• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    高杨, 张仕林, 李军, 杨超平, 陈飞宇, 霍子豪, 2026. 高位崩滑碎屑流多相态动力学物理模型试验研究. 地球科学. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.056
    引用本文: 高杨, 张仕林, 李军, 杨超平, 陈飞宇, 霍子豪, 2026. 高位崩滑碎屑流多相态动力学物理模型试验研究. 地球科学. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.056
    GAO Yang, ZHANG Shilin, LI Jun, YANG Chaoping, CHEN Feiyu, HUO Zihao, 2026. Dynamics of High-Altitude Rockslide-Debris Avalanches: Large-Scale Physical Model Experiments. Earth Science. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.056
    Citation: GAO Yang, ZHANG Shilin, LI Jun, YANG Chaoping, CHEN Feiyu, HUO Zihao, 2026. Dynamics of High-Altitude Rockslide-Debris Avalanches: Large-Scale Physical Model Experiments. Earth Science. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.056

    高位崩滑碎屑流多相态动力学物理模型试验研究

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.056
    基金项目: 

    国家重点研发计划(2024YF1700302);国家自然基金(42507251);中央高校基本科研业务费(2682025CX149).

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      高杨 (1989–),男,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,研究员,主要从事高位远程滑坡动力成灾机制与风险评价方面的研究。E-mail:737263992@qq.com,Tel:15201655282. ORCID:0000-0001-8204-2754

      通讯作者:

      张仕林 (1994-),男,西南交通大学地球科学与工程学院,讲师,主要从事高位远程地质灾害的研究工作。E-mail:slzhang@my.swjtu.edu.cn,Tel:18382437586.

    • 中图分类号: P642.22

    Dynamics of High-Altitude Rockslide-Debris Avalanches: Large-Scale Physical Model Experiments

    • 摘要: 极高山区高位崩滑碎屑流极为发育,已成为威胁山区城镇和重大工程地质安全最为严重的灾害类型。研究大规模颗粒物质在高速运动过程中的流变学特性,是从细观尺度上探索高位崩滑碎屑流动力学机制的重要手段。本文依托自主研发的高位远程地质灾害大型物理模型试验平台,开展了不同颗粒粒径和体积条件下的高速颗粒流大型物理模型试验。结果发现:高速颗粒流在运动过程中普遍呈现出浓密态—稀疏态—超稀疏态多相态共存的动力学特征,其形成与演化本质上源于颗粒体系内部速度梯度差异引发的碰撞与速度波动;颗粒粒径增大使得内部剪切由局部过渡为整体的差异性剪切,激振程度增强,颗粒体系趋向稀疏化,而体积增加则显著增强基底局部集中剪切带内的剪切速率,使得颗粒流在厚度方向上稀疏、超稀疏与浓密流态的分异更为突出。研究进一步揭示,颗粒流中碰撞—剪切主导的应力传递机制与浓密—稀疏—超稀疏流态之间具有明确对应关系。上述认识表明,构建高位崩滑碎屑流的动力学需引入能够表征颗粒浓度、颗粒温度及流态转换的状态参量,以实现对多相态结构及跨相态演化过程的有效表征。

       

    • Arran M, Mangeney A, De Rosny J, et al, 2021. Laboratory landquakes: Insights from experiments into the high-frequency seismic signal generated by geophysical granular flows. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 126(5): e2021JF006172.
      Bachelet V, Mangeney A, Toussaint R, et al, 2023. Acoustic emissions of nearly steady and uniform granular flows: A proxy for flow dynamics and velocity fluctuations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128(4): e2022JF006990.
      Bartali R, Nahmad-Molinari Y, Rodríguez-Liñán G, et al, 2020. Gravity-Driven Monodisperse Avalanches: Inertial-to Frictional-Dominated Flow. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53: 3507-3520.
      Bartali R, Sarocchi D, Nahmad-Molinari Y, 2015. Stick–slip motion and high-speed ejecta in granular avalanches detected through a multi-sensors flume. Engineering Geology, 195: 248-257.
      Bryant S, Take W, Bowman E, 2015. Observations of grain-scale interactions and simulation of dry granular flows in a large-scale flume. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52(5): 638-655.
      Cagnoli B, Piersanti A, 2015. Grain size and flow volume effects on granular flow mobility in numerical simulations: 3-D discrete element modeling of flows of angular rock fragments Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120: 2350-2366.
      Campbell C, 1990. Rapid Granular Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 22(1): 57-90.
      Campbell C, 2006. Granular material flows-an overview. Powder Technology, 162(3): 208-229.
      Chang W, Xing A, Zhang Y. Dynamic fragmentation characteristics of a heavily Jointed Rock Avalanche: DEM simulation and field seismic signal analysis[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 172: 106459.
      Davies T, McSaveney M, Hodgson K, 1999. A fragmentation-spreading model for long-runout rock avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36: 1096-1110.
      De Haas T, Braat L, Leuven J R F W, et al, 2015. Effects of debris flow composition on runout, depositional mechanisms, and deposit morphology in laboratory experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120(9): 1949-1972.
      Delannay R, Valance A, Mangeney A, et al, 2017. Granular and particle-laden flows: from laboratory experiments to field observations. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(5): 053001.
      Du J, Zhou G, Cui K, 2023. Microscopic Description of Basal Stress Generated by Granular Free-surface Flows. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, e2022JF006953.
      Evans, S., Mugnozza, G.S., Strom, A., et al., 2006. Landslides from Massive Rock Slope Failure and Associated Phenomena. Landslides,49:03-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4037-5_1
      Farin M, Tsai V, Lamb M, et al, 2019. A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(13): 2529-2543.
      Forterre Y, Pouliquen O., 2008. Flows of dense granular media. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 40(1), 1–24.
      Gao Y, Chen F, Yin Y, et al, 2025. Numerical simulation of anisotropic landslide dam behavior in high-altitude environments of the Tibetan Plateau using a continuum model of multiphase-state fluid. Engineering Geology, 108385.
      Gao Y, Li B, Gao H, et al, 2023. Risk assessment of the Sedongpu high-altitude and ultra-long-runout landslide in the lower Yarlung Zangbo River, China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 82(9): 360.
      Gao Y, Yin Y, Li B, et al, 2024. Multistate transition and coupled solid-liquid modeling of motion process of long-runout landslide. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16(7): 2694-2714.
      Gao Y, Zhuang Y, Li B, et al. Entrainment‐driven transition from avalanche to debris flow: Insights from the 2018 Sedongpu event[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2026, 131(2): e2025JF008750.
      Hsu L, Dietrich W, Sklar L, 2014. Mean and fluctuating basal forces generated by granular flows: Laboratory observations in a large vertically rotating drum. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119(6): 1283-1309.
      Hsu L, Dietrich W, Sklar L, 2014. Mean and fluctuating basal forces generated by granular flows: Laboratory observations in a large vertically rotating drum. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119(6): 1283-1309.
      Iverson R, 1997. The physics of debris flows. Reviews of geophysics, 35(3): 245-296.
      Iverson R, Logan M, Denlinger R, 2004. Granular avalanches across irregular three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Experimental tests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 109(F1).
      Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O, 2005. Crucial role of sidewalls in granular surface flows: consequences for the rheology. Journal of fluid mechanics, 2005, 541: 167-192.
      Kokelaar B, Graham R, Gray J, et al, 2014. Fine-grained linings of leveed channels facilitate runout of granular flows. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 385: 172-180.
      Langlois V, Quiquerez A, Allemand P, 2015. Collapse of a two-dimensional brittle granular column: Implications for understanding dynamic rock fragmentation in a landslide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120(9): 1866-1880.
      Li K, Wang Y, Cheng Q, et al, 2022. Insight into granular flow dynamics relying on basal stress measurements: From experimental flume tests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(3): e2021JB022905.
      Li K, Wang Y, Lin Q, et al, 2021. Experiments on granular flow behavior and deposit characteristics: Implications for rock avalanche kinematics. Landslides, 18: 1779-1799.
      Locat P, Couture R, Leroueil S, et al, 2006. Fragmentation energy in rock avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 43: 830–851.
      McCoy S, Tucker G, Kean J, et al, 2013. Field measurement of basal forces generated by erosive debris flows. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118: 589-602.
      Mergili M, Frank B, Fischer J, et al, 2018. Computational experiments on the 1962 and 1970 landslide events at Huascarán (Peru) with r. avaflow: Lessons learned for predictive mass flow simulations. Geomorphology, 2018, 322: 15-28.
      Ogawa S, 1978. Multitemperature theory of granular materials//Proc. of the US-Japan Seminar on Continuum Mechanical and Statistical Approaches in the Mechanics of Granular Materials, 1978. Gakajutsu Bunken Fukyu-Kai, 208-217.
      Sanvitale N, Bowman E, 2017. Visualization of dominant stress-transfer mechanisms in experimental debris flows of different particle-size distribution. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(2): 258-269.
      Shugar D, Jacquemart M, Shean D, et al, 2021. A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli, Indian Himalaya. Science, 373(6552): 300-306.
      Wang Y, Cheng Q, Yuan Y, et al, 2020. Emplacement mechanisms of the Tagarma rock avalanche on the Pamir-western Himalayan syntaxis of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Landslides, 17: 527-542.
      Wang Q, Xing A, Xu X, et al. Formation mechanism and dynamic process of open-pit coal mine landslides: a case study of the Xinjing landslide in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Landslides, 2024, 21(3): 541-556.
      Wang Q, Li B, Xing A, et al. Failure process analysis of a catastrophic landslide in Zhenxiong triggered by prolonged low-intensity rainfall using centrifuge tests[J]. Engineering Geology, 2025, 351: 108044.
      Yin Y, Li B, Gao Y, et al, 2023. Geostructures, dynamics and risk mitigation of high-altitude and long-runout rockslides. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(1): 66-101.
      Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of substrate erosion and entrainment in rock avalanches. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2026.
      Zhang S L, Yin Y P, Hu X W, et al, 2023. Block‐grain phase transition in rock avalanches: Insights from large‐scale experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128(11): e2023JF007204.
      Zhang S, Yin Y, Li H, et al, 2022. Transport process and mechanism of the Hongshiyan rock avalanche triggered by the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China. Landslides, 19(8): 1987-2004.
      Zhou G, Sun Q, 2013. Three-dimensional numerical study on flow regimes of dry granular flows by DEM. Powder technology,239: 115-127.
      高杨, 殷跃平, 李滨, 2023. 考虑颗粒状态转化的高位远程滑坡数值模拟方法. 岩石力学与工程学报, 42(7): 1623-1637.
      高杨, 殷跃平, 李壮, 等, 2022. 高位远程岩质滑坡动力解体效应研究. 岩石力学与工程学报, 41(10): 1958-1970.
      高杨,尹浩栋,陈福振,等.高位远程地质灾害多相态动力学数值模拟研究综述[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2026,37(1): 1-17.
      贺旭荣, 殷跃平, 赵立明, 等. 基于大型物理模型试验的高位岩质滑坡碎屑流解体破碎效应[J]. 地球科学, 2024, 49(7): 2650-2661.
      李滨, 高杨, 庄宇, 等. 瑞士瓦莱州 Blatten 高位远程崩滑碎屑流成灾特征与级联放大效应[J]. 地球科学, 2025, 50(12): 4950-4969.
      李滨, 殷跃平, 谭成轩, 等, 2022. 喜马拉雅东构造结工程选址面临的地质安全挑战. 地质力学学报, 28(6): 907-918.
      李坤, 王玉峰, 程谦恭, 等, 2021. 分形粒径分布对颗粒流粒径分选的影响规律. 岩石力学与工程学报, 40: 330-343.
      彭建兵, 张永双, 黄达, 等. 青藏高原构造变形圈-岩体松动圈-地表冻融圈-工程扰动圈互馈灾害效应[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(8): 3099-3114.
      司鹏飞, 2019. 颗粒体-流体混合物的两相流模型及其应用 清华大学.
      殷跃平, 2000. 西藏波密易贡高速巨型滑坡特征及减灾研究. 水文地质工程地质, 27: 8-11.
      殷跃平, 高少华, 2024. 高位远程地质灾害研究: 回顾与展望. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 35(1): 1-18.
      殷跃平,张仕林,霍子豪,等, 2025. 瑞士阿尔卑斯桦树“5•28”高位远程冰岩崩-碎屑流研究. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 36(4): 1- 14.
      青藏高原高位远程地质灾害. 中国科学出版社, 2021.
      郑虎, 牛文清, 毛无卫, 等, 2021. 颗粒物质力学及其在工程地质领域中的应用初探. 工程地质学报, 29: 12-24.
      张永双, 任三绍, 李金秋, 等. 怒江构造混杂岩带多拉寺滑坡的易滑地质结构及高位启滑运动机制[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(12): 4668-4679.
    • 加载中
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  61
    • HTML全文浏览量:  2
    • PDF下载量:  5
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2025-12-24
    • 网络出版日期:  2026-03-11

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回