地质灾害生态化治理工程耐久性评估指标研究

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2025.106

地质灾害生态化治理工程耐久性评估指标研究

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.106

1. 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护全国重点实验室(成都理工大学), 四川成都, 610059;
2. 天府永兴实验室, 四川成都 610213

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2023YFC3007100）

详细信息

作者简介:
吕雅兰（2001-），女，硕士研究生在读，主要从事生态修复评价工作.E-mail：17398185268.163.com

中图分类号: P642
计量
- 文章访问数: 31
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-04-26
- 网络出版日期: 2025-06-23

Exploration of Durability Evaluation for Ecological Remediation Engineering in Geological Hazard Governance

1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Tianfu Yongxing Laboratory, Chengdu 610213, China

摘要

摘要: 随着国家生态文明建设的深入推进，传统地质灾害治理工程侧重防护强度，在生态保护修复、生态环境质量提升、景观恢复方面的局限日益凸显，生态功能耐久性严重不足。本研究面向减轻地质灾害风险、提升生态效益的核心目标，在地质灾害生态化治理规划设计及生态化治理技术有机配置分析基础上，阐明生态环境与治理工程之间的耦合关系，综合考量工程体耐久性、治理效果耐久性及景观恢复耐久性3个层面，筛选能够客观反映生态耐久性的具体指标，建立地质灾害生态化治理工程耐久性评估指标体系，并提出明确量化方法；评估指标体系包括7个一级指标, 以及13类二级指标和17个三级指标。可推进地质灾害防治生态效益提升和推动生态减灾实践，为地质灾害生态化治理工程方案制定、效果评估提供科学参数和理论支撑。
- 地质灾害 /
- 生态化治理技术 /
- 耐久性评估 /
- 压力-状态-响应模型
Abstract: With the deepening of national ecological civilization construction, the limitations of traditional geological hazard control projects, which focus primarily on protective strength, have become increasingly apparent in terms of ecological protection and restoration, ecological environment quality improvement, and landscape recovery. The ecological functionality and durability of such projects are severely inadequate.This study aims to address the core objectives of mitigating geological hazard risks and enhancing ecological benefits. Based on an analysis of eco-friendly geological hazard control planning, design, and the optimal integration of ecological control technologies, it elucidates the coupling relationship between the ecological environment and control engineering. By comprehensively evaluating three dimensions—structural durability, control effectiveness durability, and landscape restoration durability—the study identifies specific indicators that objectively reflect ecological durability and establishes an assessment index system for the durability of eco-friendly geological hazard control projects. The proposed system includes 7 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 17 tertiary indicators, along with a clear quantification methodology.The findings are expected to advance the improvement of ecological benefits in geological hazard prevention and promote ecological disaster risk reduction practices. They also provide scientific parameters and theoretical support for the formulation and effectiveness evaluation of eco-friendly geological hazard control engineering solutions.
- Geological Hazards /
- Ecological Restoration Project /
- Durability Evaluation /
- Pressure-State-Response Model

HTML全文

参考文献(60)

Andre Klewell.,James Aronson.,2022.Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Frameworks for an Emerging Discipline.,Peking:China City Press.
China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring.,2011. Geological Hazard Map of Rockfalls and Landslides in China(1:400).,Peking: SinoMaps Press.
Guo,Y,J.,Liu,S,L.,Dong,Y,H.,et al.,2023.indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture., 31(10),1525-1538.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Hu,Y,F.,Wang,H.,Jiao,L.,et al.,2022.Evaluation index system of comprehensive benefits of ecological restoration of major construction projects on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.,Acta Ecological Sinica., 42,(18):7565-7576.DOI:10.5846/stxb202104291129.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Huo,H,Y.,Hou,Z.,Peng,K,P.,2025.Evaluation and optimization of ecological resilience of resource-based cities under the perspective of landscape pattern.,Coal Engineering.,57(1),203-211(in Chinese with English abstract).
Jian,W,B.,2015.Geological Hazards and Their Prevention and Control.,Peking:People's Communications Press.
Li,X,Y.,Tang,H,P.,Zhang,X,S.,et al.,2007.Potential Soil Erosion Assessment Based on the USLE and Multi-factor Hierarchical Cover Model—A Case Study of Linxi County in Inner Mongolia.,Research of Soil and Water Conservation., 14(A04),154-159,167.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu,C,Z.,2015.Epistemology and methodology on Geo-hazard research.,Journal of Engineering Geology.,23(5),809-820(in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu,X.M.,Wang,C.,Wang,Y.,et al.,2024.Evaluation on the implementation effect of ecological protection and restoration project of Mountain⁃Water⁃Forest⁃Cropland⁃Lake⁃Grass system in Qilian mountains,Qinghai Province.,Acta Ecologica Sinica.,44(14),5960-5973.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu,R,Z., Jin,L,Y., Zhang,C,J., et al., Evaluation of the risk of geological disaster and analysis of the benefit of project. Journal of Gansu Sciences, 2003,(201): 84-86. DOI:10.16468/i.cnki.issn1004-0366.2003.s1.020. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu,H,B., Tong Y, Jiang,Y,J., et al., Recent development of seismic fragility analysis methods for RC frame structures. WORLD EARTHOUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020,36,(3):141-150.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Li,G,Q.,Zhou,Z.,Zhang,G,J.,2024.Study on Ecological Function Enhancement and Ecological Benefit Evaluation of Comprehensive Soil and Water Conservation Management in Nanchagou Small Watershed,Shandong Agricultural University.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Li,D,L.,Song,L.,2013.Investigation and Evaluation of Geological Hazards.,Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press Co., Ltd.
Li, Mingyue.,Liang,Dong.,Xia,Jun.,et al.,2021.Evaluation of water conservation function of Danjiang River Basin in Qinling Mountains, China based on InVEST model). Journal Of Environmental Management,286,112212-112212.
Li,Y.,Yang,X,D.,Yin,C,R., et al.,2020.Spatio-temporal Distribution and Disaster Prevention/Mitigation of Geological Hazards in China.,Peking: Geological Press.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE).,2021.Technical Specifications for National Ecological Condition Survey and Assessment — Ecosystem Pattern Evaluation.,（HJ-1171-2021）.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE).,2021. Technical Specifications for National Ecological Condition Survey and Assessment — Ecosystem Services Evaluation,（HJ-1173-2021）.
Ma,B., Mao,Z,X., Li,Q,X., et al., Multi-scale Landscape Diversity Analysis and Threshold Discussion. TERRITORY & NATURAL RESOURCES STUDY, 2025,(3):63-69.DOI:10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2025.03.014.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Meng,F,D.,Zhou,Z.,Zhang,G,J.,et al.,2023. Spatial Ecological Restoration Zoning Based on Ecosystem Service Supply-Demand and Ecological Resilience: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Regio,Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,31(09):1496-1510.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Pei,X,J.,2024.Mechanisms Of Geological Environment Disturbance And Ecological Restoration Technical Systems For Major Engineering Projects On The Tibetan Plateau.,Journal of Engineering Geology., 32(5),1737-1758.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Shi,J,F.,2013.Strategies and Thoughts on Geological Survey Work.,Peking:Geological Press.
Wu,D,D.,Cai,Y,L.,2009.Evaluation of Ecological Restoration Effects in China:A Review.Progress in Geography, 28(4),622-628.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Wu,X,H.,Wang,Y,F.,Chen,J,D.,2021.Study on Standardization Design of Slope Ecological Protection Technology.,International Journal of Ecology.,10(2),230-235.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Wang,S,Y.,2019.Evaluation and Early Warning Research on Ecological Carrying Capacity in Jilin Province under the New Normal,Northeast Electric Power University.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Xiao,W.,Ruan,L,L.,Yue,W,Z.,2023.Construction of a multi-scale effectiveness evaluation system for ecological restoration and protection of territorial space.,Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology.,34(9),2566-2574.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Xu,Xin,Zhang.,Daojun,Zhang.,Yu,Yao.,et al.,2020.Evaluating the vegetation restoration potential achievement of ecological projects: A case study of Yan'an, China).Land Use Policy,90,104293-000.
Zhang,X,Y.,Wei,D,B.,Du,Y,G.,2022.Evaluation Parameters and System for Reclaimed Water Quality Stability.,Environmental Science., 43(2),586-596.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhu,H.,Zhang,Y,H.,Ren,S,S.,et al.,2025.Characteristics and Chain Evolution Process of Geological Hazards Triggered by Extreme Rainfall in the Upper Reaches of the Juma River.,Hydrogeology and EngineeringGeology.,DOI:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202411008.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Zha,X.,Huang,S,Y.,2001.Effects of Vegetation Destruction on Accelecated Erosion and Soil Degradation Processes on Loess Plateau.,Mountain Research.,19(2),109-114.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhou,Y.,Wang,J,M.,Chen,Y.,et al.,2024.Technological Path Exploration for Application of Nature-based Solutions to Integrated Ecological Conservation and Restoration Project of Mountains,Rivers,Forests,Farmland,Lakes,Grassland and Deserts.,China Land Science., 38(6),40-49.(in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhang,Yaxian.,Fan,Jiangwen.,Wang,Suizi.,2020.Assessment of Ecological Carrying Capacity and Ecological Security in China's Typical Eco-Engineering Areas.Sustainability,12(9),3923.
安德烈·克莱威尔，詹姆斯·阿伦森，2022.生态修复:新兴行业的原则、价值和结构，北京：中国城市出版社.
中国地质环境监测院，2011，中国崩塌滑坡灾害图（1；400），北京：中国地图出版社.
郭玉佳，刘世梁，董玉红，等，2023.基于景观格局和生态系统服务的生态廊道修复成效评估指标体系，中国生态农业学报（中英文），31(10),1525-1538.
胡一帆，王浩，焦磊，等，2022.青藏高原重大建设工程生态修复综合效益评估指标体系.生态学报，42,(18):7565-7576.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104291129.
霍海鹰，侯卓，彭可平，等，2025.景观格局视角下资源型城市生态韧性评估与优化研究，煤炭工程，57(1),203-211.
简文彬，2015.地质灾害及其防治，北京：人民交通出版社.
李新宇，唐海萍，张新时，等，2007.基于多因子层次覆盖模型的潜在土壤侵蚀等级评价——以内蒙古林西县为例，水土保持研究，14(A04),154-159,167.
刘传正，2015.地质灾害防治研究的认识论与方法论，工程地质学报，23(5),809-820.
刘晓曼，王超，王燕，等，2024.青海祁连山区山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程生态成效评估，生态学报，44(14),5960-5973.
刘如珍,金凌燕,张永军,等. 地质灾害危险性评估和防治工程效益分析评价. 甘肃科学学报, 2003,(201): 84-86. DOI: 10.16468/i.cnki.issn1004-0366.2003.s1.020.
刘洪波,佟瑶,蒋垚俊等.RC框架结构地震易损性分析方法研究进展.世界地震工程,2020,36,(3):141-150.
李国强，2024.南岔沟小流域水土保持综合治理生态功能提升及生态效益评价研究，山东农业大学，DOI: 10.27277/d.cnki.gsdnu.2024.000193.
李东林，宋彬，2013.地质灾害调查与评价.武汉：中国地质大学出版社有限责任公司.
李媛，杨旭东，尹春荣，等，2020.中国地质灾害时空分布及防灾减灾，北京：地质出版社.
孟凡迪，周智，张贵军，等，2023.基于生态系统服务供需与生态恢复力的国土空间生态修复分区——以京津冀为例[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文)，31(09):1496-1510.
马彪,毛子玄,李权玺等.多尺度景观多样性分析及阈值探讨.国土与自然资源研究,2025,(3):63-69.DOI: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2025.03.014.
裴向军，2024.青藏高原重大工程地质环境扰损机制及生态修复技术体系，工程地质学报，32(5),1737-1758.
生态环境部，2021.全国生态状况调查评估技术规范 ——生态系统格局评估，（HJ-1171-2021）.
生态环境部，2021.全国生态状况调查评估技术规范 ——生态系统服务功能评估，（HJ-1173-2021）.
施俊法，2013.地质调查工作战略与思考，北京：地质出版社.
吴丹丹，蔡运龙，2009.中国生态恢复效果评价研究综述，地理科学进展，28(4),622-628.
吴小蕙，王彦峰，陈建东，2021.边坡生态防护技术标准化设计研究，世界生态学，10(2),230-235.
王思远，2019，新常态下吉林省生态承载力评价及预警研究，东北电力大学，2018.
肖武，阮琳琳，岳文泽，等，2023.面向国土空间生态保护修复的多尺度成效评估体系构建.应用生态学报,34(9),2566-2574.
张馨怡，魏东斌，杜宇国，2022.再生水水质稳定性评价指标与体系，环境科学，43(2),586-596.
朱贺，张永双，任三绍，等，2025.拒马河上游极端降雨引发地质灾害特征与链生演化过程.水文地质工程地质，DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202411008.
查轩，黄少燕，2001.植被破坏对黄土高原加速侵蚀及土壤退化过程的影响，山地学报，19(2),109-114.
周妍，王金满，陈妍，等，2024.基于自然的山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复技术路径探索，中国土地科学，38(6),40-49.
李媛，杨旭东，尹春荣，等，2020.中国地质灾害时空分布及防灾减灾，北京：地质出版社.