• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    地下爆炸Lg波地震矩与源地震矩关系数值模拟

    王旭亮 靳平 王晓明 刘哲函 唐伟 徐妍妍 李俊杰

    王旭亮, 靳平, 王晓明, 刘哲函, 唐伟, 徐妍妍, 李俊杰, 2026. 地下爆炸Lg波地震矩与源地震矩关系数值模拟. 地球科学, 51(2): 647-656. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.300
    引用本文: 王旭亮, 靳平, 王晓明, 刘哲函, 唐伟, 徐妍妍, 李俊杰, 2026. 地下爆炸Lg波地震矩与源地震矩关系数值模拟. 地球科学, 51(2): 647-656. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.300
    Wang Xuliang, Jin Ping, Wang Xiaoming, Liu Zhehan, Tang Wei, Xu Yanan, Li Junjie, 2026. Numerical Simulation on the Relationship between Seismic Moment of Lg Wave and Source of Underground Explosion. Earth Science, 51(2): 647-656. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.300
    Citation: Wang Xuliang, Jin Ping, Wang Xiaoming, Liu Zhehan, Tang Wei, Xu Yanan, Li Junjie, 2026. Numerical Simulation on the Relationship between Seismic Moment of Lg Wave and Source of Underground Explosion. Earth Science, 51(2): 647-656. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.300

    地下爆炸Lg波地震矩与源地震矩关系数值模拟

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.300
    详细信息
      作者简介:

      王旭亮(1993-),男,助理研究员,从事禁核试核查地震监测方面研究. ORCID: 0009-0005-0153-9002. E-mail: wang.xuliang@ndc.org.cn

      通讯作者:

      靳平,ORCID: 0000-0003-2498-2654. E-mail:jinping@nint.ac.cn

    • 中图分类号: P315

    Numerical Simulation on the Relationship between Seismic Moment of Lg Wave and Source of Underground Explosion

    • 摘要: 针对地下爆炸当量估算问题,基于理论地震图仿真和Lg波谱反演方法,系统研究了不同场地中埋深、震源成分(ISO源、CLVD源、DC源及其组合)对源地震矩M0(source)与Lg波地震矩M0(Lg)关系的影响.通过定量标定M0(source)/M0(Lg)比值,结果表明两者比值具有显著的场地依赖性:朝鲜场地比值普遍高于0.2,而内华达场地低于0.2. CLVD和DC源等次生震源会显著降低朝鲜场地的Lg波激发效率(降幅可达50%),同时埋深增大会减弱P-S转换效应,导致比值进一步减小.(进一步的,结合震源模型建立了基于Lg波地震矩的当量估算方法,并以朝鲜第六次核试验数据为例进行了验证.

       

    • 图  1  纯ISO、埋深0.26 km时,400~1 000 km震中距上的理论地震图

      红色为截取的Lg波,速度窗口为3.0~3.6 km/s

      Fig.  1.  With pure ISO and a depth of 0.26 km, theoretical seismogram at epicentral distances of 400~1 000 km

      图  2  不同埋深时Lg波频谱比值随频率的变化

      星号表示观测值,直线为拟合结果

      Fig.  2.  The Lg wave spectrum ratio with frequency at different burial depths

      图  3  纯ISO埋深0.26 km时反演得到的Lg波地震矩及视源拐角频率

      直线表示源地震矩

      Fig.  3.  With pure ISO and a burial depth of 0.26 km, the Lg seismic moment and apparent source corner frequency obtained from inversion

      图  4  ISO+CLVD源时,不同场地M0(Lg)/M0(exp)与FCLVD值及埋深关系

      Fig.  4.  Relationship between M0(Lg)/M0(exp) and FCLVD values and burial depth for different sites when using ISO+CLVD sources

      图  5  ISO+DC源时,不同场地M0(Lg)/M0(exp)与FDC值及埋深关系

      Fig.  5.  Relationship between M0(Lg)/M0(exp) and FDC values and burial depth for different sites when using ISO+DC sources.

      图  6  ISO+CLVD+DC源时,不同场地M0(Lg)/M0(exp)与K值及埋深关系

      Fig.  6.  Relationship between M0(Lg)/M0(exp) and FCLVD values and burial depth for different sites when using ISO+CLVD+DC sources

      图  7  Kor17事件位置和台站分布

      Fig.  7.  Location of Kor17 event and distribution of stations.

      图  8  部分台站反演结果

      黑色虚线为观测Lg波频谱,灰色为迭代曲线,红色为最优结果

      Fig.  8.  Inversion results of partial stations

      图  9  Kor17 Lg波地震矩反演结果

      Fig.  9.  Seismic moment inversion results of Lg of Kor17

      图  10  朝鲜速度模型下,P/S幅值比随埋深变化

      Fig.  10.  P/S amplitude ratio versus burial depth under the North Korean velocity model

      表  1  朝鲜和内华达场地速度模型(部分)

      Table  1.   velocity models for North Korea and Nevada sites(partial)

      Layer(km) VS(km/s) VP(km/s) ρ(g/cm3
      朝鲜部分速度模型 1.0 3.09 5.35 2.57
      8.0 3.35 5.81 2.66
      20.0 3.62 6.27 2.78
      4.37 7.91 3.17
      内华达部分速度模型 0.5 1.00 2.00 1.70
      1.0 2.00 3.30 2.10
      1.5 2.70 4.50 2.40
      1.0 3.40 5.90 2.75
      8.0 3.52 5.96 2.78
      9.0 3.61 6.11 2.80
      10.0 3.76 6.37 2.84
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Adushkin, V. V., 2001. Yield Estimation for Semipalatinsk Underground Nuclear Explosions Using Seismic Surface-Wave Observations at Near-Regional Distances. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158(11): 2217-2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001146
      Chun, K. Y., West, G. F., Kokoski, R. J., et al., 1987. A Novel Technique for Measuring Lg Attenuation: Results from Eastern Canada between 1 to 10 Hz. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77(2): 398-419. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0770020398
      Denny, M. D., Johnson, L. R., 1991. The Explosion Seismic Source Function: Models and Scaling Laws Reviewed. Explosion Source Phenomenology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1029/gm065p0001
      Ford, S. R., Dreger, D. S., Walter, W. R., 2009. Source Analysis of the Memorial Day Explosion, Kimchaek, North Korea. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(21): 2009GL040003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040003
      He, J., Wu, Q. J., Li, Y. H., et al., 2017. Developments of Earthquake Lg-Wave Attenuation Study and Its Application in the Continental China. Progress in Geophysics, 32(2): 466-475(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Herrmann, R. B., 1995. Broadband Seismology and Small Regional Seismic Networks. Professional Paper.
      Jin, P., Xiao, W. G., Duan, K. M., 2004. Estimating Seismic Moments and Qlgusing Lg Spectra. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(S1): 21-30(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Jin, P., Xu, H. L., Ding, S. B., et al., 2023. Source Spectra of Pg and Lg Waves from North Korean Nuclear Tests Estimated Using a Nonmodel-Based Approach. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 114(2): 1151-1166. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230035
      Jin, P., Zhu, H. F., Xu, X., et al., 2019. Seismic Spectral Ratios between North Korean Nuclear Tests: Implications for Their Seismic Sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124(5): 4940-4958. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016554
      Liu, J., Li, L., Zahradník, J., et al., 2018. North Korea's 2017 Test and Its Nontectonic Aftershock. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(7): 3017-3025. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077095
      Lu, Y., Zhao, L. F., Pang, X. L., et al., 2024. Yield Estimation of North Korean Underground Nuclear Tests Using Lg-Wave Source Spectra. Frontiers in Earth Science, 12: 1386932. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1386932
      Marshall, P. D., Douglas, A., Hudson, J. A., 1971. Surface Waves from Underground Explosions. Nature, 234(5323): 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/234008a0
      Mitchell, B. J., 1980. Frequency Dependence of Shear Wave Internal Friction in the Continental Crust of Eastern North America. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 85(B10): 5212-5218. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB10p05212
      Murphy, J. R., Barker, B. W., 2001. Application of Network-Averaged Teleseismic P-Wave Spectra to Seismic Yield Estimation of Underground Nuclear Explosions. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158(11): 2123-2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001144
      Murphy, J. R., Mueller, R. A., 1971. Seismic Characteristics of Underground Nuclear Detonations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 61(6): 1693-1704. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0610061693
      Pasyanos, M. E., Myers, S. C., 2018. The Coupled Location/Depth/Yield Problem for North Korea's Declared Nuclear Tests. Seismological Research Letters, 89(6): 2059-2067. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180109
      Sereno, T. J. Jr, Bratt, S. R., Bache, T. C., 1988. Simultaneous Inversion of Regional Wave Spectra for Attenuation and Seismic Moment in Scandinavia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 93(B3): 2019-2035. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB093iB03p02019
      Stevens, J. L., 1986. Estimation of Scalar Moments from Explosion-Generated Surface Waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 76(1): 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0760010123
      Street, R. L., Herrmann, R. B., Nuttli, O. W., 1975. Spectral Characteristics of the Lg Wave Generated by Central United States Earthquakes. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 41(1): 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05484.x
      Wan, Y. G., 2024. Focal Mechanism Classification Based on Areal Strain of Horizontal Strain Rosette of Focal Mechanism and Characteristic Analysis of Overall Focal Mechanism of Earthquake Sequence. Earth Science, 49(7): 2675-2684(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xie, J. K., 1993. Simultaneous Inversion for Source Spectrum and pathQusingLgwith Application to Three Semipalatinsk Explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83(5): 1547-1562. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0830051547
      Xie, J., 2002. Lg Q in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(2): 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010154
      Xie, J., Mitchell, B. J., 1990. Attenuation of Multiphase Surface Waves in the Basin and Range Province, Part Ⅰ: Lg and Lg Coda. Geophysical Journal International, 102(1): 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb00535.x
      Xie, J., Nuttli, O. W., 1988. Interpretation of High-Frequency Coda at Large Distances: Stochastic Modelling and Method of Inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 95(3): 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1988.tb06705.x
      Xu, H. L., Ni, S. D., Liu, W. X., et al., 2020. Focal Mechanisms of the 2017 North Korean Nuclear Test and Its Early Collapse Event. Geophysical Journal International, 220(2): 737-752. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz462
      Xu, Z. S., Wen, X. T., Xi, N., et al., 2025. Aftershock Relocation and Intensity Distribution of the Dingri MS6.8 Earthquake in 2025. Earth Science, 50(5): 1759-1769(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, L. F., Xie, X. B., Wang, W. M., et al., 2012. Yield Estimation of the 25 may 2009 North Korean Nuclear Explosion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(2): 467-478. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110163
      Zhu, L. P., Ben-Zion, Y., 2013. Parametrization of General Seismic Potency and Moment Tensors for Source Inversion of Seismic Waveform Data. Geophysical Journal International, 194(2): 839-843. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt137
      Zhu, L. P., Rivera, L. A., 2002. A Note on the Dynamic and Static Displacements from a Point Source in Multilayered Media. Geophysical Journal International, 148(3): 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01610.x
      何静, 吴庆举, 李永华, 等, 2017. 天然地震Lg波衰减研究进展及其在中国大陆地区的应用. 地球物理学进展, 32(2): 466-475.
      靳平, 肖卫国, 段克敏, 2004. 由Lg波振幅谱估算地震矩及Lg波Q值. 地震学报, 26(S1): 21-30.
      万永革, 2024. 震源机制水平应变花面应变的地震震源机制分类方法及序列震源机制总体特征分析. 地球科学, 49(7): 2675-2684. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.245
    • 加载中
    图(10) / 表(1)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  98
    • HTML全文浏览量:  38
    • PDF下载量:  3
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2025-10-13
    • 刊出日期:  2026-02-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回