic Systematics and Their Applications in Petrology. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(2) : 186-208(in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	Wu, F. Y., Sun, D. Y., Ge, W. C., et al., 2011. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic Granitoids in Northeastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 41(1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.014
[35]	Xia, Y., Liu, L and Xu, X. S. 2016. Late Mesozoic A-Type Granitoids in SE China and Paleo-Pacific Plate Subduction and Slab Rollback. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 35(6): 1110-1116(in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	Xiao, W. J., Windley, B. F., Hao, J., et al., 2003. Accretion Leading to Collision and the Permian Solonker Suture, Inner Mongolia, China: Termination of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Tectonics, 22(6): 1069.
[37]	Xiao, W. J., Windley, B. F., Huang, B. C., et al., 2009. End Permian to Mid-Triassic termination of the Accretionary Processes of the Southern Altaids: Implications for the Geodynamic Evolution, Phanerozoic Continental Growth, and Metallogeny of Central Asia. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 98(6): 1189-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00531-008-0407-z
[38]	Xiao, W. J., Windley, B. F., Sun, S., et al., 2015. A Tale of Amalgamation of Three Permo Triassic Collage Systems in Central Asia: Oroclines, Sutures, and Terminal Accretion. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 43: 477-507. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105254
[39]	Xu, Y. G., Ma, J. L., Frey, F. A., et al., 2005. Role of Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Interaction in the Genesis of Quaternary Alkali and Tholeiitic Basalts from Datong, Western North China Craton. Chemical Geology, 224(4): 247-271. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.08.004
[40]	Xu, B., Zhao, P., Bao, Q. Z., et al., 2014. Preliminary study on the Pre-Mesozoic tectonic unit division of the Xing-Meng Orogenic Belt(XMOB). Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(7): 1842-1851(in Chinese with English abstract).
[41]	Xu, B., Wang, Z. W., Zhang, L. Y., et al., 2018. The Xing-Meng Intra Continent Orogenic Belt. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 34(10): 2820-2838(in Chinese with English abstract).
[42]	Yuan, G. B., Wang, H. C., 2006. Magmatic Activity and Its Tectonic Implications during the Early Permianin the Northwest Ward of Wuchuan, Inner Mongolia. Geological Survey and Research, 29(4): 303-310(in Chinese with English abstract).
[43]	Zhang, X. F., Liu, J. L., Feng, J. L., et al., 2016. Geochronological and Geochemical Features of Volcanic Rocks of Dashizhai Formation in Ural Sutai of Xilin Hot, Inner Mongolia, and Their Geological Significance. Geological Bulletin of China, 35(5): 767-774(in Chinese with English abstract).
[44]	Zhang, X. F., Zhou, Y., Liu, J. L., et al., 2018a. Geochronology and Geochemistry for Volcanic Rocks of Dashizhai Formation and Its Geological Significance in XiUjimqin Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 34(6): 1775-1791(in Chinese with English abstract).
[45]	Zhang, X. F., Zhou, Y., Cao, J., et al., 2018b. Geochronological and Geochemical Features of Bimodal Intrusive Rocks in the Hanwula Area Xiwu Banner, Inner Mongolia: Constraints on Closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. Acta Geologica Sinica, 92(4): 665-686 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[46]	Zhu, R. X., Xu, Y. G., 2019. The Subduction of the West Pacific Plate and the Destruction of the North China Craton. Science China Earth Sciences, 49(9)1346-1356 (in Chinese).
[47]	曹代勇, 赵发, 刘登, 等, 2014. 内蒙古翁牛特旗地区早二叠世火山岩地球化学特征及其构造意义. 湖南科技大学学报, 29(3): 38-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTKY201403009.htm
[48]	初航, 王慧初, 魏春景, 等, 2012. 华北北缘承德地区高压麻粒岩的变质演化历史. 地球学报, 33(6): 977-987. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201206022.htm
[49]	陈井胜, 2008. 赤峰地区晚古生代-早中生代花岗岩成因及其构造意义(博士学位论文). 长春: 吉林大学, 151-155.
[50]	程天赦, 杨文静, 王登红, 2013. 内蒙古锡林浩特毛登牧场大石寨组细碧-角斑岩系地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义. 现代地质, 27(3): 526-535. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201303003.htm
[51]	崔玉良, 渠洪杰, 陈英富, 等, 2019. 华北板块北缘解放营子地区发现~2.61 Ga斜长角闪岩. 中国地质, 46(2)436-437. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202102024.htm
[52]	董晓杰, 王挽琼, 沙茜, 等, 2016. 华北克拉通北缘中段二叠纪苏吉火山岩及其形成机制. 岩石学报, 32(9): 2765-2779. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201609012.htm
[53]	关庆彬, 刘正宏, 白新会, 等, 2016. 内蒙古巴林右旗新开坝地区大石寨组火山岩形成时代及构造背景. 岩石学报, 32(7): 2029-2040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201607007.htm
[54]	郝百武, 蒋杰, 2010. 内蒙古镶黄旗哈达庙金矿杂岩体年代学、地球化学及其形成机制. 岩石矿物学杂志, 29(6) : 750-762. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201006012.htm
[55]	候可军, 李延河, 邹天人, 等, 2007. LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石Hf同位素的分析方法及地质应用. 岩石学报, 23(10): 2595-2604. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200710026.htm
[56]	李锦轶, 高立明, 孙桂华, 等, 2007. 内蒙古东部双井子中三叠世同碰撞壳源花岗岩的确定及其对西伯利亚与中朝古板块碰撞时限的约束. 岩石学报, 23(3): 566-578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703006.htm
[57]	李世超, 王洪涛, 李刚, 等, 2020. 中亚造山带中段古亚洲洋北向平板俯冲过程: 来自埃达克岩的证据. 岩石学报, 36(8): 2521-2536. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB202008015.htm
[58]	刘军, 武广, 刘铁刚, 等, 2014. 内蒙古镶黄旗哈达庙地区晚古生代中酸性侵入岩的年代学、地球化学、Sr-Nd同位素组成及其地质意义. 岩石学报, 30(1): 96-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201401007.htm
[59]	刘永江, 冯志强, 蒋立伟, 等, 2019. 中国东北地区蛇绿岩. 岩石学报, 35(10): 3018-3034. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201910006.htm
[60]	吕志成, 郝立波, 段国正, 等, 2002. 大兴安岭南段早二叠世两类火山岩岩石地球化学特征及其构造意义. 地球化学, 31(4): 339-345. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200204004.htm
[61]	梅可辰, 李秋根, 王宗起, 等, 2015. 内蒙古中部苏尼特左旗大石寨组流纹岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb、地球化学特征及其构造意义. 地质通报, 34(12): 2182-2193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201512005.htm
[62]	彭斌, 王国祺, 刘乐, 等, 2016. 内蒙古赤峰地区二叠纪火山岩的发现及其地质意义. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 35(6): 1330-1339. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201606033.htm
[63]	尚庆华, 2004. 北方造山带内蒙古中、东部地区二叠纪放射虫的发现及意义. 科学通报, 49(24): 2574-2578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB20042400D.htm
[64]	邵济安, 唐克东, 何国琦, 2014. 内蒙古早二叠世构造古地理的再造. 岩石学报, 30(7): 1858-1866. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201407002.htm
[65]	童英, 洪大卫, 王涛, 等, 2016. 中蒙边境中段花岗岩时空分布特征及构造和找矿意义及构造和找矿. 地球学报, 31 (3): 395-412. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201003016.htm
[66]	王挽琼, 徐仲元, 刘正宏, 等, 2013. 华北板块北缘中段早中二叠世的构造属性: 来自花岗岩类锆石U-Pb年代学及地球化学的制约. 岩石学报, 29(9): 2988-3000. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201311020.htm
[67]	王玉净, 樊志勇, 1997. 内蒙古西拉木伦河北部蛇绿岩带中二叠纪放射虫的发现及其地质意义. 古生物学报, 36(1): 58-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSWX701.004.htm
[68]	王月古, 2018. 华北板块北缘早二叠世火山岩的构造意义: 以四子王旗地区为例. 硕士学位论文. 北京: 中国地质大学, 1-30.
[69]	吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等, 2007a. 花岗岩成因研究的若干问题. 岩石学报, 23(6): 1220-1233. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200706000.htm
[70]	吴福元, 李献华, 郑永飞, 等, 2007b. Lu-Hf同位素体系及其应用. 岩石学报, 23(2): 186-208.
[71]	夏炎, 刘磊, 徐夕生, 2016. 中国东南部中生代A型花岗岩类与太平洋板块俯冲-后撤. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 35(6) : 1110-1116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201606007.htm
[72]	俆备, 赵盼, 鲍庆中, 等, 2014. 中亚造山带前中生代构造单元划分初探. 岩石学报, 30(7): 1842-1851.
[73]	俆备, 王志伟, 张立杨, 等, 2018. 中亚陆内造山带. 岩石学报, 34(10): 2820-2838.
[74]	袁桂邦, 王惠初, 2006. 内蒙古武川西北部早二叠世岩浆活动及其构造意义. 地质调查与研究, 29(4): 303-309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHWJ200604009.htm
[75]	张晓飞, 刘俊来, 冯俊岭, 等, 2016. 内蒙古锡林浩特乌拉苏太大石寨组火山岩年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义. 地质通报, 35(5): 767-774. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201605012.htm
[76]	张晓飞, 周毅, 刘俊来, 等, 2018a. 内蒙古西乌旗大石寨组火山岩年代学和地球化学特征及地质意义. 岩石学报, 34(6): 1775-1791. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201806014.htm
[77]	张晓飞, 周毅, 曹军, 等, 2018b. 内蒙古西乌旗罕乌拉地区双峰式侵入体年代学、地球化学特征及其对古亚洲洋闭合时限的制约. 地质学报, 92(4): 665-686. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201804004.htm
[78]	朱日祥, 徐义刚, 2019. 西太平洋板块俯冲与华北克拉通破坏. 中国科学: 地球科学, 49(9)1346-1356. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK202005007.htm