• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    塔里木盆地塔西南地区巴什托与玉北构造带原油差异性比较

    云露 吴悠 曹自成 陈红汉 耿锋 沙旭光 苏鹏 胡守志

    云露, 吴悠, 曹自成, 陈红汉, 耿锋, 沙旭光, 苏鹏, 胡守志, 2026. 塔里木盆地塔西南地区巴什托与玉北构造带原油差异性比较. 地球科学, 51(5): 1768-1786. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.165
    引用本文: 云露, 吴悠, 曹自成, 陈红汉, 耿锋, 沙旭光, 苏鹏, 胡守志, 2026. 塔里木盆地塔西南地区巴什托与玉北构造带原油差异性比较. 地球科学, 51(5): 1768-1786. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.165
    Yun Lu, Wu You, Cao Zicheng, Chen Honghan, Geng Feng, Sha Xuguang, Su Peng, Hu Shouzhi, 2026. Difference Comparison of Oil Properties between Bashentuo and Yubei Structures in Southwest Tarim Basin, NW China. Earth Science, 51(5): 1768-1786. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.165
    Citation: Yun Lu, Wu You, Cao Zicheng, Chen Honghan, Geng Feng, Sha Xuguang, Su Peng, Hu Shouzhi, 2026. Difference Comparison of Oil Properties between Bashentuo and Yubei Structures in Southwest Tarim Basin, NW China. Earth Science, 51(5): 1768-1786. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.165

    塔里木盆地塔西南地区巴什托与玉北构造带原油差异性比较

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.165
    基金项目: 

    国家科技重大专项项目“深层超深层碳酸盐岩油气富集规律与高效勘探” 2025ZD1402301

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      云露(1972-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事石油地质综合研究与管理工作.E-mail:yunl.xbsj@sinopec.com

      通讯作者:

      吴悠, E-mail:wuyou-33@163.com

      陈红汉,E-mail:hhchen@cug.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P618

    Difference Comparison of Oil Properties between Bashentuo and Yubei Structures in Southwest Tarim Basin, NW China

    • 摘要: 塔西南坳陷经历70多年的勘探虽发现了巴什托和玉北等油气田,但与塔北坳陷相比仍存在很大差距.长期以来油气来源的争议成为塔西南坳陷勘探部署的制约因素之一.通过采集塔里木盆地34件原油样品开展芳基类异戊二烯烃、硫同位素和正构烷烃单体碳同位素组成分析,开展油源对比研究,并结合烃源岩和原油碳同位素组成以及油气成藏过程分析,比较了二者原油差异性的原因.结果表明:(1)玉北构造带原油主要来自于玉尔吐斯组烃源岩,局部可能存在肖尔布拉克组烃源贡献;巴什托构造带油气可能主要来自于肖尔布拉克组烃源岩,局部可能来自于石炭-二叠系烃源贡献.(2)玉北构造带发育海西中期、海西晚期和喜山晚期三期成藏,但以海西中期和海西晚期为主,且在海西晚期遭受了比较偏强烈的生物降解;巴什托构造带石炭系发生了海西晚期和喜山晚期两期油气成藏,且以晚期成藏为主,其中,海西晚期充注的油气仅局部遭受了轻微的生物降解.(3)油源、油气成藏过程以及原油在海西期遭受生物降解程度的差异性是造成巴什托构造带形成轻质油-凝析油与玉北构造带形成中质油的根本原因.因此,加强肖尔布拉克组和石炭-二叠系烃源岩特征研究是塔西南坳陷下一步勘探部署的关键.

       

    • 图  1  塔里木盆地塔西南坳陷构造分区(a)和地层综合柱状图(b)

      Fig.  1.  The tectonic division (a) and the synthetic stratigraphic column (b) in the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  2  巴什托构造带剖面(a)和玉北构造带剖面(b)

      剖面位置见图 1

      Fig.  2.  The sections of Bashentuo structure (a) and Yubei structure (b)

      图  3  玉北和巴什托构造带原油中检测到和未检测到芳基类异二烯烃GC-MS典型图谱比较

      a.检测到芳基类异戊二烯烃;b,c.未检测到芳基类异戊二烯烃

      Fig.  3.  The typical GC-MS spectrum contrast between detected and undetected aryl isoprenoids of crude oils in Yubei and Bashentuo structures

      图  4  塔里木盆地硫同位素组成(δ34S/‰)分布

      寒武系和上奥陶统古海水硫同位素组成数据来自于刘文汇等(2015)

      Fig.  4.  Diagram of distribution of δ34S (‰) in Tarim basin

      图  5  塔西南地区原油硫同位素组成油源判识

      Fig.  5.  The identification pattern of oil sources by δ34S in the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  6  塔里木盆地寒武系和奥陶系烃源岩干酪根和原油稳定碳同位素组成分布

      Fig.  6.  The δ13C distribution pattern of source rock kerogens and crude oils for the Cambrian and Ordovician in Tarim basin

      图  7  塔里木盆地不同地区原油正构烷烃单体碳同位素组成分布

      Fig.  7.  The compound specific carbon isotopic ratio distribution pattern of crude oils for the different areas in Tarim basin

      图  8  塔西南地区原油金刚烷化合物MDI与MAI关系

      MDI=4-MD/(4-MD+1-MD+3-MD);MAI=1-MA/(1-MA+2-MA);MA.甲基单金刚烷;MD.甲基双金刚烷

      Fig.  8.  The plot of MDI vs. MAI of adamantane compounds of crude oils in the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  9  玉北与塔河奥陶系原油生标差异对比

      Fig.  9.  The contrast of crude oil biomarkers between Yubei and Tahe Ordovician

      图  10  塔西南地区原油MDBT/MP与DBTs关系

      DBTs.总二苯并噻吩类化合物;MDBT.甲基二苯并噻吩;MP.甲基菲

      Fig.  10.  The plot of MDBT/MP vs. DBTs of crude oils in the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  11  塔西南坳陷巴什托和玉北构造带油气成藏期次和时期确定图

      Fig.  11.  The diagram showing hydrocarbon charging events and chronologies in Bashentuo and Yubei structures of the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  12  塔西南坳陷巴什托和玉北构造带原油饱和烃气相色谱

      Fig.  12.  The GC spectra of saturated hydrocarbon of crude oils in Bashentuo and Yubei structures in the Southwest Tarim basin

      图  13  塔西南坳陷及邻区上奥陶统却尔却克组等厚图

      Fig.  13.  The contour map of the Upper Ordovician Queerqueke Formation in the Southwest Tarim basin and surrounding areas

      表  1  本研究采集的塔里木盆地原油样品信息

      Table  1.   The crude oil sample information for the first and second batches in Tarim basin in this study

      序号 构造带 样品编号 井号 层位 深度(m) 测试单位
      1 巴什托 G011149 巴开2 D3d 4 945~4 956 德国地学中心
      2 G011150 巴开8 D3d 4 950.5~4 960.5
      3 G011173 巴开7 D3d 4 948~4 953
      4 G011179 麦3 C2x 4 299.5~4 300.51
      5 G011181 巴参1 C1b 2 375~2 390
      6 TWN-1 麦3 P1n 4 300.51 中科院地质与地球物理研究所、长江大学教育部重点实验室
      7 TWN-14 麦6 P1n 4 308.3~4 318
      8 TWN-3 麦4 C1b 4 755~4 767
      9 TWN-4 巴开5 C1b 4 498~4 850
      10 TWN-11 巴参1 C1b 2 375~2 390
      11 TWN-2 巴探4 D3d 4 913~4 965
      12 玉北 G011183 玉北1-2X O1‒2y 5 105~5 190 德国地学中心
      13 TWN-6 玉北1-2X O1‒2y 5 100~5 190 中科院地质与地球物理研究所、长江大学教育部重点实验室
      14 TWN-7 巴开3 C1b 4 772~4 775
      15 TWN-8 玉北1-4 O1‒2y 5 044.4~5 138
      16 TWN-9 玉北1-5 O1‒2y 5 309~5 333.55
      17 TWN-10 玉北1-1 O1‒2y 5 956.99~6 020
      18 TWN-12 玉北1 O1‒2y 5 594.96~5 620
      19 TWN-13 玉北1-3H O1‒2y 5 809.97~6 382
      20 麦盖提斜坡 TWN-5 皮山北新1 E2 6 919~6 932
      21 顺托果勒 G011168 顺9 S1k 5 560.5~5 583 德国地学中心
      22 G011169 顺7 O1‒2y 6 820~6 912
      23 塔河 G011176 雅轮2-3 K1bs 5 198~5 411(斜) 德国地学中心
      24 G011163 雅开1 K1yU 5 248~5 282
      25 G011164 雅开9X K1yL 5 375.5~5 390(斜)
      26 G011155 沙47 O1‒2y 5 346~5 497
      27 G011156 沙70 C1kl 5 153.02~5 166
      28 G011158 塔开310 C1kl 4 918~4 922
      29 G011166 雅探2-11H T-Ⅲ 4 650~4 940
      30 G011171 塔开846CH O2yj 5 594.2~5 680
      31 G011160 托普106 O2yj 6 299~6 333.82
      32 G011161 托普205X O2yj 6 477~6 531.7
      33 G011170 阿探AT5 O2yj 6 554.17~6 595.02
      34 G011177 艾丁25 O2yj 6 530.5~6 580.11
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  塔里木盆地原油和烃源岩芳基类异戊二烯烃系列化合物检测结果

      Table  2.   The measurements of serial aryl isoprenoid compounds of crude oils and source rocks in Tarim basin

      构造带/位置 样品类型 井号 层位 1, 2, 3, 4-TMB 2, 3, 6-AIPs+2, 3, 4-AIPs 资料来源
      巴什托 原油 巴开2 D3d × × 本文
      巴开8 D3d × ×
      巴开7 D3d × ×
      巴参1 C1b × ×
      巴开3 C1b × ×
      巴开5 C1b × ×
      麦4 C1b × ×
      巴探4 D3d × ×
      麦6 P1n × ×
      麦3 P1n × ×
      麦3 C2x × ×
      玉北 原油 玉北1-2X O1‒2y 本文
      玉北1-4 O1‒2y
      玉北1-5 O1‒2y × ×
      玉北1-1 O1‒2y
      玉北1 O1‒2y
      玉北1-3H O1‒2y
      玉北1 O1‒2y 孙永革等(2021)
      和田河油田 原油 玛3 C1b、O3l 李梦勤等(2025)
      玛4 C1b+O1‒2y
      玛8 C1b
      麦盖提斜坡 原油 罗斯2 O1p
      皮山北新1 K2y × × 本文
      沙雅隆起 原油 于奇901 O1‒2y
      于奇103 O1‒2y
      于奇5-9 O1‒2y
      雅东1 J1、K1y
      沙47 O1‒2y
      沙70 C1kl
      塔开310 C1kl
      塔开846CH O2yj
      托普106 O2yj
      托普205X O2yj
      阿探5 O2yj
      艾丁25 O2yj
      英探2-11H T-Ⅲ
      沙116 O2yj 孙永革等(2021)
      轮南631 O1‒2y 李梦勤等(2025)
      轮南62 S1t
      英古2 O
      塔中隆起 原油 塔中62 S1t
      中深1C 1x
      顺北 原油 顺7 O1‒2y × × 本文
      顺9 S1k
      柯坪 烃源岩 肖尔布拉克剖面 1y 王道伟(2023); 张科等(2023)
      大湾沟剖面 O2+3s ×
      轮南 秋探1 1y
      轮探1 1y
      塔东 塔东2 1x
      塔东2 O1‒2h
      巴楚 和4
      塔中 塔中10 O2+3 ×
      塔中12 O2+3 ×
      注:√.检测得到;×.检测不到;-.未做分析.
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  3  塔西南地区原油硫同位素组成分析结果

      Table  3.   The measured δ34S-VCDT of crude oils in Southwest Tarim basin

      构造带 样品编号 井号 层位 深度(m) δ34S-VCDT(‰)
      巴什托 TWN-1 麦3 P1n 4 300.51 +7.95
      TWN-14 麦6 P1n 4 308.3~4 318 +8.80
      TWN-15 曲1 C1b 4 731.4~4 905.6 +7.21
      TWN-3 麦4 C1b 4 755~4 767 +12.76
      TWN-2 巴探4 D3d 4 913~4 965 +11.90
      TWN-11 巴参1 C1b 2 375~2 390 +13.50
      TWN-7 巴开3 C1b 4 772~4 775 +14.34
      TWN-4 巴开5 C1b 4 498~4 850 +16.12
      玉北 TWN-6 玉北1-2X O1-2y 5 100~5 190 +17.73
      TWN-8 玉北1-4 O1-2y 5 044.4~5 138 +18.17
      TWN-10 玉北1-1 O1-2y 5 956.99~6 020 +18.26
      TWN-12 玉北1 O1-2y 5 594.96~5 620 +18.14
      TWN-13 玉北1-3H O1-2y 5 809.97~6 382 +18.05
      TWN-9 玉北1-5 O1-2y 5 309~5 333.55 +18.07
      麦盖提斜坡 TWN-5 皮山北新1 E2 6 919~6 932 +17.94
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  4  塔里木盆地原油正构烷烃单体碳同位素组成(δ13Ci,‰VPDB)

      Table  4.   The compound specific carbon isotopic ratios (δ13Ci, ‰VPDB) of crude oils in Tarim basin

      构造带 井号 层位 nC14 nC15 nC16 nC17 nC18 nC19 nC20 nC21 nC22 nC23 nC24 nC25 nC26 nC27 nC28 nC29 nC30 nC31
      巴什托 巴开8 D3d -35.46 -35.69 -35.68 -35.75 -35.76 -35.61 -35.78 -35.91 -35.78 -35.81 -35.89 -35.78
      巴开7 D3d -35.64 -35.99 -36.10 -36.06 -36.20 -35.70 -36.71 -36.93 -36.75 -36.49 -36.33 -36.38 -36.14 -37.34
      麦3 P1n -32.74 -32.87 -32.58 -32.65 -32.69 -32.68 -32.92 -33.15 -33.28 -33.18 -33.37 -33.06 -33.00 -33.38 -34.57
      巴参1 C1b -34.40 -34.93 -34.92 -35.05 -35.39 -35.20 -35.85 -35.71 -35.59 -35.71 -35.10 -36.11
      玉北 玉北1-2X O1-2y -33.91 -34.00 -33.85 -33.50 -34.04 -33.83 -33.91 -34.51 -33.46 -34.46 -34.64 -34.03
      顺托果勒 顺9 S1k -33.96 -34.22 -34.29 -34.60 -34.19 -34.13 -34.37 -34.63 -34.58 -34.67 -34.36 -34.19 -34.63 -33.92 -33.83 -34.48
      顺7 O1-2y -31.47 -31.64 -31.54 -31.55 -31.84 -32.34 -32.61 -33.20 -33.42 -33.72 -33.72 -34.32 -33.56 -33.39 -34.17 -33.91 -33.71 -34.64
      塔河 雅轮2-3 K1bs -23.69 -24.06 -23.89 -24.08 -24.47 -24.81 -25.28 -25.64 -26.11 -26.48 -28.63 -27.35 -27.22 -26.77 -26.57 -28.19
      雅开1 K1yU -33.34 -33.78 -33.68 -33.93 -33.81 -33.73 -34.00 -34.33 -33.99 -34.54 -34.05 -33.90 -34.27 -34.94 -35.25
      雅开9x K1yL -33.43 -34.03 -33.78 -33.84 -33.72 -33.62 -33.83 -33.92 -33.99 -34.12 -33.76 -33.81 -34.37 -34.39 -34.77
      沙47 O1-2y -33.90 -34.22 -34.33 -34.48 -34.51 -34.16 -34.32 -34.69 -34.41 -34.90 -34.78 -34.36 -34.67 -35.40 -35.08 -35.79
      沙70 C1kl -33.91 -34.16 -34.31 -34.38 -34.19 -33.84 -34.00 -34.41 -34.30 -34.54 -34.32 -34.38 -34.26 -34.81 -34.79 -35.64 -35.18
      塔开310 C1kl -34.06 -34.57 -34.48 -34.53 -34.49 -34.19 -34.41 -34.82 -34.77 -34.95 -34.83 -34.77 -34.86 -35.13 -34.73 -35.34 -35.36
      英探2-11H T-Ⅲ -33.41 -33.81 -33.79 -33.96 -34.02 -33.78 -33.44 -34.00 -33.57 -33.84 -34.09 -34.12 -34.21 -34.68 -34.21 -34.48
      塔开846CH O2yj -33.91 -34.27 -34.40 -34.56 -34.58 -34.33 -34.56 -35.00 -34.62 -34.98 -34.64 -35.85 -35.18 -33.88 -35.27
      托普106 O2yj -34.39 -34.84 -34.36 -34.61 -34.95 -34.55 -34.57 -34.95 -34.45 -34.61 -35.07 -35.38 -34.17
      托普205x O2yj -34.49 -34.58 -35.00 -34.92 -34.62 -34.41 -34.27 -34.57 -34.57 -34.76 -34.80 -34.75 -34.64 -35.17 -35.08
      阿探5 O2yj -33.52 -34.03 -33.90 -33.97 -34.08 -34.02 -34.50 -34.96 -34.90 -35.08 -35.10 -34.95 -35.23 -34.43 -35.42 -35.25 -34.89 -36.57
      艾丁25 O2yj -34.43 -35.55 -35.26 -35.24 -35.26 -35.06 -35.19 -36.13 -35.30 -35.57
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  5  巴什托和玉北构造带原油地面物理性质对比统计

      Table  5.   The statistical comparison of surface crude oil physical properties between Bashentuo and Yubei structural belts

      构造带 井号 井段
      (m)
      层位 密度
      (g/cm3)
      动力粘度
      (mPa⋅s)
      凝固点
      (℃)
      含硫量
      (%)
      含蜡量
      (%)
      初馏点
      (℃)
      原油类型
      玉北 玉北1 5 603.68~5 630 O1‒2y 0.916 3 90.87 < ‒34 0.69 6.63 90.8 中质油
      玉北1-1 5 956.99~6 020.00 O1‒2y 0.931 8 260.11 ‒32 0.68 4.41 149.10 中质油
      玉北1-2X 5 105~5 450 O1‒2y 0.934 6 393.33 < ‒34 0.82 15.15 131.1 中质油
      玉北1-3H 5 809.97~6 382 O1‒2y 0.918 2 114.14 < ‒34 0.72 2.51 90.9 中质油
      玉北1-4 5 044.4~5 138 O1‒2y 0.926 6 184.45 ‒26 0.77 6.5 144.3 中质油
      巴什托 巴开8 4 950.5~4 999.5 D3d 0.789 2 1.82 < ‒34 0.08 5.32 60.0 凝析油
      巴开2 4 944~4 979.65 D3d 0.813 7 3.25 < ‒34 0.08 5.63 85.0 轻质油
      巴开3 4 772~4 775 C1b 0.800 8 1.71 < ‒34 0.16 5.29 51.0 凝析油
      巴开4H 4 955.5~5 158.21 C1b 0.825 8 2.94 < ‒34 0.21 4.38 80.8 轻质油
      巴开6 4 311~4 395 C1b 0.832 0 3.34 < ‒34 0.22 4.96 轻质油
      巴探4 4 913.65 D3d 0.830 3 4.97 < ‒34 0.12 14.20 86.4 轻质油
      麦3 4 299.5~4 300.51 C2x 0.782 0 1.134 < ‒31 0.24 0.068 85.1 凝析油
      麦4 4 755.5~4 767 C1b 0.799 3 1.65 < ‒34 0.17 5.43 53.1 轻质油
      群5 4 784.5~4 882.5 C1b 0.796 1 ‒30.5 1.05~4.8 58~72 轻质油
      群5-1 4 871~ 4 874 C1b 0.793 4 轻质油
      群7 4 877~4 875 C1b 0.801 2 轻质油
      南隆 皮山北新1 6 919~6 932 E2 0.828 4~ 0.847 3 3.49~5.39 0.22~0.29 0.47~0.81 轻质油
      注:“-”表示信息缺损.动力粘度在20-30 ℃温度下测定.
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Andrusevich, V. E., Engel, M. H., Zumberge, J. E., et al., 1998. Secular, Episodic Changes in Stable Carbon Isotope Composition of Crude Oils. Chemical Geology, 152(1-2): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(98)00096-5
      Brocks, J. J., Schaeffer, P., 2008. Okenane, a Biomarker for Purple Sulfur Bacteria (Chromatiaceae), and Other New Carotenoid Derivatives from the 1 640 Ma Barney Creek Formation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72(5): 1396-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.006
      Cai, C. F., Zhang, C. M., Cai, L. L., et al., 2009a. Origins of Palaeozoic Oils in the Tarim Basin: Evidence from Sulfur Isotopes and Biomarkers. Chemical Geology, 268(3-4): 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.08.012
      Cai, C. F., Li, K. K., Ma, A. L., et al., 2009b. Distinguishing Cambrian from Upper Ordovician Source Rocks: Evidence from Sulfur Isotopes and Biomarkers in the Tarim Basin. Organic Geochemistry, 40(7): 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.04.008
      Cao, Z. C., Yun, L., Ping, H. W., et al., 2025. Reconstruction of Carbon Isotope of Kerogen in Shunbei Area, Tarim Basin and Discussions on Hydrocarbon Generation Model of Lower Cambrian Yurtus Formation Source Rock. Earth Science, 50(12): 4736-4750 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, J. H., Fu, J. M., Sheng, G. Y., et al., 1996. Structural Characteristics and Geochemical Significance of Adamantane Compounds. Chinese Science Bulletin, 41(6): 524-527 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/csb1996-41-6-524
      Chen, J. X., Qu, Q. P., Qiu, B., 1997. Forming Condition of Carboniferous Reservoir in Bashitop Anticline, Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 18(4): 319-323, 5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, X. Y., Sun, C. H., Tao, X. W., et al., 2024. Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Favorable Exploration Areas in the Western Maigaiti Slope of Tarim Basin: A Case Study of Bashituopu Oilfield. Chinese Journal of Geology, 59(4): 991-1002 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Ding, Y., Jia, C. S., Shao, Z. B., 2013. Geochemical Features and Sources of Crude Oils in Bachu-Maigaiti Area. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 35(6): 683-688 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Duan, Y., Zhou, S. X., Meng, Z. F., 2001. Study on the Oil Source of Crude Oils from Well Qun-5 and Well Qu-1 in the Tarim Basin: New Evidences from Fatty Acids and Alkyl Cyclohexanes Series Compounds. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 23(4): 433-437, 456 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Gao, Y. J., Yin, C. M., Liu, L. H., et al., 2024. Characteristics of Source Rocks in the Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Northwestern Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 45(4): 1064-1078 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hao, J. L., Yu, T. X., Cao, Z. C., et al., 2014. Study of the Main Factors Controlling Hydrocarbon Accumulation and the Regularity of Hydrocarbon Enrichment in Yubei Area of Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Geology, 32(3): 344-350 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      He, T. H., Lu, S. F., Li, W. H., et al., 2020. Paleoweathering, Hydrothermal Activity and Organic Matter Enrichment during the Formation of Earliest Cambrian Black Strata in the Northwest Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 189: 106987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106987
      He, T. H., Li, W. H., Lu, S. F., et al., 2023. Quantitatively Unmixing Method for Complex Mixed Oil Based on Its Fractions Carbon Isotopes: A Case from the Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Science, 20(1): 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.07.010
      He, X. Y., 1988. Estimate of the Oil-Gas Prospect in Bachu Fault-Swell-Makit Slope of Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Geology, 6(4): 52-58 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Hu, J., Wang, T. G., Chen, J. P., et al., 2015. Geochemical Characteristics and Origin Patterns of Oils in Periphery of Southwestern Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 36(10): 1221-1233 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Koopmans, M. P., Schouten, S., Kohnen, M. E. L., et al., 1996. Restricted Utility of Aryl Isoprenoids as Indicators for Photic Zone Anoxia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60(23): 4873-4876. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00303-1
      Li, M. Q., Yao, C., Chen, F. F., et al., 2025. Biomarker Classifications of Lower Paleozoic Deep Source Rocks and Crude Oils from the Tarim Basin and Oil Sources. Natural Gas Geoscience, 36(1): 166-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, S. M., Pang, X. Q., Yang, H. J., et al., 2010. Generation, Migration and Accumulation Model for the Marine Oils in the Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 35(4): 663-673 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, W. H., Teng, G. E., Gao, B., et al., 2015. Formation and Distribution of Natural Gas-Bearing Sulfur-Exemplified by Sichuan Basin. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lü, H. T., Gu, Y., Ding, Y., et al., 2016. Cretaceous Petroleum Origin in Well PSBX1 in the Southwestern Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 38(1): 84-90 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Orr, W. L., 1974. Changes in Sulfur Content and Isotopic Ratios of Sulfur during Petroleum Maturation—Study of Big Horn Basin Paleozoic Oils. AAPG Bulletin, 58(11): 2295-2318. https://doi.org/10.1306/83d91b9b-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
      Shao, Z. B., Lü, H. T., Geng, F., 2010. Geochemical Characteristics of the Carboniferous Oil Pools in Maigaiti Area, the Tarim Bain. Oil & Gas Geology, 31(1): 84-90 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shuai, Y. H., Peng, P. A., Tao, X. W., et al., 2023. Intramolecular 13C Isotope Distributions in Propane from Natural Gases and Produced in the Laboratory. Chinese Science Bulletin, 68(36): 4995-5008 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/TB-2023-0210
      Si, S. H., Chen, H. H., Yuan, B. L., et al., 2018. Identification of Hydrocarbon Charging Events by Using Fluorescence Spectrum Multiparameter of Oil Inclusions: A Case Study of Carboniferous in Bashituo Structural Belt of Markit Slope of Tarim Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 23(2): 25-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Summons, R. E., Powell, T. G., 1986. Chlorobiaceae in Palaeozoic Seas Revealed by Biological Markers, Isotopes and Geology. Nature, 319(6056): 763-765. https://doi.org/10.1038/319763a0
      Sun, Y. G., Lu, Q. H., He, Y. X., et al., 2021. Recognition of Origin of Crude Oil from Well Yubei in Tarim Basin and Its Significance1. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 43(5): 810-817 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Sun, Y. G., Xu, S. P., Lu, H., et al., 2003. Source Facies of the Paleozoic Petroleum Systems in the Tabei Uplift, Tarim Basin, NW China: Implications from Aryl Isoprenoids in Crude Oils. Organic Geochemistry, 34(4): 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(03)00063-9
      Wang, D. W., 2023. Genesis and Secondary Alterations of Oil and Gas in the Tabei Area, Tarim Basin (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Q. H., Yang, H. J., Li, Y., et al., 2023. Major Breakthrough in the Carboniferous-Permian in Well Qiatan 1 and Exploration Prospect in the Piedmont Southwestern Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 28(4): 34-45 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Q. H., Yang, H. J., Cai, Z. Z., et al., 2024a. Exploration Breakthrough and Significance of the Ordovician Fault Controlled Karst Oil and Gas Reservoir in Well Luotan 1 in Maigaiti Slope, Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 29(2): 1-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Q. H., Yang, H. J., Li, Y., et al., 2024b. Major Oil and Gas Discovery and Significance of Well Yetan 1 in the Peripheral Kekeya Area in the Piedmont of the Southwestern Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 29(4): 1-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, B., Wang, Y. T., Wang, Q. M., et al., 1985. Oil Source Correlation of Marine Crude Oil in Well Qu 1 and Oil-Bearing Prospect of Marine Carboniferous and Permian in Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 6(4): 1-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yang, H. J., Yu, S., Zhang, H. Z., et al., 2020. Geochemical Characteristics of Lower Cambrian Sources Rocks from the Deepest Drilling of Well LT-1 and Their Significance to Deep Oil Gas Exploration of the Lower Paleozoic System in the Tarim Basin. Geochimica, 49(6): 666-682 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Yue, H. W., 2015. Discussion on the Original Biochemical Components of Aryl Isoprenoid. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 45(Supplement): 10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, K., Su, J., Chen, Y. Q., et al., 2023. The Biogeochemical Features of the Cambrian-Ordovician Source Rocks and Origin of Ultra-Deep Hydrocarbons in the Tarim Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 97(6): 2026-2041 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, Z. N., Liu, W. H., Zheng, J. J., et al., 2006. Carbon Isotopic Reversed Distribution of the Soluble Organic Components for the Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonate Rocks in Tabei and Tazhong Areas, Tarim Basin. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 26(4): 69-74 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, M. J., Huang, D. F., Zhang, S. C., 1994. An On-Line Carbon Isotope Study of Hydrocarbon Monomers in Crude Oils from Tarim Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 21(3): 52-57 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, X. J., Chen, J. F., He, L. W., et al., 2017. Geochemical Characteristics and Source Correlation of Hydrocarbons in the Well Luosi 2 of Maigaiti Slope, Tarim Basin, China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 28(4): 566-574 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      曹自成, 云露, 平宏伟, 等, 2025. 塔里木盆地顺北地区干酪根碳同位素恢复及下寒武统玉尔吐斯组烃源岩生烃模式探讨. 地球科学, 50(12): 4736-4750. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.182
      陈军红, 傅家谟, 盛国英, 等, 1996. 金刚烷化合物的结构特性及其地球化学意义. 科学通报, 41(6): 524-527.
      陈俊湘, 屈秋平, 邱斌, 1997. 塔里木盆地巴什托普背斜石炭系油气藏形成条件. 新疆石油地质, 18(4): 319-323, 5.
      陈秀艳, 孙崇浩, 陶小晚, 等, 2024. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡西段成藏演化与有利勘探区域: 以巴什托普油田为例. 地质科学, 59(4): 991-1002.
      丁勇, 贾存善, 邵志兵, 2013. 巴楚-麦盖提地区主要油气藏原油地球化学特征及油源探讨. 石油实验地质, 35(6): 683-688.
      段毅, 周世新, 孟自芳, 2001. 塔里木盆地群5井和曲1井原油的油源研究: 脂肪酸及烷基环己烷系列化合物提供的新证据. 石油实验地质, 23(4): 433-437, 456.
      高永进, 尹成明, 刘丽红, 等, 2024. 塔里木盆地西北缘寒武系肖尔布拉克组烃源岩特征. 石油与天然气地质, 45(4): 1064-1078.
      郝建龙, 余腾孝, 曹自成, 等, 2014. 塔里木盆地玉北地区成藏主控因素与油气富集规律. 新疆地质, 32(3): 344-350.
      何向阳, 1988. 塔里木盆地巴楚断隆-麦盖提斜坡含油气远景评价. 新疆地质, 6(4): 52-58.
      胡健, 王铁冠, 陈建平, 等, 2015. 塔西南坳陷周缘原油地球化学特征与成因类型. 石油学报, 36(10): 1221-1233.
      李梦勤, 姚超, 陈方方, 等, 2025. 塔里木盆地下古生界深层烃源岩和原油生物标志物类型划分及油源. 天然气地球科学, 36(1): 166-182.
      李素梅, 庞雄奇, 杨海军, 等, 2010. 塔里木盆地海相油气源与混源成藏模式. 地球科学, 35(4): 663-673. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2010.081
      刘文汇, 腾格尔, 高波, 等, 2015. 含硫天然气的形成与分布: 以四川盆地为例. 北京: 科学出版社.
      吕海涛, 顾忆, 丁勇, 等, 2016. 塔里木盆地西南部皮山北新1井白垩系油气成因. 石油实验地质, 38(1): 84-90.
      邵志兵, 吕海涛, 耿锋, 2010. 塔里木盆地麦盖提地区石炭系油藏地球化学特征. 石油与天然气地质, 31(1): 84-90.
      帅燕华, 彭平安, 陶小晚, 等, 2023. 丙烷分子内碳同位素示踪作用. 科学通报, 68(36): 4995-5008.
      斯尚华, 陈红汉, 袁丙龙, 等, 2018. 利用油包裹体荧光光谱多参数划分油气充注幕次: 以塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡巴什托构造带石炭系为例. 海相油气地质, 23(2): 25-30.
      孙永革, 路清华, 何毓新, 等, 2021. 塔里木盆地玉北1井原油成因再认识及其意义. 石油实验地质, 43(5): 810-817.
      王道伟, 2023. 塔里木盆地塔北地区原油和天然气成因及次生改造研究(博士学位论文). 北京: 中国地质大学(北京).
      王清华, 杨海军, 蔡振忠, 等, 2024a. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡罗探1井奥陶系断控岩溶新类型油气藏勘探突破及意义. 中国石油勘探, 29(2): 1-15.
      王清华, 杨海军, 李勇, 等, 2024b. 塔西南山前地区柯克亚周缘叶探1井油气勘探重大突破及意义. 中国石油勘探, 29(4): 1-16.
      王清华, 杨海军, 李勇, 等, 2023. 塔西南山前地区恰探1井石炭系: 二叠系重大突破与勘探前景. 中国石油勘探, 28(4): 34-45.
      杨斌, 王屿涛, 王秋明, 等, 1985. 曲1井海相原油油源对比与塔里木盆地海相石炭、二叠系含油远景. 新疆石油地质, 6(4): 1-10.
      杨海军, 于双, 张海祖, 等, 2020. 塔里木盆地轮探1井下寒武统烃源岩地球化学特征及深层油气勘探意义. 地球化学, 49(6): 666-682.
      岳会雯, 2015. 芳基类异戊二烯的原始生化组分来源探讨. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 45(增刊): 10.
      张科, 苏劲, 陈永权, 等, 2023. 塔里木盆地寒武系-奥陶系烃源岩油源特征与超深层油气来源. 地质学报, 97(6): 2026-2041.
      张中宁, 刘文汇, 郑建京, 等, 2006. 塔里木盆地塔北、塔中地区寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩中可溶有机组分的碳同位素逆转现象. 矿物岩石, 26(4): 69-74.
      赵孟军, 黄第藩, 张水昌, 1994. 原油单体烃类的碳同位素组成研究. 石油勘探与开发, 21(3): 52-57.
      朱心健, 陈践发, 贺礼文, 等, 2017. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡罗斯2井油气地球化学特征及油气源分析. 天然气地球科学, 28(4): 566-574.
    • 加载中
    图(13) / 表(5)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  37
    • HTML全文浏览量:  15
    • PDF下载量:  8
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2026-02-09
    • 刊出日期:  2026-05-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回