• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带反转构造对油气成藏的控制作用

    杨子杰 陈冬霞 常吟善 王军 陈晓意 王福伟 刘金水 潘劲捷 刘晨 王翘楚 王昱超 曲洪达 荣澜熹

    杨子杰, 陈冬霞, 常吟善, 王军, 陈晓意, 王福伟, 刘金水, 潘劲捷, 刘晨, 王翘楚, 王昱超, 曲洪达, 荣澜熹, 2026. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带反转构造对油气成藏的控制作用. 地球科学, 51(7): 2682-2702. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.119
    引用本文: 杨子杰, 陈冬霞, 常吟善, 王军, 陈晓意, 王福伟, 刘金水, 潘劲捷, 刘晨, 王翘楚, 王昱超, 曲洪达, 荣澜熹, 2026. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带反转构造对油气成藏的控制作用. 地球科学, 51(7): 2682-2702. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.119
    Yang Zijie, Chen Dongxia, Chang Yinshan, Wang Jun, Chen Xiaoyi, Wang Fuwei, Liu Jinshui, Pan Jinjie, Liu Chen, Wang Qiaochu, Wang Yuchao, Qu Hongda, Rong Lanxi, 2026. Control of Hydrocarbon Accumulation by Inverted Structure of Central Anticline Belt in Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin. Earth Science, 51(7): 2682-2702. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.119
    Citation: Yang Zijie, Chen Dongxia, Chang Yinshan, Wang Jun, Chen Xiaoyi, Wang Fuwei, Liu Jinshui, Pan Jinjie, Liu Chen, Wang Qiaochu, Wang Yuchao, Qu Hongda, Rong Lanxi, 2026. Control of Hydrocarbon Accumulation by Inverted Structure of Central Anticline Belt in Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin. Earth Science, 51(7): 2682-2702. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.119

    东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带反转构造对油气成藏的控制作用

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.119
    基金项目: 

    中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司重大科技专项 CCL2024SHPS001RS

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      杨子杰(1998—),男,博士研究生,从事油气成藏机理与分布规律.ORCID:0000-0002-9514-0481. E-mail:yangzj2834@163.com

      通讯作者:

      陈冬霞,ORCID:0000-0003-4657-9081. E-mail:Lindachen@cup.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P618.13

    Control of Hydrocarbon Accumulation by Inverted Structure of Central Anticline Belt in Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin

    • 摘要: 西湖凹陷在中新世期间发生了强烈的构造反转,因此揭示其与油气成藏的耦合作用尤为重要.该研究利用三维地震、录井和测井等资料,并采用多方法定量评估构造反转的强度.结果表明:中央背斜带的凹‒隆转换显著,背斜核部发育近EW向的横张正断层,早期NNE-NE向的正断层受到挤压反转发生活化,形成正反转断层,并且根据反转正断层特征划分出八种反转构造样式.通过褶皱波幅比、断裂分形及断层反转率等评价方法,明确中央背斜带的反转强度呈现出北强‒南弱的特征,基于此建立了4种成藏模式:Ⅰ型:弱反转‒继承性活化断砂耦合控藏模式;Ⅱ型:中强反转‒高强度调整型深层局部富集模式;Ⅲ型:强反转‒接力式纵向多层系局部富集模式;Ⅳ型:强反转‒未贯穿型规模富集模式.深化了对西湖凹陷构造反转背景下油气成藏机理的认识,为类似盆地的勘探提供了指导意义.

       

    • 图  1  东海盆地西湖凹陷构造纲要图

      Fig.  1.  Structural scheme of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin

      图  2  东海盆地西湖凹陷构造演化示意图(据刘金水等,2020修改)

      Fig.  2.  Schematic diagram illustrating the tectonic evolution of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin

      图  3  东海盆地西湖凹陷地层综合柱状图

      Fig.  3.  Comprehensive stratigraphic histogram of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin

      图  4  东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转运动前后构造特征

      a.T21界面16 Ma前古构造特征;b.T21界面现今构造特征;c.IL2521测线;d.IL8741测线

      Fig.  4.  Structural characteristics before and after tectonic inversion of the central anticline belt in Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin

      图  5  东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造断陷期断裂体系(T30界面)发育特征和NW-SE方向地震剖面图

      a.T30地震反射界面; b.II8741测线; c.I15321测线; d.IL721测线

      Fig.  5.  Development characteristics of the fault system during the rifting period(T30) in the central anticline zone of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin and seismic profiles in the NW-SE direction

      图  6  东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转期断裂体系(T16界面)发育特征和SW-NE方向地震剖面图

      a.T16地震反射界面; b.XL3188测线; c.XL2628测线; d.XL2868测线

      Fig.  6.  Development characteristics of the fault system during the tectonic inversion period (T16) in the central anticline zone of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin and seismic profiles in the SW-NEdirection

      图  7  不同构造带NW-SE方向地震剖面图(具体测线位置见图 5a)

      a.A构造: 11921;b.B构造: I12521;c.C构造: II3921;d.D构造: 115541;e. E构造: 117241;f.F构造: IL9041

      Fig.  7.  NW-SE direction seismic profiles of different structural zones(see Fig. 5a for specific survey line locations)

      图  8  西湖凹陷中央背斜带反转构造样式

      Fig.  8.  The inversion tectonic pattern of the central anticline belt in Xihu Depression

      图  9  构造反转强度定量计算方法示意图

      a. 反转褶皱波幅比;b. 断裂分形维数;c. 断层反转率

      Fig.  9.  Scheme of the method for calculating tectonic inversion intensity

      图  10  西湖凹陷中央背斜带不同构造带反转强度综合对比分析

      a.T21界面16 Ma前古构造特征;b.不同构造带反转褶皱波幅比;c.NNE向断裂断距特征;d.不同构造带EW向断裂分形维数特征

      Fig.  10.  Comprehensive comparative analysis diagram of the inversion intensity of different tectonic zones in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  11  西湖凹陷中央背斜带局部断裂尺度内构造反转强度综合分析图

      a.不同构造带主要断裂反转率计算结果;b.不同构造带典型断裂位移‒距离图

      Fig.  11.  Comprehensive analysis diagram of the inversion intensity at the scale of local faults in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  12  西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转作用对背斜规模及油气汇聚的耦合关系

      a. 现今T21界面背斜发育特征及油气运移路径;b.反转褶皱波幅比与单井油气显示厚度关系散点图;c.不同构造带单井油气显示厚度综合柱状图与反转褶皱波幅比折线图

      Fig.  12.  Coupling relationship diagram between tectonic inversion effects on the scale of anticline and hydrocarbon accumulation in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  13  西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转作用对东西向断裂发育及油气富集的耦合关系

      a. 现今T21界面背斜发育特征与EW向断裂发育关系;b. 主要EW向断裂断距特征(测线号见图 5);c. 典型单井花上段与龙井组气层显示厚度;d. 典型单井花上段与花下段气层及气水同层含气饱和度散点图

      Fig.  13.  Coupling relationship diagram between tectonic inversion effects on the development of east-west strike faults and hydrocarbon accumulation in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  14  西湖凹陷中央背斜带不同构造带东西向断裂及油气分布特征

      Fig.  14.  Characteristics of East-West strike faults and hydrocarbon distribution of different tectonic zones in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  15  西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转控制下的断层活化与油气运移、聚集耦合关系

      a.GOI指数与断层反转率散点图;b.单井油气显示厚度与断层反转率散点图;c.低断层反转率的B-3井油气显示特征;d.高断层反转率的E-2井油气显示特征

      Fig.  15.  Coupling relationship diagram between fault activation and hydrocarbon migration and accumulation controlled by tectonic inversion in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

      图  16  西湖凹陷中央背斜带构造反转作用控制下的油气差异成藏模式

      Fig.  16.  Diagram of the differential hydrocarbon accumulation models controlled by tectonic inversion in the central anticline belt of the Xihu Depression

    • Aziz, T., Li, X. Q., Xie, X. N., et al., 2025. A Large-Scale T2 (Late Cretaceous Turonian) Polygonal-Fault System Influenced by Regional Tectonic Stress in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China. Journal of Earth Science, 36(2): 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-024-0048-6
      Bally, A. W., 1984. Tectogenese et Sismique Reflexion. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 7(2): 279-285. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.s7-xxvi.2.279
      Buiter, S. J. H., Pfiffner, O. A., Beaumont, C., 2009. Inversion of Extensional Sedimentary Basins: A Numerical Evaluation of the Localisation of Shortening. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 288(3-4): 492-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.10.011
      Chen, Z. L., Liu, G. D., Lu, X. J., et al., 2015. Quantatitive Study on Inversion Degree of Inversion Tectonics and Its Impact on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Erlian Basin, Northern China. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 46(11): 4136-4145 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cooper, M., Warren, M. J., 2020. Inverted Fault Systems and Inversion Tectonic Settings. Regional Geology and Tectonics: Principles of Geologic Analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64134-2.00009-2
      Fu, C., Fan, X., Li, S. L., et al., 2025. Effect of the Tectonic Inversion on the Source-to-Sink System Evolution in a Lacustrine Rift Basin, a Case Study of South Yellow Sea Basin, East China. Journal of Earth Science, 36(2): 562-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-022-1664-7
      Guo, Q. J., Deng, M. Z., Zhang, C. Y., et al., 2024. Structural Styles and Their Geological Significance to Petroliferous Basins of China. Oil & Gas Geology, 45(3): 609-621 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Guo, Y. C., Pang, X. Q., Chen, D. X., et al., 2013. Progress of Research on Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Tight Sand Gas and Several Issues for Concerns. Oil & Gas Geology, 34(6): 717-724 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Guo, Z., Liu, C. Y., Tian, J. F., 2015. Structural Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of Inversion Structures in Xihu Depression in Donghai Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(3): 59-67 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Harding, T. P., 1985. Seismic Characteristics and Identification of Negative Flower Structures, Positive Flower Structures, and Positive Structural Inversion. AAPG Bulletin, 69(4): 582-600. https://doi.org/10.1306/ad462538-16f7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
      He, X. J., Jiang, Y. M., Li, L., et al., 2024. Progressive Deformation Characteristics and Mechanism of Longjing Movement in Xihu Sag. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 36(5): 34-43 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hudleston, P. J., 1973. Fold Morphology and Some Geometrical Implications of Theories of Fold Development. Tectonophysics, 16(1-2): 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(73)90129-7
      Jiang, Y. M., Zou, W., Liu, J. S., et al., 2020. Genetic Mechanism of Inversion Anticline Structure at the End of Miocene in Xihu Sag, East China Sea: A New Understanding of Basement Structure Difference. Earth Science, 45(3): 968-979 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lin, J. L., Dong, C. M., Lin, C. Y., et al., 2024. The Impact of Tectonic Inversion on Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality of the Oligocene Fluvial Sandstones: The Upper Huagang Formation, Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 165: 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.106860
      Lin, J. L., Zhang, X. G., Lin, C. Y., et al., 2019. Diagenetic Evolution Characteristics Constrained by Lithofacies in Deep Tight Sand Gas Reservoir. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(4): 886-899 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, J. S., Xu, H. Z., Jiang, Y. M., et al., 2020. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Basin Structure and Tectonic Evolution in the East China Sea Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 94(3): 675-691 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Riahi, Z. T., Sarkarinejad, K., Faghih, A., et al., 2021. Impact of Inversion Tectonics on the Spatial Distribution of Hydrocarbon Traps in the NW Persian Gulf and the Southern Dezful Embayment, SW Iran. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 134: 105364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105364
      Roy, A., Perfect, E., Dunne, W. M., et al., 2007. Fractal Characterization of Fracture Networks: An Improved Box-Counting Technique. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112(B12): 2006JB004582. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004582
      Song, T. G., 1997. Inversion Styles in the Songliao Basin (Northeast China) and Estimation of the Degree of Inversion. Tectonophysics, 283(1-4): 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00147-9
      Song, Y. F., Dou, L. R., Cheng, D. S., et al., 2024. Driving Mechanism of Tectonic Inversion in Intra-Plate Rift Basins and Its Impact on Oil: A Case Study of the Bongor Basin in Central Africa. Geological Review, 70(S1): 239-240 (in Chinese).
      Tang, D. Q., Chen, H. H., Jiang, T., et al., 2013. Neogene Differential Structural Inversion and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Yitong Basin, East China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(6): 682-691 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tang, X. J., Zhu, H. H., Li, N., et al., 2025. Segmented Differential Deformation of Inverted Anticlines and Its Significance on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Ningbo Structural Zone, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 46(1): 167-177 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Tari, G., Arbouille, D., Schléder, Z., et al., 2020. Inversion Tectonics: A Brief Petroleum Industry Perspective. Solid Earth, 11(5): 1865-1889. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1865-2020
      Tari, G., Connors, C. P., Flinch, J. F., et al., 2023. Negative Structural Inversion: An Overview. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 152: 106223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106223
      Tian, K., Yin, J. Y., Wang, D. P., et al., 2020. Petroleum Geology and Exploration in Levant Basin, Eastern Mediterranean. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 42(1): 95-102 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Williams, G. D., Powell, C. M., Cooper, M. A., 1989. Geometry and Kinematics of Inversion Tectonics. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 44(1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.044.01.02
      Xiao, K. Y., Zhang, X. S., Gao, Y. J., et al., 2025. Formation Mechanism of Rift Basins in Central African Strike-Slip Tectonic Setting: A Case Study of Bongor Basin. Earth Science, 50(12): 4801-4818 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xu, C. J., Ye, J. R., Liu, J. S., et al., 2021. Key Evidence of Gas Accumulation Period in Xihu Sag of the East China Sea Shelf Basin: Gas Hydrocarbon Inclusion. Natural Gas Industry, 41(11): 64-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xue, Y. A., Niu, C. M., Wang, D. Y., et al., 2019. New Understanding and Exploration Progress of Shallow Oil and Gas Migration in Bohai Sea Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 40(S2): 29-37 (in Chinese).
      Yan, H. J., He, D. B., Xu, W. Z., et al., 2016. Paleotopography Restoration Method and Its Controlling Effect on Fluid Distribution: A Case Study of the Gas Reservoir Evaluation Stage in Gaoqiao, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 37(12): 1483-1494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zeng, F., Dong, C. M., Lin, C. Y., et al., 2021. Analyzing the Effects of Multi-Scale Pore Systems on Reservoir Properties—A Case Study on Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 203: 108609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108609
      Zeng, W. T., Ding, W. L., Jiu, K., et al., 2012. Review of Inversion Structure and the Relationship between Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Inversion Structure. Science & Technology Review, 30(2): 58-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, H. G., Yang, H. F., Su, W., et al., 2024. Key Stages in Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation in Layers Outside Source Rocks and the Evaluation Methods Related: A Case Study of the Lower Member of the Minghuazhen Formation, Bozhong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 45(1): 281-292 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Y. Z., Jiang, Y. M., Diao, H., et al., 2025. Exploration and Development Practice, New Geological Understanding and Resource Potential of Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs in Xihu Sag of East China Sea Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 46(6): 1074-1088 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, P., Sun, P., Liu, C. F., et al., 2024. On Time-Space Matching of Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Yuquan Structure, Xihu Sag. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 44(1): 121-129 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. H., 2020. Geological Understanding and Innovation in Xihu Sag and Breakthroughs in Oil and Gas Exploration. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 32(1): 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, W. L., Zhang, Y. Z., Jiang, Y. M., et al., 2025. Research Advances and Prospects on Fundamental Geological Issues of the East China Sea Petroliferous Basin. Earth Science, 50(12): 4783-4800 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ziegler, P. A., 1987. Compressional Intra-Plate Deformations in the Alpine Foreland—An Introduction. Tectonophysics, 137(1-4): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90223-X
      陈哲龙, 柳广弟, 卢学军, 等, 2015. 二连盆地反转构造反转程度定量研究及对油气成藏的影响. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 46(11): 4136-4145.
      郭齐军, 邓铭哲, 张晨雨, 等, 2024. 中国含油气盆地不同构造样式及其油气地质意义. 石油与天然气地质, 45(3): 609-621.
      郭迎春, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 等, 2013. 致密砂岩气成藏研究进展及值得关注的几个问题. 石油与天然气地质, 34(6): 717-724.
      郭真, 刘池洋, 田建锋, 2015. 东海盆地西湖凹陷反转构造特征及其形成的动力环境. 地学前缘, 22(3): 59-67.
      何新建, 蒋一鸣, 李磊, 等, 2024. 西湖凹陷龙井运动构造递进变形特征与机制. 中国海上油气, 36(5): 34-43.
      蒋一鸣, 邹玮, 刘金水, 等, 2020. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制: 来自基底结构差异的新认识. 地球科学, 45(3): 968-979. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.292
      林建力, 张宪国, 林承焰, 等, 2019. 岩相约束下的深层致密砂岩气藏储层演化特征. 石油与天然气地质, 40(4): 886-899.
      刘金水, 许怀智, 蒋一鸣, 等, 2020. 东海盆地中、新生代盆架结构与构造演化. 地质学报, 94(3): 675-691.
      宋一帆, 窦立荣, 程顶胜, 等, 2024. 板内裂谷盆地构造反转驱动机制以及对油气的影响——以中非Bongor盆地为例. 地质论评, 70(S1): 239-240.
      唐大卿, 陈红汉, 江涛, 等, 2013. 伊通盆地新近纪差异构造反转与油气成藏. 石油勘探与开发, 40(6): 682-691.
      唐贤君, 朱虹浩, 李宁, 等, 2025. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷宁波构造带反转背斜分段差异变形及其油气地质意义. 石油与天然气地质, 46(1): 167-177.
      田琨, 殷进垠, 王大鹏, 等, 2020. 黎凡特盆地油气地质特征与勘探方向. 石油实验地质, 42(1): 95-102.
      肖坤叶, 张新顺, 高彦杰, 等, 2025. 中非剪切背景下裂陷盆地的发育机制: 以Bongor盆地为例. 地球科学, 50(12): 4801-4818.
      徐陈杰, 叶加仁, 刘金水, 等, 2021. 东海西湖凹陷天然气成藏时期的关键证据: 气烃包裹体. 天然气工业, 41(11): 64-73.
      薛永安, 牛成民, 王德英, 等, 2019. 渤海海域浅层油气运移新认识与勘探新进展. 石油学报, 40(S2): 29-37.
      闫海军, 何东博, 许文壮, 等, 2016. 古地貌恢复及对流体分布的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥区气藏评价阶段为例. 石油学报, 37(12): 1483-1494.
      曾维特, 丁文龙, 久凯, 等, 2012. 反转构造进展与油气聚集关系. 科技导报, 30(2): 58-64.
      张宏国, 杨海风, 宿雯, 等, 2024. 源外层系油气运聚关键环节研究与评价方法——以渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷明化镇组下段为例. 石油与天然气地质, 45(1): 281-292.
      张迎朝, 蒋一鸣, 刁慧, 等, 2025. 东海盆地西湖凹陷低渗‒特低渗天然气勘探开发实践、地质新认识及资源潜力. 石油学报, 46(6): 1074-1088.
      周平, 孙鹏, 刘春锋, 等, 2024. 西湖凹陷玉泉构造油气成藏时空匹配关系研究. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 44(1): 121-129.
      周心怀, 2020. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破. 中国海上油气, 32(1): 1-12.
      朱伟林, 张迎朝, 蒋一鸣, 等, 2025. 东海含油气盆地基础地质问题研究进展及展望. 地球科学, 50(12): 4783-4800. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.185
    • 加载中
    图(16)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  128
    • HTML全文浏览量:  30
    • PDF下载量:  23
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2026-01-07
    • 刊出日期:  2026-07-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回