• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩沉积作用

    周晓峰 杨学锋 李熙喆 赵圣贤 郭伟 梁萍萍

    周晓峰, 杨学锋, 李熙喆, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 梁萍萍, 2026. 四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩沉积作用. 地球科学, 51(7): 2747-2772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.226
    引用本文: 周晓峰, 杨学锋, 李熙喆, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 梁萍萍, 2026. 四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩沉积作用. 地球科学, 51(7): 2747-2772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.226
    Zhou Xiaofeng, Yang Xuefeng, Li Xizhe, Zhao Shengxian, Guo Wei, Liang Pingping, 2026. Sedimentation of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation Shale in Sichuan Basin. Earth Science, 51(7): 2747-2772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.226
    Citation: Zhou Xiaofeng, Yang Xuefeng, Li Xizhe, Zhao Shengxian, Guo Wei, Liang Pingping, 2026. Sedimentation of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation Shale in Sichuan Basin. Earth Science, 51(7): 2747-2772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.226

    四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩沉积作用

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2026.226
    基金项目: 

    中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技管理部项目 2021DJ1901

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      周晓峰(1973-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事油气储层沉积成岩研究. ORCID:0009-0001-8063-311X. E-mail:zhouxf@cup.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P581;P67

    Sedimentation of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation Shale in Sichuan Basin

    • 摘要: 海相页岩沉积作用尚不清楚.在四川盆地7口井五峰组‒龙马溪组采集9块页岩分成18个研究单元,利用岩心、光学显微镜、电子探针、MAPS技术有序衔接开展沉积作用分析.结果表明,海相页岩为静水沉积、深水重力流沉积、深水牵引流沉积交互叠置,各沉积类型岩石学标志不同.静水沉积的典型标志为富孔有机黏粒复合体,深水重力流沉积的典型标志为粗粒陆源石英与浅水介屑悬浮在含深水细粒物质中,深水牵引流沉积发育富孔纯净有机质.含放射虫页岩是开展海相页岩沉积分析的关键,沉积环境与沉积类型结合是解释矿物和有机质及页岩纹层赋存形式与成因的约束条件,分沉积类型开展储层评价是页岩气高效开发的有效路径.建议页岩沉积和储层分析重视MAPS技术.

       

    • 图  1  四川盆地及邻区五峰组‒龙马溪组沉积相及地层柱状图(据周晓峰等,2026a修改)

      Fig.  1.  Sedimentary facies map and stratigraphic column of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in the Sichuan Basin and its peripheral area(modified from Zhou et al., 2026a)

      图  2  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组埋藏史‒有机质热演化史(据周晓峰等,2026a

      Fig.  2.  Burial history and thermal evolution history of the organic matters in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin (modified from Zhou et al., 2026a)

      图  3  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩岩心典型特征

      a~b.白色虚线之下页岩含丰富粗粒石英碎屑,之上页岩含丰富介屑;c~e. 放射虫纹层(箭头之间)

      Fig.  3.  Typical features of the shale cores in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin

      图  4  四川盆地五峰组S-92含放射虫硅岩纹层典型岩石学特征

      a. S-92亮纹层及S-91、S-93暗纹层,硅壳呈亮色环带,硅壳腔黑色、黄色、灰色、灰白色,单偏光;b.残缺硅壳,保存较完整硅壳腔充填物,波谱图像;c~e. 图b的C、Si、Ca元素面扫描图像,颜色由黑色经蓝、绿、黄至红色表示元素含量逐渐升高;f.完整硅壳具有3个圈层结构,内、外圈层缺乏孔隙,中间圈层富孔隙,硅壳腔充填有机硅粒复合体和方解石;g. 富孔隙有机硅粒复合体;h. 完整硅壳,硅壳腔充填有机硅粒复合体;i. “内核外壳”结构的壳屑,内核富孔隙,外壳无孔隙;j. 陆源石英碎屑,缺乏孔隙;k. 不规则方解石;l. 菱形白云石;m. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;n. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;o. 晶粒点状接触的莓状黄铁矿;p. 变形的晶粒漂浮的莓状黄铁矿;q. 条带状黏土;r. 条带状无孔隙纯净有机质;s. 硅质骨架颗粒间富孔隙有机硅粒复合体、富孔隙和无孔隙纯净有机质,据周晓峰等(2022a);t. 团块状富孔隙纯净有机质;u. 团块状无孔隙纯净有机质

      Fig.  4.  Typical petrological features of the radiolarian silicalite coded as S-92 in the Wufeng Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  5  四川盆地五峰组S-91硅岩和S-93硅质页岩典型岩石学特征

      a. S-91岩石学特征全貌,生物硅和陆源石英、方解石、白云石、黄铁矿等组成岩石骨架,黏土和有机质分布在骨架间;b. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;c. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;d. 晶粒点状接触的莓状黄铁矿;e. 变形的晶粒漂浮的莓状黄铁矿;f. 团块状富孔隙有机黏粒复合体;g. 团块状富孔隙纯净有机质;h. 团块状无孔隙纯净有机质;i. 条带状无孔隙纯净有机质

      Fig.  5.  Typical petrological features of the silicalite coded as S-91 and the siliceous shale coded as S-93 in the Wufeng Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  6  四川盆地五峰组S-42含放射虫硅岩中硅壳腔充填物典型岩石学特征

      a. 残缺硅壳腔方解石、有机硅粒复合体和黄铁矿,波谱图像;b~g. 图a的C、Si、Ca、Mg、Fe、S元素面扫描图像,颜色由黑色经蓝、绿、黄至红色表示元素含量逐渐升高;h. 残缺硅壳腔方解石和有机硅粒复合体;i. 完整硅壳腔有机硅粒复合体;j. 完整硅壳腔黄铁矿

      Fig.  6.  Typical petrological features of the fillings in the siliceous shells'cavities from the radiolarian silicalite coded as S-42 in the Wufeng Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  7  四川盆地龙马溪组S-7硅岩中笔石典型岩石学特征

      Fig.  7.  Typical petrological features of the graptolite from the silicalite coded as S-7 in the Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  8  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组静水沉积形成过程

      Fig.  8.  Still-water sedimentation process in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin

      图  9  四川盆地五峰组S-1和S-2硅质页岩光学显微镜和电子探针显微镜图像

      a.粗粒碎屑漂浮在黑色细粒物质中,粗粒陆源石英碎屑的含量高于粗粒浅水介屑的含量,单偏光;b. 粗粒碎屑漂浮在黑色细粒物质中,粗粒浅水介屑的含量高于粗粒陆源石英碎屑的含量,单偏光;c. 粗粒陆源石英碎屑含量高,波谱图像;d~k. 图c的C、Si、Ca、Mg、Fe、S、Al、O元素面扫描图像;l. 粗粒陆源石英碎屑和浅水介屑含量偏低,波谱图像;m~t. 图l的C、Si、Ca、Mg、Fe、S、Al、O元素面扫描图像.图d至图k和图m至图t中,颜色由黑色经蓝、绿、黄至红色表示元素含量逐渐升高;在Si、O元素面扫描图中,绿、黄、红色区域为石英;在Ca元素面扫描图中,红色区域为方解石;在Mg元素面扫描图中,绿、黄、红色区域为白云石

      Fig.  9.  Optical and electron probe microscope images of the siliceous shales coded as S-1 and S-2 in the Wufeng Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  10  四川盆地五峰组S-2硅质页岩细粒物质的典型纳米岩石图像

      a.具有孔隙的泥级石英的聚合体间充填富孔隙有机黏粒复合体;b. 陆源石英碎屑颗粒;c. 方解石(介屑)压溶现象明显(红色箭头);d.边缘受损的菱形白云石;e. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;f. 强烈压溶的晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;g. 变形的莓状黄铁矿;h. 富孔隙有机黏粒复合体;i. 富孔隙纯净有机质;j. 无孔隙纯净有机质

      Fig.  10.  Typical nanoscale petrological images of fine grains from the siliceous shale coded as S-2 in the Wufeng Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  11  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组重力流沉积作用过程(据周晓峰等,2025

      Fig.  11.  Gravity flow sedimentation process in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin (after Zhou et al., 2025)

      图  12  四川盆地龙马溪组S-31和S-33含放射虫硅岩典型岩石学特征

      a. S-32黑色硅岩纹层和S-33含放射虫硅岩纹层,单偏光;b. 硅壳腔有机硅粒复合体和黄铁矿,波谱图像;c~f. 图b的C、Si、Fe、S元素面扫描图像,颜色由黑色经蓝、绿、黄至红色表示元素含量逐渐升高;g. 硅壳腔有机硅粒复合体;h. 硅壳腔黄铁矿;i. 含放射虫硅岩纳米岩石图像,红框为图j的位置,黄框为图k的位置,蓝框为图l的位置;j. 骨架间富孔隙纯净有机质;k. 生烃增压缝充填无孔隙纯净有机质;l. 硅壳腔有机质镶嵌在硅质微粒中;m. 生物硅发育孔隙;n~o. 陆源石英碎屑表面的泥级生物硅膜;p. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;q. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿

      Fig.  12.  Typical petrological features of the radiolarian silicalites coded as S-31 and S-33 in the Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  13  四川盆地龙马溪组S-32和S-34硅岩典型岩石学特征

      a~f. S-32的纳米岩石图像. g~k. S-34的纳米岩石图像. a. S-32硅岩纹层纳米岩石特征全貌;b. 富黏土团块(红线圈定),表面发育生物硅膜;c. 富孔隙纯净有机质;d. 无孔隙纯净有机质;e. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;f. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;g. S-34硅岩纹层纳米岩石特征全貌;h. 微纳生物硅和富孔隙纯净有机质;i. 富黏土团块(红线圈定),表面发育生物硅膜;j. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;k. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿

      Fig.  13.  Typical petrological features of the silicalites coded as S-32and S-34 in the Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  14  四川盆地龙马溪组S-31和S-33含放射虫硅岩深水牵引流沉积作用过程

      Fig.  14.  Deep-water traction current sedimentation process of the radiolarian silicalites coded as S-31 and S-33 in the Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan Basin

      图  15  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组被研究页岩岩相分类

      Ⅰ. 硅岩;Ⅱ.碳酸盐岩;Ⅲ.黏土岩;Ⅳ. 硅质页岩;Ⅴ. 碳酸盐质页岩;Ⅵ.黏土质页岩;Ⅶ.混合页岩

      Fig.  15.  Classification of the shale lithofacies from the shale samples studied in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin

      图  16  S-92和S-93的背散射图像和矿物扫描图像及结果

      a. S-92,背散射图像;b. 图a的矿物扫描图像及矿物与有机质的含量和颗粒数;c. S-93,背散射图像;d. 图c的矿物扫描图像及矿物与有机质的含量和颗粒数.背散射图像和矿物扫描图像采集于中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所微纳结构和岩心分析实验室,仪器型号为QEMSCAN 650F,分辨率1 µm

      Fig.  16.  Backscatter images and mineral scanning images and their results of S-92 and S-93

      表  1  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩样品基本信息

      Table  1.   Primary information of the shale samples in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin

      井名 层位 深度(m) 样品编码 岩心描述
      H204 五峰组
      观音桥层
      3 610.22 S-12 介屑丰富的黑色页岩
      S-11 石英碎屑丰富的黑色页岩
      H205 五峰组
      观音桥层
      4 225.68 S-22 介屑丰富的黑色页岩
      S-21 石英碎屑丰富的黑色页岩
      龙马溪组 4 225.37 S-34 黑色页岩
      S-33 7.1 mm含放射虫黑色页岩纹层
      S-32 1.1 mm黑色页岩纹层
      S-31 8.6 mm含放射虫硅质页岩纹层
      L203H57-3 五峰组 3 744.43 S-43 黑色页岩
      S-42 2.9 mm含放射虫黑色页岩纹层
      S-41 黑色页岩
      龙马溪组 3 743.76 S-5 黑色页岩
      W202 龙马溪组 2 570.03 S-6 黑色页岩
      W206 龙马溪组 3 791.84 S-7 黑色页岩
      Z201 龙马溪组 3 666.21 S-8 黑色页岩
      Z205 五峰组 4 103.96 S-93 黑色页岩
      S-92 2.5 mm含放射虫黑色页岩纹层
      S-91 黑色页岩
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组被研究页岩矿物和有机质含量(体积百分含量,%)

      Table  2.   Statistics of minerals and organic matter from the shale samples studied in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of the Sichuan Basin(v, %)

      样品编码 沉积作用类型 生物硅 陆源石英 方解石 白云石 黏土矿物 黄铁矿-1 黄铁矿-2 黄铁矿-3
      S-12 深水重力流沉积 43.1 16.8 27.6 2.7 3.3 0.1 0.1 /
      S-11 21.9 38.3 31.2 1.9 2.0 0.1 0.1 /
      S-22 31.4 16.2 28.3 13.6 3.2 0.1 0.1 /
      S-21 11.2 45.3 27.2 10.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 /
      S-34 深水牵引流沉积 76.1 7.0 2.2 1.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 /
      S-33 78.4 3.0 1.7 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 /
      S-32 71.4 8.2 3.1 1.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 /
      S-31 80.4 2.5 1.9 1.5 0.9 0.1 0.1 /
      S-43 静水沉积 59.3 6.8 7.5 7.1 11.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
      S-42 60.6 6.1 7.2 8.5 8.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
      S-41 58.8 5.6 9.1 9.7 8.9 0.1 0.1 0.1
      S-5 静水沉积 61.2 7.2 4.3 7.1 8.5 0.2 0.2 0.2
      S-6 深水牵引流沉积 78.8 2.9 2.4 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 /
      S-7 静水沉积 60.4 8.5 4.7 7.1 6.4 0.2 0.3 0.3
      S-8 深水牵引流沉积 72.4 4.4 2.9 2.2 2.6 0.1 0.1 /
      S-93 静水沉积 55.6 5.6 17.6 8.2 3.9 0.2 0.1 0.1
      S-92 58.7 4.1 13.1 5.2 6.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
      S-91 60.1 4.8 15.4 6.3 4.6 0.2 0.1 0.1
      S-12 深水重力流沉积 / 0.1 0.1 5.2 / / 0.6 0.3
      S-11 / 0.1 0.1 4.1 / / / 0.2
      S-22 / 0.1 0.1 5.7 / / 0.7 0.5
      S-21 / 0.1 0.1 3.5 / / 0.7 0.4
      S-34 深水牵引流沉积 / / / / / / 11.8 0.6
      S-33 / / / / 2.2 / 13.1 0.3
      S-32 / / / / / / 14.5 0.6
      S-31 / / / / 3.4 / 8.5 0.7
      S-43 静水沉积 0.1 / 0.1 6.1 / / 0.5 1.1
      S-42 0.1 / 0.1 4.6 2.4 / 1.3 0.5
      S-41 0.1 / 0.1 5.9 / / 0.7 0.8
      S-5 静水沉积 0.2 / 0.1 6.3 / / 2.9 1.6
      S-6 深水牵引流沉积 / / / / / / 13.1 0.3
      S-7 静水沉积 0.2 / 0.1 3.9 / 2.2 5.1 0.6
      S-8 深水牵引流沉积 / / / / / / 12.8 2.5
      S-93 静水沉积 0.1 / 0.1 4.9 / / 2.3 1.3
      S-92 0.1 / 0.1 5.1 4.2 / 2.1 0.8
      S-91 0.1 / 0.1 5.7 / / 1.8 0.7
      注:“/”指含量小于0.1.零星黄铁矿颗粒和硅壳腔黄铁矿未做统计.黄铁矿-1. 过度生长的莓状黄铁矿;黄铁矿-2. 晶粒线状接触的莓状黄铁矿;黄铁矿-3. 晶粒点状接触的莓状黄铁矿;黄铁矿-4. 晶粒漂浮的莓状黄铁矿;黄铁矿-5. 晶粒接触关系多样的莓状黄铁矿;有机质-1. 富孔隙有机黏粒复合体;有机质-2. 富孔隙有机硅粒复合体;有机质-3. 富孔隙笔石;有机质-4. 富孔隙纯净有机质;有机质-5. 无孔隙纯净有机质.
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Bao, F., Yu, L. J., Rui, X. Q., et al., 2021. Microstructure and Electron Microscope-Raman Study on Pore Heterogeneity of Organic Matter in Shale. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 43(5): 871-879 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Bernard, S., Horsfield, B., Schulz, H. M., et al., 2012. Geochemical Evolution of Organic-Rich Shales with Increasing Maturity: A STXM and TEM Study of the Posidonia Shale (Lower Toarcian, Northern Germany). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 31(1): 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.010
      Cai, J. G., Zeng, X., Wei, H. L., et al., 2019. From Water Body to Sediments: Exploring the Depositional Processes of Organic Matter and Their Implications. Journal of Palaeogeography, 21(1): 49-66 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cai, L. X., Yang, T., Tian, J. C., et al., 2023. Advances in Studies of Development and Growth Mechanisms of Clay Minerals in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 41(6): 1859-1889 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Chen, Z. Y., Liu, R., Tan, X. C., et al., 2023. Implications of Multi-Source Quartz on Shale-Gas Enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale of Changning Area in Southern Margin of Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Palaeogeography, 25(4): 920-930 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Cheng, L. X., Wang, Y. J., Chen, H. D., et al., 2013. Sedimentary and Burial Environment of Black Shales of Sinian to Early Palaeozoic in Upper Yangtze Region. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(8): 2906-2912 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Gao, Z. Z., He, Y. B., Liu, C. X., et al., 2006. History, Status and Prospect of Study on Deep-Water Traction Current Deposits. Journal of Palaeogeography, 8(3): 331-338 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Huang, Y. G., 2018. Ecological Modeling of Marine and Terrestrial Paleocommunities in South China and Xinjiang during Permian and Triassic and Marine Redox Variations (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 69-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Kong, W. L., Qiu, Z., Zhang, J. Q., et al., 2025. Volcanic Activity and Extraordinarily High Organic Matter Deposition across Ordovician-Silurian Transition: A Case Study from South China. Earth Science, 50(12): 4583-4603 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, C., Cheng, M., Algeo, T. J., et al., 2015. A Theoretical Prediction of Chemical Zonation in Early Oceans (> 520 Ma). Scientia Sinica Terrae, 45(12): 1829-1838 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/zd2015-45-12-1829
      Liu, B., 2023. Organic Matter in Shale: Types, Thermal Evolution and Organic Porosity. Earth Science, 48(12): 4641-4657 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Liu, C. L., Zhang, J. Y., Hu, Z. Q., et al., 2026. A Review of Coupling Modes between Shale Gas Geological and Engineering Sweet Spots in Wordwide Typical Sedimentary Basins. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 1-16 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3474.P.20260604.1311.002
      Liu, S. G., Deng, B., Sun, W., et al., 2018. Sichuan Basin: A Superimposed Basin Formed under the Control of Peripheral Activities. Chinese Journal of Geology, 53(1): 308-326 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Loucks, R. G., Reed, R. M., 2014. Scanning-Electron-Microscope Petrographic Evidence for Distinguishing Organic-Matter Pores Associated with Depositional Organic Matter versus Migrated Organic Matter in Mudrocks. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Journal, 3: 51-60. http://www.gcags.org/Journal/2014.GCAGS.Journal/GCAGS.Journal.2014.vol3.p51-60
      Loucks, R. G., Reed, R. M., Ruppel, S. C., et al., 2012. Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores. AAPG Bulletin, 96(6): 1071-1098. https://doi.org/10.1306/08171111061
      Lu, B., Qiu, Z., Zhou, C. M., et al., 2021. Progress and Prospects in the Physical Simulation of Mudstone Deposition. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 39(4): 781-793 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Lu, L. F., Liu, W. X., Wei, Z. H., et al., 2022. Diagenesis of the Silurian Shale, Sichuan Basin: Focus on Pore Development and Preservation. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 40(1): 73-87 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Qiu, Z., Wei, H. Y., Liu, H. L., et al., 2021. Accumulation of Sediments with Extraordinary High Organic Matter Content: Insight Gained through Geochemical Characterization of Indicative Elements. Oil & Gas Geology, 42(4): 931-948 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shanmugam, G., 2013. New Perspectives on Deep-Water Sandstones: Implications. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(3): 294-301 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shi, Z. S., Zhou, T. Q., 2024. Advances and Perspectives in the Study of the Genetic Mechanism and Organic Matter Enrichment Models of Marine Fine-Grained Sediment. Oil & Gas Geology, 45(4): 910-928 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Shi, Z. S., Zhang, Y. X., Zeng, F. H., et al., 2025. Main Sedimentary Structure Types of Marine Fine-Grained Terrigenous Clastic Rocks and Their Significance for Shale Gas. Journal of Palaeogeography, 27(1): 32-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, D. S., Zhang, J. C., Li, Z., et al., 2022. Formation Mechanism of Framboidal Pyrite and Its Theory Inversion of Paleo-Redox Conditions. Geology in China, 49(1): 36-50 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, S. F., Zou, C. N., Dong, D. Z., et al., 2014. Biogenic Silica of Organic-Rich Shale in Sichuan Basin and Its Significance for Shale Gas. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 50(3): 476-486 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, X. P., Mou, C. L., Wang, Q. Y., et al., 2015. Diagenesis of Black Shale in Longmaxi Formation, Southern Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 36(9): 1035-1047 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, Y. M., Wang, H. Y., Shen, J. J., et al., 2020. New Discovery and Geological Significance of Thick-Bedded Porphyrite in the Upper Member of Longmaxi Formation of Lower Silurian in Northern Sichuan-Western Hubei Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41(11): 1309-1323 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wilkin, R. T., Barnes, H. L., Brantley, S. L., 1996. The Size Distribution of Framboidal Pyrite in Modern Sediments: An Indicator of Redox Conditions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60(20): 3897-3912. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00209-8
      Xi, B. B., Pan, A. Y., Bao, F., et al., 2023. In-Situ Thermal Simulation Experiment of Single Organic Matter Pore Evolution in Shale. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 45(5): 1016-1025 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xiao, K. X., Hu, X. M., Jiang, J. X., et al., 2024. Carbonate Compensation Depth (CCD) Is a Potential Key to Decipher the Cenozoic Surface Carbon Cycle. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 54(6): 1769-1785 (in Chinese).
      Yang, R., He, Z. L., Dong, T., et al., 2025. What Are the Key Factors Controlling the Occurrence and Enrichment of Deep Marine Shale Gas in the Middle-Upper Yangtze Region? Earth Science, 50(12): 5012-5019 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, G. R., Nie, H. K., Tang, X., et al., 2020. Pyrite Type and Its Effect on Shale Gas Accumulation: A Case Study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale in Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 42(3): 459-466 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, J. H., Jin, Z. J., 2021. Mudstone Diagenesis: Research Advances and Prospects. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 39(1): 58-72 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhao, J. H., Liu, K. Y., Zhao, S. H., et al., 2025. Response of Organic Matter Pore Development to Functional Groups in Overmature Marine Shale: Insights from AFM-IR Spectroscopy. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 52(2): 395-407 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Guo, W., Li, X. Z., et al., 2022a. Mutual Relation between Organic Matter Types and Pores with Petrological Evidence of Radiolarian Siliceous Shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 46(5): 12-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Li, X. Z., Guo, W., et al., 2022b. Characteristics, Formation Mechanism and Influence on Physical Properties of Carbonate Minerals in Shale Reservoir of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 33(5): 775-788 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Guo, W., Li, X. Z., et al., 2024. Deciphering Nano-Resolution Petrological Characteristics of the Siliceous Shale at the Bottom of the Longmaxi Formation in the Zigong Area, Sichuan Basin, China: Deep-Water Microbialites. Minerals, 14(10): 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14101020
      Zhou, X. F., Guo, W., Li, X. Z., et al., 2025. Formation Process of the Guanyinqiao Bed of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in Sichuan Basin and Its Adjacent Area through Petrological Evidence. Journal of Palaeogeography, 27(6): 1452-1465 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Guo, W., Li, X. Z., et al., 2026a. Nanoscale Petrological Characterization Elucidating Hydrocarbon Generation and Pore Formation during the Thermal Evolution of Organic Matters in Shale: Taking the Shale Gas Sweet Spot Section in the Longmaxi Formation of the Huang 202 Block in Yuxi Gas Field of the Sichuan Basin as an Example. Natural Gas Geoscience, 37(6): 1176-1194 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Guo, W., Li, X. Z., et al., 2026b. Deciphering Nano-Resolution Petrological Characterization of Radiolarian Siliceous Shale in Wufeng Formation, Sichuan Basin, China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 100(3): 1030-1049 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhou, X. F., Zhao, J., Yan, B. N., et al., 2025. Deep-Water Traction Current Sedimentation in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation Siliceous Shales, Weiyuan Area, Sichuan Basin, China, Using Nano-Resolution Petrological Evidence. Minerals, 15(7): 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15070723
      鲍芳, 俞凌杰, 芮晓庆, 等, 2021. 页岩中有机质孔隙非均质性的微观结构及电镜‒拉曼联用研究. 石油实验地质, 43(5): 871-879.
      蔡进功, 曾翔, 韦海伦, 等, 2019. 从水体到沉积物: 探寻有机质的沉积过程及其意义. 古地理学报, 21(1): 49-66.
      蔡来星, 杨田, 田景春, 等, 2023. 致密砂岩储层中黏土矿物发育特征及其生长机理研究进展. 沉积学报, 41(6): 1859-1889.
      陈增裕, 刘睿, 谭秀成, 等, 2023. 四川盆地南缘长宁地区五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩内多源石英对页岩气富集的意义. 古地理学报, 25(4): 920-930.
      程立雪, 王元君, 陈洪德, 等, 2013. 上扬子地区震旦系‒早古生界黑色页岩的沉积和埋藏环境. 岩石学报, 29(8): 2906-2912.
      高振中, 何幼斌, 刘成鑫, 等, 2006. 深水牵引流沉积的研究历程、现状与前景. 古地理学报, 8(3): 331-338.
      黄元耕, 2018. 华南及新疆地区二叠纪至三叠纪海洋、陆地古群落模拟及海洋氧化还原环境变化研究(博士学位论文). 武汉: 中国地质大学, 69-73.
      孔维亮, 邱振, 张家强, 等, 2025. 奥陶纪‒志留纪转折期火山活动与异常高有机质沉积: 以中国华南地区为例. 地球科学, 50(12): 4583-4603. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.125
      李超, 程猛, Algeo, T. J., 等, 2015. 早期地球海洋水化学分带的理论预测. 中国科学: 地球科学, 45(12): 1829-1838.
      刘贝, 2023. 泥页岩中有机质: 类型、热演化与有机孔隙. 地球科学, 48(12): 4641-4657. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.130
      刘成林, 张婧瑶, 胡宗全, 等, 2026. 全球典型沉积盆地页岩气地质‒工程甜点耦合模式综述. 地球学报, 1-16. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3474.P.20260604.1311.002
      刘树根, 邓宾, 孙玮, 等, 2018. 四川盆地: 周缘活动主控下形成的叠合盆地. 地质科学, 53(1): 308-326.
      卢斌, 邱振, 周川闽, 等, 2021. 泥页岩沉积物理模拟研究进展与发展趋势. 沉积学报, 39(4): 781-793.
      卢龙飞, 刘伟新, 魏志红, 等, 2022. 四川盆地志留系页岩成岩特征及其对孔隙发育与保存的控制. 沉积学报, 40(1): 73-87.
      邱振, 韦恒叶, 刘翰林, 等, 2021. 异常高有机质沉积富集过程与元素地球化学特征. 石油与天然气地质, 42(4): 931-948.
      Shanmugam, G., 2013. 深水砂体成因研究新进展. 石油勘探与开发, 40(3): 294-301.
      施振生, 周天琪, 2024. 海相细粒沉积成因机制与有机质富集模式研究进展. 石油与天然气地质, 45(4): 910-928.
      施振生, 张亚雄, 曾番惠, 等, 2025. 海相细粒陆源碎屑岩主要沉积构造类型及页岩气意义. 古地理学报, 27(1): 32-54.
      王东升, 张金川, 李振, 等, 2022. 草莓状黄铁矿的形成机制探讨及其对古氧化‒还原环境的反演. 中国地质, 49(1): 36-50.
      王淑芳, 邹才能, 董大忠, 等, 2014. 四川盆地富有机质页岩硅质生物成因及对页岩气开发的意义. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 50(3): 476-486.
      王秀平, 牟传龙, 王启宇, 等, 2015. 川南及邻区龙马溪组黑色岩系成岩作用. 石油学报, 36(9): 1035-1047.
      王玉满, 王红岩, 沈均均, 等, 2020. 川北‒鄂西地区下志留统龙马溪组上段厚层斑脱岩的新发现及地质意义. 石油学报, 41(11): 1309-1323.
      席斌斌, 潘安阳, 鲍芳, 等, 2023. 页岩中单体有机质孔隙演化的原位热模拟实验. 石油实验地质, 45(5): 1016-1025.
      肖开迅, 胡修棉, 蒋璟鑫, 等, 2024. 碳酸盐补偿深度(CCD)是解密新生代表层碳循环的潜在钥匙. 中国科学: 地球科学, 54(6): 1769-1785.
      杨锐, 何治亮, 董田, 等, 2025. 中上扬子海相深层页岩气赋存和富集的关键因素是什么?地球科学, 50(12): 5012-5019. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2025.278
      张光荣, 聂海宽, 唐玄, 等, 2020. 页岩中黄铁矿类型及其对页岩气富集的影响: 以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩为例. 石油实验地质, 42(3): 459-466.
      赵建华, 金之钧, 2021. 泥岩成岩作用研究进展与展望. 沉积学报, 39(1): 58-72.
      赵建华, 刘可禹, 赵生辉, 等, 2025. 海相过成熟页岩有机质孔隙与分子官能团的响应关系: 来自基于原子力显微镜红外光谱的证据. 石油勘探与开发, 52(2): 395-407.
      周晓峰, 郭伟, 李熙喆, 等, 2022a. 四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组有机质类型与有机孔配置的放射虫硅质页岩岩石学证据. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 46(5): 12-22.
      周晓峰, 李熙喆, 郭伟, 等, 2022b. 四川盆地五峰组‒龙马溪组页岩储层中碳酸盐矿物特征、形成机制及对储层物性影响. 天然气地球科学, 33(5): 775-788.
      周晓峰, 郭伟, 李熙喆, 等, 2025. 岩石学证据约束四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组观音桥层形成过程. 古地理学报, 27(6): 1452-1465.
      周晓峰, 郭伟, 李熙喆, 等, 2026a. 纳米岩石证据约束页岩有机质热演化生烃成孔过程——以四川盆地渝西气田黄202区块龙马溪组页岩气甜点段为例. 天然气地球科学, 37(6): 1176-1194.
      周晓峰, 郭伟, 李熙喆, 等, 2026b. 四川盆地五峰组放射虫硅质页岩纳米岩石特征解析. 地质学报, 100(3): 1030-1049.
    • 加载中
    图(16) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  67
    • HTML全文浏览量:  27
    • PDF下载量:  11
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2026-04-01
    • 刊出日期:  2026-07-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回