• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    考虑细观形貌特征的岩石裂隙受压时变闭合规律

    宋振宇 颜炳明 李博 邹良超 石振明

    宋振宇, 颜炳明, 李博, 邹良超, 石振明, 2026. 考虑细观形貌特征的岩石裂隙受压时变闭合规律. 地球科学, 51(2): 496-512. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.241
    引用本文: 宋振宇, 颜炳明, 李博, 邹良超, 石振明, 2026. 考虑细观形貌特征的岩石裂隙受压时变闭合规律. 地球科学, 51(2): 496-512. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.241
    Song Zhenyu, Yan Bingming, Li Bo, Zou Liangchao, Shi Zhenming, 2026. Study on Time-Dependent Closure Behavior of Rock Fractures Subject to Normal Stress. Earth Science, 51(2): 496-512. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.241
    Citation: Song Zhenyu, Yan Bingming, Li Bo, Zou Liangchao, Shi Zhenming, 2026. Study on Time-Dependent Closure Behavior of Rock Fractures Subject to Normal Stress. Earth Science, 51(2): 496-512. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.241

    考虑细观形貌特征的岩石裂隙受压时变闭合规律

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.241
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金资助项目 42077252

    国家自然科学基金资助项目 42377162

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      宋振宇(1996-),男,博士研究生,主要从事裂隙岩体多场耦合特性等方面的研究. ORCID:0000-0001-6514-8282. E-mail:szytj@tongji.edu.cn

      通讯作者:

      李博,ORCID:0000-0002-9993-3948. E-mail:libotj@tongji.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: TU45

    Study on Time-Dependent Closure Behavior of Rock Fractures Subject to Normal Stress

    • 摘要: 基于不同高径比微凸体的受压时效性试验,根据赫兹接触理论,得到了不同微凸体弹性模量随时间的衰减规律. 对红砂岩和石灰岩新鲜裂隙面开展了不同法向应力条件下的受压时变闭合试验,结合小波分析法、区域生长算法和参考面法,提出了一种岩石裂隙细观尺度微凸体形貌的识别方法,对比了试验前后微凸体数量、高度和高径比的差异. 建立了考虑微凸体间相互作用的接触力学模型,求解Boussinesq方程并考虑弹性模量随时间的衰减,对两种岩石裂隙开展了逐级增加应力条件下的受压时变闭合计算. 通过对比计算和试验得到的损伤面积和蠕变变形验证了模型的有效性,阐明了微凸体的应变、接触面积和接触应力随时间的演化规律,揭示了不同细观形貌特征的微凸体在裂隙受压时变闭合过程中的关键性作用.

       

    • 图  1  不同高径比微凸体的受压时效性试验

      Fig.  1.  Semi-ellipsoid gypsum samples of A-1~A-4

      图  2  A-1~A-4在统一荷载下的受压时变试验

      Fig.  2.  The time-dependent compression experiments of A-1 to A-4 under an identical load

      图  3  岩石裂隙受压时变闭合试验

      a. 红砂岩受压时变闭合试验;b. 石灰岩受压时变闭合试验;c. 法向变形随时间的变化

      Fig.  3.  Experiments on time-dependent closure of rock fractures under compression

      图  4  微凸体识别流程

      Fig.  4.  Asperities recognition process

      图  5  不同高径比的微凸体模型及识别效果(单位:mm)

      Fig.  5.  Asperities models and identification results of A-1~A-4(unit: mm)

      图  6  不同岩石裂隙表面微凸体识别结果(单位:mm)

      a.裂隙面微凸体识别效果(以红砂岩为例);b.微凸体概化为半椭球体;c.分水岭方法的局限性(Wen et al.,2022);d.红砂岩和石灰岩裂隙面微凸体分布图

      Fig.  6.  Identification results of asperities on rock fracture surfaces (unit: mm)

      图  7  试验前裂隙面微凸体高度分布(单位:mm)

      a.红砂岩裂隙;b.石灰岩裂隙

      Fig.  7.  Height distribution of asperities on the fracture surfaces of red sandstone and limestone (unit: mm)

      图  8  试验前裂隙面微凸体高径比分布

      a. 红砂岩裂隙;b.石灰岩裂隙

      Fig.  8.  Height-to-radius ratios distribution of asperities on the fracture surfaces of red sandstone and limestone

      图  9  受压裂隙时效变形计算流程

      Fig.  9.  Calculation process for time-dependent fracture deformation subject to compression

      图  10  红砂岩损伤区域

      上行为刚达到某应力时的损伤区域;下行为达到某应力并蠕变72小时后的损伤区域;单位:mm

      Fig.  10.  Damage zone in sandstone

      图  11  石灰岩损伤区域

      上行为刚达到某应力时的损伤区域;下行为达到某应力并蠕变72 h后的损伤区域;单位:mm

      Fig.  11.  Damage zone in limestone

      图  12  不同法向应力下裂隙面损伤面积演化趋势

      a.红砂岩裂隙损伤面积演化趋势;b.石灰岩裂隙损伤面积演化趋势

      Fig.  12.  Evolution of fracture damage area under different normal stresses

      图  13  数值和试验损伤区域对比

      a. 红砂岩损伤区域;b. 石灰岩损伤区域;1为数值计算结果;2为试样三维扫描结果;3为试验后实拍照片

      Fig.  13.  Comparison of numerical similation and experimental damage areas

      图  14  不同岩石裂隙法向变形-时间曲线的试验数据与数值结果对比

      a.法向变形-时间曲线(红砂岩裂隙);b.法向变形-时间曲线(石灰岩裂隙)

      Fig.  14.  Comparison of experimental data and numerical results of normal deformation-time curves of different rock fractures

      图  15  红砂岩裂隙面微凸体的变形和受力特性

      a. ε-t;b. ω-t;c. A-t;d. σn-t

      Fig.  15.  The The deformation characteristics mechanical properties of asperities on the fracture surface of red sandstone

      图  16  石灰岩裂隙面微凸体变形和受力特性

      a. ε-t;b. ω-t;c. A-t;d. σn-t

      Fig.  16.  The deformation characteristics mechanical properties of asperities on the fracture surface of limestone

      图  17  试验后裂隙面微凸体高度分布(单位:mm)

      a.红砂岩裂隙;b.石灰岩裂隙

      Fig.  17.  Height distribution of asperities on the fracture surfaces after experiment (unit: mm)

      图  18  试验后裂隙面微凸体高径比分布

      a.红砂岩裂隙;b.石灰岩裂隙

      Fig.  18.  Height-to-radius ratios distribution of asperities on the fracture surfaces after experiment

      图  19  S-No.5和L-No.23的对比

      a. ε-t;b. ω-t;c. A-t;d. σn-t

      Fig.  19.  The comparison between S-No. 5 and L-No. 23

      图  20  S-No.5(a)和L-No.23(b)的位置(用浅蓝色标识)

      Fig.  20.  The position of S-No.5(a) and L-No.23(b) (marked with blue)

      表  1  弹性模量衰减拟合参数

      Table  1.   Parameters of different types of rock samples

      A(103 GPa) B(103 GPa) R2
      A-1 1.718 3.152 0.933
      A-2 8.509 6.463 0.997
      A-3 22.916 13.250 0.995
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  不同类型岩石试样参数

      Table  2.   Parameters of different types of rock samples

      名称 密度(g/cm3) 单轴抗压强度(MPa) 泊松比 弹性模量(GPa) 抗拉强度(MPa) 硬度(MPa) 相对硬度
      红砂岩 2.5 45.8 0.30 26.8 3.1 29.5 0.02
      石灰岩 2.7 190.0 0.25 35.5 12 74.7 0.04
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Alamos, F. J., Philo, M., Go, D. B., et al., 2022. Rough Surface Contact under Creep Conditions. Tribology International, 176: 107916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107916
      Brot, C. C., Etsion, I., Kligerman, Y., 2008. A Contact Model for a Creeping Sphere and a Rigid Flat. Wear, 265(5/6): 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.12.003
      Brown, S. R., Scholz, C. H., 1985. Closure of Random Elastic Surfaces in Contact. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90(B7): 5531-5545. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05531
      Chen, L., Zhao, X. G., Liu, J., et al., 2023. Progress on Rock Mechanics Research of Beishan Granite for Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in China. Rock Mechanics Bulletin, 2(3): 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2023.100046
      Chung, J. C., 2010. Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of an Ellipsoid and a Rigid Flat. Tribology International, 43(1/2): 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2009.08.005
      Ciavarella, M., Delfine, V., Demelio, G., 2006. A "Re-Vitalized" Greenwood and Williamson Model of Elastic Contact between Fractal Surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54(12): 2569-2591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.05.006
      Goedecke, A., Jackson, R. L., Mock, R., 2010. Asperity Creep under Constant Force Boundary Conditions. Wear, 268(11/12): 1285-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.01.025
      Greenwood, J. A., 2006. A Simplified Elliptic Model of Rough Surface Contact. Wear, 261(2): 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.09.031
      Greenwood, J. A., Williamson, J. B. P., 1966. Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295(1442): 300-319
      Huang, K., Yu, F., Zhang, W., et al., 2023. Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on the Influence of Gaseous Water on the Mechanical Properties of Red-Layer Mudstone in Central Sichuan. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 56(4): 3159-3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03228-z
      Kang, F. C., Li, Y. C., Tang, C. A., et al., 2022. Competition between Cooling Contraction and Fluid Overpressure on Aperture Evolution in a Geothermal System. Renewable Energy, 186: 704-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.033
      Kang, H., Einstein, H., Brown, S., et al., 2020. Numerical Simulation for Rock Fracture Viscoelastic Creep under Dry Conditions. Geofluids, 2020(1): 8879890. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8879890
      Kling, T., Vogler, D., Pastewka, L., et al., 2018. Numerical Simulations and Validation of Contact Mechanics in a Granodiorite Fracture. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 51(9): 2805-2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1498-x
      Kumamoto, K. M., Thom, C. A., Wallis, D., et al., 2017. Size Effects Resolve Discrepancies in 40 Years of Work on Low-Temperature Plasticity in Olivine. Science Advances, 3(9): e1701338. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701338
      Li, B., Cui, X. F., Mo, Y. Y., et al., 2021. Deformation Behavior of Dislocated Sandstone Fractures Subject to Normal Stresses. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 42(7): 1850-1860 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, B., Mo, Y. Y., Zou, L. C., et al., 2022. An Extended Hyperbolic Closure Model for Unmated Granite Fractures Subject to Normal Loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55(7): 4139-4158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02862-3
      Li, B., Zhao, Z. H., Jiang, Y. J., et al., 2015. Contact Mechanism of a Rock Fracture Subjected to Normal Loading and Its Impact on Fast Closure Behavior during Initial Stage of Fluid Flow Experiment. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 39(13): 1431-1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2365
      Ma, H. C., Cao, Y., Qian, J. Z., et al., 2023. Theoretical Study of the Mesoscopic Mechanism of Rock Fractures during Normal Deformation. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 56(8): 5719-5733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03372-6
      Malamut, S., Kligerman, Y., Etsion, I., 2009. The Effect of Dwell Time on the Static Friction in Creeping Elastic-Plastic Polymer Spherical Contact. Tribology Letters, 35(3): 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9445-3
      Matsuki, K., Wang, E. Q., Sakaguchi, K., et al., 2001. Time-Dependent Closure of a Fracture with Rough Surfaces under Constant Normal Stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 38(5): 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00022-3
      Ovcharenko, A., Halperin, G., Etsion, I., 2009. Experimental Study of a Creeping Polymer Sphere in Contact with a Rigid Flat. Journal of Tribology, 131: 011404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3002330
      Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., Nolte, D. D., 2016. Approaching a Universal Scaling Relationship between Fracture Stiffness and Fluid Flow. Nature Communications, 7: 10663. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10663
      Qu, J. K., Xue, Y. G., Kong, F. M., et al., 2025. Multi-Scale Analysis of the Influence of Red-Bed Lithological Interface on Tunnel Deformation and Instability. Engineering Geology, 357: 108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108314
      Rohmer, J., Pluymakers, A., Renard, F., 2016. Mechano-Chemical Interactions in Sedimentary Rocks in the Context of CO2 Storage: Weak Acid, Weak Effects? Earth-Science Reviews, 157: 86-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.03.009
      Rostami, A., Goedecke, A., Mock, R., et al., 2014. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Elasto-Plastic Sinusoidal Contact under Time Dependent Deformation Due to Stress Relaxation. Tribology International, 73: 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.020
      Serati, M., Alehossein, H., Williams, D. J., 2015. Estimating the Tensile Strength of Super Hard Brittle Materials Using Truncated Spheroidal Specimens. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 78: 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.02.011
      Song Z. Y., Li B., Yan B. M., et al., 2024. Time-Dependent Closure Calculation Method of Rock Fractures Considering the Attenuation of Relaxation Modulus. In: China Rock Mechanics and Engineering Society, International Association for Geohazards and Risk Reduction. Proceedings of the 21st Chinese Rock Mechanics and Engineering Academic Conference, CHINA ROCK 2024. Department of Underground Architecture and Engineering, Tongji University; Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2024: 42-48 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Song, Z. Y., Li, B., Chen, X. W., et al., 2025. Time-Dependent Deformation of Fracture Asperities with Different Height-to-Radius Ratios Subject to Normal Loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2025: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04858-1
      Sun, J., 2007. Rock Rheological Mechanics and Its Advance in Engineering Applications. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26(6): 1081-1106 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, Z. C., Zhang, Q. Z., 2021. Elliptical Hertz-Based General Closure Model for Rock Joints. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54(1): 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02275-0
      Tian, X. F., Bhushan, B., 1996. A Numerical Three-Dimensional Model for the Contact of Rough Surfacesby Variational Principle. Journal of Tribology, 118(1): 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2837089
      Viswanathan, H. S., Ajo-Franklin, J., Birkholzer, J. T., et al., 2022. From Fluid Flow to Coupled Processes in Fractured Rock: Recent Advances and New Frontiers. Reviews of Geophysics, 60(1): e2021RG000744. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000744
      Wang, Z., Shen, M. R., Tian, G. H., et al., 2017. Characteristics of Aging Strength of Structural Planes with Different Roughness. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 36(S1): 3287-3296 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wen, Y. Q., Tang, J. Y., Zhou, W., et al., 2022. New Analytical Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact for Three-Dimensional Rough Surfaces Considering Interaction of Asperities. Friction, 10(2): 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0419-7
      Xue, Y. C., Xu, T., Heap, M. J., et al., 2023. Time-Dependent Cracking and Brittle Creep in Macrofractured Sandstone. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 162: 105305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105305
      Zhang, L. L., Wang, X. J., 2020. Viscoelastic-Plastic Damage Creep Model for Rock. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 42(6): 1085-1092 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Q. Z., Wu, C. Z., Fei, X. C., et al., 2019. Time-Dependent Behavior of Rock Joints Considering Asperity Degradation. Journal of Structural Geology, 121: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.01.004
      Zhang, W. G., Lin, S. C., Wang, L. Q., et al., 2024. A Novel Creep Contact Model for Rock and Its Implement in Discrete Element Simulation. Computers and Geotechnics, 167: 106054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2 023. 106054 doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106054
      Zou, L. C., Li, B., Mo, Y. Y., et al., 2020. A High-Resolution Contact Analysis of Rough-Walled Crystalline Rock Fractures Subject to Normal Stress. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53(5): 2141-2155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-02034-w
      李博, 崔逍峰, 莫洋洋, 等, 2021. 法向应力作用下砂岩错位裂隙变形行为研究. 岩土力学, 42(7): 1850-1860.
      宋振宇, 李博, 颜炳明, 等, 2024. 考虑松弛模量衰减的岩石裂隙时变闭合计算方法. 见: 中国岩石力学与工程学会, 国际地质灾害与减灾协会. CHINA ROCK 2024第二十一次中国岩石力学与工程学术年会论文集. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系; 瑞典皇家理工学院环境科学与工程系, 2024: 42-48.
      孙钧, 2007. 岩石流变力学及其工程应用研究的若干进展. 岩石力学与工程学报, 26(6): 1081-1106.
      王振, 沈明荣, 田光辉, 等, 2017. 不同粗糙度结构面时效强度特征. 岩石力学与工程学报, 36(S1): 3287-3296.
      张亮亮, 王晓健, 2020. 岩石黏弹塑性损伤蠕变模型研究. 岩土工程学报, 42(6): 1085-1092.
    • 加载中
    图(20) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  152
    • HTML全文浏览量:  32
    • PDF下载量:  8
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2025-07-15
    • 刊出日期:  2026-02-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回